PDF(7316 KB)
PDF(7316 KB)
PDF(7316 KB)
泥岩碎屑作为路基填料的吸湿膨胀变形特性
Water-induced Expansion Deformation Characteristics of Mudstone Clast as Roadbed Filler
为贯彻落实绿色发展理念,促进红层渣土资源再利用,以甘肃天水地区的红层泥岩碎屑为研究对象,开展压实泥岩碎屑试样的侧限膨胀试验,建立改进的Huder-Amberg膨胀模型,获取试样最终含水率随轴向压力变化的函数,绘制试样压缩模量随含水率增大而劣化的曲线,并基于湿度场理论提出一种分层模拟路基吸湿膨胀变形的数值计算方法。研究结果表明:①压实红层泥岩碎屑遇水仍具有较强的膨胀性,最大膨胀应力为120.0 kPa,侧限膨胀率为0.163;②外加轴向压力从最大膨胀应力值降为0时,压实泥岩碎屑试样的最终含水率从20.6%升至40.0%、压缩模量从3 605.8 kPa降至34.1 kPa;③分层确定填筑路基的湿度线膨胀系数方法,与不分层法计算相比,路基吸湿膨胀变形更大,用于工程设计更加保守和安全;④泥岩碎屑遇水产生超过相关规范要求的膨胀变形是其不宜直接作为路基填料使用的根本原因,掺入2%的水泥改性可有效解决以上问题。
To advance the concept of green development and promote the reuse of red layer residue resources, confined expansion tests were conducted on compacted red layer mudstone clast samples from the Tianshui area of Gansu Province as a research object.An improved Huder-Amberg expansion model was established to obtain the function of final moisture content varying with axial pressure and the curves of compression modulus degradation with increasing moisture content. Furthermore, a layered numerical calculation method based on humidity field theory was proposed to simulate water-induced expansion deformation in roadbeds. The findings indicate that: 1) despite compaction, the red layer mudstone clasts exhibited substantial expansion when exposed to water, reaching a maximum expansion stress of 120.0 kPa and a confined expansion ratio of 0.163. 2) As applied axial pressure decreased from the maximum expansion stress value to zero, the final moisture content of the compacted mudstone clast samples increased from 20.6% to 40.0%, concurrently with a decrease in compression modulus from 3 605.8 kPa to 34.1 kPa. 3) The method for determining the water-induced linear expansion coefficient in layered roadbed construction resulted in greater water-induced expansion deformation compared to non-layered methods. This approach is considered more conservative and safer for engineering design. 4) The water-induced expansion of mudstone clasts exceeded the requirements specified in relevant standards, making them unsuitable for direct use as roadbed filler. However, adding 2% cement can effectively address this issue.
路基工程 / 泥岩碎屑 / 吸湿膨胀 / 湿度场理论 / 分层模拟
roadbed engineering / mudstone clast / water-induced expansion / humidity field theory / layered simulation
| [1] |
《中国公路学报》编辑部. 中国路基工程学术研究综述·2021[J]. 中国公路学报, 2021, 34(3):1-49.
(Editorial Department of China Journal of Highway and Transport. Review on China’s Subgrade Engineering Research · 2021[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2021, 34(3): 1-49. (in Chinese))
As the foundation of the pavement structure, a stable, strong and durable subgrade plays a key role in the quality protection of pavement. However, the phenomenon of paying attention to road surface but neglecting subgrade has existed in China for a long time, and makes it very common that the subgrade diseases lead to the destruction of pavement structure. Based on the subgrade engineering in recent years related the technical innovation contents of the China's National Science and Technology Award, the projects of the Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC), the excellent Chinese authoritative journals, and the highly cited papers in Web of Science (WoS), this review paper systematically analyzes the research status and future development direction of 5 major fields of pavement engineering in China and abroad. This content includes advanced foundation treatment technology, embankment filling engineering properties, embankment structural performance evolution under multi-field coupling action, cutting slope stability analysis, subgrade retaining and protection. Overall, this review paper is able to provide references and insights for researchers and engineers in the field of subgrade engineering.
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
陈康, 刘先峰, 袁胜洋, 等. 饱和红层泥岩填料累积变形特性及安定界限研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(5): 1261-1268.
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
王骑虎. 甘肃红层工程地质特性与边坡稳定性研究[D]. 北京: 北京工业大学, 2016.
(
|
| [7] |
冯高顺, 余飞, 戴张俊, 等. 川中红层泥岩吸水膨胀时效特征的试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2022, 41(增刊1): 2780-2790.
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
刘景宇. 泥岩膨胀机制及其发展规律研究[D]. 北京: 中国铁道科学研究院, 2019.
(
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
刘晓丽, 王思敬, 王恩志, 等. 含时间效应的膨胀岩膨胀本构关系[J]. 水利学报, 2006, 37(2): 195-199.
|
| [13] |
左清军, 陈可, 谈云志, 等. 基于时间效应的富水泥质板岩隧道围岩膨胀本构模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2016, 37(5): 1357-1364.
|
| [14] |
左清军, 吴立, 袁青, 等. 软板岩膨胀特性试验及微观机制分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2014, 35(4): 986-990, 997.
|
| [15] |
张善凯, 冷先伦, 盛谦. 卢氏膨胀岩湿胀软化特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2):561-570.
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
李永志, 王世明, 邹建文, 等. 膨胀性泥岩抗剪强度与含水率相关性机理[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2021, 21(7):2857-2864.
|
| [18] |
刘先峰, 马杰, 袁胜洋, 等. 干密度和含水率对压实红层泥岩路基填料强度特性的影响研究[J]. 铁道科学与工程学报, 2022, 19(10):2910-2918.
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
钟志彬, 李安洪, 邓荣贵, 等. 高速铁路红层软岩路基时效上拱变形机制研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2020, 39(2): 327-340.
|
| [22] |
缪协兴, 杨成永, 陈至达. 膨胀岩体中的湿度应力场理论[J]. 岩土力学, 1993, 14(4): 49-55.
|
| [23] |
缪协兴. 湿度应力场理论的耦合方程[J]. 力学与实践, 1995, 17(6):22-24.
|
| [24] |
白冰, 李小春. 湿度应力场理论的证明[J]. 岩土力学, 2007, 28(1): 89-92.
|
| [25] |
李康全, 周志刚. 基于湿度应力场理论的膨胀土增湿变形分析[J]. 长沙理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2005, 2(4): 1-6.
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |