为研究煤岩组合体在外载荷作用下的力学响应及能量演化规律,设计了纯煤、煤岩组合体和纯岩试件单轴循环加卸载试验,分析了不同试件单轴抗压强度和弹性模量等力学响应特征,深入研究了煤岩组合体输入能密度、弹性能密度和耗散能密度演化规律,得到了不同试件的弹性能储存速率及储能能力的特性,建立并探讨了煤岩组合体能量破坏机理。结果表明:①煤岩组合体的力学参数更接近纯煤试件,其力学特性主要受煤体影响;②随外载荷增加,煤岩组合体输入能、弹性能和耗散能呈明显非线性增加趋势,其中弹性能占比远高于耗散能;③煤岩组合体能量破坏机理为外载荷作用使煤体和岩体同时开始储存弹性能,由于煤体弹性能储存速率较快,其内部弹性能率先达到储能极限,导致煤体破坏并向岩体释放弹性能,当达到岩体的储能极限时,岩体发生破坏。
Abstract
Uniaxial cyclic loading and unloading experiments on pure coal, coal-rock assembly and pure rock specimens were designed and conducted to study the mechanical response and energy evolution law of coal-rock assembly under external load. The mechanical response characteristics such as uniaxial compressive strength and elastic modulus of test specimens were analyzed, and the evolution law of input energy density, elastic energy density and dissipated energy density of coal-rock assembly were examined in detail. The characteristics of elastic energy storage rate and energy storage capacity of different specimens were obtained, and the energy failure mechanism of coal-rock assembly were discussed. Results demonstrate that: 1) The mechanical parameters of coal-rock combined specimens are closer to those of pure coal specimens, mainly affected by the coal. 2) With the rise of external load, the input energy, elastic energy and dissipated energy of coal-rock combined specimen present obvious non-linear increase trends, in which the proportion of elastic energy is much higher than that of dissipated energy. 3) Under external load, elastic energy is stored in coal and rock masses synchronously; but as elastic energy reaches the storage limit in coal earlier than that in rock, the coal mass breaks and releases elastic energy to the rock mass. When the storage limit in rock mass is reached, failure of rock mass occurs.
关键词
煤岩组合体 /
力学响应 /
能量演化 /
循环加卸载 /
能量储存
Key words
coal-rock assembly /
mechanical response /
energy evolution /
cyclic loading and unloading /
energy storage
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] 姜耀东, 潘一山, 姜福兴,等. 我国煤炭开采中的冲击地压机理和防治[J].煤炭学报, 2014, 39(2): 205-213.
[2] 蓝 航, 陈东科, 毛德兵. 我国煤矿深部开采现状及灾害防治分析[J].煤炭科学技术, 2016, 44(1): 39-46.
[3] 齐庆新, 欧阳振华, 赵善坤,等. 我国冲击地压矿井类型及防治方法研究[J].煤炭科学技术, 2014, 42(10): 1-5.
[4] SRINIVASAN C, ARORA S K, YAJI R K. Use of Mining and Seismological Parameters as Premonitors of Rockbursts[J] International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 1997, 34(6): 1001-1008.
[5] TORABI A, ZARIFI Z. Energy Release Rate of Propagating Deformation Bands and Their Hosted Cracks[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2014, 67: 184-190.
[6] 李成杰, 徐 颖, 冯明明,等. 单轴荷载下类煤岩组合体变形规律及破坏机理[J].煤炭学报, 2020, 45(5): 1773-1782.
[7] 左建平, 裴建良, 刘建锋,等. 煤岩体破裂过程中声发射行为及时空演化机制[J].岩石力学与工程学报, 2011, 30(8): 1564-1570.
[8] 王晓南, 陆菜平, 薛俊华,等. 煤岩组合体冲击破坏的声发射及微震效应规律试验研究[J].岩土力学, 2013, 34(9): 2569-2575.
[9] 左建平, 谢和平, 吴爱民,等. 深部煤岩单体及组合体的破坏机制与力学特性研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报, 2011, 30(1): 84-92.
[10] 张黎明, 高 速, 任明远,等. 岩石加荷破坏弹性能和耗散能演化特性[J].煤炭学报, 2014, 39(7): 1238-1242.
[11] 张志镇, 高 峰. 受载岩石能量演化的围压效应研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报, 2015, 34(1): 1-11.
[12] 王子辉, 周宏伟, 安 露,等. 循环加卸载下花岗岩破裂过程及能量演化研究[J].中国矿业大学学报, 2020, 49(5): 874-881.
[13] 孟庆彬, 王从凯, 黄炳香,等. 三轴循环加卸载条件下岩石能量演化及分配规律[J].岩石力学与工程学报, 2020, 39(10): 2047-2059.
[14] FAIRHURST C E, HUDSON J A. Draft ISRM Suggested Methodfor the Complete Stress-Strain Curve for Intact Rock in Uniaxial Compression[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 1999, 36(3): 279-289.
[15] 杨圣奇, 陶 焱, 唐劲舟. 循环加载下单节理砂岩三轴强度与变形试验研究[J].中国矿业大学学报, 2020, 49(5): 819-825.
[16] XIE H P, LI L Y, PENG R D, et al. Energy Analysis and Criteria for Structural Failure of Rocks[J]. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 2009, 1(1): 11-20.
[17] 谢和平, 鞠 杨, 黎立云. 基于能量耗散与释放原理的岩石强度与整体破坏准则[J].岩石力学与工程学报, 2005,24(17): 3003-3010.
[18] ZHOU H W, WANG Z H, WANG C S, et al. On Acoustic Emission and Post-peak Energy Evolution in Beishan Granite under Cyclic Loading[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2019, 52(1): 283-288.
基金
煤炭资源与安全开采国家重点实验室自主研究课题项目(SKLCRSM2020X05)
PDF(1964 KB)
