包裹式加筋土桥台结构性能现场试验研究

doi:10.11988/ckyyb.20230358

院报 ›› 2024, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (7): 126-131.DOI: 10.11988/ckyyb.20230358

包裹式加筋土桥台结构性能现场试验研究

王清明¹, 徐超^1,2, 李昊煜³, 赵崇熙¹, 孟亚¹, 沈盼盼⁴

1.同济大学地下建筑与工程系,上海 200092;
2.同济大学岩土及地下工程教育部重点实验室,上海 200092;
3.安徽省交通规划设计研究总院股份有限公司,合肥 230088;
4.上海勘测设计研究院有限公司,上海 200434

收稿日期:2023-04-04 修回日期:2023-08-14 出版日期:2024-07-01 发布日期:2024-07-08
通讯作者: 徐超(1965-),男,河南临颍人,教授,博士,博士生导师,主要从事土工合成材料及地基加固方面的研究。E-mail: c_axu@tongji.edu.cn
作者简介:王清明(1995-),男,河北邯郸人,博士研究生,主要从事加筋土结构相关研究。E-mail: qm_wang@tongji.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(42002270,41772284);安徽省交通运输行业重点科技项目(2021-KJQD-016)

Field Monitoring on Structural Performance of a Mixed Geosynthetics Reinforced Soil Abutment

WANG Qing-ming¹, XU Chao^1,2, LI Hao-yu³, ZHAO Chong-xi¹, MENG Ya¹, SHEN Pan-pan⁴

1. Department of Geotechnical Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China;
2. Key Laboratory of Geotechnical and Underground Engineering of Ministry of Education, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China;
3. Anhui Transport Consulting & Design Institute Co., Ltd., Hefei 230088, China;
4. Shanghai Investigation, Design & Research Institute Co., Ltd., Shanghai 200434, China

Received:2023-04-04 Revised:2023-08-14 Published:2024-07-01 Online:2024-07-08

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为探究包裹式加筋土桥台结构性能,依托安徽省明(光)巢(湖)高速公路包裹式加筋土桥台项目,进行现场原位监测。通过工后330 d的现场监测,研究了包裹式加筋土桥台面板后水平土压力、桩侧水平土压力、面板水平位移、面板沉降,以及土工格栅应变等分布和变化规律,同时探讨了绕桩格栅截断对面板后水平土压力分布的影响。结果表明:面板后水平土压力沿墙高呈非线性分布,面板中部水平土压力大于其他位置,同时墙趾约束会使底部水平土压力逐渐增大,格栅绕桩截断对面板后水平土压力未造成显著影响;桩侧水平土压力沿高度呈近线性分布,盖梁的存在会使桩侧上部水平土压力偏小;面板水平位移和沉降在工后150~180 d内达到稳定状态,最大变形值均出现在道路中线附近;墙背土工格栅应变随墙高呈非线性分布,随桥台运营时间出现收缩现象。总体上,包裹式加筋土桥台在工后较为稳定,服役期间的监测数据可为今后类似工程设计施工提供参考。

关键词: 土工合成材料, 加筋土桥台, 格栅截断, 现场监测, 结构性能

Abstract: Field test was conducted to examine the structural performance of a mixed geosynthetics reinforced soil (GRS) abutment in the Mingguang to Chaohu Expressway project in Anhui Province. The horizontal stresses behind face slab and pile, horizontal dislacement and settlement of the face slab, and the geogrid strains were examined based on monitoring data collected over 330 days post-construction of the mixed GRS abutment. The impact of geogrid truncation on horizontal stresses was also examined. Results indicated that horizontal stress distribution behind the face slab was non-linear, with maximum values occurring in the middle, while stresses gradually increased towards the bottom due to toe restraint. Geogrid truncation around piles had minimal influence on horizontal stresses. Horizontal stress distribution behind pile was linear along the elevation, with reduced stress on the top due to the presence of cap beam. Furthermore, face slab deformations stabilized within 150-180 days post-construction, with maximum deformations observed near the road’s centerline. Geogrid strain distributed non-linearly along the wall height, demonstrating elastic behavior with shrinkage and rebound under service conditions, indicating the geogrid is far from reaching ultimate strain. Overall, the mixed GRS abutment exhibits minimal deformation, and the monitoring data collected during the service period can inform the design and construction of similar projects.

Key words: geosynthetics, reinforced soil abutment, geogrid truncation, filed monitoring, structural performance

中图分类号:

TU472

王清明, 徐超, 李昊煜, 赵崇熙, 孟亚, 沈盼盼. 包裹式加筋土桥台结构性能现场试验研究[J]. 院报, 2024, 41(7): 126-131.

WANG Qing-ming, XU Chao, LI Hao-yu, ZHAO Chong-xi, MENG Ya, SHEN Pan-pan. Field Monitoring on Structural Performance of a Mixed Geosynthetics Reinforced Soil Abutment[J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2024, 41(7): 126-131.

[1]	范永丰, 赵阳, 史先利, 卢正, 姚海林. 基于直剪试验的土工格室加筋层抗剪性能数值模拟[J]. 院报, 2024, 41(2): 98-104.
[2]	吴迪, 罗琛, 李丹, 徐超. 土工合成材料土中与空气中抗拉强度对比[J]. 院报, 2022, 39(2): 94-101.
[3]	杜春雪, 徐超, 彭善涛. 土工织物反滤作用研究进展[J]. 院报, 2022, 39(2): 108-114.
[4]	胡艳平, 王振华, 李青云, 汤显强, 张笛梦. 氯化钙-腐殖酸活化作用下土壤Cd的电动脱除性能[J]. 院报, 2021, 38(8): 60-65.
[5]	郎永彪, 郑郧, 金伟, 穆彦虎, 柴明堂. 青藏高原湖泊引流疏导工程多年冻土立体监测方法[J]. 院报, 2021, 38(6): 45-51.
[6]	霍润科, 秋添, 李曙光, 曹新祥, 钱美婷. 不同加固方案下富水黄土隧道地层变形规律分析[J]. 院报, 2020, 37(7): 96-104.
[7]	张向东, 李亦芃, 李庆文, 殷增光. 考虑流固耦合效应深埋富水隧道围岩稳定性研究[J]. 院报, 2018, 35(10): 98-103.
[8]	黄岳文. 土工合成材料在广州水利工程中的应用介绍[J]. 院报, 2017, 34(2): 120-125.
[9]	丁金华，童军，刘军. 新型多功能土-土工合成材料试验机在筋土相互作用研究中的应用[J]. 院报, 2017, 34(2): 29-34.
[10]	梁程，徐超. 筋-土剪切带的研究现状与展望[J]. 院报, 2017, 34(2): 23-28.
[11]	汪兴萌,卢亦焱,金璐,雷东山. 辋川河引水输水渡槽结构性能评估研究[J]. 院报, 2017, 34(11): 116-120.
[12]	蔡佳愿,周传波,吴超. 双线平行地铁隧道盾构同向推进纵向安全间距研究[J]. 院报, 2016, 33(12): 105-108.
[13]	张家发,吴庆华,朱国胜. 海绵城市入渗设施淤堵研究进展及长期性能改进方案探讨[J]. 院报, 2016, 33(12): 78-85.
[14]	陈文龙,张煜,叶松,沈定涛,魏思奇. 无人机全景技术在现场监测中的应用[J]. 院报, 2016, 33(11): 89-92.
[15]	段文刚,王才欢,田子勤,郑涛平. 电站变顶高尾水洞水力过渡过程现场监测分析[J]. 院报, 2015, 32(9): 80-85.

包裹式加筋土桥台结构性能现场试验研究

Field Monitoring on Structural Performance of a Mixed Geosynthetics Reinforced Soil Abutment

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价