坡面土层底部透水性和坡度对径流产沙特征的影响

doi:10.11988/ckyyb.20231235

raybet体育在线院报 ›› 2025, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (2): 62-68.DOI: 10.11988/ckyyb.20231235

坡面土层底部透水性和坡度对径流产沙特征的影响

刘纪根¹^,²(), 路良伟¹^,², 童晓霞¹^,², 陈锦阳¹^,², 郭雨辉¹^,²

¹ raybet体育在线水土保持研究所,武汉 430010
² 水利部山洪地质灾害防治工程技术研究中心,武汉 430010

收稿日期:2023-11-14 修回日期:2024-03-19 出版日期:2025-02-01 发布日期:2025-02-01
作者简介:
刘纪根(1975-),男,湖北汉川人,正高级工程师,博士,主要从事土壤侵蚀与水土保持研究。E-mail:jigenliu@163.com
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划项目(2021YFE0111900); 国家自然科学基金项目(42377330)

Influence of Bottom Soil Layer Permeability and Slope Gradient on Runoff and Sediment Yield Characteristics

LIU Ji-gen¹^,²(), LU Liang-wei¹^,², TONG Xiao-xia¹^,², CHEN Jin-yang¹^,², GUO Yu-hui¹^,²

¹ Soil and Water Conservation Department,Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute,Wuhan 430010,China
² Research Center on Mountain Torrent & Geologic Disaster Prevention,Ministry of Water Resources,Wuhan 430010, China

Received:2023-11-14 Revised:2024-03-19 Published:2025-02-01 Online:2025-02-01

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

坡面径流产沙过程作为山区暴雨洪水过程的重要组成部分,其变化规律及特征对完善山区暴雨洪水过程研究有重要意义。为明确山区坡面土层底部透水性和坡度对径流产沙特征的影响,采用室内人工模拟连续降雨试验方法,设计了坡顶薄坡底厚的试验土槽,选取官山河流域土壤作为试验用土,研究并总结了不同坡度条件下土质坡面的径流变化规律及土壤侵蚀规律。结果表明:①土槽坡度为5°和25°时,地表径流产流率随雨强增大而增大,且均呈现底部不透水侧产流量大于底部透水侧的规律;坡度为15°时,地表径流产流率呈现波动上升趋势,不同底部透水性土槽的地表径流产流量差异不大。②单场降雨条件下壤中流产流率随产流时间增加呈现增加趋势,各坡度之间壤中流产流率变化规律差异较大,但基本呈现出底部不透水土槽的壤中流产流量大于底部透水侧的;坡度为5°时壤中流产流率与地表径流产流率呈负相关关系,坡度为25°时则为正相关关系。③坡面地表流速随降雨强度增大而增大,坡度为5°和15°时不透水侧流速明显大于透水侧,坡度25°时流速差异不大。④不同坡度条件下,坡面侵蚀主要在第2场降雨和第3场降雨产生;坡度为5°和25°时不透水侧坡面侵蚀速率远大于透水侧,15°时呈现交替波动趋势。

关键词: 雨强, 坡度, 基岩渗透性, 产流产沙, 连续降雨

Abstract:

Understanding the runoff and sediment yield processes on slopes are of crucial significance in enhancing the research on rainstorm and flood dynamics in mountainous areas. To examine the effects of slope soil permeability and gradient on runoff and sediment yield characteristics in mountainous terrain, an indoor artificial simulated continuous rainfall experiment was conducted. The experiment was conducted on a soil trough with shallow upper section and deep lower section using soil samples from the Guanshan River Basin. The study aimed to investigate and summarize the variations in runoff and soil erosion with different slope gradients. Findings reveal that 1) At 5° and 25° slopes, surface runoff rates increased with escalating rainfall intensity, with higher rates observed on slopes featuring impermeable bottom layers compared to those with permeable layers. At a 15° slope, however, runoff increased with notable fluctuations, and differences in runoff rates between impermeable and permeable bottom layers were not statistically significant. 2) Interflow rates escalated over time during each rainfall simulation, displaying significant variations across different slope gradients. Generally, interflow rates were higher on slopes with impermeable bottom layers than on those with permeable layers. Notably, the relationship between interflow rate and surface runoff rate was negatively correlated at 5° slopes and positively correlated at 25° slopes. 3) Surface runoff velocities increased with rising rainfall intensity. At 5° and 15° slopes, velocities were significantly higher on impermeable bottom layers compared to permeable ones, whereas at 25°, no significant differences were observed. 4) Soil erosion was most pronounced during the second and third rainfall simulations across different slope gradients. Erosion rates were higher on impermeable bottom layers compared to permeable ones at 5° and 25° slopes, but showed fluctuations at 15° slopes.

Key words: rainfall intensity, slope gradient, bedrock permeability, runoff and sediment yield, continuous rainfall

中图分类号:

S157.1

刘纪根, 路良伟, 童晓霞, 陈锦阳, 郭雨辉. 坡面土层底部透水性和坡度对径流产沙特征的影响[J]. raybet体育在线院报, 2025, 42(2): 62-68.

LIU Ji-gen, LU Liang-wei, TONG Xiao-xia, CHEN Jin-yang, GUO Yu-hui. Influence of Bottom Soil Layer Permeability and Slope Gradient on Runoff and Sediment Yield Characteristics[J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute, 2025, 42(2): 62-68.

图/表 9

图1 土槽设计示意图

Fig.1 Schematic diagram of indoor rainfall simulation apparatus

图2 不同底部透水条件下地表径流产流率

Fig.2 Surface runoff rate with impermeable and permeable bottom layers

表1 总产流量统计

Table 1 Statistics of total runoff yield

坡度/ (°)	设计雨强/ (mm·min^-1)	表面流总产流量/L		壤中流总产流量/L
坡度/ (°)	设计雨强/ (mm·min^-1)	透水	不透水	透水	不透水
5	0.5	4.95	18.43	2.40	3.69
	1.0	37.44	50.09	0.67	1.69
	1.5	60.70	81.11	0.51	1.77
	2.0	68.03	87.62	0.30	1.39
15	0.5	28.05	23.72	1.05	2.18
	1.0	47.86	43.25	0.37	3.75
	1.5	61.59	67.28	0.45	5.03
	2.0	79.44	75.64	0.34	4.81
25	0.5	2.32	2.70	0.08	0.00
	1.0	33.74	41.79	0.33	0.97
	1.5	52.55	64.55	0.34	0.31
	2.0	64.34	81.23	0.64	1.27

图3 不同透水条件壤中流产流率

Fig.3 Interflow runoff rate with impermeable and permeable bottom layers

图4 不同透水条件下地表流速

Fig.4 Surface flow velocity with impermeable and permeable bottom layers

图5 不同透水条件下地表侵蚀速率变化

Fig.5 Variation in surface erosion rate with impermeable and permeable bottom layers

图6 不同透水性与坡度条件下地表径流产流率与壤中流产流率相关关系

Fig.6 Correlation between surface runoff rates and interflow runoff rates with impermeable and permeable bottom layers at different slope gradients

图7 不同透水性条件下各场次降雨地表径流产流率与侵蚀速率相关关系

Fig.7 Correlation between surface runoff rate and erosion rate with impermeable and permeable bottom layers in each rainfall simulation

表2 地表径流产流率与侵蚀速率的相关关系

Table 2 Correlation between surface runoff rate and erosion rate

数据类别	透水性	回归方程	R²
全部数据	透水	D=0.115 35Q_b+0.050 79	0.256 12
全部数据	不透水	D=0.102 32Q_b+0.084 18	0.153 70
前3场数据	透水	D=0.221 42Q_b+0.002 44	0.663 13
前3场数据	不透水	D=0.251 9Q_b-0.004 54	0.682 54

[1]	芮茂刚, 周彦辰, 陶余铨, 谢淑彦, 薛杨. 砾石作用下松散红壤堆积体坡面产流产沙特征[J]. raybet体育在线院报, 2024, 41(4): 70-77.
[2]	李熙, 刘强, 江世雄, 孙宝洋, 钱峰, 陈垚. 典型红壤区输变电工程堆积体边坡细沟侵蚀特征[J]. raybet体育在线院报, 2023, 40(9): 61-67.
[3]	刘涛, 杨以翠, 周旺, 郑腾辉. 降雨强度对工程堆积体坡面土壤养分及颗粒组成的影响[J]. raybet体育在线院报, 2023, 40(12): 59-64.
[4]	刘邦晓, 朱兴华, 郭剑, 姜程. 不同沟床坡度堰塞坝溃口下切过程试验研究[J]. raybet体育在线院报, 2020, 37(12): 59-66.
[5]	李桂江, 瞿瑶, 卢国胜, 刘军帅. 复杂偏压小净距隧道围岩压力计算及参数影响性研究[J]. raybet体育在线院报, 2020, 37(12): 133-138.
[6]	杜兰,许学问,黄国兵. 窄缝挑坎水翅危害强度研究[J]. raybet体育在线院报, 2019, 36(9): 77-80.
[7]	杨蒙,王建磊,宋迎俊,王涛. 土工袋挡墙变形特性有限元分析[J]. raybet体育在线院报, 2019, 36(2): 106-110.
[8]	李清溪, 丁文峰, 朱秀迪, 庞延杰. 雨强和地表糙度对坡面微地形及侵蚀的影响[J]. raybet体育在线院报, 2019, 36(1): 41-47.
[9]	李增永, 史雯雨. 暴雨强度公式对比分析及参数优化求解[J]. raybet体育在线院报, 2018, 35(10): 64-69.
[10]	朱秀迪, 丁文峰, 张冠华, 李清溪, 王强. 新型水溶性聚氨酯对紫色土坡面产流产沙的影响[J]. raybet体育在线院报, 2018, 35(1): 47-51.
[11]	杜兰, 卢金龙, 李利, 许学问. 大型水利枢纽泄洪雾化原型观测研究[J]. raybet体育在线院报, 2017, 34(8): 59-63.
[12]	黄国兵, 杜兰, 王才欢, 聂艳华. 窄缝挑坎水翅轨迹及降雨特性研究[J]. raybet体育在线院报, 2017, 34(12): 44-47.
[13]	赵鹏，杨沛霖，蒋莉，杜春兰. 渝东北地区强降雨诱发地质灾害险情分析[J]. raybet体育在线院报, 2017, 34(10): 50-56.
[14]	聂艳华, 王才欢, 况曼曼. 基于降雨分析的窄缝挑坎消能工水翅特性研究[J]. raybet体育在线院报, 2017, 34(1): 67-70.
[15]	张冠华,程冬兵,张平仓,牛俊,张长伟. 工程开挖面水土流失特征试验研究[J]. raybet体育在线院报, 2015, 32(3): 27-30.

坡面土层底部透水性和坡度对径流产沙特征的影响

Influence of Bottom Soil Layer Permeability and Slope Gradient on Runoff and Sediment Yield Characteristics

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 9

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价