A water conflict coordination method based on stakeholder preference is presented to address the contradiction between supply and demand of water resources and the deterioration of water environment. The conflict between the objectives of stakeholders is analyzed to obtain the non-inferior solution set. On this basis, the concepts of equal preference, non-cooperative preference and cooperative preference of stakeholders are introduced to establish the model of water conflict coordination. The coordination solution is obtained, and finally the impact of stakeholder preferences on different water users is analyzed. The model is applied to the Ganjiang-Fuhe River Plain Irrigation Area, and the results show that the model solution based on the non-inferior solution set improves the environmental utility at the cost of economic utility. The coordination solution obtained by the equal preference model and the non-cooperative preference model is similar to that of the cooperative preference model. This suggests that when it is difficult for stakeholders to cooperate, the solution of the equal preference model and the solution of the non-cooperative preference model based on the non-inferior solution set can replace the solution of the cooperative preference model. Compared with traditional decision-making method with the maximum total utility, the presented three preference models pay more attention to environmental utility. The water shortage in Ganjiang-Fuhe River Plain Irrigation Area is mainly shared by agricultural sector because the water consumption of agricultural sector accounts for about 40%, and the sewage discharge accounts for about 30%. To reduce the total sewage discharge, it is necessary to reduce the water consumption of sectors with large sewage discharge, which also indicates the required water-saving amount. The research provides a practical analysis method for water-saving priority and environmental protection.
Key words
water /
conflict coordination method /
equality preference /
non-cooperative preference /
cooperative preference /
Ganjiang-Fuhe River Plain Irrigation Area
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
References
[1] 朱法君. 科学调剂水资源 促进区域协调发展[J]. 中国水利, 2021(11): 19-21.
[2] DONOSO M, BALDASSARRE G, BOEGH E, et al. International Hydrological Programme (IHP) Eighth Phase: Water Security: Responses to Local, Regional and Global Challenges. Strategic Plan, IHP-VIII (2014-2021)[R]. Paris: UNESCO, 2012.
[3] 李国英. 推动新阶段水利高质量发展为全面建设社会主义现代化国家提供水安全保障: 在水利部“三对标、一规划”专项行动总结大会上的讲话[J]. 水利建设与管理, 2021, 41(9): 1-5, 27.
[4] 徐 丹, 付 湘, 谢亨旺, 等. 考虑城市生态环境供水的灌区水资源配置[J]. 中国农村水利水电, 2018(7): 62-64.
[5] 张翔宇, 董增川, 宋瑞明, 等. 黄河流域干流河段水资源调配多目标优化模型[J]. raybet体育在线
院报, 2017, 34(11): 18-22.
[6] 郭 毅, 陈 璐, 周建中, 等. 基于均衡发展的郁江流域水资源优化配置[J]. 水电能源科学, 2020, 38(3): 42-45.
[7] TANG X, HE Y, QI P, et al. A New Multi-objective Optimization Model of Water Resources Considering Fairness and Water Shortage Risk[J]. Water, 2021, 13(19): 2648.
[8] 付 湘, 陆 帆, 胡铁松. 利益相关者的水资源配置博弈[J]. 水利学报, 2016, 47(1): 38-43.
[9] QIN J, FU X, PENG S, et al. Asymmetric Benefit Compensation Model for Resolving Transboundary Water Management Conflicts[J]. Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), 2020, Doi: 10.1007/s11269-020-02639-9.
[10] CHEN Y, LU H, LI J, et al. A Leader-Follower-Interactive Method for Regional Water Resources Management with Considering Multiple Water Demands and Eco-environmental Constraints[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2017, 548: 121-134.
[11] 韩 瑜, 徐海燕, 陈 璐. 基于图模型理论的决策者组合行为冲突分析[J]. 控制与决策, 2022, 37(7): 1894-1902.
[12] COHON J L. Multiobjective Programming and Planning[M]. New York: Academic Press, 1978.
[13] SHAPIRA N, HOUSH M, BROITMAN D. Decision-makers Matter: An Operational Model for Environmental-Economic Conflict Resolution[J]. Environmental Science & Policy, 2019, 98: 77-87.
[14] BERKES F. Evolution of Co-management: Role of Knowledge Generation, Bridging Organizations and Social Learning[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2009, 90(5): 1692-1702.
[15] GHODSI S H, KERACHIAN R, ESTALAKI S M, et al. Developing a Stochastic Conflict Resolution Model for Urban Runoff Quality Management: Application of Info-gap and Bargaining Theories[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2016, 533: 200-212.
[16] LIU D, CHEN X, LOU Z. A Model for the Optimal Allocation of Water Resources in a Saltwater Intrusion Area: A Case Study in Pearl River Delta in China[J]. Water Resources Management, 2010, 24(1): 63-81.
PDF(5780 KB)
