Analysis and Application of Comprehensive Advanced Geological Prediction Technologies for Tunnel of Central Yunnan Water Diversion Project

ZHANG Yang, ZHOU Li-ming, XIA Bo

Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute ›› 2024, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (10) : 124-132.

PDF(3043 KB)
PDF(3043 KB)
Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute ›› 2024, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (10) : 124-132. DOI: 10.11988/ckyyb.20240040

Analysis and Application of Comprehensive Advanced Geological Prediction Technologies for Tunnel of Central Yunnan Water Diversion Project

Author information +
History +

Abstract

During tunnel construction, determining which advanced geological prediction method is most accurate and applicable under varying engineering geological conditions could be quite challenging. Single methods often lack sufficient accuracy and applicability. To address these issues, this paper introduces the principles and characteristics of advanced geological prediction technologies for long-distance tunnels using seismic wave methods and for medium- and short-distance tunnels using electromagnetic methods. We discuss the advantages and disadvantages of different advanced geological prediction methods based on their working principles, methods, and prediction ranges, and outline their most suitable scenarios. We propose a practical, comprehensive advanced geological prediction process, demonstrated through engineering examples from the Dali II section of the Central Yunnan Water Diversion Project. This process combines long-distance TSP method, medium- and short-distance TEM, and GPR to predict adverse geological features such as fault fracture zones and fissure water. Initially, we use long-distance prediction methods to classify the risk levels of geological disasters and identify high-risk sections. Subsequently, short-distance prediction methods more accurately identify and locate adverse geological features. By analyzing the geophysical response characteristics obtained from the three prediction methods, we evaluate the types and spatial distributions of adverse geological bodies. We also present a case study using GPR to detect dissolution, analyzing its wave-field characteristics to infer the physical properties, scale, and spatial distribution of dissolution features. The prediction results align closely with findings from tunnel excavation, validating the reliability of the three advanced geological prediction methods and confirming the practicality of the proposed comprehensive prediction process. This approach provides valuable guidance for geophysical exploration, enhancing the accuracy of geological predictions and ensuring tunnel construction safety.

Key words

advanced geological prediction / Tunnel Seismic Prediction(TSP) / Ground-penetrating radar(GPR) / Transient Electromagnetic Method(TEM) / adverse geological body

Cite this article

Download Citations
ZHANG Yang , ZHOU Li-ming , XIA Bo. Analysis and Application of Comprehensive Advanced Geological Prediction Technologies for Tunnel of Central Yunnan Water Diversion Project[J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute. 2024, 41(10): 124-132 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20240040

References

[1]
席光勇. 深埋特长隧道(洞)施工涌水处理技术研究[D]. 成都: 西南交通大学, 2005.
(XI Guang-yong. Study on Water Inflow Treatment Technology in Deep-buried Extra-long Tunnel (Cave)[D]. Chengdu: Southwest Jiaotong University, 2005. (in Chinese))
[2]
武金博, 周华敏, 张杨, 等. 公路隧洞综合超前地质预报技术及应用[J]. 济南大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 35(2):182-189.
(WU Jin-bo, ZHOU Hua-min, ZHANG Yang, et al. Comprehensive Advanced Geological Prediction Technology and Application of Highway Tunnels[J]. Journal of Jinan University(Natural Science Edition), 2021, 35(2):182-189. (in Chinese))
[3]
DL/T 5783—2019, 水电水利地下工程地质超前预报技术规程[S]. 北京: 中国电力出版社, 2019.
(DL/T 5783—2019, Technical Code of Geological Advanced Prediction of Underground Engineering for Hydropower and Water Resources[S]. Beijing: China Electric Power Press, 2019. (in Chinese))
[4]
LI S, NIE L, LIU B. The Practice of Forward Prospecting of Adverse Geology Applied to Hard Rock TBM Tunnel Construction: The Case of the Songhua River Water Conveyance Project in the Middle of Jilin Province[J]. Engineering, 2018, 4(1): 131-137.
[5]
韩自强, 陈棚, 曹建. 综合超前地质预报技术在断层发育区隧道下穿水库工程建设中的应用[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2021, 36(6): 2702-2711.
(HAN Zi-qiang, CHEN Peng, CAO Jian. Application of Comprehensive Advanced Geological Prediction Technology in Tunnel Penetrating Reservoir Construction in Fault Development Area[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2021, 36(6): 2702-2711. (in Chinese))
[6]
杜俊, 廖健都, 韩成力. 调水工程富水破碎洞段综合超前地质预报技术[J]. raybet体育在线 院报, 2022, 39(12):15-20.
Abstract
为避免或减小隧洞穿越富水破碎岩体发生突涌水、塌方等造成的危害,提出了基于地质分析、隧道地震预报(TSP)法与超前钻探结合的综合超前预报体系。首先通过地质分析对不良地质进行评估,之后利用TSP法对前方不良地质体进行定位,确认有不良地质构造存在,最后利用超前钻探进行预报。滇中引水工程富水破碎洞段的两个工程实例表明,此预报技术可准确地预测不良地质段以及涌水段位置和规模大小,可帮助工程技术人员及时地制定相对应的预警措施和处理对策,从而减少施工过程中突泥、涌水、塌方等地质灾害出现的概率,保证隧洞安全施工。
(DU Jun, LIAO Jian-du,HAN Cheng-li. Comprehensive Advanced Geological Prediction Technology for Water-rich Broken Tunnel Segment of Water Transfer Project[J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2022, 39(12):15-20. (in Chinese))
To mitigate or even avoid water inrush and collapses caused by tunnels crossing water-rich broken rock mass, a comprehensive advanced prediction system based on geological analysis, TSP (tunnel seismic prediction) method and advanced drilling is proposed. The unfavorable geology is evaluated through geological analysis, and then the TSP method is used to locate the unfavorable geological body in front. Subsequently, advanced drilling is used to predict the location and scale of the unfavorable geological structure after it is confirmed. Two engineering examples of the water-rich fractured segment of the Central Yunnan Water Diversion Project demonstrate that the proposed technology could accurately predict the location and scale of unfavorable geology and water inrush. Corresponding early warning measures and countermeasures can be made in time to reduce the probability of geological disasters such as mud inrush, water inrush, and landslides in the construction process and to ensure the safe construction of the tunnel.
[7]
SL 326—2005, 水利水电工程物探规程[S]. 北京: 中国水利水电出版社, 2005.
(SL 326—2005, Code for Engineering Geophysical Exploration of Water Resources and Hydropower[S]. Beijing: China Water & Power Press, 2005. (in Chinese))
[8]
付代光, 周黎明, 肖国强, 等. 滤波频带对TSP预报结果影响分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(增刊2):315-325.
(FU Dai-guang, ZHOU Li-ming, XIAO Guo-qiang, et al. Influence analysis of filter frequency band on TSP prediction results[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2018,39 (Supp.2):315-325. (in Chinese))
[9]
岳全贵, 张杨, 肖国强, 等. 探地雷达的常见干扰和不良地质体的超前预报在隧道工程中的应用[J]. raybet体育在线 院报, 2017, 34(8):36-40,63.
Abstract
为了在隧道工程中准确应用探地雷达进行超前预报,针对可能遇到的常见干扰和典型不良地质体,探讨了常见干扰的成因及其对资料解译的影响,确定常见的干扰剖面图,并分别对天线耦合干扰和金属物干扰进行举例分析,提出探地雷达在采集数据过程中避开干扰的注意事项。列举3个工程实例,分别介绍了探地雷达对溶洞、断层裂隙水、软弱夹层等不良地质体的预报研究,通过分析其典型雷达剖面图的波形、频率、振幅等特征,依此推断出隧道开挖掌子面前方潜在不良地质体的类型以及位置、构造走向等空间分布特征。该结果与实际开挖揭示的不良地质体的分布范围基本一致,验证了探地雷达在预报隧道常见不良地质体的可行性和有效性。通过总结分析常见雷达干扰图像和典型不良地质体剖面图,有助于物探工作者对复杂地质体进行更精确地解释,确保隧道施工安全。
(YUE Quan-gui, ZHANG Yang, XIAO Guo-qiang, et al. Common Interferences of Ground Penetrating Radar and Advanced Prediction of Bad Geological Bodies in Tunnel Engineering[J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2017, 34(8):36- 40, 63. (in Chinese))
In order to apply ground penetrating radar(GPR) to accurate advanced geological prediction in tunnel engineering, we discussed the causes of common interferences and their influences on data interpretation, and determined the reflected interference information in profile of GPR image. Then, we gave examples of the antenna coupling and metal interferences and put forward precautions to avoid interference in the process of collecting GPR data. On the basis of three examples, we introduced the prediction of bad geological bodies such as karst cave, fault fissure water, and weak interlayer. Through analyzing typical characteristics of waveform, frequency and amplitude of the profile, we predicted the type of bad geological body as well as the spatial distribution characteristics like location and structure strike ahead of the working face of the tunnel. The prediction results are basically consistent with the distribution of bad geological bodies revealed by excavation, which proves that GPR is feasible and effective in the prediction of common bad geological bodies. By summarizing and analyzing the common radar interference images and the profiles of GPR images of typical geological bodies, we can provide references of interpreting complex geological bodies more precisely for geophysical workers and ensure the safety of tunnel construction.
[10]
琚建明. 超前地质预报技术在海底隧道施工中的应用[J]. 铁道工程学报, 2007, 24(7): 76-80, 93.
(JU Jian-ming. Application of Technologies of Geological Forecast in Advance in Construction of Submarine Tunnel[J]. Journal of Railway Engineering Society, 2007, 24(7):76- 80, 93. (in Chinese))
[11]
洪庆仁, 吴勇, 卓勇, 等. 综合超前地质预报在大秦岭隧道中的应用[J]. 人民长江, 2017, 48(7): 56-59.
(HONG Qing-ren, WU Yong, ZHUO Yong, et al. Application of Integrated Advance Geological Forecast in Daqinling Tunnel[J]. Yangtze River, 2017, 48(7): 56-59. (in Chinese))
[12]
赵晓博. 隧洞管波对于地震反射波法超前地质预报影响分析[J]. 工程勘察, 2018, 46(11):74-78.
(ZHAO Xiao-bo. Analysis on the Influence of Tunnel Pipe Wave on the Advanced Geological Prediction of Seismic Reflected Wave Method[J]. Engineering Survey, 2018, 46(11):74-78. (in Chinese))
PDF(3043 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/

Baidu
map