Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute ›› 2025, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (9): 75-82.DOI: 10.11988/ckyyb.20241184
• Water Environment And Water Ecology • Previous Articles Next Articles
LIU Jie1(), WANG Shu-xin2(
), LI Peng-fei3
Received:
2024-11-19
Revised:
2025-01-24
Published:
2025-09-01
Online:
2025-09-01
Contact:
WANG Shu-xin
CLC Number:
LIU Jie, WANG Shu-xin, LI Peng-fei. Characteristics and Sources of Heavy Metal Pollution in Hanzhong Section of Hanjiang River[J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute, 2025, 42(9): 75-82.
区域 | 河流 | 断面名称 | 水温/℃ | 经度(E) | 纬度(N) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
干流 | 汉江 | 烈金坝 | 8.2~20.5 | 106°15'54″ | 33°02'46″ |
汉江 | 临江寺 | 4.7~28.0 | 106°21'50″ | 33°03'38″ | |
汉江 | 梁西渡 | 7.8~28.9 | 106°56'25″ | 33°06'29″ | |
汉江 | 桥闸大桥 | 5.0~20.7 | 107°03'3.81″ | 33°02'31.91″ | |
汉江 | 南柳渡 | 8.9~29.6 | 107°11'57″ | 33°06'47″ | |
汉江 | 旧汉江大桥 | 6.0~32.2 | 107°20'27.69″ | 33°08'23.05″ | |
汉江 | 蒙家渡 | 5.0~32.3 | 107°32'48″ | 33°11'33″ | |
汉江 | 黄金峡 | 7.0~29.7 | 107°50'05″ | 33°11'38″ | |
汉江 | 茶镇湾渡口 | 5.7~26.3 | 108°03'30.3″ | 33°02'1.1″ | |
汉江 | 小钢桥 | 7.5~31.1 | 108°13'49.8″ | 33°02'32.28″ | |
支流 | 牧马河 | 仁义渡口 | 6.5~29.5 | 107°54'59.04″ | 33°06'24.12″ |
黑河 | 茶店桥下 | 5.0~31.0 | 106°22'58″ | 33°11'46″ | |
沮水河 | 沮水桥 | 5.0~27.0 | 106°30'16.92″ | 33°07'5.88″ | |
堰河 | 新桥 | 7.1~28.5 | 106°42'47.16″ | 33°09'13.68″ | |
濂水河 | 濂水桥 | 5.9~29.2 | 106°59'54″ | 33°02'25″ | |
褒河 | 张码头 | 4.0~28.0 | 106°57'30″ | 33°13'47″ | |
湑水河 | 湑水桥 | 5.0~32.0 | 107°22'9.04″ | 33°09'27.49″ | |
文川河 | 沙河营大桥 | 7.2~25.2 | 107°14'41.85″ | 33°07'53.54″ | |
金水河 | 金水桥 | 3.8~24.2 | 107°52'0.42″ | 33°15'57.85″ | |
酉水河 | 酉水桥 | 4.9~32.0 | 107°47'49.68″ | 33°11'49.53″ |
Table 1 Information of water sampling sites in Hanzhong section of Hanjiang River
区域 | 河流 | 断面名称 | 水温/℃ | 经度(E) | 纬度(N) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
干流 | 汉江 | 烈金坝 | 8.2~20.5 | 106°15'54″ | 33°02'46″ |
汉江 | 临江寺 | 4.7~28.0 | 106°21'50″ | 33°03'38″ | |
汉江 | 梁西渡 | 7.8~28.9 | 106°56'25″ | 33°06'29″ | |
汉江 | 桥闸大桥 | 5.0~20.7 | 107°03'3.81″ | 33°02'31.91″ | |
汉江 | 南柳渡 | 8.9~29.6 | 107°11'57″ | 33°06'47″ | |
汉江 | 旧汉江大桥 | 6.0~32.2 | 107°20'27.69″ | 33°08'23.05″ | |
汉江 | 蒙家渡 | 5.0~32.3 | 107°32'48″ | 33°11'33″ | |
汉江 | 黄金峡 | 7.0~29.7 | 107°50'05″ | 33°11'38″ | |
汉江 | 茶镇湾渡口 | 5.7~26.3 | 108°03'30.3″ | 33°02'1.1″ | |
汉江 | 小钢桥 | 7.5~31.1 | 108°13'49.8″ | 33°02'32.28″ | |
支流 | 牧马河 | 仁义渡口 | 6.5~29.5 | 107°54'59.04″ | 33°06'24.12″ |
黑河 | 茶店桥下 | 5.0~31.0 | 106°22'58″ | 33°11'46″ | |
沮水河 | 沮水桥 | 5.0~27.0 | 106°30'16.92″ | 33°07'5.88″ | |
堰河 | 新桥 | 7.1~28.5 | 106°42'47.16″ | 33°09'13.68″ | |
濂水河 | 濂水桥 | 5.9~29.2 | 106°59'54″ | 33°02'25″ | |
褒河 | 张码头 | 4.0~28.0 | 106°57'30″ | 33°13'47″ | |
湑水河 | 湑水桥 | 5.0~32.0 | 107°22'9.04″ | 33°09'27.49″ | |
文川河 | 沙河营大桥 | 7.2~25.2 | 107°14'41.85″ | 33°07'53.54″ | |
金水河 | 金水桥 | 3.8~24.2 | 107°52'0.42″ | 33°15'57.85″ | |
酉水河 | 酉水桥 | 4.9~32.0 | 107°47'49.68″ | 33°11'49.53″ |
污染 等级 | 污染指数 | 污染 程度 | 污染 等级 | 污染指数 | 污染 程度 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ⅰ | P≤0.7 | 清洁 | Ⅳ | 2.0<P≤3.0 | 中污染 |
Ⅱ | 0.7<P≤1.0 | 尚清洁 | Ⅴ | P>3.0 | 重污染 |
Ⅲ | 1.0<P≤2.0 | 轻污染 |
Table 2 Rating standards for Nemerow comprehensive pollution index
污染 等级 | 污染指数 | 污染 程度 | 污染 等级 | 污染指数 | 污染 程度 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ⅰ | P≤0.7 | 清洁 | Ⅳ | 2.0<P≤3.0 | 中污染 |
Ⅱ | 0.7<P≤1.0 | 尚清洁 | Ⅴ | P>3.0 | 重污染 |
Ⅲ | 1.0<P≤2.0 | 轻污染 |
断面 | 重金属浓度/(μg·L-1) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hg | Pb | Cu | Zn | As | Cd | Cr | ||||
干 流 | 烈金坝 | 0.02 | 0.16 | 0.36 | 3.33 | 0.20 | 0.02 | 3.60 | ||
临江寺 | 0.02 | 1.08 | 2.51 | 10.48 | 1.20 | 0.50 | 6.10 | |||
梁西渡 | 0.02 | 0.13 | 1.33 | 9.13 | 0.68 | 0.14 | 5.75 | |||
桥闸大桥 | 0.03 | 0.59 | 3.25 | 17.43 | 1.54 | 0.12 | 6.00 | |||
南柳渡 | 0.02 | 0.09 | 1.00 | 10.33 | 0.24 | 0.04 | 6.80 | |||
旧汉江大桥 | 0.02 | 1.20 | 3.05 | 15.31 | 0.70 | 0.03 | 10.67 | |||
蒙家渡 | 0.02 | 1.00 | 4.59 | 11.29 | 0.69 | 0.08 | 9.55 | |||
黄金峡 | 0.02 | 0.34 | 2.50 | 3.75 | 0.35 | 0.02 | 8.25 | |||
茶镇湾渡口 | 0.02 | 0.89 | 2.03 | 11.06 | 0.78 | 0.03 | 8.25 | |||
小钢桥 | 0.02 | 0.28 | 1.00 | 8.75 | 0.40 | 0.02 | 4.50 | |||
支流 | 仁义渡口 | 0.03 | 0.11 | 1.00 | 9.00 | 0.55 | 0.02 | 4.00 | ||
茶店桥下 | 0.02 | 0.78 | 11.30 | 10.11 | 0.74 | 0.08 | 7.27 | |||
沮水桥 | 0.02 | 1.02 | 2.57 | 10.85 | 0.77 | 0.03 | 8.55 | |||
新桥 | 0.03 | 5.00 | 0.50 | 60.00 | 3.50 | 0.50 | 2.80 | |||
濂水桥 | 0.03 | 0.83 | 21.24 | 10.36 | 0.69 | 0.20 | 9.50 | |||
张码头 | 0.03 | 0.68 | 43.40 | 21.78 | 0.69 | 0.08 | 11.00 | |||
湑水桥 | 0.02 | 0.85 | 4.18 | 6.66 | 0.52 | 0.08 | 9.18 | |||
沙河营大桥 | 0.02 | 0.17 | 10.00 | 10.00 | 0.15 | 0.05 | 2.00 | |||
金水桥 | 0.02 | 0.30 | 10.00 | 11.67 | 0.15 | 0.03 | 2.00 | |||
酉水桥 | 0.02 | 1.03 | 2.35 | 10.51 | 0.95 | 0.03 | 8.18 | |||
平均值 | 0.02 | 0.83 | 6.41 | 13.09 | 0.77 | 0.11 | 6.70 | |||
GB 3838— 2002 | Ⅰ类标准 浓度限值/ (μg ·L-1) | 0.05 | 10 | 10 | 50 | 50 | 1 | 10 | ||
检出率/% | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Table 3 Statistical results of heavy metal concentration in Hanzhong section of Hanjiang River (January-December, 2022)
断面 | 重金属浓度/(μg·L-1) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hg | Pb | Cu | Zn | As | Cd | Cr | ||||
干 流 | 烈金坝 | 0.02 | 0.16 | 0.36 | 3.33 | 0.20 | 0.02 | 3.60 | ||
临江寺 | 0.02 | 1.08 | 2.51 | 10.48 | 1.20 | 0.50 | 6.10 | |||
梁西渡 | 0.02 | 0.13 | 1.33 | 9.13 | 0.68 | 0.14 | 5.75 | |||
桥闸大桥 | 0.03 | 0.59 | 3.25 | 17.43 | 1.54 | 0.12 | 6.00 | |||
南柳渡 | 0.02 | 0.09 | 1.00 | 10.33 | 0.24 | 0.04 | 6.80 | |||
旧汉江大桥 | 0.02 | 1.20 | 3.05 | 15.31 | 0.70 | 0.03 | 10.67 | |||
蒙家渡 | 0.02 | 1.00 | 4.59 | 11.29 | 0.69 | 0.08 | 9.55 | |||
黄金峡 | 0.02 | 0.34 | 2.50 | 3.75 | 0.35 | 0.02 | 8.25 | |||
茶镇湾渡口 | 0.02 | 0.89 | 2.03 | 11.06 | 0.78 | 0.03 | 8.25 | |||
小钢桥 | 0.02 | 0.28 | 1.00 | 8.75 | 0.40 | 0.02 | 4.50 | |||
支流 | 仁义渡口 | 0.03 | 0.11 | 1.00 | 9.00 | 0.55 | 0.02 | 4.00 | ||
茶店桥下 | 0.02 | 0.78 | 11.30 | 10.11 | 0.74 | 0.08 | 7.27 | |||
沮水桥 | 0.02 | 1.02 | 2.57 | 10.85 | 0.77 | 0.03 | 8.55 | |||
新桥 | 0.03 | 5.00 | 0.50 | 60.00 | 3.50 | 0.50 | 2.80 | |||
濂水桥 | 0.03 | 0.83 | 21.24 | 10.36 | 0.69 | 0.20 | 9.50 | |||
张码头 | 0.03 | 0.68 | 43.40 | 21.78 | 0.69 | 0.08 | 11.00 | |||
湑水桥 | 0.02 | 0.85 | 4.18 | 6.66 | 0.52 | 0.08 | 9.18 | |||
沙河营大桥 | 0.02 | 0.17 | 10.00 | 10.00 | 0.15 | 0.05 | 2.00 | |||
金水桥 | 0.02 | 0.30 | 10.00 | 11.67 | 0.15 | 0.03 | 2.00 | |||
酉水桥 | 0.02 | 1.03 | 2.35 | 10.51 | 0.95 | 0.03 | 8.18 | |||
平均值 | 0.02 | 0.83 | 6.41 | 13.09 | 0.77 | 0.11 | 6.70 | |||
GB 3838— 2002 | Ⅰ类标准 浓度限值/ (μg ·L-1) | 0.05 | 10 | 10 | 50 | 50 | 1 | 10 | ||
检出率/% | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
断面名称 | 常规监测指标 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
pH值 | DO浓度/ (μg ·L-1) | NH3-N浓度/ (μg·L-1) | CODCr浓度/ (μg·L-1) | |||
干 流 | 烈金坝 | 8.00 | 9 741.67 | 20.83 | 6 200.00 | |
临江寺 | 8.05 | 9 930.00 | 189.40 | 6 888.89 | ||
梁西渡 | 8.00 | 9 341.67 | 47.50 | 9 575.00 | ||
桥闸大桥 | 8.07 | 6 990.83 | 196.92 | 10 545.45 | ||
南柳渡 | 7.83 | 8 491.67 | 36.67 | 8 600.00 | ||
旧汉江大桥 | 8.07 | 9 037.50 | 170.25 | 9 500.00 | ||
蒙家渡 | 8.26 | 9 555.00 | 169.08 | 9 000.00 | ||
黄金峡 | 8.00 | 8 333.33 | 45.00 | 8 825.00 | ||
茶镇湾渡口 | 7.71 | 8 990.00 | 176.67 | 7 636.36 | ||
小钢桥 | 8.00 | 9 633.33 | 28.33 | 7 250.00 | ||
支 流 | 仁义渡口 | 8.25 | 8 450.00 | 125.00 | 6 850.00 | |
茶店桥下 | 8.32 | 8 750.83 | 71.41 | 6 700.00 | ||
沮水桥 | 8.27 | 9 434.17 | 71.88 | 6 636.36 | ||
新桥 | 7.72 | 9 503.33 | 368.42 | 8 250.00 | ||
濂水桥 | 8.30 | 8 946.67 | 380.25 | 9 583.33 | ||
张码头 | 8.36 | 9 355.00 | 273.67 | 8 090.91 | ||
湑水桥 | 8.17 | 9 339.17 | 181.50 | 8 666.67 | ||
沙河营大桥 | 7.87 | 8 628.33 | 288.25 | 9 666.67 | ||
金水桥 | 8.10 | 8 205.83 | 243.67 | 6 666.67 | ||
酉水桥 | 8.15 | 9 259.17 | 164.71 | 8 000.00 | ||
平均值 | 8.07 | 8 995.88 | 162.47 | 8 156.57 | ||
GB 3838— 2002 | Ⅰ类标准 浓度限值/ (μg·L-1) | 6.0~ 9.0 | 7 500 (下限) | 150 | 15 000 | |
超标率/% | 0 | 5 | 60 | 0 |
Table 4 Statistical results of conventional monitoring indicators in Hanzhong section of Hanjiang River (January-December, 2022)
断面名称 | 常规监测指标 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
pH值 | DO浓度/ (μg ·L-1) | NH3-N浓度/ (μg·L-1) | CODCr浓度/ (μg·L-1) | |||
干 流 | 烈金坝 | 8.00 | 9 741.67 | 20.83 | 6 200.00 | |
临江寺 | 8.05 | 9 930.00 | 189.40 | 6 888.89 | ||
梁西渡 | 8.00 | 9 341.67 | 47.50 | 9 575.00 | ||
桥闸大桥 | 8.07 | 6 990.83 | 196.92 | 10 545.45 | ||
南柳渡 | 7.83 | 8 491.67 | 36.67 | 8 600.00 | ||
旧汉江大桥 | 8.07 | 9 037.50 | 170.25 | 9 500.00 | ||
蒙家渡 | 8.26 | 9 555.00 | 169.08 | 9 000.00 | ||
黄金峡 | 8.00 | 8 333.33 | 45.00 | 8 825.00 | ||
茶镇湾渡口 | 7.71 | 8 990.00 | 176.67 | 7 636.36 | ||
小钢桥 | 8.00 | 9 633.33 | 28.33 | 7 250.00 | ||
支 流 | 仁义渡口 | 8.25 | 8 450.00 | 125.00 | 6 850.00 | |
茶店桥下 | 8.32 | 8 750.83 | 71.41 | 6 700.00 | ||
沮水桥 | 8.27 | 9 434.17 | 71.88 | 6 636.36 | ||
新桥 | 7.72 | 9 503.33 | 368.42 | 8 250.00 | ||
濂水桥 | 8.30 | 8 946.67 | 380.25 | 9 583.33 | ||
张码头 | 8.36 | 9 355.00 | 273.67 | 8 090.91 | ||
湑水桥 | 8.17 | 9 339.17 | 181.50 | 8 666.67 | ||
沙河营大桥 | 7.87 | 8 628.33 | 288.25 | 9 666.67 | ||
金水桥 | 8.10 | 8 205.83 | 243.67 | 6 666.67 | ||
酉水桥 | 8.15 | 9 259.17 | 164.71 | 8 000.00 | ||
平均值 | 8.07 | 8 995.88 | 162.47 | 8 156.57 | ||
GB 3838— 2002 | Ⅰ类标准 浓度限值/ (μg·L-1) | 6.0~ 9.0 | 7 500 (下限) | 150 | 15 000 | |
超标率/% | 0 | 5 | 60 | 0 |
断面 | P | 污染级别 | |
---|---|---|---|
干 流 | 烈金坝 | 0.297 | 清洁 |
临江寺 | 0.481 | 清洁 | |
梁西渡 | 0.432 | 清洁 | |
桥闸大桥 | 0.474 | 清洁 | |
南柳渡 | 0.502 | 清洁 | |
旧汉江大桥 | 0.788 | 尚清洁 | |
蒙家渡 | 0.712 | 尚清洁 | |
黄金峡 | 0.606 | 清洁 | |
茶镇湾渡口 | 0.611 | 清洁 | |
小钢桥 | 0.340 | 清洁 | |
支 流 | 仁义渡口 | 0.445 | 清洁 |
茶店桥下 | 0.842 | 尚清洁 | |
沮水桥 | 0.634 | 清洁 | |
新桥 | 0.908 | 尚清洁 | |
濂水桥 | 1.560 | 轻污染 | |
张码头 | 3.141 | 重污染 | |
湑水桥 | 0.681 | 清洁 | |
沙河营大桥 | 0.732 | 尚清洁 | |
金水桥 | 0.733 | 尚清洁 | |
酉水桥 | 0.607 | 清洁 | |
平均值 | 0.776 | 尚清洁 |
Table 5 Nemerow comprehensive pollution index values and rating results of heavy metals at each monitoring cross-section in Hanzhong section of Hanjiang River
断面 | P | 污染级别 | |
---|---|---|---|
干 流 | 烈金坝 | 0.297 | 清洁 |
临江寺 | 0.481 | 清洁 | |
梁西渡 | 0.432 | 清洁 | |
桥闸大桥 | 0.474 | 清洁 | |
南柳渡 | 0.502 | 清洁 | |
旧汉江大桥 | 0.788 | 尚清洁 | |
蒙家渡 | 0.712 | 尚清洁 | |
黄金峡 | 0.606 | 清洁 | |
茶镇湾渡口 | 0.611 | 清洁 | |
小钢桥 | 0.340 | 清洁 | |
支 流 | 仁义渡口 | 0.445 | 清洁 |
茶店桥下 | 0.842 | 尚清洁 | |
沮水桥 | 0.634 | 清洁 | |
新桥 | 0.908 | 尚清洁 | |
濂水桥 | 1.560 | 轻污染 | |
张码头 | 3.141 | 重污染 | |
湑水桥 | 0.681 | 清洁 | |
沙河营大桥 | 0.732 | 尚清洁 | |
金水桥 | 0.733 | 尚清洁 | |
酉水桥 | 0.607 | 清洁 | |
平均值 | 0.776 | 尚清洁 |
指标 | Hg | Pb | Cu | Zn | As | Cd | Cr | pH值 | DO | NH3-N | CODCr |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hg | 1 | 0.346 | 0.439* | 0.535** | 0.503** | 0.327 | -0.008 | 0.202 | -0.301 | 0.578*** | 0.238 |
Pb | 1 | -0.089 | 0.918*** | 0.923*** | 0.694*** | -0.063 | -0.295 | 0.271 | 0.520** | 0.031 | |
Cu | 1 | 0.081 | -0.123 | -0.03 | 0.365 | 0.508** | 0.006 | 0.474** | 0.089 | ||
Zn | 1 | 0.905*** | 0.636*** | -0.189 | -0.322 | 0.082 | 0.571*** | 0.119 | |||
As | 1 | 0.757*** | -0.115 | -0.285 | 0.088 | 0.469** | 0.128 | ||||
Cd | 1 | -0.173 | -0.222 | 0.303 | 0.488** | 0.036 | |||||
Cr | 1 | 0.469** | 0.157 | -0.013 | 0.266 | ||||||
pH值 | 1 | 0.036 | 0.008 | -0.133 | |||||||
DO | 1 | -0.068 | -0.399* | ||||||||
NH3-N | 1 | 0.335 | |||||||||
CODCr | 1 |
Table 6 Correlation coefficients between heavy metal elements and conventional monitoring indicators in water bodies of Hanzhong section of Hanjiang River
指标 | Hg | Pb | Cu | Zn | As | Cd | Cr | pH值 | DO | NH3-N | CODCr |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hg | 1 | 0.346 | 0.439* | 0.535** | 0.503** | 0.327 | -0.008 | 0.202 | -0.301 | 0.578*** | 0.238 |
Pb | 1 | -0.089 | 0.918*** | 0.923*** | 0.694*** | -0.063 | -0.295 | 0.271 | 0.520** | 0.031 | |
Cu | 1 | 0.081 | -0.123 | -0.03 | 0.365 | 0.508** | 0.006 | 0.474** | 0.089 | ||
Zn | 1 | 0.905*** | 0.636*** | -0.189 | -0.322 | 0.082 | 0.571*** | 0.119 | |||
As | 1 | 0.757*** | -0.115 | -0.285 | 0.088 | 0.469** | 0.128 | ||||
Cd | 1 | -0.173 | -0.222 | 0.303 | 0.488** | 0.036 | |||||
Cr | 1 | 0.469** | 0.157 | -0.013 | 0.266 | ||||||
pH值 | 1 | 0.036 | 0.008 | -0.133 | |||||||
DO | 1 | -0.068 | -0.399* | ||||||||
NH3-N | 1 | 0.335 | |||||||||
CODCr | 1 |
重金属 | 主成分载荷系数 | |
---|---|---|
F1 | F2 | |
Hg | 0.583 | 0.547 |
Pb | 0.930 | — |
Cu | — | 0.903 |
Zn | 0.949 | — |
As | 0.968 | — |
Cd | 0.808 | — |
Cr | — | 0.640 |
方差贡献率/% | 53.26 | 22.16 |
累积方差贡献率/% | 53.26 | 75.42 |
Table 7 Principal components of heavy metals in water bodies of Hanzhong section of Hanjiang River
重金属 | 主成分载荷系数 | |
---|---|---|
F1 | F2 | |
Hg | 0.583 | 0.547 |
Pb | 0.930 | — |
Cu | — | 0.903 |
Zn | 0.949 | — |
As | 0.968 | — |
Cd | 0.808 | — |
Cr | — | 0.640 |
方差贡献率/% | 53.26 | 22.16 |
累积方差贡献率/% | 53.26 | 75.42 |
[1] | WU Ya-jun, YUE Hao-fan, ZANG Xue-ke, ZHANG Xu-dong, ZHANG Chang-song, WU Jin-hong. Consolidation and Heavy Metal Adsorption-Desorption Characteristics of Soils with Different Clay Contents [J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute, 2025, 42(5): 88-96. |
[2] | XIAO Shang-bin, GONG Zhe, LIU Jia, LI Shi-jian, HE Wen-cheng, ZHU Liang-chen, ZHENG Yi-ge. Source Analysis and Ecological Risk Assessment of Heavy Metals in Sediments of Taojia Lake [J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute, 2025, 42(2): 44-53. |
[3] | WANG Xing-ming, SHEN Jie, FAN Ting-yu, CHU Zhao-xia, DONG Zhong-bing, DONG Peng, LIANG Shu-ying, DENG Rui-lai. Characteristics of Heavy Metal Distribution and Health Risk Assessment in the Inland River Water Environment of Wuhu City [J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute, 2024, 41(9): 44-52. |
[4] | SUN hui, LI Cong-an, QIU Jin-wei. Experimental Study on Remediation of Heavy Metal Contaminated Kaolin by Electrokinetic Geosynthetics Drainage Board [J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute, 2024, 41(2): 123-127. |
[5] | LI Xin-yue, YANG Yan, HONG Chang-hai, ZHI Guo-qiang, YANG Jian, HAN Zhen-yang, WAN Zheng-fen, LU Shao-yong. Spatial and Temporal Distribution Characteristics of Heavy Metals in Surface Sediments of Niulan River (Kunming Section) and Potential Ecological Risk Assessment [J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute, 2024, 41(11): 32-40. |
[6] | XU Tai, E Chong-yi. Enrichment Characteristics and Potential Ecological Risks of Heavy Metalsin Alpine Swamp Meadows Soils in the Southern Piedmont of Qilian Mountains [J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute, 2023, 40(5): 70-76. |
[7] | LIU Ye, WANG Cun-shi, WU Shao-kai, SHEN Wen-tao, XU Jian-bo, BAI Wang-jun, ZHU Jian-zhong. Effects of Electric Field on Migration and Removal of Cd2+ in Sediment of High Moisture Content [J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute, 2023, 40(2): 60-66. |
[8] | LIU Yan, SU Huai, LI Wei-kang, DONG Ming. Diagnosing Cd Pollution Source in Xiaojiang River Valley of Dongchuan in Yunnan Province Based on Element Characteristic Analysis [J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute, 2022, 39(8): 29-33. |
[9] | ZHAO Yu, LI Fang. Characteristics and Risk Assessment of Heavy Metal Pollution in Weinan Segment of Weihe River Basin [J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute, 2022, 39(2): 35-42. |
[10] | WANG Zhen, LIU Min, LIN Li, ZHANG Sheng, PAN Xiong, TAO Jing-xiang. Spatio-temporal Distribution and Pollution Assessment of Heavy Metals in the Middle and Lower Reaches of Hanjiang River [J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute, 2021, 38(9): 40-47. |
[11] | LI Li-hua, LIU Jia-bei, XIAO Heng-lin, PEI Yao-yao, XU Wei-sheng. Environmental Impact of Heavy Metal Leaching from Construction and Demolition Waste Aggregates [J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute, 2021, 38(9): 92-96. |
[12] | LIU Min, DENG Wei, ZHAO Liang-yuan, HU Yuan, HUANG Hua-wei, GAO Fei. Distribution Characteristics and Sources of Heavy Metals in Surface Sediments and Bank Soils of Major Rivers in Source Region of Yangtze River [J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute, 2021, 38(7): 143-149. |
[13] | JIA Bao-jie, HE Shu-fang, HUANG Zhuo, ZHANG Jun-peng. Heavy Metals Pollution Characteristics and Ecological Risk Assessment of Sediments in Anrongjing River in Taizhou City [J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute, 2021, 38(6): 32-36. |
[14] | TANG Hai-bin, DAI Yan-ran, FAN Yao-cheng, LEI Lei, SONG Xiao-yong, CUN De-shou, HAN Jian, LIANG Wei. Typical Pollutants in Waters along the Riverbank of the Yangtze River Middle Mainstream: Species Identification and Source Analysis [J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute, 2021, 38(6): 151-159. |
[15] | LUO De-wen, WANG Ji, FENG Li-shi, PAN Chao-yi, CHANG Sha, CHEN Si-li, XIE Lei, GUO Qing-wei. Influence of Turbidity on Removing Cadmium, Lead and Arsenic in Water [J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute, 2021, 38(3): 39-44. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||