raybet体育在线 院报 ›› 2025, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (6): 51-59.DOI: 10.11988/ckyyb.20240701

• 水资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于主成分分析法与系统动力学的水资源承载力评价——以庆阳市为例

汪倩1(), 袁波2, 吴剑2, 刘文士1, 吴雁1()   

  1. 1 西南石油大学 化学与化工学院,成都 610000
    2 中国石油集团安全环保技术研究院有限公司,北京 102206
  • 收稿日期:2024-07-02 修回日期:2024-10-14 出版日期:2025-06-01 发布日期:2025-06-01
  • 通信作者:
    吴 雁(1977-),女,四川自贡人,教授,硕士,硕士生导师,主要从事环境催化方面的研究。E-mail:
  • 作者简介:

    汪 倩(1999-),女,四川德阳人,硕士研究生,主要从事水资源评价研究。E-mail:

  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划项目(2023YFF0614100); 国家重点研发计划项目(2022YFC3702900)

Assessment of Water Resources Carrying Capacity Based on Principal Component Analysis and System Dynamics: A Case Study of Qingyang City

WANG Qian1(), YUAN Bo2, WU Jian2, LIU Wen-shi1, WU Yan1()   

  1. 1 College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610000, China
    2 CNPC Research Institute of Safety and Environment Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing 102206, China
  • Received:2024-07-02 Revised:2024-10-14 Published:2025-06-01 Online:2025-06-01

摘要:

黄河流域资源型城市水资源承载力评价相关研究缺失,亟待填补以支撑黄河流域的生态保护与高质量发展战略。以油气资源城市庆阳市为例,其油气开发面临水资源短缺问题。结合庆阳市实际,融合动静评价法构建油气开发区水资源承载力评估体系,在静态评估中通过主成分分析法追溯历史变化并分析关键影响因素,动态评估则是采用系统动力学提出了4种优化方案,并对庆阳市2022—2035年水资源承载力趋势进行了预测。结果表明:2012—2022年,由于社会经济发展、水资源利用和生态建设等多方面因素的共同影响,庆阳市水资源承载力总体呈逐年下降趋势,年均下降幅度为18.78%;考虑节水、治污、经济调节等方面形成综合发展方案,认为可通过采取供需双向调整策略缓解水资源压力。研究成果可为庆阳市水资源调控提供参考。

关键词: 水资源承载力, 评估体系, 动静评价法, 主成分分析, 系统动力学, 水资源调控, 庆阳市

Abstract:

[Objectives] This study aims to overcome the limitations of traditional static evaluation methods by developing a multidimensional assessment framework for water resource carrying capacity with spatiotemporal continuity. It seeks to reveal the evolution patterns of regional water resources carrying capacity and propose optimized regulation schemes. [Methods] A dynamic-static analytical framework combining principal component analysis (PCA) and system dynamics (SD) modeling was applied, with Qingyang City in Gansu Province—an area relatively short on water resources—as the study area. First, using data from 21 indicators from 2012 to 2022, PCA was used to extract principal components (cumulative variance contribution rate >85%) to establish a comprehensive evaluation system for water resources carrying capacity and identify key influencing factors. Subsequently, a complex dynamic model of water resources system was established by dividing the system into socioeconomic, water supply-demand, and ecological subsystems. The dynamic changes in water supply and demand under different development scenarios were simulated. Four optimization schemes were designed: status quo development (baseline), water-saving, wastewater treatment, and integrated coordinated development. Their optimization effects on regional water resources carrying capacity were evaluated from the perspectives of water demand control, water supply efficiency improvement, and coordinated governance. [Results] (1) The water resources carrying capacity of Qingyang City significantly declined, with an annual average decrease rate of 18.78% from 2015 to 2022. PCA revealed that socioeconomic development (population growth rate, GDP per capita), water resource allocation efficiency (crude oil processing volume, water resources per capita), and ecological development level (green coverage rate in built-up areas) were the key driving factors, contributing 35.2%, 28.6%, and 19.3% to the principal component loadings, respectively. (2) Dynamic simulations showed that under the status quo development scheme (scheme 1), water shortage in 2035 increased by 47.8% compared to the baseline year (2012), with a supply-demand gap expanding to 123 million m3. The water-saving scheme (scheme 2) reduced the shortage by 11.9% through improved reuse rates, but due to the inflexible growth in water demand, the imbalance remained significant. The wastewater treatment scheme (scheme 3) reduced water shortage by 15.1% by increasing reuse rate to 55%, demonstrating a 3.2-percentage-point greater improvement compared to scheme 2. The integrated coordinated development scheme (scheme 4) implemented a synergistic “water-saving and pollution-control” strategy, optimizing demand-side control (improving industrial water-saving and agricultural irrigation efficiency) and enhancing supply-side circulation (wastewater reuse rate at 60%). This ultimately reduced the water shortage in 2035 by 16.7% compared to scheme 1, lowered total water demand by 19.4%, and narrowed the supply-demand gap to 51 million m3. [Conclusions] This study innovatively establishes an analytical paradigm integrating “historical diagnosis, dynamic early warning, and strategy optimization.” The degradation of water resources carrying capacity in oil and gas resource-based cities is essentially a manifestation of the imbalance between energy development, economic growth, and ecological protection. An integrated development strategy that includes water-saving, pollution control, and economic adjustments proves effective in alleviating water resource pressure through dual supply-demand adjustments. Future water management in Qingyang City requires curbing its current development trends promptly and regulating key guiding factors. Among the four projected schemes, the integrated coordinated development scheme performs optimally.

Key words: water resources carrying capacity, evaluation system, dynamic and static evaluation method, principal component analysis, system dynamics, water resources regulation, Qingyang City

中图分类号: 

Baidu
map