PDF(6910 KB)
Assessment of Water Resources Carrying Capacity Based on Principal Component Analysis and System Dynamics: A Case Study of Qingyang City
WANG Qian, YUAN Bo, WU Jian, LIU Wen-shi, WU Yan
Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute ›› 2025, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (6) : 51-59.
PDF(6910 KB)
PDF(6910 KB)
Assessment of Water Resources Carrying Capacity Based on Principal Component Analysis and System Dynamics: A Case Study of Qingyang City
[Objectives] This study aims to overcome the limitations of traditional static evaluation methods by developing a multidimensional assessment framework for water resource carrying capacity with spatiotemporal continuity. It seeks to reveal the evolution patterns of regional water resources carrying capacity and propose optimized regulation schemes. [Methods] A dynamic-static analytical framework combining principal component analysis (PCA) and system dynamics (SD) modeling was applied, with Qingyang City in Gansu Province—an area relatively short on water resources—as the study area. First, using data from 21 indicators from 2012 to 2022, PCA was used to extract principal components (cumulative variance contribution rate >85%) to establish a comprehensive evaluation system for water resources carrying capacity and identify key influencing factors. Subsequently, a complex dynamic model of water resources system was established by dividing the system into socioeconomic, water supply-demand, and ecological subsystems. The dynamic changes in water supply and demand under different development scenarios were simulated. Four optimization schemes were designed: status quo development (baseline), water-saving, wastewater treatment, and integrated coordinated development. Their optimization effects on regional water resources carrying capacity were evaluated from the perspectives of water demand control, water supply efficiency improvement, and coordinated governance. [Results] (1) The water resources carrying capacity of Qingyang City significantly declined, with an annual average decrease rate of 18.78% from 2015 to 2022. PCA revealed that socioeconomic development (population growth rate, GDP per capita), water resource allocation efficiency (crude oil processing volume, water resources per capita), and ecological development level (green coverage rate in built-up areas) were the key driving factors, contributing 35.2%, 28.6%, and 19.3% to the principal component loadings, respectively. (2) Dynamic simulations showed that under the status quo development scheme (scheme 1), water shortage in 2035 increased by 47.8% compared to the baseline year (2012), with a supply-demand gap expanding to 123 million m3. The water-saving scheme (scheme 2) reduced the shortage by 11.9% through improved reuse rates, but due to the inflexible growth in water demand, the imbalance remained significant. The wastewater treatment scheme (scheme 3) reduced water shortage by 15.1% by increasing reuse rate to 55%, demonstrating a 3.2-percentage-point greater improvement compared to scheme 2. The integrated coordinated development scheme (scheme 4) implemented a synergistic “water-saving and pollution-control” strategy, optimizing demand-side control (improving industrial water-saving and agricultural irrigation efficiency) and enhancing supply-side circulation (wastewater reuse rate at 60%). This ultimately reduced the water shortage in 2035 by 16.7% compared to scheme 1, lowered total water demand by 19.4%, and narrowed the supply-demand gap to 51 million m3. [Conclusions] This study innovatively establishes an analytical paradigm integrating “historical diagnosis, dynamic early warning, and strategy optimization.” The degradation of water resources carrying capacity in oil and gas resource-based cities is essentially a manifestation of the imbalance between energy development, economic growth, and ecological protection. An integrated development strategy that includes water-saving, pollution control, and economic adjustments proves effective in alleviating water resource pressure through dual supply-demand adjustments. Future water management in Qingyang City requires curbing its current development trends promptly and regulating key guiding factors. Among the four projected schemes, the integrated coordinated development scheme performs optimally.
water resources carrying capacity / evaluation system / dynamic and static evaluation method / principal component analysis / system dynamics / water resources regulation / Qingyang City
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
张礼兵, 胡亚南, 金菊良, 等. 基于系统动力学的巢湖流域水资源承载力动态预测与调控[J]. 湖泊科学, 2021, 33(1): 242-254.
(
|
| [6] |
宋世强, 冯倩, 王萍根, 等. 基于系统动力学模型的江西省水资源承载力评价[J]. 人民珠江, 2023, 44(3): 74-83.
(
|
| [7] |
王茂吉. 广安市水资源承载力与城镇化质量耦合协调性研究[D]. 重庆: 重庆大学, 2021.
(
|
| [8] |
左其亭. 水资源承载力研究方法总结与再思考[J]. 水利水电科技进展, 2017, 37(3): 1-6.
(
|
| [9] |
李依, 杨艳昭, 闫慧敏, 等. 水资源承载力的研究方法:进展与展望[J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology. 2018, 9(5): 455-460.
The study of water resources carrying capacity (WRCC), a major component of resources and environment carrying capacity (RECC), began relatively recently. However, WRCC has witnessed a rapid development in terms of concept, calculation methods, and empirical research in recent years. WRCC has become an important criterion for rational development and utilization of regional water resources. This paper first briefly reviews the development process of WRCC. It then evaluates and contrasts the representative research methods of conventional trend (CT), system dynamics (SD), multi-objective model analysis (MOMA), comprehensive evaluation (CE), and dynamic simulation recursive (DSR). The results show that although there are various methods of WRCC, the major methods used have become out-of-date and stagnant, and new more sophisticated methods and technologies are lacking. Specifically, our analysis found that the index system, scientific robustness and comprehensiveness of evaluation criteria of current research methods are insufficient and need to be improved. In addition, the dynamic research of WRCC should receive more attention, and it requires further study to make it more applicable to real-world uses. Finally, a set of monitoring and early warning systems should be established and applied in demonstration areas to meet the urgent needs of water resource management in the new era.
(
The study of water resources carrying capacity (WRCC), a major component of resources and environment carrying capacity (RECC), began relatively recently. However, WRCC has witnessed a rapid development in terms of concept, calculation methods, and empirical research in recent years. WRCC has become an important criterion for rational development and utilization of regional water resources. This paper first briefly reviews the development process of WRCC. It then evaluates and contrasts the representative research methods of conventional trend (CT), system dynamics (SD), multi-objective model analysis (MOMA), comprehensive evaluation (CE), and dynamic simulation recursive (DSR). The results show that although there are various methods of WRCC, the major methods used have become out-of-date and stagnant, and new more sophisticated methods and technologies are lacking. Specifically, our analysis found that the index system, scientific robustness and comprehensiveness of evaluation criteria of current research methods are insufficient and need to be improved. In addition, the dynamic research of WRCC should receive more attention, and it requires further study to make it more applicable to real-world uses. Finally, a set of monitoring and early warning systems should be established and applied in demonstration areas to meet the urgent needs of water resource management in the new era.
|
| [10] |
任波. 水资源承载力多模型耦合评价及时空分析方法研究[D]. 武汉: 华中科技大学, 2023.
(
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
高玉琴, 吴迪, 刘海瑞, 等. 城市化影响下区域水资源承载力评价[J]. 水利水电科技进展, 2022, 42(3): 1-8.
(
|
| [13] |
杨光明, 时岩钧, 杨航, 等. 基于系统动力学的水资源承载力可持续发展评估:以重庆市为例[J]. 人民长江, 2019, 50(8):6-13.
(
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
孙即才. 中国西部油气资源开发生态补偿机制建设的对策研究[J]. 中国矿业, 2019(12): 23-27.
(
|
| [17] |
许程程. 甘肃省水资源承载力评价研究[D]. 兰州: 兰州财经大学, 2021.
(
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
张启森, 桂琳, 罗玲, 等. 北京消费者对B2C电商配套服务满意度研究:基于主成分分析法[J]. 物流科技, 2018, 41(8): 47-51.
(
|
| [20] |
高策. 基于聚类-主成分分析法的储气库站场设备风险评价研究[D]. 北京: 中国石油大学(北京), 2020.
|
| [21] |
柴乃杰, 贾鼎元, 曾小雪. 水资源承载力的灰色模糊可变决策模型及应用[J]. 北京:水资源与水工程学报, 2020, 31(1): 70-76.
(
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
于昊含. 水资源现状与开发潜力分析:以固原市降水资源为例[D]. 银川: 宁夏大学, 2021.
(
|
| [24] |
黄垒, 张礼中, 朱吉祥, 等. 河南省水资源承载力时空特征分析[J]. 南水北调与水利科技, 2019, 17(1):54-60.
(
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
赵磊, 王立权, 戴长雷, 等. 基于DPSIRM模型的太原市水资源承载力研究[J]. 水资源与水工程学报, 2021, 32(2):109-115.
(
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
王炳龙, 蔡宴朋, 李春晖. 基于区间分析的鄂尔多斯市水资源承载力研究[J]. 人民黄河, 2017, 39(3): 55-60.
(
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |