PDF(1153 KB)
PDF(1153 KB)
PDF(1153 KB)
基于GEE的曲靖市喀斯特石漠化时空演变过程
Spatio-temporal Evolution of Karst Rocky Desertification in Qujing City Based on Google Earth Engine
曲靖市位于长江上游和珠江源头,具有重要的生态区位,探究该地区长时间序列的石漠化变化动态与演变过程具有重要意义。基于Landsat5、Landsat8、DEM等数据,通过GEE云平台和决策树分类法获得1990—2020年的曲靖市石漠化分布,分析其石漠化时空变化特征和演变过程。结果表明:①曲靖市整体石漠化以潜在石漠化、无石漠化为主;31 a间曲靖市已石漠化面积减少1 728.38 km2,无石漠化面积增加1 936.61 km2,石漠化整体得到明显改善。②1990—2020年,曲靖市石漠化的总体变化速率是-57.61 km2/a,随石漠化加剧变化速率呈下降趋势;变化频率排序依次为极强度石漠化>强度石漠化>中度石漠化>轻度石漠化>无石漠化>潜在石漠化。③31 a间,曲靖市石漠化演变方向以不变型居多,面积达7 967.67 km2,占比61.39%;反映石漠化程度好转的持续好转型和波动好转型总面积达3 197.03 km2,占比24.63%;而表示石漠化程度加剧的恶化型面积最少,为558.52 km2,占比4.3%,表明研究区石漠化状况总体呈现好转趋势。
Qujing City is located in the upper reaches of the Yangtze River and the source of the Pearl River holding an important ecological position. Exploring the dynamics and evolutionary process of rocky desertification over a long time series in this area is of great significance. In this study, using Landsat5, Landsat8, DEM, etc., we obtained the rocky desertification distribution from 1990 to 2020 through the Google Earth Engine(GEE) cloud platform and decision tree classification, and analyzed the spatial and temporal change characteristics and evolution process of the rocky desertification. The results show that: 1) the overall rocky desertification in Qujing City was primarily characterized potentially rocky and no rocky desertification; in 31 years, the rocky desertification area in Qujing City decreased by 1 728.38 km2, while the no rocky desertification area increased by 1 936.61 km2, and the overall rocky desertification was significantly improved.(2) From 1990 to 2020, the overall change rate of rocky desertification in Qujing City was -57.61 km2/a, and the change rate decreasd as the intensity of rocky desertification aggravated: extreme intensity > intensity > moderate > mild > no > potential desertification. (3)Over 31 years, the pattern of rocky desertification evolution in Qujing City remained mostly unchanged, covering an area of 7 967.67 km2, accounting for 61.39%. Continuous and fluctuating transformations, reflecting improvements in rocky desertification, covered an area of 3 197.03 km2, or 24.63%. The area of deterioration was 558.52 km2, accounting for 4.3%. The results indicate a general improvement in rocky desertification in the study area.
karst rocky desertification / GEE / evolution track / Qujing City
| [1] |
李阳兵, 侯建筠, 谢德体. 中国西南岩溶生态研究进展[J]. 地理科学, 2002, 22(3):365-370.
(
Karst environment is distributed largely in Southwest China. Soil and vegetation are the most sensitive elements to the variation of Karst environment. The weathering of carbonate is important soil formation mechanism in Karst areas, but its soil forming ability is so poor that soil layer thickness becomes thin by the water erosion, though the soil loss is insignificant but serious. The character of Karst plants is firmly connected with the environment condition, i.e., lack of water, richness of Ca<sup>2+</sup>, poor soil and shortage of organic matter, the plants have low pace growth and low life-form resource, and is vulnerable under the disturbance of irrational human activities. Therefore, the rocky desertification is the end of Karst ecosystem degradation, but these degradation processes are depended on different land use patterns. Further, this paper discusses the assessment of the fragility on Karst ecosystem and raises vital problems on how to improve productivity. Finally, this paper suggests some solutions about rehabilitation of ecology to solve the problems of man-land relation in Karst environment in Southwest China.
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
习近平. 决胜全面建成小康社会夺取新时代中国特色社会主义伟大胜利: 在中国共产党第十九次全国代表大会上的报告(节选)[J]. 黑河学刊, 2017(6): 2, 193.
(
|
| [4] |
种国双, 海月, 郑华, 等. 中国西南喀斯特石漠化治理现状及对策[J]. raybet体育在线
院报, 2021, 38(11):38-43.
我国西南喀斯特地区石漠化问题严重,虽然通过石漠化治理措施遏制了整体扩张趋势,但是治理形势并不乐观,生态环境质量有待进一步改善。针对中国西南石漠化治理存在的治理成果难以有效维持、无法彻底消除人地矛盾、治理难度不断提高等问题,在系统梳理西南喀斯特地区的特殊性、石漠化成因、西南喀斯特地区石漠化综合治理模式的基础上,从重视区域整体治理与系统修复、探索喀斯特生态产品价值实现机制与途径、加强喀斯特地区生态补偿、探索喀斯特地区社会-生态系统的协同机制四方面,提出了面向区域整体治理与绿色发展的对策建议,为我国西南地区生态环境和社会经济协同高质量发展提供科学参考。
(
Despite that the expansion of severe rocky desertification in the karst areas of southwest China has been initially curbed, the situation allows no optimism and the eco-environment needs to be further improved. Effective efforts are required to maintain the achievements of desertification control; the contradiction between human and land cannot be eradicated; and the difficulty of controlling desertification has been escalating. In view of this, we summarized the specific characteristics of the karst areas in southwest China, the causes of rocky desertification, as well as the comprehensive management mode. On this basis, we put forward suggestions on comprehensive regional control and green development in four aspects: highlighting holistic management and systematic restoration, exploring pathways of value realization of eco-products, strengthening eco-compensation, and seeking a coordinated social and ecological system. The suggestions are expected to provide scientific reference for the coordinated high-quality development of eco-environment and social economy in southwest China.
|
| [5] |
彭晚霞, 王克林, 宋同清, 等. 喀斯特脆弱生态系统复合退化控制与重建模式[J]. 生态学报, 2008, 28(2):811-820.
(
|
| [6] |
马士彬, 张勇荣, 安裕伦, 等. 喀斯特石漠化景观空间分布特征分析: 以贵州六枝特区为例[J]. raybet体育在线
院报, 2015, 32(12): 30-35.
(
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
耿国彪. 我国石漠化土地扩展趋势实现逆转:国家林业和草原局公布第三次石漠化监测结果[J]. 绿色中国, 2018(23):8-11.
(
|
| [10] |
姚永慧, 索南东主, 张俊瑶, 等. 2010—2015年贵州省关岭县石漠化时空演变及人类活动影响因素[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(11):1759-1769.
石漠化是中国西南喀斯特地区面临的重要环境问题之一,其演化过程和驱动机制分析一直是相关研究领域的难点和热点,尤其是人类活动的影响分析方面仍有待于进一步研究。论文选择贵州石漠化极其严重的关岭县为研究区,利用2010年SPOT5/ALOS数据、2015年的高分一号/资源三号数据等,结合地面调查、采用目视解译的方法获得了2010—2015年石漠化分布、演化过程及驱动因素等信息;在系统分析石漠化的空间分布及演化过程的基础上,着重分析土地利用类型、社会经济水平及石漠化治理工程等人类活动因素对贵州石漠化演化的影响。研究结果表明:① 关岭县石漠化土地占有很大比重(2015年占总土地面积的45%以上)且以中度石漠化为主;② 石漠化总体上得到明显改善,石漠化土地面积逐年减少,尤其是重度石漠化和极重度石漠化土地明显减少,但仍有部分石漠化土地的状况在恶化。③ 人类活动对石漠程度和演化过程具有重要的影响,首先,土地利用类型尤其是灌木林、旱地和有林地对石漠化演化起着重要的作用;其次,人口密度较大和GDP较高的地区,石漠化程度也较高且石漠化恢复治理的效果越不明显;另外,关岭县的各类石漠化治理工程取得了显著的成果,约1/3的处于稳定和得到改善的石漠化土地是通过治理工程来实现的。本文查明了土地利用类型、人口及石漠化治理工程与石漠化演化的关系,研究结果可为石漠化治理与生态恢复工作提供科学的依据。
(
|
| [11] |
习慧鹏, 王世杰, 白晓永, 等. 西南典型喀斯特地区石漠化时空演变特征: 以贵州省普定县为例[J]. 生态学报, 2018, 38(24): 8919-8933.
(
|
| [12] |
李阳兵, 白晓永, 周国富, 等. 中国典型石漠化地区土地利用与石漠化的关系[J]. 地理学报, 2006, 61(6):624-632.
(
Based on land rocky desertification and land use data (scale: 1:50000) in 2004, the distribution law of land use types with different lithologies and occurrence ratios of rocky desertification relating to different land use types in typical fengcong (peak cluster) rocky desertified area located in central-southern part of Panxian county of Guizhou province were researched quantitatively. The results indicate that there is a high ratio of difficult to use land with exposed basement rocks in homogenous limestone, limestone interbedded with clastic rock, mixed dolomite/limestone assemblages. There is relationship among different grades of rocky desertification and land use types and rock types, such as the cultivated land on slopes has a higher occurrence ratio of slight rocky desertification in homogenous limestone, and then the limestone interbedded with clastic rock. Slight rocky desertified land was dominated by shrub land, and sloping cropland accounts for 11.67%, moderate rocky desertification was dominated by moderate coverage grass slopes, intense rocky desertification was dominated by rocky dryland which is difficult to use. From 1995 to 2000, the rate of intense and highly intense rocky desertification in moderate coverage grass slopes and difficult to use land increased. Finally, the further classification of rocky desertified land by land cover was made according to the above-mentioned researches, and the forming processes and taming emphases of karst rocky desertification in the study area was also pointed out in this paper. |
| [13] |
杨帆, 王博. 基于决策树的遥感图像分类方法研究[J]. 测绘与空间地理信息, 2019, 42(7): 1-4.
(
|
| [14] |
闫利会, 周忠发, 陈全, 等. 高原峡谷区喀斯特石漠化演变过程研究[J]. 水文地质工程地质, 2016, 43(2):112-117,125.
(
|
| [15] |
李阳兵, 罗光杰, 程安云, 等. 黔中高原面石漠化演变典型案例研究: 以普定后寨河地区为例[J]. 地理研究, 2013, 32(5): 828-838.
(
|
| [16] |
白晓永, 王世杰, 陈起伟, 等. 贵州土地石漠化类型时空演变过程及其评价[J]. 地理学报, 2009, 64(5): 609-618.
(
In this paper the spatial-temporal evolution processes of KRD land in Guizhou Province was analyzed mathematically by using 1:100000 scale digital-distribution maps of KRD land obtained by user-computer interactive interpreting method from Landsat images in 1986, 1995 and 2000. The following conclusions are obtained: (1) From 1986 to 2000, the change in total area of KRD land in Guizhou was not obvious, but the mutual transformation of different KRD types is extremely remarkable. (2) The change patterns of KRD land are divided into three kinds: simple change mode, continuous change mode and returned change mode, and characterized by continuous change mode. (3) The forward and reversion evolution processes coexist, with the ratio of the former to the latter being 82.29%, demonstrating that the situation is getting better partially and on the whole it is worsening. (4) The rate of the KRD evolution is 398.31 km2 per year, and the change rate of different type KRD land is inverse proportion to its degree of degradation. (5) The change frequencies of moderate and potential KRD land is highest and obviously higher than that of light KRD land. The regional characteristics of KRD spatial evolution and its influencing factors are analyzed, and some suggestions on comprehensive control of KRD land are put forward. |
| [17] |
张蕊娇, 张超, 陆双飞, 等. 滇东典型岩溶地区石漠化时空演变特征研究[J]. 林业资源管理, 2019(2):99-108.
(
|
| [18] |
赵玲华, 太佩荣. 曲靖市岩溶地区第二、第三次石漠化监测结果对比分析[J]. 绿色科技, 2018, 20(16):146-147, 149.
(
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |