Effects of Water and Fertilizer Regulation on Rice Growth in Different Hydrological Years

WANG Yan, SUN Guang-bao, LIU Hong-kui, LUO Wen-bing, XIAO Xin, YANG Zi-rong

Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute ›› 2024, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (8) : 73-81.

PDF(1447 KB)
PDF(1447 KB)
Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute ›› 2024, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (8) : 73-81. DOI: 10.11988/ckyyb.20230347
Agricultural Water Conservancy

Effects of Water and Fertilizer Regulation on Rice Growth in Different Hydrological Years

Author information +
History +

Abstract

A field experiment of water and fertilizer regulation was conducted at the Jiangxi Provincial Irrigation Experiment Center Station from 2020 to 2022 to investigate the impacts of water and fertilizer regulation on rice growth and water demands across varying hydrological conditions. The findings revealed that intermittent irrigation resulted in reduced irrigation (by 20.82%), drainage (by 3.93%), leakage (by 16.68%), and evapotranspiration (by 6.77%) compared to conventional irrigation methods during different hydrological years. Evapotranspiration during the late tillering and jointing-booting stages accounted for 40.2% of the total evapotranspiration throughout the growth period. Rice plant height, tiller number, leaf area index (LAI), and dry matter accumulation exhibited consistent dynamic changes across different hydrological years, all being greater under fertilization treatments compared to non-fertilized conditions, with fertilizer application notably affecting yield. However, in drought years, rice yield under intermittent irrigation was lower than that under submerged irrigation, and plant height, tiller number, LAI, dry matter accumulation, rice yield, and evapotranspiration were all restrained. Average irrigation amounts were higher in drought years compared to wet and normal years, while average drainage, leakage, and plant height were lower. Average evapotranspiration of paddy fields was lower in drought years compared to wet years but higher than in normal years, while tiller number, LAI, dry matter accumulation, and rice yield were lower in drought years compared to normal years but higher than in wet years.

Key words

rice growth / drought / water and fertilizer regulation / rice yield / evapotranspiration

Cite this article

Download Citations
WANG Yan , SUN Guang-bao , LIU Hong-kui , et al . Effects of Water and Fertilizer Regulation on Rice Growth in Different Hydrological Years[J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute. 2024, 41(8): 73-81 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20230347

References

[1]
辛良杰, 李鹏辉. 中国居民口粮消费特征变化及安全耕地数量[J]. 农业工程学报, 2017, 33(13):1-7.
(XIN Liang-jie, LI Peng-hui. Variation of Grain Consumption Characteristics and Safety Cultivated Land Area in China[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2017, 33(13):1-7. (in Chinese))
[2]
ALBRIZIO R, TODOROVIC M, MATIC T, et al. Comparing the Interactive Effects of Water and Nitrogen on Durum Wheat and Barley Grown in a Mediterranean Environment[J]. Field Crops Research, 2010, 115(2): 179-190.
[3]
SINGH R P, AGRAWAL M. Effect of Different Sewage Sludge Applications on Growth and Yield of Vigna Radiata L. Field Crop: Metal Uptake by Plant[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2010, 36(7): 969-972.
[4]
任小龙, 贾志宽, 陈小莉. 不同模拟雨量下微集水种植对农田水肥利用效率的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2010, 26(3): 75-81.
(REN Xiao-long, JIA Zhi-kuan, CHEN Xiao-li. Effect of Micro-catchment Rainwater Harvesting on Water and Nutrient Use Efficiency in Farmland under Different Simulated Rainfall Conditions[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2010, 26(3): 75-81. (in Chinese))
[5]
MUELLER N D, GERBER J S, JOHNSTON M, et al. Correction: Corrigendum: Closing Yield Gaps through Nutrient and Water Management[J]. Nature, 2012, 490(7419) : 254-257.
[6]
LI S X, WANG Z H, MALHI S S, et al. Chapter 7 Nutrient and Water Management Effects on Crop Production, and Nutrient and Water Use Efficiency in Dryland Areas of China[J]. Advances in Agronomy, 2009, 102: 223-265.
[7]
LIU W Z, ZHANG X C. Optimizing Water and Fertilizer Input Using an Elasticity Index: a Case Study with Maize in the Loess Plateau of China[J]. Field Crops Research, 2007, 100(2/3): 302-310.
[8]
TEIXEIRA E I, GEORGE M, HERREMAN T, et al. The Impact of Water and Nitrogen Limitation on Maize Biomass and Resource-use Efficiencies for Radiation, Water and Nitrogen[J]. Field Crops Research, 2014, 168: 109-118.
[9]
李双双, 李晶, 陈龙涛, 等. 施氮量对春小麦根系生长及产量的影响[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2013, 33(1): 141-145.
(LI Shuang-shuang, LI Jing, CHEN Long-tao, et al. Effects of Nitrogen Application Rate on Root Growth and Yield Formation of Spring Wheat[J]. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2013, 33(1): 141-145. (in Chinese))
[10]
SMIKA D E, HAAS H J, POWER J F. Effects of Moisture and Nitrogen Fertilizer on Growth and Water Use by Native Grass1[J]. Agronomy Journal, 1965, 57(5): 483-486.
[11]
张岁歧, 山仑. 氮素营养对春小麦抗旱适应性及水分利用的影响[J]. 水土保持研究, 1995, 2(1): 31-35, 55.
(ZHANG Sui-qi, SHAN Lun. Effects of Nitrogen Nutrition on the Drought Adaptation and Water Use of Spring Wheat[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 1995, 2(1): 31-35, 55. (in Chinese))
[12]
GOOD S P, NOONE D, BOWEN G. Hydrologic Connectivity Constrains Partitioning of Global Terrestrial Water Fluxes[J]. Science, 2015, 349(6244): 175-177.
[13]
MANZONI S, SCHIMEL J P, PORPORATO A. Responses of Soil Microbial Communities to Water Stress: Results from a Meta-analysis[J]. Ecology, 2012, 93(4): 930-938.
Soil heterotrophic respiration and nutrient mineralization are strongly affected by environmental conditions, in particular by moisture fluctuations triggered by rainfall events. When soil moisture decreases, so does decomposers' activity, with microfauna generally undergoing stress sooner than bacteria and fungi. Despite differences in the responses of individual decomposer groups to moisture availability (e.g., bacteria are typically more sensitive than fungi to water stress), we show that responses of decomposers at the community level are different in soils and surface litter, but similar across biomes and climates. This results in a nearly constant soil-moisture threshold corresponding to the point when biological activity ceases, at a water potential of about -14 MPa in mineral soils and -36 MPa in surface litter. This threshold is shown to be comparable to the soil moisture value where solute diffusion becomes strongly inhibited in soil, while in litter it is dehydration rather than diffusion that likely limits biological activity around the stress point. Because of these intrinsic constraints and lack of adaptation to different hydro-climatic regimes, changes in rainfall patterns (primary drivers of the soil moisture balance) may have dramatic impacts on soil carbon and nutrient cycling.
[14]
肖新, 邹志科, 陈燕飞, 等. 南方平原区水肥调控下水稻节水减排效应研究[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2023, 42(4):67-73.
(XIAO Xin, ZOU Zhi-ke, CHEN Yan-fei, et al. Improveing Irrigation and Fertilization to Reduce Water Usage and Nitrogen Pollution from Rice Fields in Southern China[J]. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 2023, 42(4):67-73. (in Chinese))
[15]
茆智. 水稻节水灌溉[J]. 中国农村水利水电, 1997(4): 45-47.
(MAO Zhi. Water-saving Irrigation of Rice[J]. China Rural Nater and Hydropower, 1997(4): 45-47. (in Chinese))
[16]
TABBAL D F, LAMPAYAN R M, BHUIYAN S I. Water Efficient Irrigation Technique for Rice[R]. Bangkok, Thailand: Asian Institute of Technology, 1992: 146-159.
[17]
李发鹏, 徐宗学, 李景玉. 基于MODIS数据的黄河三角洲区域蒸散发量时空分布特征[J]. 农业工程学报, 2009, 25(2): 113-120, 313-314.
(LI Fa-peng, XU Zong-xue, LI Jing-yu. Characteristics of the Spatial and Temporal Distribution for Regional Evapotranspiration in the Yellow River Delta Based on MODIS Data[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2009, 25(2): 113-120, 313-314. (in Chinese))
[18]
刘笑吟, 王冠依, 杨士红, 等. 不同时间尺度节水灌溉水稻腾发量特征与影响因素分析[J]. 农业机械学报, 2016, 47(8):91-100,170.
(LIU Xiao-yin, WANG Guan-yi, YANG Shi-hong, et al. Influence Factors and Characteristics of Transpiration and Evaporation in Water-saving Irrigation Paddy Field under Different Temporal Scales[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2016, 47(8):91-100,170. (in Chinese))
[19]
彭世彰, 刘明, 杨士红, 等. 田块和小区尺度下节水灌溉稻田腾发量差异分析[J]. 农业工程学报, 2014, 30(14):87-95.
(PENG Shi-zhang, LIU Ming, YANG Shi-hong, et al. Analysis on Evapotranspiration Difference of Paddy Field under Water-saving Irrigation on Field and Plot Scales[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2014, 30(14):87-95. (in Chinese))
[20]
彭世彰, 徐俊增, 丁加丽, 等. 节水灌溉条件下水稻叶气温差变化规律与水分亏缺诊断试验研究[J]. 水利学报, 2006, 37(12): 1503-1508.
(PENG Shi-zhang, XU Jun-zeng, DING Jia-li, et al. Leaf-air Temperature Difference of Rice and Water Deficit Diagnose under Water Saving Irrigation[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2006, 37(12): 1503-1508. (in Chinese))
[21]
赵丽雯, 赵文智, 吉喜斌. 西北黑河中游荒漠绿洲农田作物蒸腾与土壤蒸发区分及作物耗水规律[J]. 生态学报, 2015, 35(4): 1114-1123.
(ZHAO Li-wen, ZHAO Wen-zhi, JI Xi-bin. Division between Transpiration and Evaporation, and Crop Water Consumption over Farmland within Oases of the Middlestream of Heihe River Basin, Northwestern China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2015, 35(4): 1114-1123. (in Chinese))
[22]
崔远来, 许亚群, 赵树君, 等. 南方水稻灌区节水减排技术与应用[M]. 武汉: 科学出版社, 2015.
(CUI Yuan-lai, XU Ya-qun, ZHAO Shu-jun, et al. Water Saving and Emission Reduction Technology and Application in Rice Irrigation Area in Southern China[M]. Wuhan: Science Press, 2015. (in Chinese))
[23]
李竞春. 南方稻作区不同水肥调控方案对稻田水分利用、水稻生长与污染物排放的影响研究[D]. 镇江: 江苏大学, 2019.
(LI Jing-chun. Effects of Different Water and Fertilizer Regulation Schemes on Water Use, Rice Growth and Pollutant Emission of Rice Planting Areas in Southern China[D]. Zhenjiang: Jiangsu University, 2019. (in Chinese))
[24]
SINGH A K, MALL A K, SINGH P K, et al. Interrelationship of Genetics Parameters for Quantitative and Physiological Traits in Rice under Irrigated and Drought Conditions[J]. Oryza, 2010, 47(2): 142-147.
[25]
NDJIONDJOP M N, SECK P A, LORIEUX M, et al. Effect of Drought on Oryza Glaberrima Rice Accessions and Oryza Glaberrima Derived-lines[J]. Asian Journal of Agricultural Research, 2012, 6(4): 144-157.
[26]
BOCCO R, LORIEUX M, SECK P A, et al. Agro-morphological Characterization of a Population of Introgression Lines Derived from Crosses between IR 64 (Oryza Sativa Indica) and TOG 5681 (Oryza Glaberrima) for Drought Tolerance[J]. Plant Science, 2012, 183: 65-76.
The study evaluated effects of drought on some agro-morphological traits of 60 rice genotypes comprising 54 introgression lines with their parents, IR 64 (Oryza sativa) and TOG 5681 (Oryza glaberrima) and four NERICA-L varieties developed from the same parents for comparison. The genotypes were subjected either to full irrigation from sowing to maturity (control) or to 21-day drought applied by stopping irrigation from the 45th day after sowing (DAS) onward (drought) in the dry seasons of 2006 and 2007-2008. Plant height, spikelet fertility, grain yield and leaf area at harvesting were consistently reduced by drought in both seasons. Values of leaf temperature, leaf rolling, leaf tip drying, leaf blast, days from seeding to flowering and maturity were higher under drought. The results on SPAD and number of tillers were not consistent. Significant relationship (P<0.05) was observed between all traits evaluated and grain yield under drought. Introgression lines, SEN-L13-2, MPL-15-3, SEN-L10-1, SEN-L26-3 and SEN-L21-2 showed significantly higher yield than the highest yield NERICA-L variety (all of them had higher yield than the parents). Among them, SEN-L13-2 showed the lowest yield loss by drought and MPL-15-3 had high yield potential and considerably low yield loss by drought.Copyright © 2011. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.
[27]
段素梅, 杨安中, 黄义德, 等. 干旱胁迫对水稻生长、生理特性和产量的影响[J]. 核农学报, 2014, 28(6):1124-1132.
Abstract
以皖稻153、两优0293等9个品种为材料,利用土壤水势张力计控制土壤水分,在分蘖期和孕穗期进行自然干旱处理与常规水分管理,研究干旱对不同品种水稻生长、生理特性和产量的影响。结果表明:分蘖期和孕穗期水稻土壤水势控制在-75kPa左右10d时间,对水稻的株高、分蘖动态、绿叶面积、叶片水势和叶片含水量均产生明显影响;水稻植株生理指标对干旱胁迫响应明显,MDA浓度、POD活性、SOD活性、可溶性糖含量和脯氨酸含量均有不同程度增加,且差异均达极显著水平;从产量上看,新两优6号、新两优香4号和两优0293三个品种抗旱性较强,其中,新两优6号干旱处理分别比对照减产最小,仅是3.32%和4.27%;新两优香4号和两优0293两个品种虽然也减产,但减产幅度在10%以内。
(DUAN Su-mei, YANG An-zhong, HUANG Yi-de, et al. Effects of Drought Stress on Growth and Physiological Feature and Yield of Various Rice Varieties[J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2014, 28(6): 1124-1132. (in Chinese))

Using 9 rice varieties as materials,this paper studied the effects of soil water stress (soil water potential) on the growth and physiological feature and yield by pot experiment by manual rigorously controlling soil potential with tension-meter.The results indicated that the plant height, tillering dynamics, green leaf area, leaf potential, and leaf water content were affected to different degree when the soil water potential (SWP) reduced to - 75 kPa during different growth periods.Under drought stress,leaves of 4 varieties of Hydrangea of different physiological changes occur,content of Methane Dicarboxylic Aldehyde and POD and SOD activity and proline and total soluble sugar marly all increase.The difference reached to a most significant level.As for yield, the drought resistance of Xinliangyouxiang 4, Xinliangyou6 and Liangyou0293 are strong.Yield of Xinliangyouxiang4 for the drought treatment were lower than the CK by 3.32% and 4.27%,the other two decreased within 10%.

[28]
陈进红, 赵国平, 陈志银, 等. 早稻旱育和水育苗床的生态效应及其秧苗的生长生理特性[J]. 浙江农业学报, 1998, 10(4): 179-183.
(CHEN Jin-hong, ZHAO Guo-ping, CHEN Zhi-yin, et al. Ecological Effects of Upland and Paddy Seedling Beds and Its Physiobiochemical Effects on the First Season Rice Seedling Growth[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 1998, 10(4): 179-183. (in Chinese))
[29]
杨建昌, 王国忠, 王志琴, 等. 旱种水稻灌浆特性与灌浆期籽粒中激素含量的变化[J]. 作物学报, 2002, 28(5): 615-621.
(YANG Jian-chang, WANG Guo-zhong, WANG Zhi-qin, et al. Grain-filling Characteristics and Changes of Hormonal Content in the Grains of Dry-cultivated Rice during Grain-filling[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2002, 28(5): 615-621. (in Chinese))
[30]
刘路广, 陈扬, 吴瑕, 等. 不同水肥综合调控模式下水稻生长特征、水肥利用率及氮磷流失规律[J]. 中国农村水利水电, 2020(12): 67-72, 76.
Abstract
为进一步探明水稻生长与水分养分之间作用机制,充分发挥水肥耦合效应,在湖北省灌溉试验中心站开展了水肥综合调控模式试验研究。设置了常规淹灌模式(W0)、间歇灌溉模式(W1)、蓄雨型间歇灌溉模式(W2)3种灌溉模式;不施氮肥处理(N0)、当地实际施氮水平(N1)、当地施氮水平的75%(N2)3种施氮水平;基肥+一次追肥(F1)、基肥+二次追肥(F2)2种施肥方式。结果表明,与淹灌相比,间歇灌溉有利于水稻后期生长及高产,总氮排放负荷减少26%、总磷减少11%,氮肥利用率提高5.2%;与间歇灌溉相比,蓄雨型间歇灌溉会促进水稻全生育期生长,但后期茎叶过盛使产量略有减少,总氮排放负荷减少29%、总磷减少39%,氮肥利用率相当;在一定范围内增加施氮量可促进水稻的生长发育与高产;高施氮量下增加追肥次数可促进水稻后期生长与高产,但低施氮量下增加追肥次数可能会产生相反效果。
(LIU Lu-guang, CHEN Yang, WU Xia, et al. Growth Characteristics of Rice, Water-fertilizer Utilization and Nitrogen and Phosphorus Loss Law under Different Water-fertilizer Control Patterns[J]. China Rural Water and Hydropower, 2020(12): 67-72, 76. (in Chinese))
In order to further explore the mechanism between rice growth and water nutrients, give full play to the coupling effect of water and fertilizer, the experimental study on the comprehensive regulation of water and fertilizer was carried out at Hubei Provincial Central Station. Three irrigation modes were set up: conventional flooding irrigation mode (W0), intermittent irrigation mode (W1), and rain-storing intermittent irrigation mode (W2), as well as three levels of nitrogen application: no nitrogen fertilizer treatment (N0), local actual nitrogen level (N1), local application nitrogen level 75% (N2); There are two kinds of fertilization methods: base fertilizer + primary topdressing (F1), base fertilizer + secondary topdressing (F2). The test results show that compared with flooding irrigation mode (W0), intermittent irrigation mode is beneficial to the late growth and high yield of rice, the total nitrogen emission load is reduced by 26%, the total phosphorus is reduced by 11%, and the utilization rate of nitrogen fertilizer is increased by 5.2%; Compared with intermittent irrigation mode, rain-storing intermittent irrigation mode will promote the growth of rice during the whole growth period, but in the later stage, excessive stems and leaves will slightly reduce the yield, total nitrogen emission load decreased 29%, total phosphorus decreased 39%, and the nitrogen fertilizer utilization rate is equivalent; Increasing the amount of nitrogen in a certain range can promote the growth and high yield of rice; And increasing the number of topdressing under high nitrogen can promote the late growth and high yield of rice, but increasing the number of topdressing under low nitrogen may have the opposite effect.
[31]
陆建飞, 丁艳锋, 黄丕生. 持续土壤水分胁迫对水稻生育与产量构成的影响[J]. 江苏农学院学报, 1998, 19(2): 43-48.
(LU Jian-fei, DING Yan-feng, HUANG Pi-sheng. Effects of Sustained Soil Water Stress on Growth, Development and Yield Components of Two Rice Cultivars[J]. Journal of Yangzhou University (Agricultural and Life Science Edition), 1998, 19(2): 43-48. (in Chinese))
[32]
吕国安. 不同灌溉方式水稻植株对氮素的吸收利用研究[J]. 中国农村水利水电, 1997(12):18-20,48.
( Guo-an. Study on the Absorptivity and Transference of Nitrogen of Rice Plant in Different Irrigation Treatments[J]. China Rural Nater and Hydropower, 1997(12): 18-20, 48. (in Chinese))
[33]
李远华, 张祖莲, 赵长友, 等. 水稻间歇灌溉的节水增产机理研究[J]. 中国农村水利水电, 1998(11): 12-15, 46.
(LI Yuan-hua, ZHANG Zu-lian, ZHAO Chang-you, et al. Mechanism of Water-saving and Yield-raising of the Intermittent Submerged Irrigation for Rice[J]. China Rural Nater and Hydropower, 1998(11): 12-15, 46. (in Chinese))
[34]
程建平, 曹凑贵, 蔡明历, 等. 不同土壤水势与氮素营养对杂交水稻生理特性和产量的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2008, 14(2): 199-206.
(CHENG Jian-ping, CAO Cou-gui, CAI Ming-li, et al. Effect of Different Nitrogen Nutrition and Soil Water Potential on Physiological Parameters and Yield of Hybrid Rice[J]. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2008, 14(2): 199-206. (in Chinese))
PDF(1447 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/

Baidu
map