Identification of Key Elements of Soil Erosion in Railway Engineering in Mountainous Areas

BAO Xue-ying, ZHANG Cheng-hao, HE Zhen-xia, LI Ya-juan, SHEN Du-hua, CHEN Hui-xin

Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute ›› 2024, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (8) : 38-46.

PDF(2054 KB)
PDF(2054 KB)
Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute ›› 2024, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (8) : 38-46. DOI: 10.11988/ckyyb.20230343
Soil and Water Conservation and Ecological Restoration

Identification of Key Elements of Soil Erosion in Railway Engineering in Mountainous Areas

Author information +
History +

Abstract

A method to identify key factors contributing to water and soil erosion in mountainous railway projects is proposed. Initially, the disciplines prone to causing erosion are determined. Subsequently, the interactive relationship between railway projects and water and soil erosion is analyzed to identify essential elements and construct an indicator system. Furthermore, a multi-layer network model to identify key elements is developed using a complex network model combined with the entropy weighting method, IGAHP (Improved Group Analytic Hierarchy Process) method, and DWNodeRank algorithm. A specific mountainous railway project is examined as a case study. The key elements for mountainous railway project include residue disposal, embankment slope protection, and drainage ditch layout. Key elements for soil and water conservation performance include large-scale temporary soil disturbance and residue disposal.Factors influencing soil and water loss encompass hydrology, surface vegetation, and sedimentation. Emphasizing these key elements in water conservation measures and engineering design is crucial for effectively controlling soil and water erosion and enhancing the ecological environment in mountainous railway projects.

Key words

railway engineering / soil erosion / complex networks / key elements / indicator system

Cite this article

Download Citations
BAO Xue-ying , ZHANG Cheng-hao , HE Zhen-xia , et al . Identification of Key Elements of Soil Erosion in Railway Engineering in Mountainous Areas[J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute. 2024, 41(8): 38-46 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20230343

References

[1]
CHEN H, LI H, WANG Y, et al. A Comprehensive Assessment Approach for Water-soil Environmental Risk during Railway Construction in Ecological Fragile Region Based on AHP and MEA[J]. Sustainability, 2020, 12(19): 7910.
[2]
BAO X, LI H. Study on the Evaluation Method of Subgrade Slope Green Protection Effect in Dry-hot Valley of Sichuan-Tibet Railway[J]. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2020, doi: 10.1155/2020/7159582.
[3]
匡星. 铁路工程边坡水力侵蚀规律与评价方法研究[D]. 北京: 北京交通大学, 2009: 73-106.
(KUANG Xing. Research on the Rules and Evaluations of Water Erosion on Railroad Slopes[D]. Beijing: Beijing Jiaotong University, 2009: 73-106. (in Chinese))
[4]
栗健. 桥梁钻孔灌注桩施工的水土流失防治措施研究[J]. 铁路节能环保与安全卫生, 2014, 4(2): 47-50.
(LI Jian. The Measures Study for Soil Erosion Prevention and Control of Bridge Bored Pile Construction[J]. Railway Energy Saving & Environmental Protection & Occupational Safety and Health, 2014, 4(2): 47-50. (in Chinese))
[5]
徐晨宸. 西北寒旱地区铁路桥梁施工期生态环境影响评价研究[D]. 兰州: 兰州交通大学, 2021: 19-37.
(XU Chen-chen. Research on Ecological Environmental Impact Assessment of Railway Bridge Construction Period in Northwest China[D]. Lanzhou: Lanzhou Jiaotong University, 2021: 19-37. (in Chinese))
[6]
荆莎莎. 胶东丘陵铁路项目路基与堆弃土水土流失特征[D]. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2017: 18-55.
(JING Sha-sha. Characteristics of Soil and Water Loss of Roadbed and Spoil Soil in Jiaodong Hilly Railway Project[D]. Taian: Shandong Agricultural University, 2017: 18-55. (in Chinese))
[7]
王文龙, 李建明, 康宏亮, 等. 生产建设项目工程堆积体土壤侵蚀预测模型构建[J]. 水土保持学报, 2023, 37(3): 27-34, 42.
(WANG Wen-long, LI Jian-ming, KANG Hong-liang, et al. Soil Erosion Prediction Model for Spoil Heaps in Production and Construction Projects[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2023, 37(3): 27-34, 42. (in Chinese))
[8]
王爱军. 青藏铁路格尔木至拉萨段水土保持研究[D]. 成都: 西南交通大学, 2007.
(WANG Ai-jun. Study on Water & Soil Conservation at Qinghai-Tibet Railway Geermu-Lasa Section[D]. Chengdu: Southwest Jiaotong University, 2007. (in Chinese))
[9]
方创琳, 崔学刚, 梁龙武. 城镇化与生态环境耦合圈理论及耦合器调控[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(12): 2529-2546.
Abstract
城镇化与生态环境之间客观上存在着极其复杂的近远程非线性耦合关系,如何协调城镇化与生态环境的关系问题已上升为全球性战略问题和世界性科学难题。本文从理论上揭示了城镇化与生态环境交互作用的耦合性、耦合关系和耦合度;根据主控要素总结出了城镇化与生态环境耦合的10种关系和交互方式;根据耦合度强弱将耦合性分为低度耦合、较低耦合、中度耦合、较高耦合、高度耦合和完全耦合6种类型,分别对应随性耦合、间接耦合、松散耦合、协同耦合、紧密耦合和控制耦合,进而形成城镇化与生态环境耦合塔;创建了城镇化与生态环境耦合圈理论,按每旋转10°生成一个图谱构建了由直线图谱、指数曲线图谱、对数曲线图谱、双指数曲线图谱和“S”型曲线图谱等组合而成的45种耦合图谱,不同图谱对应着不同的城市发展阶段和发展模式。在多种耦合图谱中,认为“S”型曲线耦合图谱是最佳图谱,代表着多种图谱中体现城镇化与生态环境相互作用的最佳耦合状态。以“S”型曲线耦合图谱为依托,借助SD模型及各变量之间存在的一对一、一对多和多对多的复杂关系,构建了由11个调控要素和201个变量构成的耦合调控器(UEC),只要一个变量发生变化,就会牵一发而动全身,影响整个耦合调控器的结构、功能和调控结果。这种耦合调控器包括同一时间多个城市城镇化圈与生态环境圈之间的静态调控、不同时间同一城市城镇化圈与生态环境圈之间的动态调控、不同时间多个城市城镇化圈与生态环境圈之间的动态调控3种时空尺度,通过调控将逐步推动城镇化圈与生态环境圈之间由低级耦合向高级耦合方向演进。
(FANG Chuang-lin, CUI Xue-gang, LIANG Long-wu. Theoretical Analysis of Urbanization and Eco-environment Coupling Coil and Coupler Control[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019, 74(12): 2529-2546. (in Chinese))

There is an extremely complex nonlinear coupling relationship between urbanization and eco-environment. How to coordinate this relationship has become a global strategic problem and a worldwide scientific problem. First, based on theoretical analysis, this paper revealed the coupling, coupling relationship, coupling degree and coupling tower of interaction between urbanization and eco-environment. Second, by analyzing the main controlling factors, ten kinds of interaction modes between urbanization and eco-environment are summarized. Third, according to the strength of coupling degree, we have identified six coupling types, including low coupling, slight coupling, moderate coupling, high coupling, excellent coupling, and full coupling, which correspond to the random coupling, indirect coupling, loose coupling, synergistic coupling, tight coupling and control coupling, respectively. Then, urbanization and eco-environment coupling tower was formed. Finally, the theory of urbanization and eco-environment coupling coil was established. Through rotating the graph by 10°, we built 45 kinds of coupled graphs, including linear graph, index curve graph, logarithmic curve graph, double index curve graph and S-shaped curve graph. Different graphs represent different urban development modes, stages and characteristics. Among them, S-shaped curve coupled graph is optimal, and it reflects the best state of urbanization and eco-environment coupling. After that, we amplified the S-shaped coupled graph, and then constructed a coupler (UEC) based on the SD model and the complex relationship between different variables. The coupler consists of 11 regulatory elements and 201 variables, and can control the coupling state between urbanization coil and eco-environment coil. In general, the above control types include static control of multiple cities at the same time, dynamic control of a single city at different times, and dynamic control of multiple cities at different times. Through coupler control, urbanization coil and eco-environment coil can keep the best dynamic and orderly state. In addition, if one variable changes, the structure, function and simulation results of the coupler will also be affected. Finally, with the increase of control intensity, the coupler will gradually improve the coupling degree between urbanization coil and ecological environment coil.

[10]
何吉成. 秦巴山区铁路增建二线的水土流失影响分析[J]. 水土保持研究, 2012, 19(6): 64-67, 76.
(HE Ji-cheng. Impact of the Railway Constructions of the Second Line on Soil Erosion and Water Loss in Qinling-Daba Mountainous Area[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2012, 19(6): 64-67, 76. (in Chinese))
[11]
夏敦宁, 葛波, 殷承启, 等. 宁杭高铁运营期典型样地侵蚀因子特征研究[J]. 中国水土保持, 2020(4):44-49,7.
(XIA Dun-ning, GE Bo, YIN Cheng-qi, et al. The Characteristics of Erosion Factors of Typical Sample Plots during the Operation Period of Nanjing-Hangzhou High-speed Railway[J]. Soil and Water Conservation in China, 2020(4): 44-49, 7. (in Chinese))
[12]
邢亭婷. 高速铁路建设水土流失预测与防治研究[D]. 成都: 西南交通大学, 2011: 13-16.
(XING Ting-ting. High Speed Railway Construction Soil Erosionprediction and Prevention Research[D]. Chengdu: Southwest Jiaotong University, 2011: 13-16. (in Chinese))
[13]
HARBOR J. Engineering Geomorphology at the Cutting Edge of Land Disturbance: Erosion and Sediment Control on Construction Sites[J]. Geomorphology, 1999, 31(1):247-263.
[14]
SEEGER M. Uncertainty of Factors Determining Runoff and Erosion Processes as Quantified by Rainfall Simulations[J]. CATENA, 2007 71(1): 56-67.
[15]
蒋观滔. 从水土保持角度浅谈铁路工程弃渣减量优化设计[J]. 中文科技期刊数据库(全文版)工程技术, 2023(1): 154-157.
(JIANG Guan-tao. Optimization Design of Reducing Wastes from Railway Projects from the Perspective of Soil and Water Conservation[J]. Engineering Technology, 2023(1): 154-157. (in Chinese))
[16]
庞毅. 新疆铁路奎屯至北屯线水土保持监测与分析评价[J]. 中国水土保持, 2012(1):48-49.
(PANG Yi. Monitoring, Analysis and Evaluation of Soil and Water Conservation on Kuitun-Beitun Railway in Xinjiang[J]. Soil and Water Conservation in China, 2012(1):48-49. (in Chinese))
[17]
黎恩丹, 杨勤科, 庞国伟, 等. 青藏高原坡度坡长因子(LS)空间格局及影响因素分析[J]. 水土保持学报, 2023, 37(1):133-139.
(LI En-dan, YANG Qin-ke, PANG Guo-wei, et al. Spatial Pattern and Influencing Factors of Slope Length and Steepness Factors (LS) in Qinghai-Tibet Plateau[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2023, 37(1):133-139. (in Chinese))
[18]
杨树云, 张铁钢, 张展, 等. 工程堆积体坡面不同植被格局的控蚀效果研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022, 36(4):121-127.
(YANG Shu-yun, ZHANG Tie-gang, ZHANG Zhan, et al. Study on Erosion Control Effect of Different Vegetation Patterns on Slope Surface of Engineering Accumulation[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2022, 36(4): 121-127. (in Chinese))
[19]
AI X, SHENG M, SU X, et al. Effects of Frame Beam on Structural Characteristics of Artificial Soil on Railway Cut-slopes in Southwestern China[J]. Land Degradation & Development, 2021, 32(1): 482-493.
[20]
CZIGANY S, PIRKHOFFER E. Potential Areas of Flood Impoundment in Human Environments, Bukkosd Valley, SW Hungary[J]. Geomorphologie-Relief Processus Environment, 2010, 3:301-310.
[21]
LIU G, HU F, ZHENG F, et al. Effects and Mechanisms of Erosion Control Techniques on Stairstep Cut-slopes[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 656: 307-315.
[22]
LIU B, WAGNER L E, NING D, et al. Estimation of Wind Erosion from Construction of a Railway in Arid Northwest China[J]. International Soil and Water Conservation Research, 2017, 5(2): 102-108.
[23]
SAJJAN A K, GYASI-AGYEI Y, SHARMA R H. Modeling Grass-cover Effects on Soil Erosion on Railway Embankment Steep Slopes[J]. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 2015, 20(9): 04014092.
[24]
GOKDEMIR C, RUBIN Y, LI X, et al. A Vulnerability Assessment Method to Evaluate the Impact of Tunnel Drainage on Terrestrial Vegetation under Various Atmospheric and Climatic Conditions[J]. Advances in Water Resources, 2021, 147: 103796.
[25]
张薇, 鲍学英. 基于改进灰靶的铁路弃渣场生态环境影响等级评价研究[J]. 工程管理学报, 2020, 34(6):55-60.
(ZHANG Wei, BAO Xue-ying. Research on Comprehensive Evaluation of Ecological Environment Impact Grade of Railway Dregs Field Based on Improved Grey Target[J]. Journal of Engineering Management, 2020, 34(6): 55-60. (in Chinese))
[26]
任慧君. 黄河流域9省区能源产业链与资源环境耦合关系研究[D]. 北京: 中国矿业大学, 2020:7-9.
(REN Hui-jun. Coupling Relationship between Energy Industry Chain and Resource-environment of 9 Provinces and Regions along the Yellow River Basin Area[D]. Beijing: China University of Mining & Technology, Beijing, 2020: 7-9. (in Chinese))
[27]
崔欣, 路庆昌, 徐鹏程, 等. 基于重要性贡献矩阵的城市轨道交通关键站点识别[J]. 铁道科学与工程学报, 2022, 19(9):2524-2531.
(CUI Xin, LU Qing-chang, XU Peng-cheng, et al. Critical Station Identification Based on Node Importance Contribution Matrix in Urban Rail Transit Network[J]. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, 2022, 19(9): 2524-2531. (in Chinese))
[28]
刘倩倩, 陈岩. 基于熵权法的流域水资源脆弱性评价:以淮河流域为例[J]. raybet体育在线 院报, 2016, 33(9):10-17.
Abstract
流域水资源脆弱性评价可以量化表现出水资源的脆弱性程度,客观地反映研究区的水安全状况。根据水资源脆弱性的表现形式及成因,设置了水量、水质、洪涝灾害、旱灾4个一级指标,自然因素、人为因素、承载因素3个二级指标,分级构建了水资源脆弱性评价指标体系,在线性加权法的基础上采用熵权法构建了水资源脆弱性评价模型。以淮河流域为例进行实证分析,从时间、空间2个维度上对2003—2012年淮河流域整体及流域内的4个省份进行水资源脆弱性评价。结果表明时间上,10 a间淮河流域整体水资源脆弱度数值逐年减小,水资源脆弱性呈现好转趋势,流域内河南、安徽、江苏、山东4省的水资源脆弱性在10 a间均有所缓解;空间上,淮河流域水资源自西向东越来越脆弱。研究结果表明目前淮河流域水资源脆弱性状况呈现好转趋势,但仍然存在一些问题,有待进一步管理和调控。
(LIU Qian-qian, CHEN Yan. Assessing the Vulnerability of Basin Water Resources Based on Entropy Weight Method: a Case Study of Huaihe River Basin[J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2016, 33(9): 10-17. (in Chinese))
Assessment of basin water resources vulnerability reflects the water security conditions of the research area in an objective way by quantifying the degree of water resources vulnerability. According to the manifestation and causes of water resources' vulnerability, we built an evaluation indices system which consists of four primary indicators including water yield, water quality, flood disaster and drought and three secondary indicators of natural factor, human factor and carrying factor. On this basis, we constructed an assessment model for water resource vulnerability by using the entropy weight method in association with the linear weighting method. In this research we took Huaihe River basin as an example and assessed the water resources vulnerability of four provinces in 2003-2012 from two dimensions of time and space. The results showed that in terms of the time dimension, the value of water resources vulnerability in Huaihe River basin decreased in the decade, indicating that the vulnerability of water resources in the four provinces was improving; while in terms of the space dimension, water resources in Huaihe River basin was becoming more and more fragile from the west to the east. Research shows that the water resources vulnerability in Huaihe River basin presents a trend of improvement, but there are still some problems that need further management and regulation.
[29]
李海文, 鲍学英. 川藏铁路高原脆弱区沿线受损生态空间修复状况综合评价[J]. 铁道科学与工程学报, 2020, 17(9): 2412-2422.
(LI Hai-wen, BAO Xue-ying. Comprehensive Evaluation of the Restoration Status of Damaged Ecological Space along the Fragile Area of the Sichuan-Tibet Railway Plateau[J]. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, 2020, 17(9): 2412-2422. (in Chinese))
[30]
张琨, 李配配, 朱保平, 等. 基于PageRank的有向加权复杂网络节点重要性评估方法[J]. 南京航空航天大学学报, 2013, 45(3): 429-434.
(ZHANG Kun, LI Pei-pei, ZHU Bao-ping, et al. Evaluation Method for Node Importance in Directed-weighted Complex Networks Based on PageRank[J]. Journal of Nanjing University of Aeronautics & Astronautics, 2013, 45(3): 429-434. (in Chinese))
PDF(2054 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/

Baidu
map