筑坝粗粒料单线法湿化变形模型比较

孙向军, 潘家军, 周跃峰, 左永振

raybet体育在线 院报 ›› 2023, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (1) : 146-152.

PDF(1111 KB)
PDF(1111 KB)
raybet体育在线 院报 ›› 2023, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (1) : 146-152. DOI: 10.11988/ckyyb.20210869
岩土工程

筑坝粗粒料单线法湿化变形模型比较

  • 孙向军, 潘家军, 周跃峰, 左永振
作者信息 +

A Comparative Study of Wetting Deformation Model of Single-line Method of Damming Coarse Grain

  • SUN Xiang-jun, PAN Jia-jun, ZHOU Yue-feng, ZUO Yong-zhen
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

粗粒土的湿化变形是一种普遍现象,对土石坝长期安全运行至关重要。针对已有多种经验公式拟合精度未知问题,对搜集的试验数据进行验证研究。结果表明:①各向等压湿化体变与围压用幂函数拟合效果较好;②湿化轴向应变与应力水平用指数函数拟合效果较好,指数函数参数与围压呈良好的线性关系;③湿化体变采用双线性模型,形式简单且拟合精度较幂线型及六参数型高;④湿化剪应变与应力水平呈良好的双曲线关系,与围压相关性较弱。最后,分析了湿化应变与不同应力水平的相关程度,建立了基于改进相对湿化应力水平的湿化应变经验公式。

Abstract

The common wetting deformation of coarse grain soil is of crucial importance for the long-term safe operation of earth and rockfill dam. The fitting accuracy of existing empirical formulas is unclear. In view of this,experimental data was collected and verified. Results demonstrated that: 1) the relation between wetting volumetric deformation under constant pressure and confining pressure can be well fitted with power function;2) the relation between wetting axial strain and stress level can be well fitted with exponential function,and the parameters of exponential function are linearly related to confining pressure;3) a bilinear model with simple form for wetting volumetric strain has higher fitting accuracy than the power linear model and the six-parameter model;4) wetting shear strain is in a good hyperbolic relationship with stress level but a weak correlation with confining pressure. In addition,an empirical formula of wetting strain based on modified relative wetting stress level is established by analyzing the correlation between wetting strain and different stress levels.

关键词

湿化应变 / 经验公式 / 应力水平 / 拟合精度 / 相关性分析

Key words

wetting strain / empirical formula / stress levels / fit accuracy / correlation analysis

引用本文

导出引用
孙向军, 潘家军, 周跃峰, 左永振. 筑坝粗粒料单线法湿化变形模型比较[J]. raybet体育在线 院报. 2023, 40(1): 146-152 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20210869
SUN Xiang-jun, PAN Jia-jun, ZHOU Yue-feng, ZUO Yong-zhen. A Comparative Study of Wetting Deformation Model of Single-line Method of Damming Coarse Grain[J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute. 2023, 40(1): 146-152 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20210869
中图分类号: TU411   

参考文献

[1] 刘祖德.土石坝变形计算的若干问题[J].岩土工程学报,1983,5(1):1-13.
[2] 赵振梁,朱俊高,杜 青,等.粗粒料湿化变形三轴试验研究[J].水利水运工程学报,2018(6):84-91.
[3] 程展林,左永振,丁红顺,等.堆石料湿化特性试验研究[J].岩土工程学报,2010,32(2):243-247.
[4] 陈 剑.低渗透性砾石土心墙料湿化变形特性研究[D].武汉:raybet体育在线 ,2019.
[5] 李广信.堆石料的湿化试验和数学模型[J].岩土工程学报,1990,12(5):58-64.
[6] 迟世春,周雄雄.堆石料的湿化变形模型[J].岩土工程学报,2017,39(1):48-55.
[7] 牛 昂.土石坝粗粒料湿化变形试验研究[D].郑州:华北水利水电大学,2020.
[8] 沈珠江,王剑平.土质心墙坝填筑及蓄水变形的数值模拟[J].水利水运科学研究,1988(4):47-64.
[9] 傅 华,韩华强,赵晓菊.堆石料湿化变形特性试验研究[J].水利与建筑工程学报,2010,8(4):50-53.
[10]张少宏,张爱军,陈 涛.堆石料三轴湿化变形特性试验研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2005,24(增刊2):5938-5942.
[11]周雄雄.高心墙堆石坝湿化变形与数值模拟方法研究[D].大连:大连理工大学,2020.
[12]杨小龙.土石坝湿化变形及反滤料液化可能性研究堆石料湿化变形特性试验研究[D].大连:大连理工大学,2015.
[13]魏 松,朱俊高.粒料三轴湿化颗粒破碎试验研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2006,25(6):1252-1258.
[14]左永振,程展林,潘家军,等.砾石土心墙料的大三轴湿化变形试验与规律分析[J].岩土工程学报,2020,42(增刊2):37-42.
[15]OLDECOP L A,ALONSO E E.Suction Effects on Rockfill Compressibility[J].Geotechnique,2003,53(2): 289-292.
[16]OLDECOP L A,PINYOL N M.Time Dependent Behavior of Rockfill Embankments and Dams[M].Doi: 10.1201/b12130-8.
[17]李国英,王禄仕,米占宽.土质心墙堆石坝应力和变形研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2004,23(8):1363-1369.
[18]李全明,于玉贞,张丙印,等.黄河公伯峡面板堆石坝三维湿化变形分析[J].水力发电学报,2005,24(3):24-29.
[19]方绪顺.砂砾石料浸水变形特性研究及砂砾石坝蓄水变形的数值模拟[D].南京:河海大学,2005.
[20]彭 凯,朱俊高,王观琪.堆石料湿化变形三轴试验研究[J].中南大学学报(自然科学版),2010,41(5):1953-1960.
[21]魏 松.粗粒料浸水湿化变形特性试验及其数值模型研究[D].南京:河海大学,2006.
[22]左永振.粗粒料的蠕变和湿化试验研究[D].武汉:raybet体育在线 ,2008.
[23]SZEKELY G,RIZZO M.Measuring and Testing Independence by Correlation Distance[J].The Annals Statistics,2007,35: 2769-2794.

基金

国家自然科学基金重点项目(U1765203);国家自然科学基金面上项目(51979010);中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费项目(CKSF2021484/YT)

PDF(1111 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/

Baidu
map