刚性面加筋土挡墙工作性状与设计方法探讨

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-5485.2014.03.006

院报 ›› 2014, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (3): 40-47.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5485.2014.03.006

刚性面加筋土挡墙工作性状与设计方法探讨

王协群^{1, 2}, 邹维列¹, 冷建军³, 刘家国⁴, 邓卫东⁵

1.武汉大学岩土与结构工程安全湖北省重点实验室, 武汉 430072;

2.武汉理工大学土木工程与建筑学院, 武汉 430070;
3.Tenax Corporation, Baltimore MD 21205, USA;

4.深圳地质勘察局, 深圳 518015; 5.招商局重庆交通科研设计院有限公司, 重庆 400067

收稿日期:2013-12-31 修回日期:2014-03-07 出版日期:2014-03-07 发布日期:2014-03-07
通讯作者: 邹维列(1969-), 男, 重庆人, 教授, 博士生导师, 主要从事非饱和土特性与土工合成材料应用等方面的研究, (电话)13627232863(电子信箱)zwilliam@126.com。
作者简介:王协群(1971-), 女, 江苏扬州人, 教授, 主要从事土工合成材料应用和地基处理方面的研究, (电话)027-68775328(电子信箱)xqscwang@126.com。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(51109171);岩土与结构工程安全湖北省重点实验室开放研究基金项目(HBKLCIV201209)

Working Behaviour and Design Method of Geosynthetic-reinforced Soil Retaining Wall with Rigid Facing

WANG Xie-qun^{1, 2}, ZOU Wei-lie¹, LENG Jian-jun³, LIU Jia-guo⁴, DENG Wei-dong⁵

1.Key Laboratory of Safety for Geotechnical and Structural Engineering of Hubei Province, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China; 2. School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China; 3. Tenax Corporation, Baltimore MD 21205, USA; 4. Shenzhen Geology Survey Bureau , Shenzhen 518015 , China; 5. Chongqing Institute of Communication Research and Design, Chongqing 400067, China

Received:2013-12-31 Revised:2014-03-07 Online:2014-03-07 Published:2014-03-07

摘要/Abstract

摘要： “重力式”加筋土挡墙和“全高刚性面”加筋土挡墙是墙面为具有抗弯刚性的新型挡土结构, 可统称为“刚性墙面加筋土挡墙”。与普通面板式加筋土挡墙的主要不同在于其墙面厚、刚度大, 对墙后填土侧向变形的约束较大, 并要求刚性墙面承担墙后土压力的作用。但目前我国对其工作性状、设计方法缺少系统、深入的研究, 相关规范也没有涉及, 明显落后于实践。针对墙顶有堆载的路堤式挡墙, 采用数值分析方法, 考虑“先筑刚性墙、后填加筋土”和“先填加筋土、后筑刚性墙”2种不同施工顺序, 从筋材与填土的应力、应变和挡墙变形等方面, 分析了刚性墙面加筋土挡墙的工作性状。结果表明:刚性墙面的水平变形沿墙高为直线分布, 墙顶处最大;“先填加筋土、后筑刚性墙面”的施工顺序能更好地发挥筋材的作用, 减小墙后土压力, 控制墙体的变形。综合数值分析结果和现有文献资料, 提出了刚性墙面加筋土挡墙筋材拉力的确定方法, 并建议借鉴日本《RRR-B工法设计·施工规范》的“双楔法”计算墙后土压力。

关键词: 加筋土, 刚性墙面, 筋材拉力, 土压力, 双楔法

Abstract: Geosynthetic-reinforced soil retaining wall (GRS RW) with a gravity wall(GW)facing and GRS RW with a full-height rigid (FHR) facing are new retaining wall structures, which are collectively known as GRS RW-RWF (rigid wall facing). The differences of GRS RW-RWF with normal GRS RW with a thin concrete slab lie in that the rigid wall facing has larger thickness and higher rigidity, which can restrain the deformation of backfill soil and bear soil pressure. At present, the working behaviour and design method of GRS RW-RWF are not covered in specifications and systematic in-depth researches are in lack. In this paper, we take embankment retaining wall which is commonly employed in roadbed engineering of railway and highway as a research object, and analyzed the working behaviour of GRS RW-RWF is analyzed from aspects including the stress and strain of reinforced material and filling soil as well as the deformation of rigid retaining wall in the presence of two different construction sequences (construction sequence A: pouring rigid retaining wall before filling geosynthetic-reinforced soil, and construction sequence B: filling geosynthetic-reinforced soil before pouring rigid retaining wall). Results show that the lateral deformation of GRS RW-RWF is linearly distributed along the height of retaining wall, and the maximum value of lateral deformation occurs on the top of the rigid retaining wall. Construction sequence B is superior to construction sequence A because it better develops the function of reinforced material, reduces the soil pressure acting on rigid retaining wall and controls the deformation of rigid retaining wall. Moreover, the method of determining the reinforcement tension in GRS RW-RWF is presented, and the two-part wedge method recommended by Japanese Code of Design and Construction for RRR-B Construction System can be used to calculate soil pressure acting on rigid retaining wall.

Key words: reinforced soil, rigid wall facing, reinforcement tension, soil pressure, two-part wedge method

中图分类号:

TU472.3

王协群, 邹维列, 冷建军, 刘家国, 邓卫东. 刚性面加筋土挡墙工作性状与设计方法探讨[J]. 院报, 2014, 31(3): 40-47.

WANG Xie-qun, ZOU Wei-lie, LENG Jian-jun, LIU Jia-guo, DENG Wei-dong. Working Behaviour and Design Method of Geosynthetic-reinforced Soil Retaining Wall with Rigid Facing[J]. JOURNAL OF YANGTZE RIVER SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH INSTI, 2014, 31(3): 40-47.

[1]	刘洋, 王怡萱, 杨光昌. 基于墙后填土各向异性强度的土压力计算方法[J]. 院报, 2023, 40(1): 116-122.
[2]	王协群, 匡文壮, 韩仲, 邹维列. 膨胀土中EPS缓冲层-悬臂式挡墙支护结构的受力变形数值模拟[J]. 院报, 2022, 39(7): 78-86.
[3]	李明宇, 辛勇慧, 魏艳卿, 郭院成, 陶云超, 赵红艳, 杜宁. 局部超载作用下邻近支挡结构土压力分析[J]. 院报, 2022, 39(2): 102-107.
[4]	胡其志, 周勇, 马强, 陶高梁. 根系与格栅复合加筋土的力学特性试验研究[J]. 院报, 2022, 39(10): 109-115.
[5]	熊雨, 邓华锋, 彭萌, 齐豫, 李涛. 四种人工合成纤维加筋黄土的抗剪特性[J]. 院报, 2022, 39(1): 122-126.
[6]	李敏, 曹文贵, 王林庆, 张慧姐. 基于大主应力迹线的无黏性土挡墙土压力分析[J]. 院报, 2021, 38(6): 72-78.
[7]	蒋峻峰, 赵其华, 喻小, 王谊. 挡土结构墙后黏土主动土压力改进计算[J]. 院报, 2021, 38(2): 80-85,91.
[8]	陈建旭, 钱波, 郭宁, 余明东, 庄锦亮. 倾斜挡墙黏性填土非极限主动土压力计算[J]. 院报, 2021, 38(12): 137-145.
[9]	张玮鹏, 李冬冬, 曾光辉, 张石虎, 崔梦轩. 非线性条件下加筋土边坡上限法的研究[J]. 院报, 2020, 37(6): 108-114.
[10]	武孝天, 李洪涛, 徐永福. 双向搅拌桩施工对桩周土体扰动分析[J]. 院报, 2020, 37(5): 127-132.
[11]	陈建旭, 郭宁, 虞佳颖, 余明东. 刚性挡墙非极限被动土压力计算方法[J]. 院报, 2020, 37(11): 107-113.
[12]	张帅,肖昭然,赵宪强,蒋敏敏. 桩长对桩与桩相互作用影响的试验研究[J]. 院报, 2019, 36(9): 110-114,120.
[13]	李丽华,余长道,胡智,刘一鸣,张蒋,李俊鹏. 加筋粉煤灰砂混合料大型三轴试验研究[J]. 院报, 2019, 36(8): 97-103,111.
[14]	徐超, 罗敏敏. GRS结构与MSE结构的性能差异及评价方法[J]. 院报, 2019, 36(3): 1-7.
[15]	邵先锋, 朱克亮, 刘流, 杨泰朋. 二级垛式悬臂式挡土墙的受力与变形特征分析[J]. 院报, 2019, 36(12): 121-125.

刚性面加筋土挡墙工作性状与设计方法探讨

Working Behaviour and Design Method of Geosynthetic-reinforced Soil Retaining Wall with Rigid Facing

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价