In this article, strength reduction method was employed to investigate the stability of slope reinforced in shallow surface. Moreover, the influences of reinforcement width, cohesion of reinforced soil, reinforcement depth (the depth of reinforcement area penetrating into foundation), and geometric parameters of slope on the stability and slip surface of slope were analyzed in the presence of soil foundation (the same material with slope soil) and rock foundation, respectively. Results showed that in the presence of soil foundation, the safety coefficient declined and then increased with the increasing of cohesion regardless of reinforcement width, and then remained stable once cohesion reached a critical value. With the increase of soil cohesion in the reinforced zone, the failure surface of slope moved from shallow surface to deep layer and then passed beyond the reinforced zone lastly. In this sense, increasing the depth of reinforced zone in the foundation could help enhance the stability. On the other hand, in the presence of rock foundation, the safety coefficient declined and then increased linearly in general with the increase of reinforced soil cohesion. With the same geometric parameters and soil material of slope, the safety coefficient was 0.5-1 times that of slope with soil foundation. As cohesion in reinforced zone increased, which means shear strength increased, the safety coefficient improved correspondingly.
Key words
shallow reinforcement on slope surface /
stability analysis /
strength reduction method /
width of reinforced zone /
cohesion of soil /
geometric parameters of slope
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
References
[1] BISHOP A W. The Use of the Slip Circle in the Stability Analysis of Slopes[J]. Geotechnique, 1955, 5(1): 7-17.
[2] 包承纲, 丁金华, 汪明元. 极限平衡理论在加筋土结构设计中应用的评述[J]. raybet体育在线
院报, 2014, 31(3): 1-10.
[3] DONALD I, CHEN Z Y. Slope Stability Analysis by the Upper Bound Approach: Fundamentals and Methods[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1997,34 (6): 853-862.
[4] 陈祖煜. 土质边坡稳定分析:原理·方法·程序[M]. 北京:中国水利水电出版社, 2003.
[5] ZIEKIEWICZ O C, HUMPHESON C, LEWIS R W. Associated and Non-associated Visco-plasticity and Plasticity in Soil Mechanics[J]. Geotechnique, 1975, 25(4): 671-689.
[6] DAWSON E M, ROTH W H, DRESCHER A. Slope Stability Analysis by Strength Reduction[J]. Geotechnique, 1999, (6): 835-840.
[7] 赵尚毅, 郑颖人, 王建华, 等. 基于强度折减安全系数的边坡岩土侧压力计算方法探讨[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2010, 29(9): 1760-1766.
[8] 张坤勇, 杜 伟, 李广山, 等. 土质边坡归一化变形量失稳判据研究[J]. raybet体育在线
院报, 2017, 34(6): 1-7.
[9] KOERNER R M. Designing with Geosynthetics[M]. New Jersy: Prentice-Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, 1990.
[10]杨亚川, 莫永京, 王之芳, 等. 土壤-草本植被根系复合体抗水蚀强度与抗剪强度的试验研究[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 1996, 1(2): 31-38.
[11]肖成志, 孙建诚, 刘熙媛, 等. 三维土工网垫植草护坡性能试验[J]. 重庆大学学报, 2010, 33(8): 96-102.
[12]高政国, 刘思海, 黄 新. 基于强度折减法的边坡滑动破坏分析[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2013, 9(增1): 1531-1535.
[13]FIPPIN J A, WRIGHT S G. Charts for Remediation of Highly Plastic Clay Embankments in Texas[R]. Austin: Department of Transportation, Texas, 1999.
PDF(2096 KB)
