基于1975—2020年间7期遥感数据,分析环巢湖湿地景观格局变化,揭示研究区域的演变特征及其驱动因素。采用基于样本的面向对象分类法,辅以高分辨率影像对错分地类进行目视修正。通过计算转移矩阵、动态度和景观格局指数分析景观格局特征与动态变化,通过主成分分析讨论演变驱动力。结果表明:①1975—2020年,研究区域湿地面积总体上处于缩减状态,由971.77 km2缩减到905.29 km2,主要转换成建设用地、农用地和植被用地;人工湿地在2013—2020年面积增加至39.58 km2,主要由农用地转化而来;非湿地景观中,建设用地面积增长最快,由13.85 km2增长到566.56 km2。②在景观指数分析中,斑块数量增加,不同类型斑块指数的波动变化存在一定差异;整体上景观破碎化指数从0.49增加到1.26,景观异质性增加,研究区域趋于复杂化;多样性指数总体呈现缓慢增长趋势,趋于均衡化分布。③由驱动力分析得出,自然因素在景观格局演变前期影响显著,随着社会经济的发展,自然因素作用逐渐弱化,社会经济成为景观变化的重要驱动因素;政策因素在研究区域景观演变方向中起主导作用,随着一系列政策调控的实施,有效改善了景观类型的分布。
Abstract
The changes of wetland landscape pattern around Chaohu Lake was examined to reveal the evolution characteristics and driving factors of the study area based on the remote sensing data during 1975-2020. The object-oriented classification method based on sample is adopted in association with high-resolution image to correct the wrong classification. The characteristics and dynamic changes of landscape pattern were analyzed by calculating land use transition matrix, dynamic degree and landscape pattern index; the driving forces of the changes were discussed through principal component analysis. Results unveiled that: 1) the area of wetland around Chaohu Lake presented a declining trend in general, from 971.77 km2 to 905.29 km2 in 1975-2020, most of which is converted into construction land, agricultural land and vegetation land; the area of constructed wetland expanded to 39.58 km2 during 2013-2020, mainly converted from agricultural land; among non-wetland landscapes, the area of construction land expanded the most rapidly, from 13.85 km2 to 566.56 km2. 2) In the analysis of landscape index, the number of patches increased, and the fluctuation of different types of patch index varied; on the whole, the landscape fragmentation index climbed from 0.49 to 1.26, indicating a more heterogeneous and complex landscape; the diversity index displayed a slow growth trend and tended towards a balanced distribution. 3) According to driving force analysis, natural factors played a significant role in the early stage of landscape evolution; with the development of social economy, the effect of natural factors is gradually weakened and social economy became an important driving factor; policy factor played a guiding role in regional landscape evolution by changing the distribution of landscape types via policy regulation.
关键词
环巢湖湿地 /
景观格局 /
动态变化 /
驱动力分析 /
主成分分析
Key words
wetland around Chaohu Lake /
landscape pattern /
dynamic change /
driving force analysis /
principal component analysis
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] KAYASTHA N, THOMAS V, GALBRAITH J, et al. Monitoring Wetland Change Using Inter-Annual Landsat Time-Series Data[J]. Wetlands, 2012, 32(6): 1149-1162.
[2] DELANCEY E R, SIMMS J F, MAHDIANPARI M, et al. Comparing Deep Learning and Shallow Learning for Large-Scale Wetland Classification in Alberta, Canada[J]. Remote Sensing, 2019, 12(1): 2. Doi: 10.3390/rs12010002.
[3] 刘晓辉,吕宪国,姜 明,等. 湿地生态系统服务功能的价值评估[J]. 生态学报,2008,28(11):5625-5631.
[4] WALSH T S J. Remote Sensingof Forested Wetlands: Application of Multitemporal and Multispectral Satellite Imagery to Determine Plant Community Composition and Structure in Southeastern USA[J]. Plant Ecology, 2001, 157(2): 129-149.
[5] PAPASTERGIADOU E S, RETALIS A, GEORGIADIS A T. Environmental Monitoring of Spatio-temporal Changes Using Remote Sensing and GIS in a Mediterranean Wetland of Northern Greece[J]. Water Resources Management, 2008, 22(5): 579-594.
[6] ISLAM M S, SHAHABUDDIN A K M, KAMAL M M, et al. Wetlands of Dhaka City: Its Past and Present Scenario[J]. Journal of Life and Earth Science, 2014, 7: 83-90.
[7]魏 帆, 韩广轩, 张金萍, 等. 1985—2015年围填海活动影响下的环渤海滨海湿地演变特征[J]. 生态学杂志, 2018, 37(5): 1527-1537.
[8] 高 杰, 高 敏, 赵志红, 等. 1987—2015年七里海潟湖湿地景观格局变化及驱动力分析[J]. 水生态学杂志, 2018, 39(4): 8-16.
[9] HUANG J, ZHAN J, YAN H, et al. Evaluation of the Impacts of Land Use on Water Quality: A Case Study in The Chaohu Lake Basin[J]. The Scientific World Journal, 2013(1): 329187.
[10] 陆大道.长江大保护与长江经济带的可持续发展:关于落实习总书记重要指示,实现长江经济带可持续发展的认识与建议[J].地理学报,2018,73(10):1829-1836.
[11] 祝明霞,喻光明,赵军凯.基于LUCC的鄱阳湖湿地生态效应分析[J].水生态学杂志,2017,38(3):8-14.
[12] 张莹莹, 蔡晓斌, 杨 超, 等. 1974-2017年洪湖湿地自然保护区景观格局演变及驱动力分析[J]. 湖泊科学, 2019, 31(1): 171-182.
[13] 史娜娜, 肖能文, 王 琦, 等. 长江经济带生态系统格局特征及其驱动力分析[J]. 环境科学研究,2019,32(11):1779-1789.
[14] 徐 苏, 张永勇, 窦 明, 等. 长江流域土地利用时空变化特征及其径流效应[J]. 地理科学进展,2017,36(4):426-436.
[15] 谭志强, 许秀丽, 李云良,等. 长江中游大型通江湖泊湿地景观格局演变特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境,2017,26(10):1619-1629.
[16] 任志安, 刘雨佳. 水资源利用效率测度及其收敛性分析:以巢湖流域为例[J]. 沈阳工业大学学报(社会科学版),2019,12(5):421-428.
[17] 安国庆, 贾良清, 李 堃. 引江济巢调水试验对巢湖湖水水质影响分析[J]. 国土与自然资源研究,2009, 121(1):47-48.
[18] 黄木易,仲 勇,冯少茹,等.1970s以来巢湖流域水环境保护区景观生态脆弱性时空特征及驱动解析[J]. 湖泊科学,2020,32(4):977-988.
[19] 李云生,周广金,梁 涛.巢湖流域的土地利用变化及其生态系统功能损益[J].地理研究,2009,28(6):1656-1664.
[20] 王传辉, 郭振亚, 高 超, 等. 基于遥感的巢湖流域景观格局变化研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2013, 22(12): 1586-1592.
[21] 王晴晴. 环巢湖湿地生态环境动态变化趋势研究[D]. 合肥:安徽农业大学, 2017.
[22] 王若珠. 环巢湖土地利用格局动态变化分析[D]. 合肥:安徽农业大学, 2019.
[23] 李莹莹, 尤罗利, 陈永生,等. 环巢湖地区多水塘景观时空格局演变特征及其驱动因素[J]. 生态学报, 2018, 38(17):6280-6291.
[24] 李锦斌. 着力构建水清岸绿产业优美丽长江(安徽)经济带[N]. 经济日报, 2018-08-09(8).
[25] 朱会义, 李秀彬. 关于区域土地利用变化指数模型方法的讨论[J].地理学报, 2003,58(5): 643-650.
[26] 张 建, 雷 刚, 漆良华. 南水北调中线水源区丹江口市域景观格局变化及氮磷净化能力[J]. 生态学报,2021,41(6):2261-2271.
[27] 王 玲,米文宝, 王 鑫, 等. 限制开发生态区土地利用变化驱动力分析:以宁夏西吉县为例[J]. 干旱区资源与环境,2019,33(1):51-57.
[28] 黄贤金,彭补拙,张建新,等.区域产业结构调整与土地可持续利用关系研究[J].经济地理,2002,22(4):425-429.
[29] 孔祥斌, 张凤荣, 李玉兰, 等. 区域土地利用与产业结构变化互动关系研究[J]. 资源科学,2005,27(2):59-64.
[30] 徐馨裔, 刘志有, 董 露, 等. 国土空间规划视角下产业结构与土地利用结构相互关系研究:以新疆乌鲁木齐市为例[J]. 生态经济,2020,36(4):69-74.
[31] 张崇岱, 王培华, 张之源. 巢湖水域近十年水质状况及特征分析[J]. 安徽地质, 1997, 7(4): 31-34.
[32] 王民生. 把巢湖打造成为合肥最好的名片[N]. 中国环境报, 2020-11-23(3).
基金
国家自然科学基金项目(41604028);安徽省自然科学基金项目(1708085QD83)
PDF(2599 KB)
