Effect of Soil and Water Conservation Measures on Runoff and Sediment Yield from Purple Soil Slopes Under Different Rainfall Patterns

ZHENG Yu, LI Li, DING Wen-feng

Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute ›› 2025, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (6) : 87-93.

PDF(7337 KB)
PDF(7337 KB)
Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute ›› 2025, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (6) : 87-93. DOI: 10.11988/ckyyb.20240348
Soil and Water Conservation and Ecological Restoration

Effect of Soil and Water Conservation Measures on Runoff and Sediment Yield from Purple Soil Slopes Under Different Rainfall Patterns

Author information +
History +

Abstract

[Objective] Previous studies in China on slope erosion characteristics under rainfall patterns have primarily focused on the loess region of Northwest China and red soil region of South China. Research on the purple soil region remains limited. Purple soil is the dominant cultivated soil in the Three Gorges Reservoir Region. Following the reservoir’s construction, substantial cultivated land was submerged, compelling local residents to reclaim more steep slopes for cultivation. This has exacerbated soil erosion issues in this region. Considering both rainfall patterns and land characteristics, this study conducted a comparative analysis of runoff and sediment reduction effects under different soil and water conservation (SWC) measures on purple soil slopes in the reservoir area. Understanding the response characteristics of runoff and sediment yield on purple soil slopes to SWC measures under different rainfall patterns could provide theoretical basis for evaluating the effectiveness of SWC measures in purple soil regions. [Methods] Using runoff and sediment yield data from 37 rainfall events across 10 runoff plots under different SWC measures in purple soil regions, rainfall patterns were classified using K-means clustering based on four indicators: average intensity (Iave), maximum 30-minute intensity (I30), duration (T), and erosivity (Rr). [Results] The results showed that the 37 rainfall events were classified into five patterns: Type I (low erosivity, long intensity, long duration), Type II (medium-low erosivity, medium-low intensity, medium-long duration), Type III (medium erosivity, medium intensity, medium duration), Type IV (medium-high erosivity, medium-high intensity, medium-short duration), and Type V (strong erosivity, high intensity, short duration).. Among these, Type III rainfall was identified as the primary rainfall pattern causing slope soil erosion, with runoff and sediment yields being 1.2-6.4 times and 2.7-19.4 times higher than the other four types. Narrow-terrace cultivation and platform planting exhibited optimal runoff reduction effects under light (Types I-II) and heavy (Types IV-V) rainfall patterns, respectively. [Conclusion] This was primarily because terraces effectively intercepted runoff sediment from low-intensity, small-volume rainfall, whereas under high-volume and high-intensity rainfall, terraces tended to become saturated, and platform fields were more effective in intercepting runoff sediment. Furthermore, the grass strips in forested areas demonstrated optimal runoff reduction effect under Type I rainfall pattern, primarily because the vegetation effectively slowed runoff velocity, enhanced infiltration, and facilitated sediment deposition. These findings provide a basis for further clarifying the relationship between rainfall and runoff sediment in purple soil regions.

Key words

purple soil / rainfall pattern / runoff and sediment yield / soil and water conservation measures / runoff plot

Cite this article

Download Citations
ZHENG Yu , LI Li , DING Wen-feng. Effect of Soil and Water Conservation Measures on Runoff and Sediment Yield from Purple Soil Slopes Under Different Rainfall Patterns[J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute. 2025, 42(6): 87-93 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20240348

References

[1]
YAN Y, JIANG Y, GUO M, et al. Effects of Grain-forage Crop Type and Natural Rainfall Regime on Sloped Runoff and Soil Erosion in the Mollisols Region of NorthEast China[J]. Catena, 2023, 222: 106888.
[2]
FANG N F, SHI Z H, LI L, et al. The Effects of Rainfall Regimes and Land Use Changes on Runoff and Soil Loss in a Small Mountainous Watershed[J]. Catena, 2012, 99: 1-8.
[3]
陈洋, 张海东, 于东升, 等. 南方红壤区植被结构类型与降雨模式对林下水土流失的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2020, 36(5): 150-157.
(CHEN Yang, ZHANG Hai-dong, YU Dong-sheng, et al. Effects of Vegetation Structure Types and Rainfall Patterns on Soil and Water Loss of Understory Vegetation in Red Soil Areas of South China[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2020, 36(5): 150-157. (in Chinese))
[4]
HUANG Z, OUYANG Z, LI F, et al. Response of Runoff and Soil Loss to Reforestation and Rainfall Type in Red Soil Region of Southern China[J]. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2010, 22(11): 1765-1773.
To evaluate the long-term effects of reforestation types on soil erosion on degraded land, vegetation and soil properties under conventional sloping farmland (CSF) and three different reforestation types including a Pinus massoniana secondary forest (PSF), an Eucommia ulmoides artificial economic forest (EEF) and a natural succession type forest (NST), were investigated at runoff plot scale over a six-year period in a red soil region of southern China. One hundred and thirty erosive rainfall events generating runoff in plots were grouped into four rainfall types by means of K-mean clustering method. Erosive rainfall type I is the dominant rainfall type. The amount of runoff and the soil loss under erosive rainfall type III were the most, followed by rain-fall type II, IV and I. Compared with CSF treatment, reforestation treatments decreased the average annual runoff depth and the soil loss by 25.5%-61.8% and 93.9%-96.2% during the study period respectively. Meanwhile, runoff depth at PSF and EEF treatments was significantly lower than that in NST treatment, but no significant difference existed in soil erosion modulus among the three reforestation treatments. This is mainly due to the improved vegetation properties (i.e., vegetation coverage, biomass of above- and below-ground and litter-fall mass) and soil properties (i.e., bulk density, total porosity, infiltration rate and organic carbon content) in the three reforestation treatments compared to CSF treatment. The PSF and EEF are recommended as the preferred reforestation types to control runoff and soil erosion in the red soil region of southern China, with the NST potentially being used as an important supplement.
[5]
ZHAO J, ZHANG J, HU Y, et al. Effects of Land Uses and Rainfall Regimes on Surface Runoff and Sediment Yield in a Nested Watershed of the Loess Plateau,China[J]. Journal of Hydrology:Regional Studies, 2022, 44:101277.
[6]
WEI W, CHEN L, FU B, et al. The Effect of Land Uses and Rainfall Regimes on Runoff and Soil Erosion in the Semi-arid Loess Hilly Area, China[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2007, 335(3/4): 247-258.
[7]
秦伟, 左长清, 晏清洪, 等. 红壤裸露坡地次降雨土壤侵蚀规律[J]. 农业工程学报, 2015, 31(2):124-132.
(QIN Wei, ZUO Chang-qing, YAN Qing-hong, et al. Regularity of Individual Rainfall Soil Erosion in Bare Slope Land of Red Soil[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2015, 31(2): 124-132. (in Chinese))
[8]
DUAN J, YANG J, TANG C, et al. Effects of Rainfall Patterns and Land Cover on the Subsurface Flow Generation of Sloping Ferralsols in Southern China[J]. PLoS One, 2017, 12(8): e0182706.
[9]
邬铃莉, 王云琦, 王晨沣, 等. 降雨类型对北方土石山区坡面土壤侵蚀的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2017, 33(24):157-164.
(WU Ling-li, WANG Yun-qi, WANG Chen-feng, et al. Effect of Rainfall Patterns on Hillslope Soil Erosion in Rocky Mountain Area of North China[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2017, 33(24): 157-164. (in Chinese))
[10]
张黎明, 于东升, 史学正, 等. 不同降雨类型下的南方典型土壤侵蚀量差异研究[J]. 水土保持通报, 2011, 31(4): 1-6.
(ZHANG Li-ming, YU Dong-sheng, SHI Xue-zheng, et al. Soil Loss of Different Typical Soils in South China under Different Rainfall Types[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2011, 31(4): 1-6. (in Chinese))
[11]
任雨之, 郑江坤, 付滟, 等. 不同耕种模式下遂宁组紫色土坡耕地产流产沙特征[J]. 水土保持学报, 2019, 33(2):30-38.
(REN Yu-zhi, ZHENG Jiang-kun, FU Yan, et al. Characteristics of Runoff and Sediment Yield in Purple Soil Sloping Farmland under Different Tillage Patterns in Suining Formation[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2019, 33(2):30-38. (in Chinese))
[12]
马星, 郑江坤, 王文武, 等. 不同雨型下紫色土区坡耕地产流产沙特征[J]. 水土保持学报, 2017, 31(2): 17-21.
(MA Xing, ZHENG Jiang-kun, WANG Wen-wu, et al. Characteristics of the Runoff and Sediment Yield of Sloping Farmland in the Purple Soil Area under Different Rainfall Patterns[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2017, 31(2): 17-21. (in Chinese))
[13]
CHEN H, ZHANG X, ABLA M, et al. Effects of Vegetation and Rainfall Types on Surface Runoff and Soil Erosion on Steep Slopes on the Loess Plateau, China[J]. Catena, 2018, 170: 141-149.
[14]
WEI B, LI Z, DUAN L, et al. Vegetation Types and Rainfall Regimes Impact on Surface Runoff and Soil Erosion over 10 Years in Karst Hillslopes[J]. Catena, 2023, 232: 107443.
[15]
JENSSEN R, ELTOFT T. A New Information Theoretic Analysis of Sum-of-squared-error Kernel Clustering[J]. Neurocomputing, 2008, 72(1/2/3): 23-31.
[16]
YU Y, ZHU R, MA D, et al. Multiple Surface Runoff and Soil Loss Responses by Sandstone Morphologies to Land-use and Precipitation Regimes Changes in the Loess Plateau, China[J]. Catena, 2022, 217: 106477.
[17]
何晓群. 多元统计分析[M]. 2版. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2008.
(HE Xiao-qun. Multivariate Statistical Analysis[M]. 2nd ed. Beijing: China Renmin University Press, 2008. (in Chinese))
[18]
彭浩, 李忠武, 刘春, 等. 湘中低山丘陵区坡面产流输沙对降雨、土壤类型及水保措施的综合响应特征[J]. 水土保持学报, 2019, 33(2):60-67.
(PENG Hao, LI Zhong-wu, LIU Chun, et al. Comprehensive Response Characteristics of Runoff and Sediment Yield on Rainfall, Soil Type and Water Conservation Measures in Hilly Area of Central Hunan Province[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2019, 33(2):60-67. (in Chinese))
[19]
曹媛, 孙鹏, 姚蕊, 等. 不同雨强条件下工程措施对坡地产流产沙影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020, 34(6):1-7.
(CAO Yuan, SUN Peng, YAO Rui, et al. Effects of Engineering Measures on the Runoff and Sediment Yield in Slope Land under Different Rainfall Intensities[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2020, 34(6): 1-7. (in Chinese))
[20]
甘凤玲, 苟俊菲, 刘春红, 等. 草带宽度对紫色土坡面细沟形态及水土流失特征的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022, 36(2):25-32.
(GAN Feng-ling, GOU Jun-fei, LIU Chun-hong, et al. Effect of Grass Strip Width on Rill Morphology and Soil and Water Loss on Purple Soil Slope[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2022, 36(2): 25-32. (in Chinese))
PDF(7337 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/

Baidu
map