PDF(7513 KB)
Staging of Flood Season for Danjiangkou Reservoir Considering Characteristics of Plum Rain and West China Autumn Rainfall
WANG Xiao-ya, GUO Sheng-lian, WANG Jun, SHI Yi-jun, DONG Fu-qiang, YANG Hai-cong
Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute ›› 2025, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (8) : 68-75.
PDF(7513 KB)
PDF(7513 KB)
Staging of Flood Season for Danjiangkou Reservoir Considering Characteristics of Plum Rain and West China Autumn Rainfall
[Objective] Danjiangkou Reservoir is a core project of the flood control system in the Hanjiang River Basin and a strategic water source for the Middle Route of the South-to-North Water Diversion Project, and its flood season staging schemes directly affect its flood control safety and inter-basin water transfer efficiency. Since its operation, Danjiangkou Reservoir has maintained an annual full storage rate of only 11%. How to improve this rate while ensuring flood safety remains an urgent issue. Existing research on flood season staging mainly focuses on statistical methods, with insufficient attention to the temporal characteristics of typical rainy seasons such as the plum rainy season in the middle-lower Yangtze River and the autumn rainfall in West China. This study aims to provide a theoretical basis and technical support for the operation and management of Danjiangkou Reservoir. [Methods] Based on daily inflow data of Danjiangkou Reservoir from 1961 to 2023, this study conducted preliminary flood season staging analysis using runoff statistical analysis, annual maximum flood analysis, mean change-point analysis, and vector statistical methods. [Results] The results obtained from different methods were relatively consistent. For safety reasons, the flood season was preliminarily divided into three stages. A further comprehensive analysis integrating the temporal patterns of the plum rain and West China autumn rainfall was conducted. The results showed that both exhibited significant temporal and periodic characteristics. From 1951 to 2023, the plum rain in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River began as early as May 25 and ended as late as August 8. From 1961 to 2023, autumn rainfall in West China began as early as August 21 and lasted until November 30. During the plum rain period, when water levels in the middle-lower Hanjiang River were relatively high, any coincidental occurrence between floods from Danjiangkou and downstream floods may trigger flooding in the Hanjiang River Basin. After the plum rainy season ended, the flood control pressure in the middle-lower Hanjiang River decreased, allowing the Danjiangkou Reservoir to gradually release reserved flood control storage capacity. The autumn rainfall in West China started in late August in Sichuan and gradually moved eastward toward the Qinling Mountains, aligning with the autumn flood season. The autumn rainfall in West China directly affected Danjiangkou Reservoir’s storage conditions. During flood events, reservoir regulation must balance flood safety with increasing the full storage rate to fully utilize flood resources. In full consideration of both the plum rain and West China autumn rainfall, the flood season of Danjiangkou Reservoir was ultimately divided into three stages: summer flood season from June 21 to August 10, transition period from August 11 to August 31, and autumn flood season from September 1 to October 10. [Conclusion] Based on meteorological forecasts of end dates of plum rain and West China autumn rainfall, the flood limit water level for the summer flood season can be gradually raised to the level of the autumn flood season. This approach enables early water storage and improves both water resource utilization efficiency and the reservoir’s full storage rate. The research findings provide a theoretical basis for operation and scheduling decisions for Danjiangkou Reservoir.
Danjiangkou Reservoir / flood season staging / plum rain in middle-lower Yangtze River / autumn rainfall in West China
| [1] |
唐莉, 张永波, 祝雪萍, 等. 基于PCA-Fisher最优分割法的汛期分期影响研究[J]. 水力发电, 2018, 44(1): 13-16, 76.
(
|
| [2] |
张冬冬, 王立海, 李妍清, 等. 多方法集成的三峡水库洪水分期研究[J]. 人民长江, 2022, 53(1): 18-24.
(
|
| [3] |
刘攀, 郭生练, 方彬, 等. 汛期分期变点分析方法的原理及验证[J]. raybet体育在线
院报, 2006, 23(6): 27-31.
目前常用的汛期分期方法存在一定的主观性，划分汛期也不够精确，为此提出了用于汛期分期计算的3种变点分析模型：基于日最大值取样的均值变点分析模型、基于超定量取样的概率变点分析模型以及基于年最大值取样的概率变点分析模型。应用统计试验方法对这3种汛期分期模型进行效率评价与比较，结果表明：3种方法都可以客观、精确地进行汛期分期计算，在一定程度上避免了分期中的主观随意性；其中以基于超定量取样的概率变点分析模型具有较好的无偏性和有效性，最适宜在汛期分期计算中应用。
(
Since at present the methods of flood season-ality determination are subjective and inaccurate, this paper focuses on comparing and evaluating three models for determination of flood seasonality. The change point analysis theory is used to divide the flood period into several segmentations through three different sampling methods, which include daily maximal (DM), annual maximal (AM) and the peaks-over-threshold (POT) models. Monte Carlo experiments show that the change point analysis is an objective method and can obtain rational and accurate flood seasonality. Its also shown that change point analysis with the POT sampling method can obtain best effect with the least bias and highest efficiency among these models.
|
| [4] |
谢国琴. 干旱区水库防洪风险分析研究[D]. 石河子: 石河子大学, 2006.
(
|
| [5] |
蒋海艳, 莫崇勋, 韦逗逗, 等. 水库汛期分期研究综述[J]. 水利水电科技进展, 2012, 32(3): 75-80.
(
|
| [6] |
郭生练, 刘章君, 熊立华. 设计洪水计算方法研究进展与评价[J]. 水利学报, 2016, 47(3): 302-314.
(
|
| [7] |
冯平, 徐向广, 李海. 基于模糊集合分析的汛期分期方法及其应用[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(3): 495-499.
(
|
| [8] |
侯玉, 吴伯贤, 郑国权. 分形理论用于洪水分期的初步探讨[J]. 水科学进展, 1999, 10(2): 140-143.
(
|
| [9] |
刘攀, 郭生练, 王才君, 等. 三峡水库汛期分期的变点分析方法研究[J]. 水文, 2005, 25(1): 18-23.
(
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
余玉聪, 李雯晴, 刘招, 等. 金沙江下游梯级水库汛期分期及汛限水位合理性研究[J]. raybet体育在线
院报, 2020, 37(9): 39-44.
汛期分期以及分期汛限水位的合理确定,能够较好地协调水库防洪效益与发电效益之间的矛盾,对充分发挥水库的防洪、发电能力,以及提高汛期洪水资源利用率具有重要意义。基于改进的模糊集分析方法并依据金沙江下游乌东德、白鹤滩、溪洛渡、向家坝4个梯级水库入库洪水对其汛期进行分期,通过隶属度与防洪库容的映射关系确定梯级水库分期汛限水位,提出利用跨期选样法对分期结果及汛限水位进行修正。研究结果表明:金沙江下游梯级水库前汛期为6月1日—7月14日,主汛期为7月15日—9月16日,后汛期为9月17日—10月24日,4个梯级水库合理汛限水位分别为962,800,575,374 m。通过不同典型洪水放大的洪水过程检验了分期汛限水位的合理性。研究得到的金沙江下游梯级分期结果及各库分期汛限水位,均能够在满足防洪安全的前提下提高水库发电等经济效益,在一定程度上提高了汛期洪水资源的利用率。
(
Determining flood season stages and corresponding water levels in flood season stages rationally could help coordinate the contradiction between flood control benefit and power generation benefit of reservoirs, and is also of great significance to give full play to flood control and power generation capacity of reservoirs and improve the utilization rate of flood resources in flood season. In this paper, the flood season of cascade reservoirs(Wudongde,Baihetan,Xiluodu,and Xiangjiaba) in the lower reaches of Jinsha River is divided into stages according to the incoming flood using the improved fuzzy set analysis method, and the staged limit water level of cascade reservoirs is determined through the mapping relationship between membership degree and flood control capacity. The stages and corresponding limit flood levels are revised with intertemporal sampling method. Research results reveal that the pre-flood season of cascade reservoirs in the lower reaches of Jinsha River is July 1-July 14, main flood season July 15-September 16, and post-flood season September 17-October 24. The reasonable limit flood level for the four reservoirs is 962 m, 800 m, 575 m and 374 m, respectively. The staged limit flood levels are verified through the flood process of different typical floods. The staging results obtained in this study and the phased limit flood level of each reservoir could improve the economic benefits of reservoirs' power generation under the premise of flood control safety, and enhance the utilization rate of flood resources in flood season.
|
| [12] |
李娜, 郭生练, 王俊, 等. 长江中下游梅雨与三峡水库入库洪水遭遇规律分析[J]. 人民长江, 2022, 53(3): 44-49.
(
|
| [13] |
梁萍, 周兵, 马悦, 等. 2017年秋季华西秋雨的多时间尺度变化特征及成因分析[J]. 气象, 2019, 45(8): 1104-1112.
(
|
| [14] |
郭生练, 李娜, 王俊, 等. 华西秋雨与梅雨对三峡水库蓄水调度影响分析[J]. 人民长江, 2023, 54(7): 69-74.
(
|
| [15] |
高琦, 吴翠红, 徐明, 等. 2021年汉江秋汛的水雨情及环流异常特征研究[J]. 气象, 2023, 49(7): 868-880.
(
|
| [16] |
罗霄, 李栋梁, 王慧. 华西秋雨演变的新特征及其对大气环流的响应[J]. 高原气象, 2013, 32(4): 1019-1031.
华西（21°N-39°N， 95°E-114°E）秋雨是中国秋季主要的气候特征之一， 长时间连续降水对农作物生产带来不利影响。基于1961-2010年华西地区166个气象站逐日降水资料， 综合降水量与降水日数两个因子定义了华西秋雨指数， 采用EOF分析、 小波分析等方法分析了该指数的演变和时空异常分布特征， 以及秋雨异常分布型的大气环流背景。结果表明， 华西秋雨有南北两个极大值中心， 强度和范围在近50年中存在明显的年代际变化， 进入21世纪， 其北部秋雨区位置偏北、 范围增大及强度增强； 主要异常型为秋雨区东北东和西南西之间的反相变化和总体基本一致型； 秋季， 当东亚副热带西风急流中心西移， 中心强风速带偏窄时， 华西北部的上升运动加强， 同时西太平洋副热带高压偏北、 印缅槽偏深及水汽输送偏强偏北， 有利于北部水汽辐合， 华西秋雨出现北多西南少的异常型; 反之亦然。
(
The autumn rainfall in West China （21°N-39°N， 95°E-114°E） is one of the main climatic characteristics in the autumn, and the prolonged and continuous rainfall is detrimental to crop production. The daily precipitation data at 166 station in West China during 1961-2010 was used to define IAR ( Index of autumn rainfall), which takes the both precipitation and rainy days into consideration. The interdecadal variation and the temporal and spatial distribution characteristics of IAR was analysed with EOF & wavelet method, and the atmospheric circulations was also studied. The results show that: There are maximum IAR centers in both the northern and southern area, with an obvious interdecadal variation in its intensity and range during the last 50 years. The northern part of it gets northward and stronger, and the range increases. The main anomalous type of IAR indicates a ‘northeast-north and west-southwest reversal pattern’ and a ‘consisitent pattern on the whole’. When the axis of the climatological subtropical westerly jet gets stronger and migrates westward, the subtropical high migrates westward and northward, and Indian-Myanmar trough gets deeper in the autumn, both the ascending flows and northward vapor transportation strengthens, which contributes to the pattern of more rainfall in the north and less in the southwest part.
|
| [17] |
李丹, 郭生练, 尹家波. 变参数PDS/GP模型及其在洪水频率分析中的应用[J]. 水利学报, 2016, 47(10): 1269-1276.
(
|
| [18] |
冯尚友, 余敷秋. 丹江口水库汛期划分的研究和实践效果[J]. 水利水电技术, 1982, 13(2): 56-61.
(
|
| [19] |
郭生练, 汪芸, 周研来, 等. 丹江口水库洪水资源调控技术研究[J]. 水资源研究, 2015(1): 1-8.
(
|
| [20] |
薄会娟. 三峡水库汛期分期及汛限水位动态控制研究[D]. 宜昌: 三峡大学, 2011.
(
|
| [21] |
符淙斌, 王强. 气候突变的定义和检测方法[J]. 大气科学, 1992, 16(4): 482-493.
(
|
| [22] |
陈华, 郭生练, 郭海晋, 等. 汉江流域1951—2003年降水气温时空变化趋势分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(3):340-345.
(
|
| [23] |
李一诺, 李跃清. 近20年华西秋雨演变特征及其异常机理的进展[J]. 高原气象, 2024, 43(1): 1-15.
华西秋雨是中国西部地区出现的独特而复杂的秋季降水现象， 与经济社会和国民生活息息相关。本文在20世纪以来对华西秋雨认识的基础上， 从多角度对比回顾了近20年来关于华西秋雨研究的主要成果。首先， 明确了华西秋雨的时空范围、 降水强度， 提出了表征其基本特征的量化标准和指数， 揭示了华西秋雨显著的年际差异、 “正-负-正”年代际变化和4~8年的周期循环； 其次， 指出了低中高纬度大气环流系统、 热带海温强迫、 青藏高原作用等对华西秋雨的不同重要影响， 进而得到了多系统、 多因子协同作用对华西秋雨异常演变的重要意义， 丰富了华西秋雨异常演变认识； 最后， 针对华西秋雨现状， 指出了不同季风、 冷暖气流、 演变成因、 天气过程、 夜雨特征、 区域响应等方面存在的主要问题， 并展望了青藏高原大地形下， 华西秋雨多尺度协同作用及其物理机制的综合、 精细分析研究等未来主要发展趋势。
(
Autumn rain in western China is a unique and complex precipitation phenomenon that takes place during the autumn season in the western region of China， which is closely related to various aspects of economy， society and human life.This natural phenomenon has a profound impact on agriculture， transportation and other aspects of social production and life， sometimes even causes the phenomenon of autumn flood， which deserves full attention.Based on the basic understanding of the phenomenon in the 20th century， this paper compares and reviews the main research achievements of autumn rain in western China over the past 20 years from multiple perspectives.First of all， the spatial distribution range and temporal extent and precipitation intensity of autumn rain in West China are thoroughly explored， quantitative criteria and indexes such as ARI （Autumn Rain Index）， DARI （Daily Autumn Rain Index） and MARI （Modified Autumn Rain Index）are also proposed.In addition to this， the significant interannual differences， the "positive - negative - positive" interdecadal variations and the 4~8 years cycle of autumn rain in western China fully demonstrate its complexity and inhomogeneity.Secondly， the different but important influences of atmospheric circulation systems at low， middle， and high latitudes， tropical sea temperature forcing including Pacific Ocean， Indian Ocean， and Atlantic Ocean as well as the Qinghai-Xizang （Tibet） Plateau effect and other aspects on the autumn rain in western China are pointed out.These different factors all play significant roles in the evolution of the phenomenon， but the mechanisms are different.This leads to the recognition of the significance of the multi-system and multi-factor synergistic effect on the anomalous evolution of autumn rain in western China， which enriches the understanding of the autumn rain and its impact.Finally， according to the current cognition of autumn rain in western China， the main problems that exist in the combination of different monsoon systems like Indian monsoon， East Asian monsoon and Plateau monsoon， cold and warm air currents， evolution causes， weather processes， night rain characteristics， regional responses to the global warming and other aspects are pointed out.These problems highlight the challenges that researchers face in studying this complex phenomenon.However， despite the challenges， there are several promising areas for future research.The main development trend in the future about the research of autumn rain in western China is the comprehensive and elaborate analysis of the multi-scale synergy of autumn rain in western China and its physical mechanism under the complex and important topography of Qinghai-Xizang （Tibet） Plateau. |
| [24] |
廖玉芳, 张剑明. 湖南省雨季与中国南方地区不同雨期相关分析[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2018, 34(1): 69-81.
(
|
| [25] |
洪兴骏, 余蔚卿, 任金秋, 等. 丹江口水利枢纽汛期运行水位优化研究与应用[J]. 人民长江, 2022, 53(2): 27-34.
(
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
