Experimental Study on Hydraulic Characteristics of Trapezoidal Control Gate with Upstream Water Diversion Outlets in Irrigation Area

doi:10.11988/ckyyb.20240028

Abstract

Abstract:

To support precise measurement and control of water volume in irrigation area, this study investigated the influence of diversion outlet on the flow pattern in front of control gate, as well as the variation laws of flow coefficient and head loss of trapezoidal control gate under different slopes and water diversion angles. We observed the flow pattern at diversion outlet and analyzed the causes, and further established the flow formula for trapezoidal control gate by using dimensional analysis method and calculated the head-losses based on 495 groups of discharge tests under different water diversion conditions. The discharge tests involved different gate openings and water heads with three slopes (m=1.5, 1.75, and 2) and five water diversion angles (θ=30°, 45°, 60°, 75°, and 90°). Results revealed that a backwater area was formed in front of the control gate. The coefficient of determination of the flow formula was R²=0.934, and the average relative error of the flow was 2.83%. Relative head loss decreased as the relative opening of the control gate increased. The results demonstrated high accuracy of the proposed flow formula for trapezoidal control gate, which offers a basis for flow measurement in trapezoidal channels in irrigation areas.

Key words: trapezoidal control gate, irrigation channel, water diversion outlet, head loss, flow coefficient, flow formula

CLC Number:

TV131水力理论、计算、实验

LI Lin, LIU Yan, WANG Yan-wen, DAI Wen-hong. Experimental Study on Hydraulic Characteristics of Trapezoidal Control Gate with Upstream Water Diversion Outlets in Irrigation Area[J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute, 2025, 42(4): 112-119.

m	θ/(°)	e/m	H₀/m	Q/(L·s^-1)
	30	0.03~0.07	0.086~0.132	8.60~22.49
	45	0.03~0.07	0.088~0.139	7.70~22.19
1.50	60	0.03~0.07	0.093~0.142	7.88~23.66
	75	0.03~0.07	0.084~0.138	7.25~22.90
	90	0.03~0.07	0.085~0.140	7.33~22.52
	30	0.03~0.07	0.094~0.149	9.55~24.49
	45	0.03~0.07	0.110~0.143	10.18~24.79
1.75	60	0.03~0.07	0.102~0.145	10.79~24.54
	75	0.03~0.07	0.094~0.139	8.09~22.90
	90	0.03~0.07	0.074~0.145	5.19~22.16
	30	0.03~0.07	0.103~0.149	8.89~24.84
	45	0.03~0.07	0.102~0.159	8.65~27.63
2.00	60	0.03~0.07	0.095~0.150	7.41~24.71
	75	0.03~0.07	0.106~0.147	9.61~23.63
	90	0.03~0.07	0.091~0.137	7.28~21.19

m	θ/(°)	e/m	H₀/m	Q/(L·s^-1)
	30	0.03~0.07	0.086~0.132	8.60~22.49
	45	0.03~0.07	0.088~0.139	7.70~22.19
1.50	60	0.03~0.07	0.093~0.142	7.88~23.66
	75	0.03~0.07	0.084~0.138	7.25~22.90
	90	0.03~0.07	0.085~0.140	7.33~22.52
	30	0.03~0.07	0.094~0.149	9.55~24.49
	45	0.03~0.07	0.110~0.143	10.18~24.79
1.75	60	0.03~0.07	0.102~0.145	10.79~24.54
	75	0.03~0.07	0.094~0.139	8.09~22.90
	90	0.03~0.07	0.074~0.145	5.19~22.16
	30	0.03~0.07	0.103~0.149	8.89~24.84
	45	0.03~0.07	0.102~0.159	8.65~27.63
2.00	60	0.03~0.07	0.095~0.150	7.41~24.71
	75	0.03~0.07	0.106~0.147	9.61~23.63
	90	0.03~0.07	0.091~0.137	7.28~21.19

m	e/H₀	不同θ下的e₁/cm
m	e/H₀	30°	45°	60°	75°	90°	30°	45°	60°	75°	90°
1.50	0.33	4	4	4	3	4	5	4	4	1	7
	0.41	5	4	4	5	5	6	3	3	3	5
	0.46	6	5	6	6	6	5	4	3	4	4
	0.51	6	7	6	7	7	4	4	6	5	4
1.75	0.29	3	4	4	3	3	1	7	6	2	3
	0.36	4	5	5	5	4	3	7	6	7	3
	0.44	5	6	6	6	5	2	4	4	6	3
	0.52	7	6	5	7	7	2	1	7	4	3
2.0	0.29	3	3	4	4	3	1	2	6	7	2
	0.37	5	5	5	4	4	7	7	6	1	5
	0.45	6	5	6	6	6	5	3	3	3	5
	0.51	7	7	7	6	7	5	5	2	1	1

m	e/H₀	不同θ下的e₁/cm
m	e/H₀	30°	45°	60°	75°	90°	30°	45°	60°	75°	90°
1.50	0.33	4	4	4	3	4	5	4	4	1	7
	0.41	5	4	4	5	5	6	3	3	3	5
	0.46	6	5	6	6	6	5	4	3	4	4
	0.51	6	7	6	7	7	4	4	6	5	4
1.75	0.29	3	4	4	3	3	1	7	6	2	3
	0.36	4	5	5	5	4	3	7	6	7	3
	0.44	5	6	6	6	5	2	4	4	6	3
	0.52	7	6	5	7	7	2	1	7	4	3
2.0	0.29	3	3	4	4	3	1	2	6	7	2
	0.37	5	5	5	4	4	7	7	6	1	5
	0.45	6	5	6	6	6	5	3	3	3	5
	0.51	7	7	7	6	7	5	5	2	1	1

[1]	DUAN Wen-gang, XING Meng-yuan, HUANG Ming-hai, YANG Jin-bo, SHA Ji-ting. Observation and Analysis of Ice Cover Roughness in the South-to-North Water Diversion Middle Route Project [J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute, 2024, 41(10): 78-85.
[2]	YAN Peng-peng. Hydraulic Characteristics of Spillway of a Labyrinth Weir in Kenya [J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute, 2023, 40(8): 92-96.
[3]	FU Ming-huan, ZHANG Zhi-chang. Head Loss of Hydraulic Jump in Rectangular Open Channel [J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute, 2021, 38(4): 70-74.
[4]	FU Ming-huan, QIAN Jia-huan. Calculating Local Head Loss Coefficient and Sequent Depth ofR-jump in an Abruptly Expanding Stilling Basin [J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute, 2020, 37(5): 79-84.
[5]	YANG Sheng, LI Xiao-qing, GAO Qiang, DENG Ming-song. A Calculation Formula for Flow Coefficient of Type Ⅱ Broken-line Practical Weir [J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute, 2019, 36(7): 61-63.
[6]	LI LEI. Numerical Simulation of Local Head Loss of Gradually Broadened Channel under Different Discharges [J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute, 2018, 35(4): 84-87.
[7]	DUAN Wen-gang, WANG Cai-huan, DU Lan, XUE A-qiang. Research Progress of the Hydraulics at the Inlet of Multi-level Intakeof Large Hydropower Station [J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute, 2013, 30(8): 5-9.
[8]	YAN Xu-feng , YI Zi-jing , LIU Tong-huan , LIU Xing-nian , WANG Xie-kang . Flow Structure and Characteristics of Local Head Loss in Transition Channel [J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute, 2011, 28(9): 1-5.
[9]	ZHAN Lei , DONG Yao-hua , LIU Tong-huan . Preliminary Study on Natures of Flow Structure and Sediment Transport in Right-angled Conjunction of Main and Branch Channels [J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute, 2010, 27(8): 6-11.

Experimental Study on Hydraulic Characteristics of Trapezoidal Control Gate with Upstream Water Diversion Outlets in Irrigation Area

RichHTML

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 11

Related Articles 9

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments