Comparison between FFMS Model and HEC-HMS Model Applied in Rainstorm and Flood Simulation

TIAN Jing-huan, FAN Su-qi, WANG Wen-chuan, LIU Chang-jun, ZHANG Qi-yi, ZHAO Xuan-tao, MA Shan

Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute ›› 2021, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (3) : 59-65.

PDF(2543 KB)
PDF(2543 KB)
Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute ›› 2021, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (3) : 59-65. DOI: 10.11988/ckyyb.202008502021
FLOOD PREVENTION AND DISASTER REDUCTION

Comparison between FFMS Model and HEC-HMS Model Applied in Rainstorm and Flood Simulation

  • TIAN Jing-huan1, FAN Su-qi1,2, WANG Wen-chuan1, LIU Chang-jun2, ZHANG Qi-yi2, ZHAO Xuan-tao1, MA Shan2
Author information +
History +

Abstract

In an attempt to overcome the difficulty of forecasting rainstorm flood in small watershed, the forecasting accuracy and applicability of FFMS model and HEC-HMS model were compared. FFMS stands for Flash Flood Module Simulation System, and HEC-HMS represents Hydrologic Engineering Center Hydrological Model System. The relative error of flood peak, the relative error of the peak time, and the Nash coefficient were selected as evaluation criteria for the comparison. Luanchuan and Hancheng watersheds in Henan Province as well as Haojiadian and Lipiyu watersheds in Liaoning Province were taken as case study. Verification results demonstrate that both models are applicable in forecasting storm floods in small watersheds; however, according to the results of the aforementioned three evaluation criteria, the prediction accuracy of FFMS model is better than that of HEC-HMS model. The research finding proves the validity and feasibility of FFMS model in rainstorm and flood forecasting in small watersheds of hilly areas, and can be popularized and applied in similar hilly areas.

Key words

flood forecasting / FFMS model / HEC-HMS model / small watershed in hilly area / forecasting accuracy

Cite this article

Download Citations
TIAN Jing-huan, FAN Su-qi, WANG Wen-chuan, LIU Chang-jun, ZHANG Qi-yi, ZHAO Xuan-tao, MA Shan. Comparison between FFMS Model and HEC-HMS Model Applied in Rainstorm and Flood Simulation[J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute. 2021, 38(3): 59-65 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.202008502021

References

[1] 张平仓,任红玉,胡维忠,等.中国山洪灾害防治区划初探[J].水土保持学报,2006,(6):196-200.
[2] 张志彤.山洪灾害防治措施与成效[J].水利水电技术,2016, 47 (1):1-5.
[3] 钱 群.中国西部湿润山区小流域水文响应过程:以四川龙溪河流域为例[D].杭州:浙江大学,2014.
[4] BLOSCHL G, RESZLER C, KOMMA J, et al. A Spatially Distributed Flash Flood Forecasting model[J]. Envronmental Modeling & Software, 2008, 23(4): 464-478.
[5] BRAUD I, ROUX H, ANQUETIN S, et al. The Use of Distributed Hydrological Models for the Gard 2002 Flash Flood Event: Analysis of Associated Hydrological Processes[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2010, 394(1/2): 162-181.
[6] 王 璐, 叶 磊. 山丘区小流域水文模型适用性研究[J]. 中国农村水利水电, 2018(2): 78-84.
[7] 郭 良, 唐学哲, 孔凡哲. 基于分布式水文模型的山洪灾害预警预报系统研究及应用[J]. 中国水利, 2007(14): 38-41.
[8] 李华威,万 庆.小流域山洪灾害危险性分析之降雨指标选取的初步研究[J].地球信息科学学报,2017,19(3):425-435.
[9] 练继建, 杨伟超. 山洪灾害预警研究进展与展望[J]. 水力发电学报, 2018, 37(11): 1-14.
[10] 刘昌军. 基于人工智能和大数据驱动的新一代水文模型及其在洪水预报预警中应用.[J]. 中国防汛抗旱,2019, 29(5):11-12.
[11] 袁立婷. 基于HEC-HMS水文模型的细河流域山洪预报预警研究[D].沈阳:辽宁师范大学.2019.
[12] 高玉琴,张泽宇,赖丽娟, 等.参数变化对HEC-HMS模型流域洪水模拟结果的影响[J].raybet体育在线 院报,2019,36(6):26-30.
[13] US Army Corps of Engineers. Flood-runoff Analysis[M]. Washington DC: Military Bookshop, 1994.
[14] HAWKINS R H. Runoff Curve Number with Varying Site Moisture[J]. Joural of the Irrigation and Draunage Division, 1978, 104(4): 389-398.
[15] BEDIENT P B, HUBER W C, VIEUX B E, et al. Hydrology and Floodplain Analysis[M]. Edition 5. Boston: Pearson Publishing, 2019.
[16] 雍 斌, 张万昌, 赵登忠, 等.HEC-HMS水文模型系统在汉江褒河流域的应用研究[J].水土保持通报,2006(3):86-90.
[17] 刘昌军, 文 磊, 周 剑, 等.小流域暴雨山洪水文模型与水动力学方法计算比较分析[J].中国水利水电科学研究院学报,2019,17(4):262-270.
[18] 马美红, 何秉顺, 郭 良, 等. 2012年我国山洪灾害特点及问题[J].中国防汛抗旱,2014,24(2):15-18.
[19] 覃金帛, 曾志强, 梁 籍, 等. GPU并行优化技术在水利计算中的应用综述[J]. 计算机工程与应用,2018,54(3):23-29.
[20] LAI W, OGDEN F L, STEINKE R C, et al. An Efficient and Guaranteed Stable Numerical Method for Continuous Modeling of Infiltration and Redistribution with a Shallow Dynamic Water Table[J]. Water Resources Research, 2015, 51(3): 1514-1528.
[21] BROOKS R H, COREY A T. Hydraulic Properties of Porous Media and Their Relation to Drainage Design[M]. Fort Collins: Colorado State University, 1964.
[22] VAN GENUCHTEN M T. A Closed-form Equation for Predicting the Hydraulic Conductivity of Unsaturated Soils[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1980, 44(5):892-898.
[23] PHILIP J R, KNIGHT J H. On Solving the Unsaturated Flow Equation: New Quasi-analytical Technique[J]. Soil Science, 1974, 117(1):1-13.
PDF(2543 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/

Baidu
map