院报 ›› 2019, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (3): 1-7.DOI: 10.11988/ckyyb.20180905

• 专家特约稿 • 上一篇    下一篇

GRS结构与MSE结构的性能差异及评价方法

徐超, 罗敏敏   

  1. 同济大学 土木工程学院地下建筑与工程系,上海 200092
  • 收稿日期:2018-08-22 出版日期:2019-03-01 发布日期:2019-03-20
  • 通讯作者: 罗敏敏(1988-),男,浙江上虞人,博士研究生,主要从事土工合成材料加筋土结构的研究。E-mail:zjluominmin@163.com
  • 作者简介:徐 超(1965-),男,河南临颍人,教授,博士,博士生导师,主要研究方向为土工合成材料和地基加固。E-mail:c_axu@tongji.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    政府间国际科技创新合作重点专项(2016YFE0105800);国家自然科学基金项目(41772284)

Differences in Performance and Evaluation Methods Between Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil Structure and Mechanically Stabilized Earth Structure

XU Chao, LUO Min-min   

  1. Department of Geotechnical Engineering, Tongji University,Shanghai 200092, China
  • Received:2018-08-22 Online:2019-03-01 Published:2019-03-20

摘要: GRS(Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil)结构是指加筋间距不超过30 cm、填料压实度超过95%的加筋土体;MSE(Mechanically Stabilized Earth)结构则是加筋间距相对较大的加筋土体,即目前工程中常用的加筋土结构。相比于MSE结构,GRS结构的加筋间距更小、压实度更高,一般表现出与MSE结构不同的受力机制和结构性能。通过模型试验,对比研究GRS结构和MSE结构在竖向沉降、侧向位移、筋材应变等方面的性能差异,以加深对这2种加筋土结构的认识。试验结果表明:GRS结构的侧向位移明显小于MSE结构,GRS结构中筋材的应变较小且分布更为均匀;这说明GRS结构与MSE结构在结构性能上确实存在明显的区别。此外,还将部分试验实测数据与相关计算评价方法的理论值进行了对比分析,发现适用于MSE结构的现有评价方法通常并不适用于GRS结构;这种评价方法上的差异进一步说明了GRS结构和MSE结构之间存在较大的差别,因此需在工程设计中引起注意并区别对待。

关键词: 加筋土, GRS结构, MSE结构, 模型试验, 性能差异, 评价方法

Abstract: GRS (Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil) Structures differ from MSE (Mechanically Stabilized Earth) structures in terms of force mechanism and structural performance. GRS structures are featured with smaller reinforcement spacing and higher compactness degree. The reinforcement spacing of GRS structure usually does not exceed 30 cm and the compactness degree is over 95%, while MSE structure which is commonly used in engineering is characterized by large reinforcement spacing. Through model tests, the behaviors of GRS and MSE structures are investigated and compared in aspects of vertical settlement, lateral displacement, and reinforcement strain. Test results reveal that GRS structures suffer from smaller lateral displacement and smaller yet more evenly-distributed strain of reinforcement than MSE structures, which further verifies the evident difference in structural performance between the two structures. In addition, theoretical analysis is also carried out in this study and theoretical calculation results are compared with some of the test results. The comparison demonstrates that current evaluation methods for MSE structures do not suit for GRS structures. In conclusion, such structural differences should be fully considered in engineering design.

Key words: reinforced soil, Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil (GRS) structure, Mechanically Stabilized Earth (MSE) structure, model test, differences in performance, evaluation methods

中图分类号: 

Baidu
map