生态需求流量与河道内生态需水量计算研究——以澜沧江、红河为例

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-5485.2015.03.020

院报 ›› 2015, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (3): 99-106.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5485.2015.03.020

• 水土保持与环境生态研究专辑 • 上一篇下一篇

生态需求流量与河道内生态需水量计算研究——以澜沧江、红河为例

胡波^1,2,郑艳霞³,翟红娟⁴,崔保山²

1. 水土保持研究所,武汉 430010;
2.北京师范大学环境学院,北京 100875;
3.长江勘测规划设计研究院生态产业工程有限公司,武汉 430010;
4.长江流域水资源保护局科研所,武汉 430051

收稿日期:2014-12-28 出版日期:2015-03-01 发布日期:2015-03-06
作者简介:胡波(1980-),男,山东日照人,高级工程师,主要从流域生态系统管理与生态修复研究,(电话)027-82829611(电子信箱)hubchina@hotmail.com。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目(41101521);国家水体污染控制与治理科技重大专项(2012ZX0751002-03);中国科学院科技服务网络计划项目(KEJ-EW-STS-087)

Calculations on Ecological Flow Requirement and Ecological Water Requirement: Case Study on Lancang River and Honghe River

HU Bo^1,2,ZHENG Yan-xia³,ZHAI Hong-juan⁴,CUI Bao-shan²

1.Soil and Water Conservation Department, Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, Wuhan 430010, China;
2.School of Environment, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China;
3.Ecological Industrial Engineering Company Limited, Changjiang Institute of Survey,planning, Design and Research, Wuhan 430010,China;
4.Division of Scientific Research, Yangtze River Water Resources Protection Bureau, Wuhan 430051, China

Received:2014-12-28 Online:2015-03-01 Published:2015-03-06

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目前关于生态需水的研究较多,但相关研究主要是从水资源需求和流量控制这2个角度进行理论方法以及案例应用方面的探讨,未将二者有力地结合在一起。将河道生态需水总量与河流生态需求流量相结合,提出了生态需水系数-水文参数耦合模型,选择西南纵向岭谷区2条典型河流的相似断面进行案例应用研究,分别计算了河道内生态需水量和河流生态需求流量,并对比分析了二者的结果,同时对不同地区的案例应用进行了比较分析。经过计算,结果表明:红河河道内最小、适宜以及理想生态需水量分别占还原径流量的21.55%,34.51%,54.62%;而澜沧江河道最小、适宜以及理想内生态需水量分别占还原径流量的15.61%,27.45%,48.85%;由红河干流生态需求流量推算的河道内生态需水量占还原径流量的42.27%,而澜沧江推算值为19.06%。分析可知:生态需求流量与河道内生态需水量由于应用层面不同而使得其结果有一点差异,通过对二者的综合分析,可以为水资源管理以及生态保护提供一定的科学支持;多元相关性分析结果表明,提出的河流生态需求流量的模拟结果有很强的相关性;将生态需水系数-水文参数耦合模型应用于澜沧江与红河生态需水的计算研究,发现该模型具有很强的实际操作性。

关键词: 河道内生态需水, 生态需求流量, 生态特征指数, 澜沧江, 红河

Abstract:

Present researches on ecological water requirement mainly focus on the theoretical approaches and case applications in terms of water resources management and ecology protection, yet no study has been carried out on combining water resources management with ecology protection. In view of this, a model coupling the ecological water requirement coefficient and the hydrological index is established to calculate the ecological in-stream flow requirement and ecological in-stream water requirement in rivers. Two typical rivers (Lancang river and Honghe river) in southwest China are taken as case study. Comparison on the application results reveal that the minimum, appropriate and optimal ecological water requirement in the Honghe River respectively accounts for 21.55%, 34.51% and 54.62% of the natural run-off of Honghe River, while the minimum, appropriate and optimal ecological water requirement in the Lancang River respectively takes up 15.61%, 27.45% and 48.85% of the natural run-off of Lancang River. The ecological in-stream water requirement of Honghe River deduced from the ecological flow requirement occupies 42.27% of the natural run-off of Honghe River, and the ecological in-stream water requirement of Lancang River calculated by ecological flow requirement makes up 19.06% of the natural run-off of Lancang River. Owning to differences in application, the results of in-stream ecological water requirement and ecological flow requirement are slightly different. Multivariant correlation analysis verifies that the calculation results are strongly correlated, and the model presented in this paper is highly applicable. This comprehensive analysis provides scientific support for both water resources management and ecological protection.

Key words: ecological in-stream water requirement, ecological flow requirement, ecological characteristic index, Lancang river, Honghe river

中图分类号:

S157.2

胡波,郑艳霞,翟红娟,崔保山. 生态需求流量与河道内生态需水量计算研究——以澜沧江、红河为例[J]. 院报, 2015, 32(3): 99-106.

HU Bo,ZHENG Yan-xia,ZHAI Hong-juan,CUI Bao-shan. Calculations on Ecological Flow Requirement and Ecological Water Requirement: Case Study on Lancang River and Honghe River[J]. JOURNAL OF YANGTZE RIVER SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH INSTI, 2015, 32(3): 99-106.

[1]	李红刚, 张攀全, 管镇. 近30年澜沧江上游径流演变特征分析[J]. 院报, 2023, 40(8): 24-29.
[2]	王洁, 陈裕迪, 蒿萌, 王丽荣, 吴苏舒, 马燮铫. CMADS降水的时空分布评估及分布式水文模拟——以红河流域为例[J]. 院报, 2023, 40(12): 23-29,51.
[3]	胡愈炘, 金磊, 刘威, 谭庆军, 梅增荣, 胡圣, 王英才, 熊少凯, 邓玥. 澜沧江真核浮游生物的空间格局及其多样性[J]. 院报, 2023, 40(1): 60-66.
[4]	屈星, 许继军, 吴光东, 霍军军, 王永强, 张潇. 青海省降水时空变化特征及其与太阳黑子的关系[J]. 院报, 2022, 39(2): 14-20.
[5]	许尤, 杨正健, 徐雅倩, 程豹, 刘德富, 马骏. 梯级水库对澜沧江干流水温沿程变化的影响[J]. 院报, 2019, 36(7): 18-22.
[6]	唐见, 翟文亮, 曹慧群. 澜沧江流域旱涝特征变化及其与季风之间的关联性研究[J]. 院报, 2019, 36(3): 19-25.
[7]	丁军浩，邓辉，吴敬清，雍袤. 澜沧江某库区滑坡涌浪物理模型试验[J]. 院报, 2017, 34(10): 39-44.
[8]	殷大聪, 许继军, 金燕, 许珍. 长江源与澜沧江源区浮游植物组成与分布特性研究[J]. 院报, 2017, 34(1): 61-66.
[9]	周银军, 闫霞, 金中武, 李志晶. 澜沧江源扎那曲莫云段河型判别初步分析[J]. 院报, 2016, 33(3): 29-34.
[10]	郭熙灵. 2012年江源科学考察综述及思考[J]. 院报, 2012, 29(10): 1-5.

生态需求流量与河道内生态需水量计算研究——以澜沧江、红河为例

Calculations on Ecological Flow Requirement and Ecological Water Requirement: Case Study on Lancang River and Honghe River

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

相关文章 10

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价