基于不同蒸发公式的流域典型期潜在蒸发、径流的时空演变特征

宿辉, 宋向旭, 周帅, 武春晓, 韩小庆, 张晓

raybet体育在线 院报 ›› 2025, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (3) : 26-33.

PDF(6433 KB)
PDF(6433 KB)
raybet体育在线 院报 ›› 2025, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (3) : 26-33. DOI: 10.11988/ckyyb.20231347
水资源

基于不同蒸发公式的流域典型期潜在蒸发、径流的时空演变特征

作者信息 +

Characterization of Spatial and Temporal Evolution of Potential Evaporation and Runoff during Typical Periods in a Watershed Based on Different Evaporation Formulas

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

分析潜在蒸发、径流的时空变化对准确认识气候敏感区实际蒸发和水量平衡变化规律具有重要意义,但受全球气候年际、季节变化等影响,流域层面潜在蒸发、径流难以预测与评估。以气候敏感区黄河源区为研究对象,采用综合差分样本方法(CDSST)划分流域干湿状态为丰水年、枯水年和混合年,并构建了各状态下月尺度abcd水文模型,探究了4种潜在蒸发算法(Haregreaves、Makkink、Penman-Monteith和Jensen-Haise)不确定性对流域潜在蒸发、径流预测不确定性的影响;利用不均匀系数、集中度和相对变化幅度等水文指标,揭示了4种不同潜在蒸发算法对流域水资源预测的影响。结果表明:较1990年之前,流域呈干旱状态的年份增多(由4 a增至10 a),且丰水、枯水和混合年对应的年份个数占比分别为25.86%、24.14%和50%;同时,潜在蒸发算法不确定性改变了流域蒸发量和径流量的时空分布特征。研究结果对于科学掌握变环境下流域水文过程动态变化、区域水资源管理和生态恢复具有重要的参考价值。

Abstract

Analyzing the spatiotemporal variations of potential evaporation and runoff is crucial for accurately understanding the actual evaporation and water balance changes in climate-sensitive areas. However, due to the inter-annual and seasonal variations of the global climate, predicting and evaluating potential evaporation and runoff at the watershed scale are challenging. In this study, we selected the source area of the Yellow River, a climate-sensitive region, as the research target. We utilized the Comprehensive Differential Sample Method (CDSST) to classify the dry and wet states of the watershed into wet years, dry years, and mixed years. Then, we constructed monthly-scale abcd hydrological models for each state. We also investigated how the uncertainty in four potential evaporation algorithms (Haregreaves, Makkink, Penman-Monteith, and Jensen-Haise) affects the prediction uncertainty of potential evaporation and runoff in the watershed. Subsequently, by employing hydrological indicators such as the unevenness coefficient, concentration degree, and relative variation range, we revealed the influence of these four different potential evaporation algorithms on watershed water resource prediction. Results show that, compared with the period before 1990, the number of years when the watershed was in a dry state increased (from 4 years to 10 years). The corresponding proportions of wet years, dry years, and mixed years were 25.86%, 24.14%, and 50%, respectively. Meanwhile, the uncertainty of potential evaporation algorithms alters the spatiotemporal distribution characteristics of watershed evaporation and runoff. These findings are essential for scientifically grasping the dynamic changes of watershed hydrological processes under changing environments, as well as for regional water resource management and ecological restoration.

关键词

潜在蒸发 / 径流不确定性 / 水资源 / 黄河源区

Key words

potential evaporation / runoff uncertainty / water resources / source region of the Yellow River

引用本文

导出引用
宿辉, 宋向旭, 周帅, . 基于不同蒸发公式的流域典型期潜在蒸发、径流的时空演变特征[J]. raybet体育在线 院报. 2025, 42(3): 26-33 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20231347
SU Hui, SONG Xiang-xu, ZHOU Shuai, et al. Characterization of Spatial and Temporal Evolution of Potential Evaporation and Runoff during Typical Periods in a Watershed Based on Different Evaporation Formulas[J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute. 2025, 42(3): 26-33 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20231347
中图分类号: TV21 (水资源调2查与水利规划)   

参考文献

[1]
韩松俊, 王旭, 刘亚平, 等. 青藏高原潜在蒸发时空变化的南北分异特征[J]. 水科学进展, 2023, 34(4):490-498.
(HAN Song-jun, WANG Xu, LIU Ya-ping, et al. North—South Differentiation on the Spatiotemporal Variations of Potential Evaporation in Tibetan Plateau[J]. Advances in Water Science, 2023, 34(4): 490-498. (in Chinese))
[2]
屈晓明. 基于氢氧同位素的陈家河流域地表水与地下水时空特征研究[J]. 中国煤炭地质, 2023, 35(7):28-32.
(QU Xiao-ming. Study on Spatial-temporal Characteristics of Surface Water and Groundwater in the Chenjia River Basin Based on Hydrogen and Oxygen Isotopes[J]. Coal Geology of China, 2023, 35(7): 28-32. (in Chinese))
[3]
武海喆, 刘登峰, 黄强, 等. 不同潜在蒸发估算方法对黄土高原渭河径流模拟的影响研究[J]. 人民珠江, 2020, 41(10): 36-43, 65.
(WU Hai-zhe, LIU Deng-feng, HUANG Qiang, et al. Impact of Different Potential Evaporation Estimation Methods on Runoff Simulation of Weihe River on the Loess Plateau[J]. Pearl River, 2020, 41(10):36-43, 65. (in Chinese))
[4]
屈海晨, 胡艳阳, 刘晓东. 不同水文模型在滦河流域对比运用研究[J]. 海河水利, 2015(1):44-47.
(QU Hai-chen, HU Yan-yang, LIU Xiao-dong. Comparing of the Different Hydrological Models in Luanhe River Basin[J]. Haihe Water Resources, 2015(1): 44-47. (in Chinese))
[5]
郑健, 鲍婷婷, 杨赟, 等. 参考作物蒸发蒸腾量计算方法在甘肃省不同区域的适用性分析[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2022, 41(10): 1-9.
(ZHENG Jian, BAO Ting-ting, YANG Yun, et al. Reference Evapotranspiration in Gansu Province Calculated Using Different Methods[J]. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 2022, 41(10): 1-9. (in Chinese))
[6]
李云凤, 王文科, 王国庆, 等. 黄河源区潜在蒸散量估算方法适用性分析[J]. 水文地质工程地质, 2021, 48(3): 10-19.
(LI Yun-feng, WANG Wen-ke, WANG Guo-qing, et al. The Applicability of Various Potential Evapotranspiration Estimation Methods in the Headwater Area of the Yellow River[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 2021, 48(3): 10-19. (in Chinese))
[7]
刘凤鑫. 不同潜在蒸发计算模型在本溪地区蒸散发计算中的应用对比研究[J]. 地下水, 2020, 42(1):176-177,259.
(LIU Feng-xin. Comparative Study on the Application of Different Potential Evaporation Calculation Models in Evaporation Calculation in Benxi Area[J]. Ground Water, 2020, 42(1):176-177, 259. (in Chinese))
[8]
杨飞. 气候变化和人类活动对水资源的影响研究: 以北洛河流域为例[D]. 西安: 长安大学, 2011.
(YANG Fei. Study on the Impact of Climate Change and Human Activities on Water Resources: A Case Study of Beiluo River Basin[D]. Xi’an: Chang’an University, 2011. (in Chinese))
[9]
史砚文, 王计平, 程复, 等. 黄土丘陵沟壑区西川河流域近50 a径流变化趋势与归因识别[J]. 中国水土保持科学(中英文), 2024, 22(4): 51-58.
(SHI Yan-wen, WANG Ji-ping, CHENG Fu, et al. Variation Trend and Attribution Identification of Runoff in Xichuan River Basin in Loess Hilly and Gully Region in Recent 50 Years[J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2024, 22(4): 51-58. (in Chinese))
[10]
梁鹏飞, 李宗杰, 辛惠娟, 等. 黄河源区径流变化特征及影响因素研究[J]. 水资源与水工程学报, 2022, 33(4):64-71.
(LIANG Peng-fei, LI Zong-jie, XIN Hui-juan, et al. Characteristics of Runoff Changes and Influencing Factors in the Source Region of the Yellow River[J]. Journal of Water Resources and Water Engineering, 2022, 33(4): 64-71. (in Chinese))
[11]
陈怡璇, 文军, 刘蓉, 等. 黄河源区陆面蒸散量的时空分布特征研究[J]. 高原山地气象研究, 2021, 41(4): 35-42.
(CHEN Yi-xuan, WEN Jun, LIU Rong, et al. Study on the Spatial-temporal Distribution Pattern of Land Surface Evapotranspiration over the Source Region of the Yellow River[J]. Plateau and Mountain Meteorology Research, 2021, 41(4): 35-42. (in Chinese))
[12]
叶立娟, 刘翠善, 王国庆, 等. 2000—2020年黄河源区水源涵养能力模拟与分析[J]. 水利水运工程学报, 2023(6):46-56.
(YE Li-juan, LIU Cui-shan, WANG Guo-qing, et al. Modeling and Analysis of Water Conservation Capacity in the Source region of the Yellow River from 2000 to 2020[J]. Hydro-Science and Engineering, 2023(6):46-56. (in Chinese))
[13]
夏兴生, 赵希振, 汤童, 等. Hargreaves公式在中国农业区的年内回归修正[J]. 排灌机械工程学报, 2021, 39(1): 81-88.
(XIA Xing-sheng, ZHAO Xi-zhen, TANG Tong, et al. Regression Correction of Hargreaves Equation within a Year in China’s Agricultural Regions[J]. Journal of Drainage and Irrigation Machinery Engineering, 2021, 39(1): 81-88. (in Chinese))
[14]
王婷, 刘春伟, 张佩, 等. 江苏地区不同参考作物蒸发蒸腾量估算模型[J]. 排灌机械工程学报, 2023, 41(1): 70-79.
(WANG Ting, LIU Chun-wei, ZHANG Pei, et al. Estimation Model of Evapotranspiration (ET0) of Different Reference Crops in Jiangsu Area[J]. Journal of Drainage and Irrigation Machinery Engineering, 2023, 41(1):70-79. (in Chinese))
[15]
王艳丽. 干湿条件下水文模型参数的动态效应[J]. 水电能源科学, 2022, 40(4): 28-31, 27.
(WANG Yan-li. Dynamic Effects of Hydrological Model Parameters under Dry and Wet Conditions[J]. Water Resources and Power, 2022, 40(4):28-31, 27. (in Chinese))
[16]
THOMAS J A. Improved Methods for National Water Assessment[R]. Washington, DC: US Water Resource Council, 2021.
[17]
金文婷, 王义民, 畅建霞, 等. 黄河中下游水资源多目标利益对古贤水库运行的响应[J]. 水利水电科技进展, 2024, 44(1): 52-59.
(JIN Wen-ting, WANG Yi-min, CHANG Jian-xia, et al. Response of Water Resources Multi-objective Interests in Middle-lower Yellow River to Guxian Reservoir Operation[J]. Advances in Science and Technology of Water Resources, 2024, 44(1): 52-59. (in Chinese))
[18]
谷鑫鑫, 司剑华, 卢素锦, 等. 黄河源区历史时期干湿变化特征分析[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2019, 47(23): 307-312.
(GU Xin-xin, SI Jian-hua, LU Su-jin, et al. Analysis of Dry and Wet Change Characteristics of Source Region of the Yellow River in Historical Period[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 47(23): 307-312. (in Chinese))
[19]
韩会明, 孙军红, 简鸿福, 等. 变化环境下气候因素对赣江径流的影响[J]. raybet体育在线 院报, 2023, 40(4): 44-50.
摘要
为探究变化环境下赣江流域水文极端事件季节性变化的新特征,基于赣江流域1960—2018年气象水文数据,引入Copula函数和条件概率分布建立径流与气候因素之间的概率依存关系,分析季节性径流与气候因素之间的相关性和敏感性,以及不同气候情景下水文极端事件发生的概率特征及变化。结果表明:赣江流域春季径流和降水量均呈减少趋势,其他季节呈增多趋势;对数正态分布、威布尔分布、伽玛分布和广义极值分布对气象水文要素拟合效果良好,气象要素与径流的最优Copula函数以Frank-Copula函数为主;径流与降水量、相对湿度和水汽压呈正相关,与潜在蒸散量、日照时长呈负相关,且春夏冬对降水量最敏感,秋季对日照时长最敏感;降水量从中值降至低值时,径流特枯事件发生概率平均增多16.6%,由中值增至高值时,洪水发生概率平均增多13.6%。
(HAN Hui-ming, SUN Jun-hong, JIAN Hong-fu, et al. Influence of Climate Factors on Runoff in Ganjiang River under Changing Environment[J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute, 2023, 40(4): 44-50. (in Chinese))

基金

河北省自然科学基金项目(E2023402016)
河北省高等学校科学研究项目(QN2023064)

编辑: 罗 娟
PDF(6433 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/

Baidu
map