两种沉积物粒度分析测试方法对比及转换关系

钱磊, 孙吉主, 王勇, 李坤

raybet体育在线 院报 ›› 2024, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (2) : 159-166.

PDF(1251 KB)
PDF(1251 KB)
raybet体育在线 院报 ›› 2024, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (2) : 159-166. DOI: 10.11988/ckyyb.20220990
岩土工程

两种沉积物粒度分析测试方法对比及转换关系

  • 钱磊1,2, 孙吉主1, 王勇2, 李坤1
作者信息 +

Comparison and Conversion Relationship between Two Methods of Sediment Particle Size Analysis

  • QIAN Lei1,2, SUN Ji-zhu1, WANG Yong2, LI Kun1
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

粒径分布(PSD)作为土体的基本物理性质之一,对土体的工程性质具有很大影响。目前,测量海洋沉积物PSD存在不同的方法,但不同方法量测结果的一致性和相互关系值得探讨。基于PSD沉降分析法与激光衍射法的测试原理,推导得出两种方法之间的联系,并提出了一种转换方法。采用上述两种测量方法对两种不同海域的深海沉积物进行PSD分析,依据转换方法对激光衍射法得到的PSD进行转换,并将转换后的结果进行分析。结果显示:沉降分析法与激光衍射法所得结果主要差距在于黏土、粉砂粒径的含量,且经转换后,两种测量方法得出的黏土、粉砂粒级的百分含量基本一致,检验了转换方法的可靠性。

Abstract

Particle size distribution (PSD) is a fundamental physical property that significantly influences the engineering properties of soil. Various methods exist for measuring PSD in marine sediments; however, the consistency and correlation between different measurement results need to be discussed. We deduced the relationship between sedimentation analysis method and laser diffraction method, and proposed a conversion method based on their testing principles. By employing the two methods, we analyzed the PSD of deep-sea sediment samples from the South China Sea and the Shenhu Sea area, and then converted the PSD obtained from laser diffraction method according to the conversion relationship. Results reveal that the difference between sedimentation analysis method and laser diffraction method mainly lies in the content of clay and silt particles.After the conversion, the measured percentages of clay and silt particles align well between the two methods,validating the reliability of the proposed conversion.

关键词

深海沉积物 / 粒度分析 / 沉降分析法 / 激光衍射法 / 转换方法 / 相关性

Key words

deep-sea sediment / particle size analysis / sedimentation analysis method / laser diffraction method / conversion relationship / correlation

引用本文

导出引用
钱磊, 孙吉主, 王勇, 李坤. 两种沉积物粒度分析测试方法对比及转换关系[J]. raybet体育在线 院报. 2024, 41(2): 159-166 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20220990
QIAN Lei, SUN Ji-zhu, WANG Yong, LI Kun. Comparison and Conversion Relationship between Two Methods of Sediment Particle Size Analysis[J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute. 2024, 41(2): 159-166 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20220990
中图分类号: TU41   

参考文献

[1] DEAN W E, LEINEN M, STOW D A. Classification of Deep-sea Fine-grained Sediments[J]. Journal of Sedimentary Research,1985,55(2):250-256.
[2] RAWLINS B G, WRAGG J, LARK R M. Application of a Novel Method for Soil Aggregate Stability Measurement by Laser Granulometry with Sonication[J]. European Journal of Soil Science, 2013, 64(1): 92-103.
[3] 殷宗泽. 土工原理[M]. 北京: 中国水利水电出版社, 2007. (YIN Zong-ze. Geotechnical Principle[M]. Beijing: China Water & Power Press, 2007.(in Chinese))
[4] 李慧茹,刘 博,王汝幸,等.土壤粒度组成分析方法对比[J].中国沙漠,2018,38(3):619-627.(LI Hui-ru,LIU Bo,WANG Ru-xing,et al.Particle-size Distribution Affected by Testing Method[J].Journal of Desert Research,2018,38(3):619-627.(in Chinese))
[5] 金 华. 颗粒计数仪[J]. 油气田地面工程, 2014, 33(9): 117-118. (JIN Hua. Particle Counter[J]. Oil-Gas Field Surface Engineering, 2014, 33(9): 117-118.(in Chinese))
[6] T·艾伦. 颗粒大小测定[M].喇华璞,童三多,施娟英,译. 3版. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 1984. (ALLEN T. Particle Size Measurement[M]. Translated by LA Huapu, TONG San-duo and SHI Juan-ying.3rd ed. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 1984.(in Chinese))
[7] 张富元, 冯秀丽, 章伟艳, 等. 南海表层沉积物的沉降法和激光法粒度分析结果对比和校正[J]. 沉积学报, 2011, 29(4): 767-775. (ZHANG Fu-yuan, FENG Xiu-li, ZHANG Wei-yan, et al. Comparison and Calibration of Laser Grain Size Analysis with Pipette-sieve Method: A Solution for the Underestimation of the Clay Fraction of Surface Sediments from the Eastern South China Sea[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2011, 29(4): 767-775.(in Chinese))
[8] A·L·英德比岑.深海沉积物:物理及工程性质[M].梁 博,译.北京:海洋出版社,1981.(ENDERBY A L.Deep-Sea Sediments(Physical Mechanical Properties)[M].Translated by LIANG Bo.Beijing:Ocean Press,1981.(in Chinese))
[9] 张富元, 章伟艳, 张霄宇, 等. 深海沉积物分类与命名[M]. 北京: 海洋出版社, 2013. (ZHANG Fu-yuan, ZHANG Wei-yan, ZHANG Xiao-yu, et al. Classification and Nomenclature of Deep-Sea Sediments[M]. Beijing: Ocean Press, 2013.(in Chinese))
[10]BEUSELINCK L,GOVERS G,POESEN J,et al.Grain-size Analysis by Laser Diffractometry: Comparison with the Sieve-pipette Method[J].CATENA,1998,32(3/4):193-208.
[11]ESHEL G, LEVY G J, MINGELGRIN U, et al. Critical Evaluation of the Use of Laser Diffraction for Particle-size Distribution Analysis[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2004, 68(3): 736-743.
[12]冯 腾, 陈洪松, 张 伟, 等. 激光粒度仪与沉降吸管法测定喀斯特地区土壤机械组成的对比研究[J]. 农业现代化研究, 2013, 34(1): 100-103. (FENG Teng, CHEN Hong-song, ZHANG Wei, et al. Comparative Study on Determining Soil Particle Size Distribution Measured by Laser Diffraction and the Sieve-pipette Method in Karst Regions[J]. Research of Agricultural Modernization, 2013, 34(1): 100-103.(in Chinese))
[13]朱 瑜, 张卓栋, 刘 畅, 等. 激光粒度仪与吸管法测定土壤机械组成的比较研究: 以不同退化程度栗钙土为例[J]. 水土保持研究, 2018, 25(3): 62-67, 204. (ZHU Yu, ZHANG Zhuo-dong, LIU Chang, et al. Comparison of Laser Diffraction Method and Pipette Method on Soil Particle Size Distribution Determination—A Case Study of Variously Degraded Kastanozem[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2018, 25(3): 62-67, 204.(in Chinese))
[14]王大安, 刘 刚, 王翔鹰, 等. 用激光法和吸管法测定东北黑土区侵蚀泥沙颗粒组成的差异分析[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2016, 14(1): 114-122. (WANG Da-an, LIU Gang, WANG Xiang-ying, et al. Comparative Study on Particle Size Distribution of Eroded Sediment by Laser Method and Pipette Method in Black Soil Region of Northeast China[J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2016, 14(1): 114-122.(in Chinese))
[15]DI STEFANO C, FERRO V, MIRABILE S. Comparison Between Grain-size Analyses Using Laser Diffraction and Sedimentation Methods[J]. Biosystems Engineering, 2010, 106(2): 205-215.
[16]赵明华.土力学与基础工程[M].4版.武汉:武汉理工大学出版社,2014.(ZHAO Ming-hua.Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering[M]. 4th ed.Wuhan:Wuhan University of Technology Press,2014.(in Chinese))
[17]MCCAVE I N, SYVITSKI J P M. Principles and Methods of Geological Particle Size Analysis: Principles, Methods and Application of Particle Size Analysis[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991: 3-21.
[18]程 鹏, 高 抒, 李徐生. 激光粒度仪测试结果及其与沉降法、筛析法的比较[J]. 沉积学报, 2001, 19(3): 449-455. (CHENG Peng, GAO Shu, LI Xu-sheng. Evaluation of a Wide Range Laser Particle Size Analyses and Comparison with Pipette and Sieving Methods[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2001, 19(3): 449-455.(in Chinese))
[19]赵青秀, 李雅宁. 激光粒度分析仪及其应用刍议[J]. 生命科学仪器, 2010, 8(1): 51-53. (ZHAO Qing-xiu, LI Ya-ning. Introduction of the Laser Particle Size Analyzer and Its Application[J]. Life Science Instruments, 2010, 8(1): 51-53.(in Chinese))
[20]王乃宁.颗粒粒径的光学测量技术及应用[M].北京:原子能出版社,2000.(WANG Nai-ning. Optical Measurement Technology and Application of Particle Size[M].Beijing: Atomic Energy Press,2000.(in Chinese))
[21]LERMAN A, LAL D, DACEY M F. Stokes’ Settling and Chemical Reactivity of Suspended Particles in Natural Waters: Gibbs R J. Suspended Solids in Water[M]. Boston, MA: Springer, 1974: 17-47.
[22]赵旭锋, 贾建军, 王欣凯, 等. 新型动态激光粒度粒形仪分析结果的对比与评价[J]. 海洋地质与第四纪地质, 2015, 35(6): 175-184. (ZHAO Xu-feng, JIA Jian-jun, WANG Xin-kai, et al. Evaluation of a New Dynamic Laser Particle Size & Shape Analyzer and Comparison with the Sieving and Laser Diffraction Particle Size Analyzer[J]. Marine Geology & Quaternary Geology, 2015, 35(6): 175-184.(in Chinese))
[23]GB/T 50123—2019, 土工试验方法标准[S]. 北京: 中国计划出版社,2019.(GB/T 50123—2019, Standard for Geotechnical Testing Method[S]. Beijing: China Planning Press,2019. (in Chinese))
[24]段世航, 崔若然, 江荣风, 等. 激光衍射法测定土壤粒径分布的研究进展[J]. 土壤, 2020, 52(2): 247-253. (DUAN Shi-hang, CUI Ruo-ran, JIANG Rong-feng, et al. Research Advance in Determining Soil Particle Size Distribution by Laser Diffraction Method[J]. Soils, 2020, 52(2): 247-253.(in Chinese))
[25]孙福军,苗涵博,韩春兰,等.激光粒度仪法与湿筛-沉降法测定火山碎屑物发育土壤颗粒组成的比较[J].土壤通报,2020,51(3):574-579.(SUN Fu-jun,MIAO Han-bo,HAN Chun-lan,et al. Comparison of Particle Composition of Soil Developed from Pyroclastic Material Measured by Laser Particle Size Analyzer and Wet Sieve-sedimentation Method[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science,2020,51(3):574-579.(in Chinese))
[26]KONERT M, VANDENBERGHE J. Comparison of Laser Grain Size Analysis with Pipette and Sieve Analysis: a Solution for the Underestimation of the Clay Fraction[J]. Sedimentology, 1997, 44(3): 523-535.
[27]GB/T 50145—2007, 土的工程分类标准[S]. 北京: 中国计划出版社, 2008. (GB/T 50145—2007, Standard for Engineering Classification of Soil[S]. Beijing: China Planning Press, 2008. (in Chinese))
[28]王金莲. 海洋沉积物粒度分析方法和测试结果的对比研究[D]. 北京: 中国地质大学(北京), 2011. (WANG Jin-lian. Comparison of Grain Size Analysis Methods and Results of Marine Sediments[D]. Beijing: China University of Geosciences, 2011. (in Chinese))
[29]LUKAS S, PREUSSER F, ANSELMETTI F S, et al. Testing the Potential of Luminescence Dating of High-alpine Lake Sediments[J]. Quaternary Geochronology, 2012, 8(1): 23-32.
[30]何文亮, 张沈阳. 激光粒度仪法与传统沉析法的对比分析[J]. 浙江水利科技, 2013, 41(4): 14-16. (HE Wen-liang, ZHANG Shen-yang. Comparative Grading Analysis of Laser Particle Size Analyzer and Conventional Precipitation Method[J]. Zhejiang Hydrotechnics, 2013, 41(4): 14-16.(in Chinese))

基金

国家自然科学基金项目(52127815,51979269)

PDF(1251 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/

Baidu
map