人工通江湖泊非汛期生态调度方案研究

柴朝晖, 姚仕明, 刘同宦, 刘斯盛

raybet体育在线 院报 ›› 2020, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (6) : 28-33.

PDF(4035 KB)
PDF(4035 KB)
raybet体育在线 院报 ›› 2020, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (6) : 28-33. DOI: 10.11988/ckyyb.20190276
水资源与环境

人工通江湖泊非汛期生态调度方案研究

  • 柴朝晖1,2, 姚仕明1,2, 刘同宦1,2, 刘斯盛3
作者信息 +

Ecological Operation Scheme of Artificial River-communicating Lakes in Non-flood Period

  • CHAI Zhao-hui1,2, YAO Shi-ming1,2, LIU Tong-huan1,2, LIU Si-sheng3
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

除鄱阳湖和洞庭湖外,长江中下游通江湖泊基本以涵闸形式连通江湖。由于缺乏水体的自然交换,此类湖泊经常出现水质超标的情况,特别是枯水期。以华阳河湖群为例,通过实测资料分析、现场调研、数值模拟研究了其进行生态调度的可行性及具体方案。研究结果表明:华阳河湖群TN、TP浓度随水位的升高呈下降趋势,但当湖群水位超过某值(13.5 m)后,浓度下降趋势变缓,且湖群9月下旬多年平均水位高于现行非汛期控制水位,因此,利用华阳和杨湾闸进行湖群非汛期生态调度是可行的。在考虑现行闸门调度方式、江湖关系、确保防洪安全和水环境改善4个原则的基础上,结合数值模拟结果,确定了华阳河湖群非汛期生态调度方案,即利用杨湾闸和华阳闸控制湖区10—12月份水位控制在13 m,1—2月份控制在12.5 m,3—4月份控制在11.8 m。

Abstract

Except from Poyang Lake and Dongting Lake, river-communicating lakes in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River connect with the Yangtze River by culverts and sluices in general. The water quality of such lakes is inferior on account of the weak water exchange capacity, especially in dry season. Taking Huayang river-lake group as an example, we studied the feasibility of ecological operation and specific plans in non-flood period via data analysis, field investigation and numerical simulation. Results reveal that the concentrations of TN and TP decrease with the rising of water level; but such tendency attenuates when water level exceeds a certain value (13.5 m). The annual mean water level of lake group in late September is higher than the current controlled water level in non-flood period, indicating that it is feasible to use Huayang and Yangwan sluices for ecological regulation in non-flood period. In line with the current dispatching mode, the relation between rivers and lakes, the flood control security and the water environment improvement as well as the simulated results, we obtained the specific plan of ecological operation for Huayang river-lake group in non-flood season: using Yangwan sluice and Huayang sluice to control the water level in the lake area at 13 m in October-December,12.5 m in January-February,and 11.8 m in March-April.

关键词

通江湖泊 / 江湖关系 / 非汛期 / 生态调度方案 / 水质参数 / 数值模拟 / 泄水时机

Key words

river-communicating lake / relationship between rivers and lakes / non-flood period / ecological operation scheme / water quality parameters / numerical simulation / time of drainage

引用本文

导出引用
柴朝晖, 姚仕明, 刘同宦, 刘斯盛. 人工通江湖泊非汛期生态调度方案研究[J]. raybet体育在线 院报. 2020, 37(6): 28-33 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20190276
CHAI Zhao-hui, YAO Shi-ming, LIU Tong-huan, LIU Si-sheng. Ecological Operation Scheme of Artificial River-communicating Lakes in Non-flood Period[J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute. 2020, 37(6): 28-33 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20190276
中图分类号: TV213.9   

参考文献

[1] 万荣荣,杨桂山,王晓龙,等. 长江中游通江湖泊江湖关系研究进展[J]. 湖泊科学, 2014, 26(1): 1-8.
[2] 康 玲, 郭晓明, 王学立. 大型城市湖泊群引水调度模式研究[J]. 水力发电学报, 2012, 31(3): 65-69.
[3] 赵琰鑫, 张万顺, 吴 静, 等. 水利调度修复东湖水质的数值模拟[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2012, 21(2): 168-173.
[4] 邹朝望, 孙媛媛. 城市浅水湖泊水质水量联合调度研究[J]. 三峡生态环境监测,2017, 3(2): 25-34.
[5] 郑 清,李 建,段功豪,等. 水网联通工程对大东湖水动力影响的研究[J]. 水电能源科学,2016, 34(2): 90-93, 68.
[6] 张丽丽, 殷峻暹, 张双虎, 等. 丹江口水库向白洋淀补水生态调度方案研究[J]. 湿地科学,2012,10(1): 32-39.
[7] 杨中华,朱政涛,槐文信,等. 鄱阳湖水利调控对湖区典型丰枯水年水动力水质影响研究[J]. 水利学报,2018, 49(2): 156-167.
[8] 杨 志,冯民权. 城市人工浅水湖泊群水系连通方案研究[J]. 人民长江,2020, 51(4): 49-58.
[9] 苑希民,王华熤,李其梁,等. 洪泽湖与骆马湖水资源连通分析与优化调度耦合模型研究[J]. 水利水电技术,2016, 47(2): 9-14.
[10]长江勘测规划设计研究有限公司. 华阳河蓄滞洪区建设工程可行性研究报告[R]. 武汉:长江勘测规划设计研究有限公司,2017.
[11]张 婷, 王学雷, 耿军军, 等. 基于MIKE21和灰色模式识别模型的洪湖水质模拟与评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(9): 192-202.

基金

国家重点研发计划项目(2018YFC0407601);国家自然科学基金项目(51609012,51579015,51679010)

PDF(4035 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/

Baidu
map