基于多模式情景的长江中下游未来气象干旱时空演变特征分析

doi:10.11988/ckyyb.20200970

院报 ›› 2021, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (6): 9-17.DOI: 10.11988/ckyyb.20200970

基于多模式情景的长江中下游未来气象干旱时空演变特征分析

邓翠玲¹, 佘敦先¹, 邓瑶², 陈进³, 张利平¹, 洪思¹

1.武汉大学水资源与水电工程科学国家重点实验室,武汉 430072;
2.中国电建集团昆明勘测设计研究院有限公司,昆明 650041;
3. 流域水资源与生态环境湖北省重点实验室,武汉 430010

收稿日期:2020-09-21 修回日期:2020-11-23 出版日期:2021-06-01 发布日期:2021-06-10
通讯作者: 佘敦先(1986-),男,安徽芜湖人,副教授,博士,主要从事全球变化背景下的极端水文气象事件变化规律相关研究。E-mail:shedunxian@whu.edu.cn
作者简介:邓翠玲(1996-),女,重庆巫溪人,硕士研究生,主要研究方向为水文水资源。E-mail:dengcl@whu.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划项目(2017YFA0603704); 中央高校基本科研业务费专项(2042020kf0005)

Multi-model Projections of Meteorological Drought Characteristics under Different Scenarios in the Middle and Lower Reaches of Yangtze River Basin

DENG Cui-ling¹, SHE Dun-xian¹, DENG Yao², CHEN Jin³, ZHANG Li-ping¹, HONG Si¹

1. State Key Laboratory of Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering Science, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China;
2. Power China Kunming Engineering Cooperation Limited, Kunming 650041, China;
3. Key Laboratory of Basin Water Resources and Ecological Environment in Hubei Province, Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, Wuhan 430010, China

Received:2020-09-21 Revised:2020-11-23 Online:2021-06-01 Published:2021-06-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了分析未来时期(2020—2099年)长江中下游区域气象干旱演变特征,选取跨行业影响模式比较计划(ISIMIP)的4个全球气候模式,基于不同代表性浓度路径(RCP)的排放情景(RCP-2.6、RCP-6.0和RCP-8.5),分别计算了标准化降水指数(SPI)和标准化蒸散发指数(SPEI),探讨了两种指数对研究区气象干旱的刻画能力,分析了研究区未来气象干旱变化规律。研究结果表明:未来时期SPI整体呈增加趋势,汉江流域和洞庭湖水系西北区域增加幅度较大,说明该区域干旱减缓趋势明显;SPEI呈显著减小趋势,且随着排放浓度的增加,减小幅度逐渐增加,洞庭湖水系和鄱阳湖水系东南区域减小趋势较大,说明该区域未来时期干旱增加趋势明显;不同情景下SPI减小的区域SPEI也呈减小趋势且减小幅度更大;研究区SPI与SPEI的相关性从北到南、从西到东逐渐增强;SPI与SPEI的整体相关性随着排放浓度的增加逐渐减弱。研究成果有助于预估未来长江中下游区域干旱发生演变规律。

关键词: 干旱特征, 时空演变, SPI, SPEI, ISIMIP, 长江中下游区域

Abstract: To reveal the change trend and evolution patterns of future drought during 2020-2099 in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River Basin, we calculated the Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI) and Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index (SPEI) based on precipitation and potential evapotranspiration (PET) data from 4 Global Climate Models (GCMs) under RCP-2.6,RCP-6.0 and RCP-8.5 scenarios, which are derived from Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Inter-comparison Project (ISIMIP). We also looked into the performance of SPI and SPEI in detecting and depicting drought features. Results unveil an overall climbing trend of SPI in future, with the Hanjiang River basin and the northwest Dongting Lake network witnessing a surge, which means that drought in these regions will relieve obviously in the future. SPEI shows a reducing trend in most regions under all scenarios, and such reduction escalates with the rising of emission concentration; particularly, in the southeast of Dongting Lake network and Poyang Lake network,the reductions are larger than that in other regions,implying a notable drying trend in future.SPEI drops greater in regions where SPI declined under all scenarios.The correlation between SPI and SPEI gradually intensifies from north to south and from west to east in the study area.The overall correlation between SPI and SPEI weakens gradually from RCP-2.6,to RCP-6.0 and to RCP-8.5 scenario.

Key words: drought patterns, space-time evolution, SPI, SPEI, ISIMIP, middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River Basin

中图分类号:

P426.616

邓翠玲, 佘敦先, 邓瑶, 陈进, 张利平, 洪思. 基于多模式情景的长江中下游未来气象干旱时空演变特征分析[J]. 院报, 2021, 38(6): 9-17.

DENG Cui-ling, SHE Dun-xian, DENG Yao, CHEN Jin, ZHANG Li-ping, HONG Si. Multi-model Projections of Meteorological Drought Characteristics under Different Scenarios in the Middle and Lower Reaches of Yangtze River Basin[J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2021, 38(6): 9-17.

[1]	向大享, 姜莹, 陈喆, 李喆. 基于SPI和VHI的长江中下游地区干旱时空特征分析[J]. 院报, 2024, 41(3): 153-159.
[2]	王华飞, 赵宇鸾, 杨小飘, 赵佳. 清水江河谷南寨梯田“三生”空间时空演变及格局分析[J]. 院报, 2024, 41(3): 45-53.
[3]	欧阳硕, 胡智丹, 邵骏, 龚莉, 杜涛. 基于CanESM5模式的长江流域未来降雨变化趋势分析[J]. 院报, 2024, 41(1): 36-43.
[4]	张乾柱, 卢阳, 严同金, 谢谦, 赵姹, 胡月. 重庆市山洪灾害时空演变特征及影响因素分析[J]. 院报, 2023, 40(7): 80-87.
[5]	郭豪, 袁金国, 王景芝, 王晓昕, 李艳翠, 刘博涵. 基于MOD17A3的京津冀地区植被净初级生产力时空演变[J]. 院报, 2023, 40(7): 66-72.
[6]	唐青青, 季永月, 严聆云, 曾思栋, 唐小娅, 李进林, 余勇, 陈吉龙. 三峡水库蓄水后库区典型江心洲的形态调整及时空演变特征[J]. 院报, 2023, 40(5): 29-37.
[7]	曹永强, 杨雪婷, 周姝含. 河北省夏玉米水足迹时空演变特征及影响因子分析[J]. 院报, 2023, 40(2): 67-74.
[8]	蔡宜晴, 李文辉, 于泽兴, 李其江. 长江源区降水时空演变规律[J]. 院报, 2022, 39(5): 28-35.
[9]	黎晓东, 王永强, 刘万, 许继军, 瞿思敏. 三江源典型地区1967—2019年降水时空演变特征[J]. 院报, 2022, 39(1): 16-22.
[10]	李绅东, 马燕, 孙光宝, 罗文兵, 贾韬. 1960—2013年昭通市极端降雨时空演变规律研究[J]. 院报, 2018, 35(7): 19-24.
[11]	王志成, 刘新华, 贾付生, 聂艳. 近10 a阿克苏流域植被覆盖时空演变特征及影响因素[J]. 院报, 2017, 34(9): 24-28.
[12]	陈永志，李傲，周祥. 基于多尺度SPI指数的哈巴河地区近53 a的干旱分析[J]. 院报, 2017, 34(6): 12-16.

基于多模式情景的长江中下游未来气象干旱时空演变特征分析

Multi-model Projections of Meteorological Drought Characteristics under Different Scenarios in the Middle and Lower Reaches of Yangtze River Basin

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

相关文章 12

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价