院报 ›› 2022, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (7): 131-136.DOI: 10.11988/ckyyb.20210184

• 岩土工程 • 上一篇    下一篇

考虑压实度差异的软岩路堤填料强度与变形特性试验研究

丁高俊1, 吴广怀2, 明伟2, 江洎洧3   

  1. 1.长江勘测规划设计研究有限责任公司,武汉 430010;
    2.重庆市水利港航建设集团有限公司,重庆 401120;
    3. 水利部岩土力学与工程重点实验室,武汉 430010
  • 收稿日期:2021-03-04 修回日期:2021-06-04 出版日期:2022-07-01 发布日期:2022-07-25
  • 通讯作者: 江洎洧(1984-),男,湖北赤壁人,正高级工程师,博士,研究方向为粗粒土工程特性试验及岩土工程数值计算。 E-mail: jiangjw1023@163.com
  • 作者简介:丁高俊(1991-),男,湖北武汉人,工程师,硕士,研究方向为水利水电工程施工建设管理。E-mail:dinggaojun@cjwsjy.com.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目(51979009);中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费项目(CKSF2019191/YT)

Experimental Study on Strength and Deformation Properties of Soft-rock Filling Embankment Considering Compaction Difference

DING Gao-jun1, WU Guang-huai2, MING Wei2, JIANG Ji-wei3   

  1. 1. Changjiang Institute of Survey Planning Design and Research, Wuhan 430010, China;
    2. Chongqing Water Resources Port and Waterway Construction Group Co., Ltd., Chongqing 401120, China;
    3. Key Laboratory of Geotechnical Mechanics and Engineering of Ministry of Water Resources, Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, Wuhan 430010, China
  • Received:2021-03-04 Revised:2021-06-04 Online:2022-07-01 Published:2022-07-25

摘要: 路堤填筑碾压施工平面上不同部位填料所受约束条件存在较大差异,特别对于颗粒强度较低、骨架结构锁固效应较弱的软岩填料,碾压后靠近路堤中部的填料压实度大于两侧。基于采用含砂质泥岩作为填筑料的某路堤工程开展试验研究,结果表明:①靠近路堤中线和两侧临空面填料现场检测压实度分别不低于0.95和0.93,满足下路堤压实度要求,但压实度存在差异;②对碾压后的路堤填料取样,并分别在0.95和0.93的压实度下进行大型三轴固结排水试验,压实度0.95试样摩擦角较压实度0.93的约高13%,但黏聚力基本相同;③大应变过程压实度0.93填料体变与围压基本无关,细观结构压缩呈主导,而在压实度0.95下体缩与围压呈正相关,颗粒骨架受力更为充分,但仍呈全过程体缩,表明大变形过程伴随有颗粒破碎后的二次挤密;④进一步分析发现两种压实度下球应力-体变以及体积模量-围压均很好满足线性拟合关系,采用邓肯-张E-B模型可较好描述压实度差异状态下软岩填料的变形力学特性。

关键词: 岩土工程, 路堤填筑, 软岩填料, 压实度差异, 变形力学特性

Abstract: The constraint conditions of filler on construction plane of embankment filling vary remarkably for each part. In particular, the compaction of soft-rock filler with low particle strength and weak structural lock effect is higher close to the center than that close to both sides. We carried out experimental study on an embankment project with sandy mudstone filler, and the results manifested that: 1) the measured compaction degrees of filler close to the center and both sides are not lower than 0.95 and 0.93, respectively, which meets the compaction requirements of embankment for second class highway, yet still with some difference; 2) large-scale triaxial consolidated-drained test was conducted on the rolled filler collected on site at the compaction degree of 0.95 and 0.93, respectively, and the results revealed stable cohesion and larger friction angle of sample at 0.95 compaction degree than that at 0.93 compaction degree by 13%; 3) in large strain process, the volumetric strain was generally irrelevant with confine pressure at the compaction degree of 0.93, dominated by mesostructure compression, while at the compaction degree of 0.95, volumetric shrinkage was positively correlated with confining pressure despite more sufficient stress in particle skeleton, implying that the large strain process was accompanied by secondary compaction after particles breakage; 4) at both compaction degrees, the relations of spheric stress versus volumetric strain and volumetric modulus versus confining pressure both obey linear fitting relation. Duncan-Chang E-B model could well describe the deformation mechanical characteristics of soft rock filler under different compaction degrees.

Key words: geotechnical engineering, embankment filling, soft-rock filler, compaction difference, deformation and mechanical properties

中图分类号: 

Baidu
map