PDF(2383 KB)
负压排水法处理工程泥浆的室内模型试验
储兆微, 余世杰, 李幸阳, 卢星宇, 王旭, 罗睿, 王天龙
raybet体育在线 院报 ›› 2024, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (9) : 114-122.
PDF(2383 KB)
PDF(2383 KB)
负压排水法处理工程泥浆的室内模型试验
Indoor Model Test of Negative Pressure Drainage Method for Treatment of Engineering Mud
现有传统处理工程泥浆的方法存在耗时、耗能、昂贵等缺点,而负压排水法具有绿色节能、施工简单、有效提高排水速率等特点。进行了负压排水法处理工程泥浆的室内模型试验研究,对其可行性进行讨论分析。通过使用自制试验箱和负压虹吸装置进行试验,并在虹吸管内连接测压表对装置负压实时监测。试验结果表明:在排水管内径为4 mm的前提下,负压排水能长期稳定进行;负压大小、排水效率都与排水高差呈正相关,且负压排水法处理小厚度泥浆效果较好,处理大厚度泥浆效果则会稍差。用该方法处理工程泥浆高效且免动力,可运用于实际。
Traditional methods for treating engineering slurry are usually time-consuming, energy-intensive, and costly. In contrast, the negative-pressure drainage method is environmental friendly, easy to operate and efficient. Indoor model test was conducted to assess the feasibility of the negative-pressure drainage method for treating engineering mud. The test was performed in a self-developed test chamber equipped with a negative pressure siphon device, with the siphon tube connected to a pressure gauge for real-time monitoring of the negative pressure. The results indicate that stable negative pressure drainage can be achieved using a drainage pipe with a 4 mm inner diameter. Furthermore, both the negative pressure and drainage efficiency are positively correlated with the height difference of the drainage. This method proves more effective for treating mud with small thicknesses but is less effective for thicker mud. Overall, the negative-pressure drainage method is efficient and does not require external power, making it suitable for practical applications.
工程泥浆处理 / 负压排水法 / 室内模型试验 / 4 mm管径
treatment of engineering mud / negative-pressure drainage method / indoor model test / 4 mm tube diameter
| [1] |
朱伟, 闵凡路, 吕一彦, 等. “泥科学与应用技术” 的提出及研究进展[J]. 岩土力学, 2013, 34(11): 3041-3054.
(
|
| [2] |
宋丁豹. 水平排水板真空预压法处理疏浚淤泥固结特性研究[D]. 武汉: 华中科技大学, 2021.
(
|
| [3] |
朱伟, 张春雷, 刘汉龙, 等. 疏浚泥处理再生资源技术的现状[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2002, 25(4): 39-41, 50.
(
|
| [4] |
房凯, 张忠苗, 刘兴旺, 等. 工程废弃泥浆污染及其防治措施研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2011, 33(增刊2): 238-241.
(
|
| [5] |
黄俊妤, 张春雷. 城市建筑泥浆的管理现状、污染问题及对策建议[J]. 四川环境, 2019, 38(1): 165-169.
(
|
| [6] |
武汉市生态环境局. 武汉市建筑垃圾管理办法[EB/OL].(2020-01-07)[2023-02-03]. https://hbj.wuhan.gov.cn/sjzywjfg/fg/202001/t20200107_583907.html.
(Wuhan Authority of Ecology and Environment. Administrative Measures for Construction Wastes in Wuhan City[EB/OL]. (2020-01-07)[2023-02-03]. https://hbj.wuhan.gov.cn/sjzywjfg/fg/202001/t20200107_583907.html. (in Chinese))
|
| [7] |
绍兴市人民政府. 绍兴市工程渣土(泥浆)处置管理办法[EB/OL].(2020-04-24)[2023-02-03]. https://www.sx.gov.cn/art/2020/4/24/art_1229265242_1639210.html.
(People’s Government of Shaoxing City. Administrative Measures for Engineering Residues (Mud) in Shaoxing City[EB/OL].(2020-04-24)[2023-02-03]. https://www.sx.gov.cn/art/2020/4/24/art_1229265242_1639210.html. (in Chinese))
|
| [8] |
宁波市人民政府. 宁波市建筑垃圾管理条例[EB/OL].(2022-03-30)[2023-02-05]. https://www.ningbo.gov.cn/art/2022/5/6/art_1229560977_1741696.html.
(People’s Government of Ningbo City. Administrative Regulations for Construction Wastes in Ningbo City[EB/OL]. (2022-03-30)[2023-02-05]. https://www.ningbo.gov.cn/art/2022/5/6/art_1229560977_1741696.html. (in Chinese))
|
| [9] |
上海市人民政府. 上海市建筑垃圾处理管理规定[EB/OL].(2022-03-30)[2023-02-05]. https://www.shanghai.gov.cn/nw41492/20200823/0001-41492_53766.html.
(People’s Government of Shanghai City. Administrative Regulations for Construction Waste Disposal in Shanghai City[EB/OL].(2022-03-30)[2023-02-05]. https://www.shanghai.gov.cn/nw41492/20200823/0001-41492_53766.html. (in Chinese))
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
楼春晖, 张忠苗, 房凯. 泥浆压滤处理技术理论分析及试验研究[J]. 土木建筑与环境工程, 2012, 34(6): 57-61.
(
|
| [12] |
耿朋飞, 孙林柱. 泥浆压滤脱水复合絮凝剂的实验研究[J]. 武汉理工大学学报, 2014, 36(5): 118-122, 144.
(
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
范英宏, 洪蔚, 侯世全. 京沪高速铁路废弃泥浆化学脱稳与分离处理的试验研究[J]. 铁道建筑, 2009, 49(11): 59-61.
(
|
| [16] |
孙红月, 帅飞翔, 尚岳全, 等. 边坡俯倾排水孔负压排水法研究[J]. 工程地质学报, 2019, 27(3): 585-591.
(
|
| [17] |
胡宇轩, 孙红月, 帅飞翔, 等. 滑坡负压排水方法的试验研究[J]. 自然灾害学报, 2020, 29(2): 111-117.
(
|
| [18] |
孙红月, 帅飞翔, 陈中轩, 等. 边坡俯倾孔液压流排水方法研究[J]. 自然灾害学报, 2021, 30(6): 176-183.
(
|
| [19] |
韩旭, 徐浩伦, 赵荐, 等. 粉土负压排水规律试验研究[J]. 人民长江, 2022, 53(3): 175-180.
(
|
| [20] |
雷怡, 帅飞翔, 孙红月, 等. 边坡负压排水非稳定流研究[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(1): 162-170.
(
|
| [21] |
刘昌军, 丁留谦, 孙东亚, 等. 溪古水电站左岸三维渗流场有限元分析[J]. raybet体育在线
院报, 2009, 26(增刊1): 54-57, 61.
(
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
GB/T 50123—2019,土工试验方法标准[S]. 北京: 中国计划出版社, 2019.
(GB/T 50123-2019, Standard for Geotechnical Testing Method[S]. Beijing: China Planning Press, 2019. (in Chinese))
|
| [24] |
帅飞翔. 边坡俯倾自流排水孔驱动力变化过程与影响因素[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2021.
(
|
| [25] |
熊晓亮. 高扬程虹吸排水合理管径数值模拟[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2014.
(
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |