Transverse ecological compensation in river basin is an important means to promote high-quality and green development in the Yangtze River Economic Belt. While transverse compensation within provinces of the Yangtze River Economic Belt has made rapid progress, compensation between provinces in the main stream and tributaries of the Yangtze River has lagged behind. In an attempt to promote the construction of transverse ecological compensation and optimize the paths of transverse ecological compensation among provinces in the Yangtze River Economic Belt, we systematically examine the progress, theoretical and practical challenges facing the ecological compensation system in the Yangtze River Economic Belt. Problems include low awareness among residents, limited scope, single compensation methods, ambiguous standards, and an inadequate supervision and evaluation system system. To address these challenges, we propose that measures should be taken to strengthen institutional support, promote policy, deepen interdepartmental collaboration, establish comprehensive compensation frameworks with multi-party participation, explore market-oriented and diversified compensation methods, and improve the monitoring and post-assessment system.
Key words
Yangtze River Economic Belt /
watershed ecological compensation /
transverse ecological compensation /
comprehensive ecological compensation /
high-quality green development
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
References
[1] ENGEL S,PAGIOLA S,WUNDER S. Designing Payments for Environmental Services in Theory and Practice: An Overview of the Issues[J]. Ecological Economics, 2008, 65(4): 663-674.
[2] 刘 洋, 毕 军. 流域生态补偿理论及其标准研究综述[J]. 水利经济, 2018, 36(3): 10-15, 77.
[3] 张 捷, 傅京燕. 我国流域省际横向生态补偿机制初探: 以九洲江和汀江-韩江流域为例[J]. 中国环境管理, 2016, 8(6): 19-24.
[4] GÓMEZ-BAGGETHUN E, DE GROOT R, LOMAS P L, et al. The History of Ecosystem Services in Economic Theory and Practice: From Early Notions to Markets and Payment Schemes[J]. Ecological Economics, 2010, 69(6): 1209-1218.
[5] 胡振通, 柳 荻, 靳乐山. 草原生态补偿: 生态绩效、收入影响和政策满意度[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2016, 26(1): 165-176.
[6] 蒋毓琪, 陈 珂. 流域生态补偿研究综述[J]. 生态经济, 2016, 32(4): 175-180.
[7] WUNDER S, ENGEL S, PAGIOLA S. Taking Stock: A Comparative Analysis of Payments for Environmental Services Programs in Developed and Developing Countries[J]. Ecological Economics, 2008, 65(4): 834-852.
[8] 龚天平, 刘 潜. 我国生态治理中的国内环境正义问题[J]. 湖北大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2019, 46(6): 14-21, 172.
[9] 龚天平,饶 婷. 经济伦理与美好生活:基于经济运行基本过程的探讨[J]. 伦理学研究,2020(2):94-101.
[10] 付文凤, 姜 海, 房娟娟. 农村水污染治理的农户参与意愿及其影响因素分析[J]. 南京农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2018, 18(4): 119-126, 159.
[11] 沈满洪. 水权交易与政府创新: 以东阳义乌水权交易案为例[J]. 管理世界, 2005(6): 45-56.
[12] 刘桂环,文一惠,谢 婧,等. 界定经济责任, 建立跨省流域生态补偿机制[J]. 环境经济,2017(16):50-53.
[13] 徐劲草,许新宜,王红瑞,等.晋江流域上下游生态补偿机制[J]. 南水北调与水利科技,2012,10(2):57-62.
[14] 彭文英, 滕怀凯. 市场化生态保护补偿的典型模式与机制构建[J]. 改革, 2021(7): 136-145.
[15] 国家发展改革委国土开发与地区经济研究所课题组, 贾若祥, 高国力. 地区间建立横向生态补偿制度研究[J]. 宏观经济研究, 2015(3): 13-23.
[16] 张 捷. 我国流域横向生态补偿机制的制度经济学分析[J]. 中国环境管理, 2017, 9(3): 27-29, 36.
[17] 潘 华, 周小凤. 长江流域横向生态补偿准市场化路径研究: 基于国土治理与产权视角[J]. 生态经济, 2018, 34(9): 179-184.
[18] 冯秀萍. 构建长江经济带横向生态补偿机制的进展与建议[J]. 河北环境工程学院学报,2020,30(6):58-62.
[19] YANG Lun,LIU Mou-cheng,MIN Qing-wen,et al.Transverse Ecocompensation Standards for Water Conservation: A Case Study of the Middle Route Project of South-to-North Water Diversion in China[J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2018, 9(4): 395-406.
[20] 张李啦. 南水北调中线工程横向生态补偿制度研究[D]. 武汉: 湖北工业大学, 2016.
[21] 徐 峰. 健全生态补偿机制 推动生态文明建设: 浙江省流域横向生态补偿的制度实践及对策建议[J]. 财政科学, 2020(2): 111-121, 126.
[22] 于 冰. 多视角下的生态补偿效果研究评述及发展趋势分析[J]. 环境保护, 2018, 46(增刊1): 78-81.
[23] 张化楠,葛颜祥,接玉梅,等.生态认知对流域居民生态补偿参与意愿的影响研究: 基于大汶河的调查数据[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2019, 29(9): 109-116.
[24] 陈 进. 流域横向生态补偿进展及发展趋势[J]. raybet体育在线
院报, 2022, 39(2): 1-6, 20.
PDF(6982 KB)
