院报 ›› 2014, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (9): 126-131.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5485.2014.09.024

• 水利工程建设与管理 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于可靠性分析的工程项目群FAHP风险评价模型

江新1,李琦1,赵静2   

  1. 1.三峡大学 水利与环境学院,湖北 宜昌 443002;
    2.汉江集团丹江口地产有限责任公司,湖北 丹江口 442700
  • 收稿日期:2014-01-08 修回日期:2014-09-04 出版日期:2014-09-01 发布日期:2014-09-04
  • 作者简介:江新(1966-),男,安徽寿县人,教授,硕士生导师,主要从事工程项目群管理、系统决策理论及评价等方面的研究,(电话)13339795561(电子邮箱)jiangx163@163.com。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助(51379110)

FAHP Evaluation Model for Programme Risk Based on Reliability Analysis

JIANG Xin1, LI Qi1, ZHAO Jing2   

  1. 1.College of Hydraulic & Environmental Engineering, China Three Gorges University, Yichang 443002, China;
    2.Danjiangkou Real Estate Co., Ltd., Hanjiang Group, Danjiangkou 442700, China
  • Received:2014-01-08 Revised:2014-09-04 Online:2014-09-01 Published:2014-09-04

摘要: 针对工程项目群风险评价时评价者主观估计的可靠性问题,在工程项目群风险评价中引入可靠性分析,对风险评价中常用的模糊层次综合评价法进行改进。用评价者的区间估计代替点估计,并根据集值统计原理对评价者给出的估计区间予以量化,得到评价者主观估计的可靠性程度,再将其与模糊层次综合评价法结合应用,从而构建了基于可靠性分析的工程项目群FAHP风险评价模型。将此模型运用于某水电站库周公路网工程项目群,计算结果表明,该工程项目群风险的等级为0.363,属于风险较轻。

关键词: 可靠性分析, 模糊层次综合评价法(FAHP), 风险评价模型, 工程项目群

Abstract: To solve the reliability issues of evaluator’s subjective estimates when evaluating programme risk, we introduced reliability analysis into programme risk estimation to improve the FAHP (Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process) evaluation method. We substituted the interval estimation of evaluators with point estimation, and quantified the estimation interval given by the estimator according to the principle of set-valued statistics, thus obtaining the degree of reliability of evaluator’s subjective estimate. On this basis, we built the FAHP risk evaluation model and apply it to the evaluation of a case of road network around a hydropower reservoir. Results showed that the risk level of the programme is 0.363, which belongs to small risk.

Key words: reliability analysis, FAHP, risk evaluation model, programme

中图分类号: 

Baidu
map