CFG桩复合地基新型嵌入式褥垫层桩-土应力比改善特性

郑光俊, 盛春花, 李振华, 江洎洧

raybet体育在线 院报 ›› 2023, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (12) : 133-139.

PDF(2729 KB)
PDF(2729 KB)
raybet体育在线 院报 ›› 2023, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (12) : 133-139. DOI: 10.11988/ckyyb.20231072
岩土工程

CFG桩复合地基新型嵌入式褥垫层桩-土应力比改善特性

  • 郑光俊1, 盛春花2, 李振华1, 江洎洧3
作者信息 +

Improvement Effect of Pile-Soil Stress Ratio in CFG Pile Composite Foundation with Newly Embedded Cushion

  • ZHENG Guang-jun1, SHENG Chun-hua2, LI Zhen-hua1, JIANG Ji-wei3
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

CFG桩复合地基具有较好的环保效益,近年来在软基处理中推广迅速。鉴于天然地基自身较差的工程特性,加之CFG桩施工扰动易引发表层土持力性能进一步弱化,受荷状态下刚性的CFG桩与桩间土易形成过大的桩-土应力比,褥垫层结构破坏风险增大,不利于复合地基协同受力。研究提出对截桩面下约50 cm厚剧烈影响区土层采用压实碎石换填,再铺设水泥土垫层而形成新型嵌入式褥垫层结构,以改善CFG桩复合地基持力性能,得到以下结论:①基于单桩复合地基现场载荷试验对比分析,采用嵌入式褥垫层测得的桩-土应力比显著低于常规平铺褥垫层,极限载荷下桩-土应力比较常规褥垫层的22.9降至13.8,降幅约40%,且全过程桩-土应力比曲线波动相对平缓,尤其是达到极限承载力后无陡降,有利于地基安全受荷;②采用数值试验手段模拟CFG群桩复合地基竖向受荷特性,嵌入式褥垫层对桩间土压缩层起到了显著的综合强化作用,既有效减小了桩向褥垫层的相对刺入,也使得褥垫层的变形形态更均匀平整,局部刺入和翘起得到有效缓解,避免了桩-土应力比过大对褥垫层结构的破坏;③嵌入式褥垫层条件下不同部位CFG桩的水平变形状态更优,顶部较强的约束将CFG桩受力模式由接近“悬臂式”变为接近“简支式”,对复合地基边桩和角桩的变形受力状态改善显著。

Abstract

The CFG pile composite foundation offers notable environmental advantages and has seen extensive utilization for foundational stabilization in recent years. Surface soil load-bearing capacity deteriorates due to the inferior engineering properties of natural foundations, coupled with disruptions originating from CFG pile construction. Upon load application on the composite foundation, the CFG piles, behaving as rigid bodies, can easily cause an excessive pile-soil stress ratio, which is detrimental to the composite foundation’s interaction and inflicts damage upon the cushion layer. In view of this, we put forward the substitution of the 50 cm thick severely disturbed topsoil with compacted crushed stones, followed by the application of a cement-soil cushion to establish an innovative embedded cushion layer structure, geared towards the augmentation of the CFG pile composite foundation’s bearing capacity. The findings are as follows: in-situ load tests on single CFG pile composite foundation revealed that the pile-soil stress ratio within the embedded cushion layer was considerably less than that in traditional cushion layer conditions under the ultimate load, dropping from 22.9 to 13.8, a decrease of approximately 40% compared to traditional cushion layer conditions. Additionally, the pile-soil stress ratio curve was smoother, with no significant precipitous decline in pile-soil stress ratio after reaching ultimate bearing capacity, which is favorable for the foundation’s secure loading. Mathematical simulation methods were employed to model the vertical load characteristic of the CFG pile group composite foundation. The embedded cushion layer contributed significantly to the comprehensive fortification of the compression layers, thereby mitigating the piles’ relative penetration into the cushion layer. This resulted in a more uniform deformation of the cushion layer, effectively curtailing local penetration and uplift. Damage to the cushion layer structure caused by extreme pile soil stress ratios could be circumvented accordingly. Lastly, the embedded cushion layer enhanced the horizontal deformation state of CFG piles at different parts. The increased constraint at the top transformed the stress pattern of CFG piles from an ‘approximate cantilever’ to being ‘approximately simply supported’, thereby ameliorating the deformation and stress state of the side and corner piles.

关键词

CFG桩复合地基 / 桩土应力比 / 嵌入式褥垫层 / 载荷试验 / 数值计算

Key words

CFG pile composite foundation / pile-soil stress ratio / embedded mattress layer / load test / numerical calculation

引用本文

导出引用
郑光俊, 盛春花, 李振华, 江洎洧. CFG桩复合地基新型嵌入式褥垫层桩-土应力比改善特性[J]. raybet体育在线 院报. 2023, 40(12): 133-139 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20231072
ZHENG Guang-jun, SHENG Chun-hua, LI Zhen-hua, JIANG Ji-wei. Improvement Effect of Pile-Soil Stress Ratio in CFG Pile Composite Foundation with Newly Embedded Cushion[J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute. 2023, 40(12): 133-139 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20231072
中图分类号: TU472   

参考文献

[1] 《工程地质手册》编委会. 工程地质手册[M]. 5版. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2018.
[2] 党昱敬. 刚性桩复合地基应用热点问题探讨[J]. 建筑结构, 2022, 52(24): 106-113.
[3] 化建新, 董长和, 孙东晖. CFG桩垫层效应研究[J]. 岩土工程技术, 1998, 12(1): 48-50, 2.
[4] 包 华, 崔开太, 徐汉涛, 等. 小直径刚性桩复合地基桩土应力比初步研究[J]. 南通工学院学报(自然科学版), 2003, 2(4): 50-53.
[5] 杨光华,李卓勋,刘清华,等.刚性桩复合地基桩土应力比问题探讨[J]. 广东水利水电,2020(2):1-5,57.
[6] 闫明礼, 张东刚. CFG桩复合地基技术及工程实践[M]. 2版. 北京: 中国水利水电出版社, 2006.
[7] 姚云龙, 张晓辉, 刘鑫, 等. 基于现场试验的CFG桩复合地基桩帽与垫层效应分析[J/OL]. 太原理工大学学报, (2022-08-25)https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/14.1220.N.20220825.1357.004.html.
[8] 张旭群, 杨光华, 陈 锐, 等. CM桩复合地基桩土应力比及垫层效应现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2015, 36(增刊1): 357-361.
[9] 徐妍彦, 刘均卫, 陈 娜, 等. 某大型散货码头堆场地基处理方案[J]. raybet体育在线 院报, 2023, 40(5): 131-138.
[10]陈 明, 李镜培, 梁发云, 等. 刚性桩复合地基负摩阻区深度的一种计算方法[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 39(7): 955-959.
[11]ZHANG S, ZHAO M, HE L, et al. Calculation of Settlement of Composite Foundation with Rigid Piles under Flexible Ground[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development (English Edition), 2011, 5(2): 15-21.
[12]陶景晖, 卢中强, 金如元, 等. 刚性桩复合地基桩顶埋入式垫层机理分析[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2017, 38(2): 158-167.
[13]肖耀廷,党发宁.复合地基褥垫层厚度的设计方法研究[J].地下空间与工程学报,2016,12(5):1331-1335.
[14]王惠昌, 王 斌, 蒋仁贵, 等. 用桩顶垫层压缩量法计算刚性桩复合地基最大沉降量[J]. 岩土力学, 2016, 37(增刊2): 442-448.
[15]张建伟, 原 华, 孔德志. CFG桩复合地基褥垫层效用的有限元分析[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2011, 33(增刊2): 460-463.
[16]芮 瑞, 孙 义, 朱 勇, 等. 刚性基础下复合地基褥垫层细观工作机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 445-454.
[17]靳 炎. CFG桩复合地基承载特征及沉降计算方法研究[D]. 北京: 北方工业大学,2022.
[18]郑 刚, 刘双菊, 伍止超. 不同厚度褥垫层刚性桩复合地基工作特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2006, 27(8): 1357-1360.

基金

国家自然科学基金项目(51979009)

PDF(2729 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/

Baidu
map