Inversion of Permeability in High Pressure Packer Test under Hydro-Mechanical Coupling of Dual Media

doi:10.11988/ckyyb.20230554

Abstract

Abstract:

Hydraulic fracturing easily occurs in rock masses under high-pressure packer tests, involving dual water conduction via pores and cracks. This interaction between the seepage and stress fields results in spatial-temporal variations in rock mass permeability parameters. For accurate permeability parameter inversion during high-pressure packer tests, it is recommended to consider the change in permeability coefficient before and after fracture occurrence under hydro-mechanical coupling of dual media. A hydro-mechanical coupling numerical model is employed to simulate high-pressure packer tests, and parameter inversion is conducted using on-site test data to calculate limestone permeability across different pressure stages. Key findings include: before hydraulic fracturing, as injection pressure increases, permeability and pore water pressure sees distinct boundaries among different pressure stages, with inverted permeability closely aligning with specified formula values. After hydraulic fracturing, rock mass permeability increases by about 2 times, accompanied by sharp declines in matrix pore medium permeability and flow rates.

Key words: high-pressure packer test, dual media, seepage-stress coupling, permeability, hydraulic fracturing

CLC Number:

P642.3

Cite this article

WANG Jin-guo, HAN Zhi-ying, CHENG Wei, HUANG Rui-rui, YOU Lin, YANG Yun. Inversion of Permeability in High Pressure Packer Test under Hydro-Mechanical Coupling of Dual Media[J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2024, 41(8): 113-119.

share this article

0
/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: http://ckyyb.crsri.cn/EN/10.11988/ckyyb.20230554

http://ckyyb.crsri.cn/EN/Y2024/V41/I8/113

Figures/Tables 11

Fig.1 Conceptual model of hydro-mechanical coupling of dual media[15]

Fig.2 Photos of test rock core samples

Table 1 Field test data of some test sections in ZK412 borehole

试段编号	埋深/ m	试验压力P/ MPa	流量Q/ (L·min^-1)	透水率/ Lu	按规程计算渗透率k/ (10^-15 m²)	曲线类型
ZK412-7	176.43~ 181.43	1.5	1.73	0.23	2.95	A(层流型)
		2.0	2.31	0.23	2.95
		2.5	2.77	0.22	2.83
		3.0	3.36	0.22	2.83
ZK412-10	161.97~ 166.97	1.5	0.36	0.05	0.55	C(扩张型)
		2.0	0.78	0.08	0.99
		2.5	1.85	0.15	1.79
		3.0	2.15	0.14	1.78
ZK412-12	152.43~ 157.43	1.5	0.47	0.06	0.78	C(扩张型)
		2.0	0.74	0.07	0.86
		2.5	1.50	0.12	1.49
		3.0	2.64	0.18	2.52
ZK412-13	147.60~ 152.60	1.5	0.36	0.39	5.02	A(层流型)
		2.0	0.78	0.38	4.84
		2.5	1.85	0.39	4.90
		3.0	2.15	0.40	4.94
ZK412-15	138.22~ 143.22	1.5	0.85	0.11	1.40	C(扩张型)
		2.0	1.34	0.13	1.57
		2.5	2.92	0.23	2.97
		3.0	3.75	0.25	3.15

Table 1 Field test data of some test sections in ZK412 borehole

试段编号	埋深/ m	试验压力P/ MPa	流量Q/ (L·min^-1)	透水率/ Lu	按规程计算渗透率k/ (10^-15 m²)	曲线类型
ZK412-7	176.43~ 181.43	1.5	1.73	0.23	2.95	A(层流型)
		2.0	2.31	0.23	2.95
		2.5	2.77	0.22	2.83
		3.0	3.36	0.22	2.83
ZK412-10	161.97~ 166.97	1.5	0.36	0.05	0.55	C(扩张型)
		2.0	0.78	0.08	0.99
		2.5	1.85	0.15	1.79
		3.0	2.15	0.14	1.78
ZK412-12	152.43~ 157.43	1.5	0.47	0.06	0.78	C(扩张型)
		2.0	0.74	0.07	0.86
		2.5	1.50	0.12	1.49
		3.0	2.64	0.18	2.52
ZK412-13	147.60~ 152.60	1.5	0.36	0.39	5.02	A(层流型)
		2.0	0.78	0.38	4.84
		2.5	1.85	0.39	4.90
		3.0	2.15	0.40	4.94
ZK412-15	138.22~ 143.22	1.5	0.85	0.11	1.40	C(扩张型)
		2.0	1.34	0.13	1.57
		2.5	2.92	0.23	2.97
		3.0	3.75	0.25	3.15

Fig.3 P-k and P-Q curves of some test sections in ZK412 borehole

Fig.4 Schematic diagram of high-pressure packer test model

Table 2 Statistics of parameter values

孔隙率	动力黏滞系数/ (N·s·m^-2)	泊松比	弹性模量E/ GPa	岩体密度ρ/ (kg·m^-3)	流体压缩系数 X_f/Pa^-1	基质压缩系数 X_p/Pa^-1	Biot系数	岩体法向断裂刚度 k_n/(N·m^-3)
0.1	1×10^-3	0.25	60	2 600	4×10^-10	1×10^-4	1.0	8×10¹¹

Table 2 Statistics of parameter values

孔隙率	动力黏滞系数/ (N·s·m^-2)	泊松比	弹性模量E/ GPa	岩体密度ρ/ (kg·m^-3)	流体压缩系数 X_f/Pa^-1	基质压缩系数 X_p/Pa^-1	Biot系数	岩体法向断裂刚度 k_n/(N·m^-3)
0.1	1×10^-3	0.25	60	2 600	4×10^-10	1×10^-4	1.0	8×10¹¹

Fig.5 Variation curves of permeability and pressure head

Fig.6 Fitting of P-Q curve of simulated values in unfractured section

Table 3 Inversion values of permeability at different injection pressures

试段编号	不同注液压力下的渗透率/(10^-15m²)
试段编号	1.5 MPa	2.0 MPa	2.5 MPa	3.0 MPa
ZK412-10	0.409	0.420	0.567	0.795
ZK412-12	0.378	0.383	0.41	0.616
ZK412-15	0.600	0.615	0.69	1.246

Table 3 Inversion values of permeability at different injection pressures

试段编号	不同注液压力下的渗透率/(10^-15m²)
试段编号	1.5 MPa	2.0 MPa	2.5 MPa	3.0 MPa
ZK412-10	0.409	0.420	0.567	0.795
ZK412-12	0.378	0.383	0.41	0.616
ZK412-15	0.600	0.615	0.69	1.246

Fig.7 Variation curves of pore/fracture permeability and equivalent hydraulic fracture width with injection pressure

Fig.8 Fitting of P-Q curve of simulated values in fractured section

Related Articles 15

[1]	HU Meng-ling, ZHANG Xiao-long, XU Wen-hao, WANG Zhi-wen, CHEN Hao. Influence of Dry Density and Wetting-Drying on Hydraulic Characteristics of Compacted Loess [J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2024, 41(8): 128-134.
[2]	WEI Tao, ZHANG Jian, ZHANG Da, WU Wei-dong. Effect of Acetylene Glycol Surfactant in Epoxy Resin Grouting Material [J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2024, 41(7): 163-167.
[3]	ZHANG Jie-ya, YANG Fan, CAO Jia-wei, DONG Xiao-qiang. Basic Characteristics and Mechanism of Soil Solidified with Ternary Industrial Waste and Cement [J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2024, 41(6): 122-129.
[4]	LIN Wen-bo, NING Gui-xia, MA Li-na, DING Xiao-gang, ZHANG Yang, LUO Wei. Microscopic Pore Structure Characteristics and Hydraulic Tortuosity of Unsaturated Remodeled Weakly Expansive Soil [J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2024, 41(4): 124-130.
[5]	TANG Yi-fan, CAO Xiao-wei, LI Ming, CUI Can, SONG Lin-hui. Experimental Research on Pore Pressure and Transfer Mechanism in Clay [J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2024, 41(3): 110-117.
[6]	WU Wen-bo, HE Jing-jing, WANG Hai-ting, ZHAO Kun-long, FAN Li-hao. Effect of Free Mica Content of Artificial Sand on Concrete Performance [J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2024, 41(3): 148-152.
[7]	LI Qian, LUO Jing, PEI Xiang-jun, ZENG Kun-xiang, SHAN Shi-han, JIANG Rong-hao. Experimental Study on Physical and Mechanical Properties and Freeze- Thaw Resistance of Straw Fiber Reinforced Solidified Soil [J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2024, 41(1): 128-135.
[8]	CHANG Zhou, YAN Chang-gen, AN Ning, LAN Heng-xing, SHI Yu-ling, BAO Han, XU Jiang-bo. Permeability and Soil-Water Characteristic Curve of Undisturbed Loess under Wetting-drying Cycles [J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2024, 41(1): 143-150.
[9]	WANG Zhi-chao, PENG Zhu, PENG Feng, YAN shi. Indoor Physical and Mechanical Properties of Polyurethane Cured Calcareous Sand [J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2024, 41(1): 107-113.
[10]	XIAO Gui-yuan, ZHANG Da-jin, LEI Yun, ZHU Jie-ru. Influence of Calcium Chloride Solution on the Variation of Permeability Coefficient of Red Clay [J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2023, 40(3): 80-84.
[11]	ZHONG Ju-guang, GENG Bi-jun, REN Xin, LI Yang, ZHOU Shi-hua, SHI Yan. Influence of Water-based Infiltration Capillary/Crystalline Waterproof (WCCW) Material on Properties of Concrete [J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2023, 40(11): 189-194.
[12]	TAN Wen-hui, DONG Feng-xin, MA Xue-wen, WANG Peng-fei. Influence of Rock Block Proportion on Seepage Characteristics of Soil-rock Mixture in Fault Zone [J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2022, 39(8): 86-92.
[13]	CAO Shuai, NING Jin-cheng, YANG Qing-guo. Relative Permeability Coefficient Model of Unsaturated Soil with Multiphase Flow Based on Fractal Theory [J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2022, 39(4): 135-139.
[14]	WANG Xin. Model of Predicting Soil-Water Characteristic Curve and Relative Permeability Coefficient of Unsaturated Soil Based on Pore Water Distribution [J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2022, 39(2): 89-93.
[15]	BI Fa-jiang, HE Jun, ZHANG Yu-ting, LI Mei, ZHU Xu-mei. Seepage-Stress Coupling Analysis of Soft Rock Tunnel with Drainage Structure [J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2022, 39(12): 68-74.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Comments

Abstract
Figures/Tables
Related Articles
Recommended Articles
Metrics
Comments

TOP