raybet体育在线 院报 ›› 2025, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (8): 101-110.DOI: 10.11988/ckyyb.20240648

• 岩土工程 • 上一篇    下一篇

非对称开挖基坑支护结构受力与变形计算方法

金亚兵1(), 余棚2, 葛帆1, 傅旭东3()   

  1. 1 深圳市地质局,广东 深圳 518023
    2 中国电建集团国际工程有限公司,北京 100036
    3 武汉大学 土木建筑工程学院,武汉 430072
  • 收稿日期:2024-06-21 修回日期:2024-12-24 出版日期:2025-08-01 发布日期:2025-08-01
  • 通信作者:
    傅旭东(1966-),男,湖北孝感人,教授,博士,主要从事岩土工程的教学、研究和生产工作。E-mail:
  • 作者简介:

    金亚兵(1965-),男,湖北黄梅人,正高级工程师,博士,主要从事岩土工程设计和研究工作。E-mail:

  • 基金资助:
    广东省深圳市地质局地质工程院士工作站专项经费资助项目(2013B090400025)

Incremental Iterative Calculation Method for Stress and Deformation of Retaining Structures under Asymmetric Excavation

JIN Ya-bing1(), YU Peng2, GE Fan1, FU Xu-dong3()   

  1. 1 Shenzhen Geology Bureau, Shenzhen 518023, China
    2 Power China International Group Limited, Beijing 100036, China
    3 School of Civil Engineering, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China
  • Received:2024-06-21 Revised:2024-12-24 Published:2025-08-01 Online:2025-08-01

摘要:

大量基坑工程实践及研究表明,非对称开挖基坑的深挖侧支护结构弯矩与水平位移明显大于浅挖侧,与对称开挖基坑两侧支护结构均向坑内变形的情况显著不同。采用现行规范的支撑不动点调整系数法进行计算时,存在不动点调整系数λ取值范围大和难以进行量化等不足;且当非对称开挖显著导致内支撑上不存在位移不动点时,不动点调整系数法计算结果与实际相差较大。采用支护结构土压力-水平位移双曲线模型,考虑基坑开挖与支撑施工过程,建立基坑支护结构受力与变形的增量迭代法计算流程。基于该计算流程,根据内支撑支护结构支撑左右端点处的受力平衡条件和变形协调关系,提出了非对称开挖基坑内支撑支护结构受力与变形的计算方法,并在MATLAB平台上实现了其数值化求解,克服了现行规范计算方法中不动点调整系数λ无法量化的难题。工程实例计算结果表明:本文计算方法得到的深挖侧支护结构的最大水平位移为23.15 mm,实测值为25.83 mm,两者相差10.4%;浅挖侧支护结构的最大水平位移计算值为8.75 mm,实测值为8.99 mm,两者相差仅2.67%;采用传统弹性支点法计算深挖侧支护结构的最大水平位移仅为12.93 mm,与实测值相差接近50%。采用传统弹性支点法易高估深挖侧的支撑刚度、低估深挖侧的水平位移,本文计算方法得到的深挖侧、浅挖侧地下连续墙的水平位移曲线与工程实测曲线分布规律及数值大小基本一致,可供类似基坑设计计算参考。

关键词: 非对称开挖, 受力和变形, 内支撑, 支撑不动点调整系数, 增量迭代计算

Abstract:

[Objectives] Numerous engineering practices and studies on foundation pits have shown that the bending moment and horizontal displacement of the support structure on the deep excavation side of asymmetric excavation foundation pits are significantly greater than those on the shallow excavation side, which is notably different from the situation where the support structures on both sides of symmetric excavation foundation pits deform inward uniformly. When using the current standard’s support fixed point adjustment coefficient method for calculation, there are shortcomings such as a wide range of values for the fixed point adjustment coefficient λ and difficulty in quantification, as well as significant discrepancies between the calculated results and actual conditions when asymmetric excavation causes the absence of displacement fixed points on the internal supports. [Methods] The hyperbolic model of earth pressure versus horizontal displacement (p-y) of the retaining structure was adopted. It was assumed that the curvature of the p-y curves for active and passive deformation at y = 0 are the same and calculated using the m-method, i.e., K0a = K0p = K0 = mz·z. Calculation methods for active earth pressure, passive earth pressure, and net earth pressure on the retaining structure were proposed. Considering the excavation and support construction process of the foundation pit, the increment of earth pressure load on the retaining structure caused by excavation was first calculated, and then the increments of internal force and displacement were solved using the incremental method. An incremental iterative calculation procedure for the stress and deformation of the foundation pit retaining structure was established. Based on this incremental iterative calculation procedure and according to the force balance conditions and deformation compatibility at the left and right ends of the internal support retaining structure, a calculation method for the stress and deformation of internal support retaining structures under asymmetric excavation of foundation pits was proposed and numerically implemented on the MATLAB platform, overcoming the difficulty of quantifying the fixed point adjustment coefficient λ in current normative calculation methods. [Results] Calculation results of engineering cases showed that the horizontal displacement curves of the diaphragm walls on the deep and shallow excavation sides obtained by the incremental iterative calculation method were generally consistent with the distribution of the measured curves. The maximum horizontal displacement of the support structure on the deep excavation side was 23.15 mm, while the measured value was 25.83 mm, with a difference of 10.4%. The calculated maximum horizontal displacement of the support structure on the shallow excavation side was 8.75 mm, while the measured value was 8.99 mm, with a difference of only 2.67%. The maximum horizontal displacement of the support structure on the deep excavation side calculated by the traditional elastic fulcrum method was only 12.93 mm, differing from the measured value by 49.67%, thus underestimating the horizontal displacement of the deep excavation side. The maximum bending moments of the diaphragm walls on the deep and shallow excavation sides obtained by this method were 451.24 kN·m/m and 228.95 kN·m/m, respectively, differing by 49.3%. The axial force of the internal support obtained by this method was 204.56 kN/m, which lies between the internal support axial forces calculated by the traditional elastic fulcrum method for the deep and shallow excavation sides, avoiding the waste caused by designing solely based on the deep excavation side. [Conclusions] The study shows that the traditional elastic fulcrum method tends to overestimate the support stiffness and underestimate the horizontal displacement on the deep excavation side. The incremental iterative calculation method satisfies the force balance conditions and deformation compatibility at both ends of the internal supports. The horizontal displacement curves of the diaphragm walls on both sides obtained by this method are basically consistent with the distribution patterns and values of the measured engineering curves. It overcomes the difficulty of quantifying the fixed point adjustment coefficient λ in current normative calculation methods and can serve as a reference for the design and calculation of similar foundation pits.

Key words: asymmetric excavation, stress and deformation, internal support, support fixed point adjustment coefficient, incremental iterative calculation

中图分类号: 

Baidu
map