清江隔河岩水电开发的综合碳减排效益分析

杜海龙, 王文忠

raybet体育在线 院报 ›› 2024, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (11) : 49-55.

PDF(1204 KB)
PDF(1204 KB)
raybet体育在线 院报 ›› 2024, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (11) : 49-55. DOI: 10.11988/ckyyb.20230612
水环境与水生态

清江隔河岩水电开发的综合碳减排效益分析

作者信息 +

Comprehensive Carbon Emission Reduction Benefits of Geheyan Hydropower Development in Qingjiang River

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

以清江流域隔河岩水电开发为研究对象,采用混合分析法对水电开发全过程的综合碳减排效益进行估算。结果显示,隔河岩水电站单位发电碳排放为33.22 g CO2eq/(kW·h),远低于火力发电。水电开发衍生的旅游业可减排228.21万t CO2,航运可减排106.03万t CO2,衍生行业具有显著的碳减排效益。隔河岩水电开发综合年平均碳减排效益为297.55万t CO2eq。水电开发具有非常明显的碳减排效益,水电开发是碳减排的有力手段;同时衍生行业往往具备低碳性质,在开发过程中需统筹考虑衍生行业的引导,进一步增加碳减排效益。

Abstract

With Geheyan hydropower development in Qingjiang River Basin as analysis object, the comprehensive benefit of carbon emission reduction in the whole process of hydropower development is estimated by hybrid analysis method. The results show that the carbon emission per unit power generation of Geheyan Hydropower Station is 33.22g CO2eq/(kW·h), which is much lower than that of thermal power generation. And the tourism industry derived from hydropower development can reduce 2 282 100 tons CO2, the shipping industry derived from hydropower development can reduce 1 060 290 tons CO2. The derivative industry has significant benefits in reducing carbon emissions. The comprehensive annual average carbon emission reduction benefit of Geheyan hydropower development is 2 975 500 tons of CO2. Hydropower development has very obvious benefits of carbon emission reduction, and it is a powerful means of carbon emission reduction.At the same time, derivative industries often have a low-carbon nature. In the development process, we need to consider the guidance of derivative industries as a whole to further increase the benefits of carbon emission reduction.

关键词

水电开发 / 碳排放 / 碳减排 / 综合效益 / 清洁能源

Key words

hydropower development / carbon emissions / carbon emission reduction / comprehensive benefits / clean energy

引用本文

导出引用
杜海龙, 王文忠. 清江隔河岩水电开发的综合碳减排效益分析[J]. raybet体育在线 院报. 2024, 41(11): 49-55 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20230612
DU Hai-long, WANG Wen-zhong. Comprehensive Carbon Emission Reduction Benefits of Geheyan Hydropower Development in Qingjiang River[J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute. 2024, 41(11): 49-55 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20230612
中图分类号: X22 (环境与发展)   

参考文献

[1]
FERGUSON A. Electricity without Carbon[J]. Nature, 2008, 454(7206):816-823.
[2]
HELLWEG S, CANALS L M I. Emerging Approaches, Challenges and Opportunities in Life Cycle Assessment[J]. Science, 2014, 344(6188): 1109-1113.
In the modern economy, international value chains--production, use, and disposal of goods--have global environmental impacts. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) aims to track these impacts and assess them from a systems perspective, identifying strategies for improvement without burden shifting. We review recent developments in LCA, including existing and emerging applications aimed at supporting environmentally informed decisions in policy-making, product development and procurement, and consumer choices. LCA constitutes a viable screening tool that can pinpoint environmental hotspots in complex value chains, but we also caution that completeness in scope comes at the price of simplifications and uncertainties. Future advances of LCA in enhancing regional detail and accuracy as well as broadening the assessment to economic and social aspects will make it more relevant for producers and consumers alike.Copyright © 2014, American Association for the Advancement of Science.
[3]
夏婷, 郑声安, 任艳, 等. 全球重点国家和区域水电开发程度对标分析[J]. 水力发电学报, 2022, 41(5):1-11.
(XIA Ting, ZHENG Sheng-an, REN Yan, et al. Comparison of Hydropower Development Degrees of Key Countries and Regions in the World[J]. Journal of Hydroelectric Engineering, 2022, 41(5):1-11. (in Chinese))
[4]
ALSALEH M, ABDUL-RAHIM A S. The Pathway Toward Pollution Mitigation in EU28 Region: Does Hydropower Growth Make a Difference?[J]. Renewable Energy, 2022, 185: 291-301.
[5]
KELLER P S, MARCé R, OBRADOR B, et al. Global Carbon Budget of Reservoirs Is Overturned by the Quantification of Drawdown Areas[J]. Nature Geoscience, 2021, 14: 402-408.
[6]
张翎, 王远见, 夏星辉. 水库建成与运行对温室气体排放的影响[J]. 环境科学学报, 2022, 42(1):298-307.
(ZHANG Ling, WANG Yuan-jian, XIA Xing-hui. Influence of Reservoir Construction and Operation on Greenhouse Gas Emission[J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2022, 42(1):298-307. (in Chinese))
[7]
DEEMER B R, HARRISON J A, LI S, et al. Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Reservoir Water Surfaces: a New Global Synthesis[J]. Bioscience, 2016, 66(11): 949-964.
Collectively, reservoirs created by dams are thought to be an important source of greenhouse gases (GHGs) to the atmosphere. So far, efforts to quantify, model, and manage these emissions have been limited by data availability and inconsistencies in methodological approach. Here, we synthesize reservoir CH, CO, and NO emission data with three main objectives: (1) to generate a global estimate of GHG emissions from reservoirs, (2) to identify the best predictors of these emissions, and (3) to consider the effect of methodology on emission estimates. We estimate that GHG emissions from reservoir water surfaces account for 0.8 (0.5-1.2) Pg CO equivalents per year, with the majority of this forcing due to CH. We then discuss the potential for several alternative pathways such as dam degassing and downstream emissions to contribute significantly to overall emissions. Although prior studies have linked reservoir GHG emissions to reservoir age and latitude, we find that factors related to reservoir productivity are better predictors of emission.
[8]
DELSONTRO T, MCGINNIS D F, SOBEK S, et al. Extreme Methane Emissions from a Swiss Hydropower Reservoir: Contribution from Bubbling Sediments[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2010, 44(7):2419-2425.
[9]
COLE J J, PRAIRIE Y T, CARACO N F, et al. Plumbing the Global Carbon Cycle: Integrating Inland Waters into the Terrestrial Carbon Budget[J]. Ecosystems, 2007, 10(1): 172-185.
[10]
孙志禹, 陈永柏, 李翀, 等. 中国水库温室气体研究(2009—2019):回顾与展望[J]. 水利学报, 2020, 51(3):253-267.
(SUN Zhi-yu, CHEN Yong-bo, LI Chong, et al. Research of Reservoir Greenhouse Gas Emissions in China(2009—2019): Review and Outlook[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2020, 51(3):253-267. (in Chinese))
[11]
赵玮, 朱孔贤, 黄文敏, 等. 三峡水库湖北段甲烷排放通量时空特征及其影响因素分析[J]. 水生生物学报, 2013, 37(4): 776-781.
(ZHAO Wei, ZHU Kong-xian, HUANG Wen-min, et al. temporal-spatial Patterns of Methane Emission Flux and Its Influence Factors in Hubei Part of Three Gorges Reservoir[J]. Acta Hydrobiologica Sinica, 2013, 37(4): 776-781. (in Chinese))
[12]
李哲, 王殿常. 从水库温室气体研究到水电碳足迹评价: 方法及进展[J]. 水利学报, 2022, 53(2): 139-153.
(LI Zhe, WANG Dian-chang. From Reservoir Greenhouse Gas Emissions to Hydropower Carbon Footprint: Methodology and Advances[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2022, 53(2): 139-153. (in Chinese))
[13]
HERTWICH E G, GIBON T, BOUMAN E A, et al. Integrated Life-cycle Assessment of Electricity-supply Scenarios Confirms Global Environmental Benefit of Low-carbon Technologies[J]. PNAS2015, 112(20): 6277-6282.
[14]
隔河岩水电站建设史编纂委员会. 隔河岩水电站建设史[M]. 北京: 中国水利水电出版社, 2003.
(Construction History Compilation Committee of Geheyan Hydropower Station. Construction History of Geheyan Hydropower Station[M]. Beijing: China Water Power Press, 2003. (in Chinese))
[15]
杜海龙. 金沙江大型水电站碳足迹的生命周期分析研究[D]. 重庆: 中国科学院大学 (中国科学院重庆绿色智能技术研究院), 2017.
(DU Hai-long. Carbon Footprint of Typical Hydro-projects in Jinsha River[D]. Chongqing: The University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2017. (in Chinese))
[16]
刘俊浩. 小水电机电设备成本估算模型比较[J]. 水利科学与寒区工程, 2019, 2(4): 4.
(LIU Jun-hao. Comparison of Cost Estimation Models for Small Hydropower Electromechanical Equipment[J]. Hydro Science and Cold Zone Engineering, 2019, 2(4): 4. (in Chinese))
[17]
李小冬, 王帅, 孔祥勤, 等. 预拌混凝土生命周期环境影响评价[J]. 土木工程学报, 2011, 44(1): 132-138.
(LI Xiao-dong, WANG Shuai, KONG Xiang-qin, et al. Life Cycle Assessment of Environmental Impacts of Ready-mixed Concrete[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2011, 44(1): 132-138. (in Chinese))
[18]
杜海龙, 李哲, 郭劲松. 基于ISO14067的长江上游某水电项目碳足迹分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(7): 1102-1110.
(DU Hai-long, LI Zhe, GUO Jin-song. Carbon Footprint of a Large Hydropower Project in the Upstream of the Yangtze: Following ISO14067[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2017, 26(7): 1102-1110. (in Chinese))
[19]
FEARNSIDE P M. Hydroelectric Dams in the Brazilian Amazon as Sources of ‘Greenhouse’ Gases[J]. Environmental Conservation, 1995, 22(1): 7-19.
[20]
赵登忠, 谭德宝, 李翀, 等. 隔河岩水库二氧化碳通量时空变化及影响因素[J]. 环境科学, 2017, 38(3): 954-963.
(ZHAO Deng-zhong, TAN De-bao, LI Chong, et al. Tempo-spatial Variations and Influential Factors of Carbon Dioxide Emissions from the Geheyan Reservoir over the Qingjiang River Basin, China[J]. Environmental Science, 2017, 38(3): 954-963. (in Chinese))
[21]
GOLDENFUM J A. GHG Risk Assessment Tool (BetaVersion) User manual[K]. Paris:UNESCO, 2009.
[22]
Intergovernmental Pannel on Climate Change. Refinement to the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Chapter 7 : Wetlands[M]. Kyoto: Intergovernmental Pannel on Climate Change, 2019.
[23]
娄运生, 李忠佩, 张桃林. 不同利用方式对红壤CO2排放的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2004, 24(5): 978-983.
(LOU Yun-sheng, LI Zhong-pei, ZHANG Tao-lin. CO2 Emissions from Upland and Paddy Red Soils in Mid-subtropical China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2004, 24(5): 978-983. (in Chinese))
[24]
重庆市生态环境局. 重庆市区县温室气体清单编制指南试行[R]. 重庆: 重庆市生态环境局, 2021.
Chongqing Municipal Bureau of Ecology and Environment. Trial Implementation of Guidelines for Compilation of Greenhouse Gas Inventories in Chongqing’s Districts and Counties[R]. Chongqing: Chongqing Municipal Bureau of Ecology and Environment, 2021. (in Chinese))
[25]
赵登忠, 程学军, 汪朝辉, 等. 清江流域典型发电水库甲烷源汇时空变化规律研究[J]. 水力发电学报, 2014, 33(5):128-137.
(ZHAO Deng-zhong, CHENG Xue-jun, WANG Zhao-hui, et al. Spatial-temporal Variation of Methane Source and Sink from the Representative Reservoir over Qingjiang River Basin[J]. Journal of Hydroelectric Engineering, 2014, 33(5):128-137. (in Chinese))
[26]
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC Special Report on Renewable Energy Sources and Climate Change Mitigation[R]. Kyoto: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2012.
[27]
程婕, 苏志欣. “双碳”目标下的运输结构调整瓶颈与对策研究[J]. 中国投资(中英文), 2022(增刊6):29-33.
(CHENG Jie, SU Zhi-xin. Research on the Bottleneck and Countermeasures of Transportation Structure Adjustment under the Target of “Double Carbon”[J]. China Investment, 2022(Supp. 6):29-33. (in Chinese))
[28]
丁旺旺. 中国碳减排规制路径及减排潜力研究[D]. 大连: 东北财经大学, 2022.
(DING Wang-wang. Research on the Regulation Path and Potential of Carbon Emission Reduction in China[D]. Dalian: Dongbei University of Finance and Economics, 2022. (in Chinese))
[29]
查建平, 舒皓羽, 李园园, 等. 中国旅游业碳排放及其影响因素研究: 来自2005—2015年省级面板数据的证据[J]. 旅游科学, 2017, 31(5): 1-16.
(ZHA Jian-ping, SHU Hao-yu, LI Yuan-yuan, et al. A Research on Tourism Industrial Carbon Emissions and Its Influential Factors in China: Evidences from Chinese Provincial Panel Data (2005 -2015)[J]. Tourism Science, 2017, 31(5): 1-16. (in Chinese))
[30]
伍卓, 林宣任. 长江经济带旅游业碳排放强度的时空演变及其影响因素[J]. 南华大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 23(3):25-36.
(WU Zhuo, LIN Xuan-ren. Spatio-temporal Evolution of Tourism Carbon Emission Intensity in the Yangtze River Economic Belt and Influencing Factors[J]. Journal of University of South China(Social Science Edition), 2022, 23(3):25-36. (in Chinese))
[31]
LI Z, LU L, P, et al. Carbon Footprints of Pre-impoundment Clearance on Reservoir Flooded Area in China’s Large Hydro-projects: Implications for GHG Emissions Reduction in the Hydropower Industry[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 168: 1413-1424.

基金

国家自然科学基金面上项目(62175265)

编辑: 王慰
PDF(1204 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/

Baidu
map