岩土工程实践中,一般通过测定黏性土的液塑性指数来确定其具体分类,并据此判断土体的基本工程性质。但目前《土工试验方法标准》(GB/T 50123—2019)中推荐的液塑限联合测定试验法存在一定的缺陷,制作出的土样干密度差异明显,使得试验过程中得到的数据点在双对数坐标轴上离散性很大。通过对国标中推荐的液塑限联合测定法进行改进,得到了一种新的联合测定法——竖向渗透分层取样液塑限联合测定法,这种测定法在制作土样时流程更为严密,使得数据在双对数坐标轴上呈现出很好的线性关系。对网纹红土、棕钙土、淤泥质土和潮土4种土样的界限含水率进行室内测试,验证了所制备试样干密度均匀、含水率分布层次丰富;将实施改进的试验方法与国标推荐法进行对比分析,并结合十字板剪切试验结果,进一步验证了改进方法的合理性。
Abstract
In geotechnical engineering practice, the specific classification of a clay soil is generally determined by measuring its liquidity and plasticity index, and the basic engineering properties of the soil are determined accordingly. However, the liquid-plasticity limit (LPL) method recommended in the Standard for Geotechnical Test Methods (GB/T 50123—2019) has some shortcomings as the soil samples produced by the method differ significantly in dry density, which makes the data points obtained during the test discrete in the double logarithmic coordinate axis. In this paper, a new test method, the vertical penetration stratified sampling liquid-plastic limit joint test method, is developed by improving the liquid-plastic limit joint test method recommended in the national standard. The proposed method is more rigorous in the preparation of soil samples and shows a good linear relationship on the double logarithmic axis. The boundary moisture content of four soil samples, namely, reticulated red soil, brown caliche, silt loam and tidal soil, is tested in house to verify the uniformity of dry density and the richness of moisture content distribution levels of the prepared samples. Comparison between the proposed method and standard-recommended method as well as plate shear test result further verify the rationality of the present method.
关键词
液塑限 /
液塑限联合测定法 /
干密度 /
含水率 /
锥入深度
Key words
liquid-plastic limit /
liquid-plastic limit combined testing /
dry density /
moisture content /
depth of cone penetration
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] 饶鸿雁. 土的液限塑限联合测定法的改进[J]. 岩土工程学报, 1983(1): 51-64.
[2] 周序源, 张剑峰. 界限含水量试验的现状及展望[J]. 岩土工程学报, 1985(3): 90-99.
[3] 盛海洋. 液塑限联合试验测定解析法[J]. 水电科技进展, 1998(1): 66-68.
[4] 张怀仁, 李茂柱. 液塑限联合测定法中液塑限值的计算[J]. 山西建筑, 2001,(5): 33-34.
[5] SHARMA B, BORA P K. Closure of “Plastic Limit, Liquid Limit and Undrained Shear Strength of Soil—Reappraisal”[J]. Journal of Geotechnical & Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2003, 129(8): 402.
[6] 彭 意, 李 铀, 彭 强. 提高液塑限联合测定试验精度的方法[J]. 土工基础, 2007(4): 81-84.
[7] 赵秀绍,莫林利.回归分析在界限含水率试验数据处理中的应用[J]. 华东交通大学学报,2010(3):27-32.
[8] 赵秀绍, 莫林利. 界限含水率试验数据计算方法与试验优化研究[J]. 路基工程, 2010(1): 29-31.
[9] 张洪涛, 迟银波, 王 莉. 多皿法:液塑限联合测定的新方法[J]. 交通科技与经济, 1999(2): 25-26.
[10] 郭 莹, 王 琦. 落锥法确定粉土液限和塑限的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2009, 30(9): 2569-2574.
[11] 张红斌. 提高液、塑限试验效率的方法研究[J]. 铁道工程学报, 2006, 23(6): 17-19.
[12] 叶正强, 李爱群, 杨国华, 等. 粘性土的渗透规律性研究[J]. 东南大学学报(自然科学版), 1999, 29(5): 121-125.
[13] HANSBO S. A New Approach to Determination of Shear Strength of Clay by the Fall Cone Test[M]. Stockholm: Ivar Haggatrums Boktryckeri AB, 1957.
[14] 聂守智. 用圆锥试验确定粘性土性质指标的新方法[J]. 岩土工程学报, 1984, 6(6): 18-29.
[15] SHERWOOD P T, RYLEY M D. An Investigation of a Cone-penetrometer Method for the Determination of the Liquid Limit[J]. Géotechnique, 2015, 20(2): 203-208.
[16] SKEMPTION A W, NORTHEY R D. The Sensitivity of Clays[J]. Géotechnique, 2015, 3(1): 30-53.
[17] TER-STEPANIAN G, ŠKOPEK J. Comparison of Liquid Limit Values Determined According to Casagrande and Vasilev[J]. Géotechnique, 1965, 25(1): 135-136.
[18] WROTH C P,WOOD D M.The Correlation of Index Properties with Some Basic Engineering Properties of Soils[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1978, 15(2): 137-145.
[19] YOUSSEF M S, EL R A H, EL D M. Relationships between Shear Strength, Consolidation, Liquid Limit and Plastic Limit for Remoulded Clays[C]//Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Soil Mechanical, Montreal, 1965: 126-129.
基金
国家自然科学基金项目(42167024);江西省自然科学基金项目(20192BAB206045);江西省教育厅科技项目(GJJ170485)
PDF(1431 KB)
