考虑水文效应的不同植被根系护坡效果数值分析

doi:10.11988/ckyyb.20210439

院报 ›› 2022, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (9): 102-108.DOI: 10.11988/ckyyb.20210439

考虑水文效应的不同植被根系护坡效果数值分析

廖田婷¹, 蒋关鲁¹, 张崇磊^1,2, 单源椿¹, 叶雄威¹

1.西南交通大学土木工程学院,成都 610031;
2.中国科学院水利部成都山地灾害与环境研究所,成都 610041

收稿日期:2021-05-08 修回日期:2021-07-09 出版日期:2022-09-01 发布日期:2022-09-21
通讯作者: 蒋关鲁(1962-),男,浙江富阳人,教授,博士,从事路基工程与岩土工程研究。E-mail:wgljiang@swjtu.edu.cn
作者简介:廖田婷(1996-),女,四川达州人,硕士研究生,从事边坡工程研究。E-mail:1161788749@qq.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(51878577)

Numerical Analysis of Slope Protection Effect of Root System of Different Plants Considering Hydrological Effect

LIAO Tian-ting¹, JIANG Guan-lu¹, ZHANG Chong-lei^1,2, SHAN Yuan-chun¹, YE Xiong-wei¹

1. School of Civil Engineering,Southwest Jiaotong University,Chengdu 610031,China;
2. Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Chengdu 610041,China

Received:2021-05-08 Revised:2021-07-09 Online:2022-09-01 Published:2022-09-21

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为对比不同类型植被根系在降雨条件下对坡体内水分运移影响和浅层固土效果,基于FLAC^3D软件的FISH编程模块进行二次开发,对间隔降雨大暴雨工况下3种不同植被类型根系固土边坡和未加固边坡分别进行数值计算,并与离心模型试验结果进行对比。结果表明:植被根系能够很好地阻止水分渗透,起到固土作用。heart根型加固边坡与素坡(未加固边坡)的水分运移规律截然不同,素坡表现为近坡表侧水分渗透速率快于远坡表侧;heart根型蒸腾作用最好,但plate根型两翼宽大更能抵抗浅层雨水冲刷与渗透,总的来说,heart根型最能减少坡体内部水分;tap、plate和heart 3种根型加固边坡最大水平向位移百分比分别减小52.22%、73.68%和70.24%,综合来看,heart根型更能减小内部位移,固土效果最好;数值模拟结果与降雨离心模型试验结果拟合趋势较好,验证了开发程序的正确性与有效性。研究成果为考虑更多工况与更复杂根型的模拟奠定了基础。

关键词: 植被根系, 降雨, 饱和-非饱和渗流, 水文效应, 加固效果, FLAC^3D

Abstract: The aim of this research is to compare the influence of root systems of different vegetation types on water transport in slope and shallow soil-stabilizing effect under rainfall condition.The slope reinforced with three different plants’ root system and the unreinforced slope were numerically simulated under intermittent rainfall and heavy rain conditions using a secondary development of FISH programming module of FLAC^3D,and the simulation results were compared with the that of centrifugal model test.The results demonstrated that root system could solidify the soil by preventing from water infiltration.Heart-root-reinforced slope has a entirely different water transport law from plain slope (unreinforced slope) which has a larger water permeation rate of the near-slope surface than that of the far-slope surface.Heart-root system has an optimum transpiration,while plate-root system better resists shallow rainfall erosion and penetration due to its wide wings. In general,heart-root system could reduce the moisture inside the slope body best.The maximum horizontal displacement of taproot,plate-root and heart-root reinforced slope reduce by 52.22%,73.68% and 70.24%,respectively.In conclusion,heart-root system has the best soil-stabilizing effect.In addition,the numerical simulation results are in agreement with centrifugal model test results,which verifies the correctness and effectiveness of the developed program,and lays a foundation for the simulation of more working conditions and more complex root types.

Key words: roots of plants, rainfall, saturated-unsaturated seepage, hydrological effect, reinforcement effect, FLAC^3D

中图分类号:

U416.1

廖田婷, 蒋关鲁, 张崇磊, 单源椿, 叶雄威. 考虑水文效应的不同植被根系护坡效果数值分析[J]. 院报, 2022, 39(9): 102-108.

LIAO Tian-ting, JIANG Guan-lu, ZHANG Chong-lei, SHAN Yuan-chun, YE Xiong-wei. Numerical Analysis of Slope Protection Effect of Root System of Different Plants Considering Hydrological Effect[J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2022, 39(9): 102-108.

[1]	欧阳硕, 胡智丹, 邵骏, 龚莉, 杜涛. 基于CanESM5模式的长江流域未来降雨变化趋势分析[J]. 院报, 2024, 41(1): 36-43.
[2]	王永强, 刘万, 黎晓东, 许继军. 基于陆气耦合模式的降雨径流模拟研究进展[J]. 院报, 2024, 41(1): 26-35.
[3]	李熙, 刘强, 江世雄, 孙宝洋, 钱峰, 陈垚. 典型红壤区输变电工程堆积体边坡细沟侵蚀特征[J]. 院报, 2023, 40(9): 61-67.
[4]	付敬, 艾凯, 施华堂, 高阳阳, 谭海, 吴勇进. 裂隙及强降雨入渗对堆积体滑坡渗流场及稳定性的影响[J]. 院报, 2023, 40(9): 112-117.
[5]	钟卓希, 盛建龙, 胡斌, 李京, 王庭元. 考虑等效裂隙面的含软弱夹层边坡降雨渗流模型[J]. 院报, 2023, 40(7): 118-124.
[6]	侯燕军, 田婉婷, 康永强. 基于降雨量逐步逼近法的泥石流预警判据[J]. 院报, 2023, 40(7): 146-151.
[7]	叶舟, 耿诚, 徐贝, 陈芳. 基于长系列水文监测数据的台风对舟山岛降雨量的影响[J]. 院报, 2023, 40(6): 35-42.
[8]	崔光耀, 宋博涵, 何继华, 田宇航. 超近接上跨既有隧道施工影响分区及加固措施效果[J]. 院报, 2023, 40(6): 114-118.
[9]	许文涛, 唐文坚, 王协康, 董林垚, 丁文峰, 郭宜薇, 张平仓. 暴雨山洪监测技术研究进展与发展趋势[J]. 院报, 2023, 40(4): 79-87.
[10]	邹浩, 何霏, 白俊龙. 黄冈地区降雨型滑坡影响因素及与降雨量的关系[J]. 院报, 2023, 40(2): 124-130.
[11]	刘涛, 杨以翠, 周旺, 郑腾辉. 降雨强度对工程堆积体坡面土壤养分及颗粒组成的影响[J]. 院报, 2023, 40(12): 59-64.
[12]	朱智杰, 卢书强, 梅军. 基于有效降雨量的滑坡位移-降雨相关性研究[J]. 院报, 2023, 40(12): 162-168,187.
[13]	张鑫, 罗崎峰, 涂国祥, 唐豪. 间歇性降雨作用下含碎石夹层堆积体水气运移规律[J]. 院报, 2023, 40(10): 123-130.
[14]	霍志涛, 李高, 王力, 占清华, 李玉. 降雨型滑坡浅层滑动对土体含水率变化的响应[J]. 院报, 2022, 39(7): 110-117.
[15]	李凯, 王永强, 许继军, 吴志俊, 许翔. 基于SWAT模型的巴勒更河流域降雨-径流关系[J]. 院报, 2022, 39(4): 41-48.

考虑水文效应的不同植被根系护坡效果数值分析

Numerical Analysis of Slope Protection Effect of Root System of Different Plants Considering Hydrological Effect

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价