raybet体育在线 院报 ›› 2025, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (7): 94-103.DOI: 10.11988/ckyyb.20240564

• 水力学 • 上一篇    下一篇

跨河桥梁基础冲刷研究综述

王路1(), 刘宏伟1, 魏凯2, Bruce MELVILLE3, 聂锐华1()   

  1. 1 四川大学 山区河流保护与治理全国重点实验室,成都 610065
    2 西南交通大学 桥梁智能与绿色建造全国重点实验室,成都 611756
    3 Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering,University of Auckland,Auckland 1142,New Zealand
  • 收稿日期:2024-05-26 修回日期:2024-09-02 出版日期:2025-07-01 发布日期:2025-07-01
  • 通信作者:
    聂锐华(1978-),男,安徽岳西人,研究员,博士,研究方向为水力学及河流动力学。E-mail:
  • 作者简介:

    王路(1988-),男,四川蒲江人,研究员,博士,研究方向为水力学及河流动力学。E-mail:

  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(52279074); 国家自然科学基金项目(U20A20319); 四川省科技计划项目(2023NSFSC1989)

Review of Research on Foundation Scour of River-Crossing Bridges

WANG Lu1(), LIU Hong-wei1, WEI Kai2, Bruce Melville3, NIE Rui-hua1()   

  1. 1 State Key Laboratory of Hydraulics and Mountain River Engineering, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China
    2 State Key Laboratory of Bridge Intelligent and Green Construction, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 611756, China
    3 Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Auckland, Auckland 1142, New Zealand
  • Received:2024-05-26 Revised:2024-09-02 Published:2025-07-01 Online:2025-07-01

摘要:

基础冲刷是导致跨河桥梁水毁的主要原因之一。归纳了跨河桥梁基础冲刷近60 a来的研究成果,总结了一般冲刷、束窄冲刷和局部冲刷3个方面的研究进展,并分析了现有研究的不足。过去60余年,国内外学者基于水槽试验、原型观测、数值模拟等方法,围绕跨河桥梁基础冲刷开展了大量研究,取得了一系列研究成果,显著提高了跨河桥梁基础冲刷的设计水平。由于已有跨河桥梁基础冲刷研究多局限于顺直河道、非黏性河床、单桩结构等简单边界条件,研究方法多基于水槽试验和特定桥梁的原型观测结果,较少考虑人类扰动对河床演变的影响,相关结论和设计方法的适用性和可靠性有限。未来研究需要更好地将水槽试验、原型观测、数值模拟、理论分析、人工神经网络、深度学习等方法进行融合,系统深入开展受人类扰动影响和复杂边界条件的跨河桥梁基础冲刷研究,完善跨河桥梁基础冲刷的理论体系,提出适用性更广、可靠性更高的冲刷设计方法。

关键词: 跨河桥梁, 基础冲刷, 泥沙运动, 河床演变, 桥梁水毁

Abstract:

Foundation scour is one of the primary causes of hydraulic failures in river-crossing bridges. By integrating flume experiments, prototype observations, numerical simulations, and artificial intelligence methods, this study reviews research on foundation scour of river-crossing bridges over the past six decades, summarizes progress in three aspects of general scour, contraction scour, and local scour, analyzes the limitations in existing research, and proposes future research directions. In terms of physical mechanisms, most existing studies focus on bridge foundation scour under simplified boundary conditions such as straight channels, non-cohesive riverbeds, and cylindrical structures. However, cohesive sediments prevalent in natural rivers exhibit complex force interactions and high randomness, resulting in scour processes for bridge foundations that differ significantly from those in non-cohesive riverbeds. Moreover, in common natural channels such as braided, branching, confluence, and alternating wide-narrow channels, water-sediment dynamics and riverbed evolution involve numerous factors with strong uncertainties, making scour mechanisms for bridge foundations more complex than those in straight channels. Therefore, future research must focus on scour mechanisms under more boundary conditions commonly found in natural rivers to improve the theoretical framework for foundation scour of river-crossing bridges. Regarding scour prediction methods, existing research primarily relies on flume experiments and prototype observations of specific bridges. The former’s prediction accuracy is severely affected by scale effects, while the latter has limited applicability. To date, there is a lack of predictive formulas or analytical models that quantitatively consider the scale effects on bridge foundation scour. Data-driven models such as artificial neural networks and deep learning can effectively compensate for the inability of conventional prediction methods for bridge foundation scour to account for complex boundary conditions. In particular, multi-module multilayer perceptrons (multi-module MLPs) can construct hybrid neural networks incorporating physical scour mechanisms, showing great potential in addressing the challenges of predicting scour under complex boundary conditions. In numerical modeling, existing methods are often applicable to low Reynolds number conditions, with insufficient accuracy in capturing turbulence at high Reynolds numbers and absence of standardized grid size criteria. Sediment transport is frequently computed using empirical formulas, and dynamic grid technologies often suffer from low precision. Existing numerical methods exhibit inadequate coupling between turbulence models and sediment transport models. Moreover, current numerical simulations are limited to non-cohesive riverbeds, with few models applicable to cohesive riverbeds and virtually no reported models suitable for stratified riverbeds. Therefore, numerical models for bridge foundation scour require in-depth investigation to address these issues in the future, improving their applicability and reliability under complex boundary conditions. In addition, intensified human interventions—including sand mining, channel regulation, and dam construction—have triggered rapid riverbed degradation in many rivers. These degradation events often occur at scales, rates, and complexity far beyond conventional understanding of general riverbed degradation, resulting in highly destructive and abrupt changes. Future research should systematically investigate riverbed evolution under human disturbances. To build a more comprehensive understanding of foundation scour of river-crossing bridges, future studies should better integrate flume experiments, prototype monitoring, numerical modeling, theoretical analysis, artificial neural networks, and deep learning methods. This will enable systematic investigation of bridge scour under human disturbance and complex boundary conditions, thereby improving the theoretical system and developing more widely applicable and reliable scour design methods.

Key words: river-crossing bridge, foundation scour, sediment transport, riverbed evolution, hydraulic failure of river-crossing bridges

中图分类号: 

Baidu
map