汉江中下游丰枯水期水质时空变化特征

doi:10.11988/ckyyb.20200610

院报 ›› 2021, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (8): 47-53.DOI: 10.11988/ckyyb.20200610

汉江中下游丰枯水期水质时空变化特征

张胜^1,2, 林莉^1,2, 王珍^1,2, 潘雄^1,2, 刘敏^1,2, 董磊^1,2, 陶晶祥^1,2

1. 流域水环境研究所,武汉 430010;
2. 流域水资源与生态环境科学湖北省重点实验室,武汉 430010

收稿日期:2020-06-24 修回日期:2020-11-03 出版日期:2021-08-01 发布日期:2021-08-06
通讯作者: 林莉(1983-),女,湖北咸宁人,教授级高级工程师,博士,主要从事流域水环境保护研究。E-mail: linli1229@hotmail.com
作者简介:张胜(1996-),男,江西赣州人,硕士研究生,主要从事流域水环境保护研究。E-mail: 775976557@qq.com
基金资助:
中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费专项资金项目(CKSF2019380/SH,CKSF2017062/SH)

Spatio-temporal Variation of Water Quality in Middle-lower Hanjiang River

ZHANG Sheng^1,2, LIN Li^1,2, WANG Zhen^1,2, PAN Xiong^1,2, LIU Min^1,2, DONG Lei^1,2, TAO Jing-xiang^1,2

1. Basin Water Environmental Research Department,Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, Wuhan 430010, China;
2. Key Lab of Basin Water Resource and Eco-environmental Science in Hubei Province, Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, Wuhan 430010, China

Received:2020-06-24 Revised:2020-11-03 Online:2021-08-01 Published:2021-08-06

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为探究汉江中下游丰、枯水期水质时空变化特征,于2019年6月丰水期和2020年1月枯水期对汉江中下游(丹江口-武汉段)开展全面调查,布设了18个干流采样断面和2个支流采样断面进行采样和分析,并采用综合污染指数法和综合营养状态指数评价法对水质进行评价。研究结果表明:汉江中下游干流综合污染指数在丰、枯水期整体表现为无显著性差异,但从各断面比较来看,大多数断面丰水期污染程度大于枯水期,空间上丰、枯水期沿程各断面变化趋势相似,污染较大的断面分布在襄阳、汉川和武汉段;主要污染因子为总氮(TN)、总磷(TP)、氨氮(NH₃-N),其中TN浓度在丰、枯水期各断面均超过地表水Ⅱ类标准,且丰水期显著大于枯水期,TP浓度多数断面丰水期大于枯水期,超过Ⅱ类水标准限值断面的比例为27.8%,NH₃-N在枯水期均处于Ⅱ类水标准限值内,仅在丰水期个别断面出现超标现象。通过综合营养状态评价可知,汉江中下游综合营养状态指数处于中营养到轻度富营养状态,整体上呈沿程递增趋势,时间上表现为丰、枯水期无显著性差异,但枯水期综合营养状态指数波动更大。对污染成因进行分析,汉江中下游水质主要受点源、非点源污染和支流汇入,以及水利工程等的影响。研究成果可为汉江中下游水资源保护和可持续发展提供科学依据。

关键词: 汉江中下游, 水质, 丰水期, 枯水期, 时空变化

Abstract: In the aim of exploring the characteristics of the spatio-temporal changes of water quality in middle-lower Hanjiang River in wet season and dry season, a comprehensive survey was carried out on the middle-lower Hanjiang River (Danjiangkou-Wuhan reach) during the wet season in June 2019 and the dry season in January 2020. Eighteen sampling sections in the main stream and two sampling sections in the tributaries were arranged. The water quality was evaluated by using the overall pollution index and the overall trophic level index. The results indicated that the overall pollution index of water in the mainstream of the middle-lower Hanjiang River had no significant difference between wet season and dry season; in sectional scale, yet, the pollution of most sampling sections in wet season was more severe than that in dry season. Spatially, the change trends along the river during wet season and dry season were similar. Sections in Xiangyang, Hanchuan, and Wuhan were subjected to severe pollution, mainly total nitrogen (TN), total phosphorus (TP), and ammonia nitrogen (NH₃-N), among which TN concentration exceeded the limit of class II standard (GB 3838-2002) in all sections in both wet season and dry season, apparently larger in wet season, and TP concentration of most sections in wet season was greater than that in dry season, with 27.8% sections exceeding the limit of class II standard, and NH₃-N concentration of all sections were below the limit of class II standard in dry season, while exceeding the limit only in a few sections in wet season. Moreover, the overall trophic level in middle-lower Hanjiang River presented an increasing trend along the river, ranging from moderate nutrition to mild eutrophication. Except for larger fluctuations in dry season, the overall trophic level index saw no significant difference between wet season and dry season. The water quality in the middle-lower Hanjiang River was mainly affected by point source pollution and non-point source pollution, the confluence of tributaries, and water conservancy projects. The research findings offer scientific basis for water resources protection and sustainable development in the middle-lower Hanjiang River.

Key words: middle-lower Hanjiang River, water quality, wet season, dry season, spatio-temporal variation

中图分类号:

张胜, 林莉, 王珍, 潘雄, 刘敏, 董磊, 陶晶祥. 汉江中下游丰枯水期水质时空变化特征[J]. 院报, 2021, 38(8): 47-53.

ZHANG Sheng, LIN Li, WANG Zhen, PAN Xiong, LIU Min, DONG Lei, TAO Jing-xiang. Spatio-temporal Variation of Water Quality in Middle-lower Hanjiang River[J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2021, 38(8): 47-53.

[1]	马翔宇, 闫峰. 鄱阳湖季节性氨氮水生生物生态风险评估[J]. 院报, 2024, 41(1): 66-74.
[2]	申梦姝, 郑航, 刘悦忆, 陈进, 尹正杰. 基于改进的当量因子法的生态服务价值时空变化研究——以长江流域为例[J]. 院报, 2023, 40(9): 47-54.
[3]	邹志科, 余蕾, 张煜, 王文娟, 赵永立, 孙建东, 程青雷. 基于Sentinel2-L1C的江汉平原水产养殖区水质参数反演[J]. 院报, 2023, 40(9): 181-187.
[4]	王振华, 李青云, 龙萌, 胡艳平, 郝越. 小型水库水质劣化特征及长效治理对策[J]. 院报, 2023, 40(8): 51-56.
[5]	郭利进, 许瑞伟. 基于改进果蝇算法的LSTM在水质预测中的应用[J]. 院报, 2023, 40(8): 57-63.
[6]	王小凤, 杨广斌. 贵州省北盘江流域喀斯特石漠化变化特征及治理成效分析[J]. 院报, 2023, 40(8): 77-83.
[7]	尹正杰, 庄超, 陈进. 长江干流跨省横向生态补偿机制框架探讨[J]. 院报, 2023, 40(7): 16-21.
[8]	林莉, 潘雄. 洪湖水质问题核心及水质综合提升途径思考[J]. 院报, 2023, 40(6): 1-6.
[9]	王渤权, 金传鑫, 周论, 沈笛, 蒋志强. 基于长短期记忆网络的西丽水库水质预测[J]. 院报, 2023, 40(6): 64-70.
[10]	曾天续, 马娇, 党鸿钟, 严渊, 吴新波, 李维维, 陈永志. 好氧颗粒污泥造粒过程中EPS及脱氮除碳性能[J]. 院报, 2023, 40(6): 71-76.
[11]	许文盛, 谷金钰, 孙宝洋, 张志华, 张文杰, 李力. 全坡面水土流失时空分异规律及观测技术研究进展[J]. 院报, 2023, 40(6): 77-85.
[12]	郭超, 周银军, 姚仕明, 单敏尔, 颜剑, 陈花. 丹江口—王甫洲区间河道伊乐藻灾害原因与治理措施初探[J]. 院报, 2023, 40(5): 22-28.
[13]	魏学敏, 温雅琴, 王志军, 勾芒芒. 乌梁素海入湖排水沟水质分析与污染评价[J]. 院报, 2023, 40(5): 63-69.
[14]	李名扬, 张智源, 王晓晨, 谢卫民, 翟婉盈, 谭凌智, 周伟, 刘旻璇. 船载自动巡测模式在长江水质监测中的应用[J]. 院报, 2023, 40(4): 51-58,65.
[15]	袁静, 张德兵. 基于示踪试验的湘桂边界连通关系定量技术[J]. 院报, 2023, 40(3): 25-29.

汉江中下游丰枯水期水质时空变化特征

Spatio-temporal Variation of Water Quality in Middle-lower Hanjiang River

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价