raybet体育在线 院报 ›› 2025, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (5): 119-129.DOI: 10.11988/ckyyb.20240537

• 水灾害 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于多变量变分模态分解与相关性重构的日径流预测模型

丁杰1,2(), 涂鹏飞1,2(), 冯谕1,2, 曾怀恩1,2   

  1. 1 三峡大学 土木与建筑学院,湖北 宜昌 443002
    2 三峡大学 湖北省水电工程施工与管理重点实验室,湖北 宜昌 443002
  • 收稿日期:2024-05-17 修回日期:2024-08-22 出版日期:2025-05-01 发布日期:2025-05-01
  • 通信作者:
    涂鹏飞(1965-),男,湖北宜昌人,教授,硕士,研究方向为水灾害治理与防控。E-mail:
  • 作者简介:

    丁 杰(2000-),男,湖北宜昌人,硕士研究生,研究方向为人工智能下的径流预测。E-mail:

  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(42074005)

Daily Runoff Prediction Model Based on Multivariate Variational Mode Decomposition and Correlation Reconstruction

DING Jie1,2(), TU Peng-fei1,2(), FENG Yu1,2, ZENG Huai-en1,2   

  1. 1 College of Civil Engineering & Architecture, China Three Gorges University, Yichang 443002, China
    2 Hubei Key Laboratory of Construction and Management in Hydropower Engineering,China Three Gorges University, Yichang 443002, China
  • Received:2024-05-17 Revised:2024-08-22 Published:2025-05-01 Online:2025-05-01

摘要:

准确预测径流是预防洪涝灾害的基础。针对这一问题,提出一种基于多变量变分模态分解与皮尔逊相关性重构的日经流预测组合模型,该模型首先运用多变量变分模态分解(MVMD)方法分解日径流数据,然后,针对分解后的模态分量,运用皮尔逊相关系数法对该分量进行重构分类为波动项和随机项,运用思维进化算法(MEA)优化BP神经网络对波动项进行预测;运用灰狼优化算法(GWO)优化极限学习机算法(ELM)对随机项进行预测。最后,对两个模态分量预测融合得出最终预测结果。以汉江流域中的安康水电站与白河水电站径流数据为例进行分析,结果表明:安康站平均R2为0.87,白河站平均R2为0.93,预测模型预测效果较好、准确性较高,具有预测合理性。研究结果可为预防洪涝灾害和合理调控水资源提供依据。

关键词: 多变量变分模态分解, 相关性重构, 思维进化算法, BP神经网络, 灰狼优化算法, 极限学习机算法中图分类号:TV124 文献标志码:A文章编号:1001-5485(2025)05-0119-11

Abstract:

[Objective] This study took Hanjiang River Basin as the study area. To better monitor the runoff conditions in Hanjiang River Basin, the daily runoff data collected from Ankang and Baihe hydroelectric power stations were selected for prediction analysis. The original data included daily runoff from January 2005 to December 2012. [Methods] This study first employed Multivariate Variational Mode Decomposition(MVMD) to decompose the original daily runoff data from the two stations, reducing data complexity. Subsequently, the decomposed modes and the historical runoff data from the previous 7 days were reconstructed using the Pearson correlation coefficient method(used to measure inter-variable correlation). The modes with high correlation coefficients were superimposed and defined as fluctuation terms, while those with low correlation coefficients were superimposed and defined as random terms. For the prediction of fluctuation terms, the historical runoff from the previous 7 days was used as input, resulting in seven operating conditions. Then, the Microbial Enhanced Algorithm-Back Propagation(MEA-BP) model was used for multiple predictions, and the average values were taken, and evaluation indicators were employed to assess the seven operating conditions. For the prediction of random terms, the Grey Wolf Optimizer-Extreme Learning Machine(GWO-ELM) was used for multiple predictions, and the average values were taken, and evaluation indicators were also used for assessment. Finally, the predicted results were fused, and evaluation coefficients were derived using evaluation indicators, demonstrating the accuracy and stability of the model. [Results] For Ankang station, IMF1 and IMF5 showed correlation coefficients greater than 0.5 with R1-R7, indicating high correlation. Therefore, IMF1 and IMF5 were reconstructed as fluctuation terms. IMF2, IMF3, IMF4, and IMF6, with correlation coefficients all below 0.5 with R1-R7, were reconstructed as random terms. Similarly, for Baihe station, IMF1 and IMF5 had correlation coefficients exceeding 0.5 with R1-R7 and were reconstructed as fluctuation terms, while IMF2, IMF3, IMF4, and IMF6, with correlation coefficients all below 0.5 with R1-R7, were reconstructed as random terms. For the prediction of fluctuation terms, the seven operating conditions were specifically defined as: R1,R1-R2,R1-R3, R1-R4,R1-R5, R1-R6,and R1-R7. The coefficients of determination(R2) for these seven conditions of fluctuation term prediction at Ankang station were 0.54, 0.73, 0.74, 0.72, 0.81, 0.73, and 0.60, respectively, while those at Baihe station were 0.65, 0.68, 0.72, 0.77, 0.82, 0.74, and 0.77, respectively. The optimal operating condition for both stations was condition 5(R1-R5). For the prediction of random terms, the R2 for random term prediction at Ankang and Baihe stations was 0.80 and 0.74, respectively. Finally, the integrated prediction combining fluctuation and random terms under condition 5 yielded R2 of 0.87 and 0.93 for the overall prediction at Ankang and Baihe stations, respectively, demonstrating excellent model performance. [Conclusions](1) The MVMD decomposition method can control the number of decomposition layers, ensuring complete signal feature extraction without overfitting while improving processing speed.(2) Pearson correlation coefficient method enhances prediction accuracy through decomposed data classification.(3) The MEA-BP can improve signal-to-noise ratio, adapt to complex environments, enhance learning efficiency and generalization ability, and reduce computational complexity.(4) The GWO-ELM algorithm integrates grey wolf optimizer with extreme learning machine, providing a fast and adaptive solution for time-series prediction with reduced overfitting and improved efficiency.(5) The overall combined model can efficiently and stably process large amount of data while ensuring high accuracy.

Key words: multivariate variational mode decomposition, correlation reconstruction, mind evolutionary algorithm, BP neural network, grey wolf optimizer, extreme learning machine algorithm

中图分类号: 

Baidu
map