多维多时间-空间尺度水利工程安全风险评价系统及其应用

王翔, 郑淇文, 李晨

raybet体育在线 院报 ›› 2023, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (12) : 169-175.

PDF(999 KB)
PDF(999 KB)
raybet体育在线 院报 ›› 2023, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (12) : 169-175. DOI: 10.11988/ckyyb.20230223
工程安全与灾害防治

多维多时间-空间尺度水利工程安全风险评价系统及其应用

  • 王翔, 郑淇文, 李晨
作者信息 +

Multi-dimensional Multi-spatiotemporal Safety Risk Assessment System for Water Conservancy Projects and Its Application

  • WANG Xiang, ZHENG Qi-wen, LI Chen
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

为解决风险矩阵分析法(LS法)和作业条件危险分析法(LEC法)在水利工程安全风险等级评价过程中评价指标量化依据不明确、判定标准不统一、成果运用可指导性差等缺点,基于风险矩阵原理,建立了多维多时间-空间尺度水利工程安全风险评价系统。研究结果表明:①通过风险评价要素管控措施状态M、暴露于危害的频繁程度或危害出现的频次E和运行周期内工作性态C,及其不同组合,可对水利工程全部类型危险源事故发生可能性L进行细化评价;②风险评价要素M的判定标准与水利工程管理考核标准相统一;③通过风险评价要素C,简要评价实体危险源不同时空工作性态演化与环境改变相互作用;④通过增加上游水位H和运行时段F风险评价要素,并判断危险源与下游防洪是否直接相关,事故造成的伤亡人数和经济损失是否可量化统计,可充分考虑事故后果统计时空分布不均衡的特点,并对水利工程安全风险进行实时动态评估。该研究成果对水利行业安全生产双重预防机制建设具有一定参考价值。

Abstract

Risk matrix analysis (LS) and operating condition risk analysis (LEC) have some limitations in rating the safety risks of water conservancy project, including unclear quantitative evaluation indicators, inconsistent criteria, and limited guidance for result application. In view of this, we developed a multidimensional and multi-spatiotemporal scale safety risk assessment system based on the risk matrix principle. Our research demonstrated the following outcomes: 1) the likelihood (L) of all types of hazard accidents in water conservancy projects can be assessed in detail by considering various combinations of control measures (M), frequency of hazard exposure (E), and working behavior (C) in the operation cycle. 2) The assessment criterion of M should be consistent with the standard of water conservancy project management. 3) The interaction between physical hazards evolution and environmental change can be assessed through the risk assessment factor C. 4) In consideration of the unbalanced spatiotemporal distribution of accident consequences, the safety risks of water conservancy projects can be assessed dynamically by incorporating the upstream water level (H) and operation period (F) and identifying whether hazard sources are directly related to downstream flood control or the casualties and economic losses caused by accidents can be quantified. This dynamic and real-time evaluation approach for water conservancy project safety risks offers a valuable reference for constructing a double prevention mechanism for safe production in the industry.

关键词

水利工程 / 运行安全 / 安全生产 / 多维多时间-空间尺度 / 安全风险评价系统

Key words

water conservancy project / safe operation / safe production / multi-dimensional multi-spatiotemporal / safety risk assessment system

引用本文

导出引用
王翔, 郑淇文, 李晨. 多维多时间-空间尺度水利工程安全风险评价系统及其应用[J]. raybet体育在线 院报. 2023, 40(12): 169-175 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20230223
WANG Xiang, ZHENG Qi-wen, LI Chen. Multi-dimensional Multi-spatiotemporal Safety Risk Assessment System for Water Conservancy Projects and Its Application[J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute. 2023, 40(12): 169-175 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20230223
中图分类号: TV513   

参考文献

[1] 王 翔, 郑淇文, 张志勇, 等. 高质量发展阶段中国水利工程安全监测现状及提升策略[J]. 水利水电快报, 2023, 44(3): 76-83, 88.
[2] 李玉峰, 刘袁春, 胡大山, 等. 基于风险矩阵的水电站项目风险分级评估方法研究: 以乌东德水电站为例[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2020, 16(1): 130-134.
[3] 龚远平, 阴 彬, 杨建业, 等. 大型水电工程构建双重预防机制的探索与实践: 以白鹤滩水电站为例[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2020, 16(2): 155-160.
[4] 刘 昶. 水库大坝危险源辨识及风险评价[J]. 黑龙江水利科技, 2018, 46(9): 76-77, 95.
[5] 苗新虎, 杨胜品, 王彦红, 等. 基于风险矩阵的胶凝砂砾石坝安全风险分级管控研究[J]. 大坝与安全, 2022(5): 4-9.
[6] 龙 艺, 万忠海, 刘双美, 等. 水库(水闸)工程运行危险源辨识与风险评价的应用方法与技术[J]. 四川水利, 2021, 42(4): 161-164.
[7] RUAN X, YIN Z, FRANGOPOL D. Risk Matrix Integrating Risk Attitudes Based on Utility Theory[J]. Risk Analysis, 2015, 35(8): 1437-1447.
[8] PRITCHARD D, HANNEGAN D. Drilling Hazard Management: The Value of Risk Assessment[J]. World Oil, 2010, Corpus ID: 55561946.
[9] HOLT J, LEACH A, SCHRADER G, et al. Eliciting and Combining Decision Criteria Using a Limited Palette of Utility Functions and Uncertainty Distributions: Illustrated by Application to Pest Risk Analysis[J]. Risk Analysis, 2014, 34(1): 4-16.
[10]NI H, CHEN A, CHEN N. Some Extensions on Risk Matrix Approach[J]. Safety Science, 2010, 48(10): 1269-1278.
[11]JR C L A. What’s Wrong with Risk Matrices?[J]. Risk Analysis: An Official Publication of the Society for Risk Analysis, 2008, 28(2): 497-512.
[12]DUIJM N J. Recommendations on the Use and Design of Risk Matrices[J]. Safety Science, 2015, 76: 21-31.
[13]朱启超, 匡兴华, 沈永平. 风险矩阵方法与应用述评[J]. 中国工程科学, 2003, 5(1): 89-94.
[14]阮 欣, 尹志逸, 陈艾荣. 风险矩阵评估方法研究与工程应用综述[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 41(3): 381-385.

PDF(999 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/

Baidu
map