氯化钙-腐殖酸活化作用下土壤Cd的电动脱除性能

胡艳平, 王振华, 李青云, 汤显强, 张笛梦

raybet体育在线 院报 ›› 2021, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (8) : 60-65.

PDF(4259 KB)
PDF(4259 KB)
raybet体育在线 院报 ›› 2021, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (8) : 60-65. DOI: 10.11988/ckyyb.20200498
水土保持与生态修复

氯化钙-腐殖酸活化作用下土壤Cd的电动脱除性能

  • 胡艳平1,2, 王振华1,2, 李青云1,2, 汤显强1,2, 张笛梦1,2
作者信息 +

Performance of Electrokinetic Removal of Cadmium from Contaminated Soil Treated with CaCl2-Humic Acid

  • HU Yan-ping1,2, WANG Zhen-hua1,2, LI Qing-yun1,2, TANG Xian-qiang1,2, ZHANG Di-meng1,2
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

为了提高稻田土壤Cd的去除率,同时减小对土壤pH值的影响,采用氯化钙-腐殖酸复合活化液增强土壤Cd的可移动性,基于电动土工合成材料(EKG)电动排水脱除土壤Cd,重点考察了不同活化剂浓度和活化时间下,土壤有效态Cd含量以及土壤pH值的变化,研究了活化-电动排水后土壤Cd的电动脱除量、土壤全Cd含量、有效态Cd含量、土壤pH值的变化。研究结果表明:0.5%氯化钙-1%腐殖酸对土壤Cd的活化效果最佳,土壤有效态Cd含量可从0.30 mg/kg提高至0.44 mg/kg,而活化处理后的土壤pH值仅降低约0.4;排尽上覆水后,通过电动排水可进一步脱除土壤Cd,土壤Cd的电动脱除量为上覆水中Cd含量的3倍左右;活化-电动排水后,土壤全Cd含量从1.72 mg/kg降低至1.20 mg/kg左右,土壤有效态Cd含量降至0.27~0.31 mg/kg,各截面土壤pH值较为均一且变化不明显,介于5.45~6.30之间。研究所提出的方法可最大限度地脱除土壤Cd,提高稻田土壤Cd的去除率,同时减小对土壤pH值的影响,一定程度上保证了农作物的安全生产。

Abstract

In an attempt to enhance the removal of Cadmium(Cd) from paddy field soil and meanwhile alleviate the influence on soil's pH value, we conducted electrokinetic removal test with CaCl2-humic acid solution activating the mobility of Cd in soil. We observed the changes in the content of available Cd and the pH value of soil by changing the concentration of CaCl2-humic acid and the time of activation. In addition, we examined the changes in the removed content of Cd, the total concentration of Cd , the concentration of available-state Cd, and the pH value of soil after activation and electrokinetic drainage. Results manifest that the solution with 0.5% CaCl2 and 1% humic acid has an optimum activation effect on the Cd in soil, by raising the available-state Cd from 0.3 mg/kg to 0.44 mg/kg and cutting the pH value by only 0.4. After the drainage of the overlying water, Cd can be further removed by electrokinetic drainage. The electrokinetic removal content of Cd was about three times that in the overlying water. After both activation and electrokinetic drainage, the total content of Cd dropped from 1.72 mg/kg to about 1.20 mg/kg, the content of available-state Cd declined to 0.27-0.31 mg/kg, while the pH value of each section of the soil was relatively uniform and barely changed, ranging between 5.45 and 6.30. The present research method could maximize the removal of Cd in soil while reducing the impact on pH value, which ensures the safe production of crops.

关键词

稻田土壤Cd / 脱除性能 / 氯化钙-腐殖酸 / 活化作用 / 电动土工合成材料(EKG) / 电动排水

Key words

cadmium in paddy soil / removal performance / CaCl2-humic acid / activation / electrokinetic geosynthetics (EKG) / electrokinetic drainage

引用本文

导出引用
胡艳平, 王振华, 李青云, 汤显强, 张笛梦. 氯化钙-腐殖酸活化作用下土壤Cd的电动脱除性能[J]. raybet体育在线 院报. 2021, 38(8): 60-65 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20200498
HU Yan-ping, WANG Zhen-hua, LI Qing-yun, TANG Xian-qiang, ZHANG Di-meng. Performance of Electrokinetic Removal of Cadmium from Contaminated Soil Treated with CaCl2-Humic Acid[J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute. 2021, 38(8): 60-65 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20200498
中图分类号: X53   

参考文献

[1] 陈 楠,谢 湉,周 歆, 等. 原位化学淋洗技术对湖南省重金属复合污染稻田土壤处理效果研究[J]. 安徽农业科学,2015,43(28):247-249,274.
[2] 纪雄辉, 梁永超, 鲁艳红, 等. 污染稻田水分管理对水稻吸收积累镉的影响及其作用机理[J]. 生态学报, 2007, 27(9):3930-3939.
[3] 董 萌,赵运林,库文珍,等. 蒌蒿(Artemisia selengensis L.)修复洞庭湖土壤Cd污染的强化措施研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境,2013,22(7):937-944.
[4] 温东东,付融冰,张 卫, 等. 不锈钢电极对重金属污染土壤的强化电动修复及电极腐蚀结晶现象与机制[J]. 环境科学,2017,38(3):1209-1217.
[5] ZHOU D M, CANG L, DENG C F. Electrokinetic Processes of Chromium in Yellow Brown Soil as Affected by Hydrogen Peroxide[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2005, 42(1):59-63.
[6] REDDY K R , CHINTHAMREDDY S. Effects of Initial Form of Chromium on Electrokinetic Remediation in Clays[J]. Advances in Environmental Research, 2003, 7(2): 353-365.
[7] PASCAL S, GITYE K, ALLARDB. Speciation and Transport of Heavy Metals and Macroelements during Electroremediation[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2003, 37(1):177-181.
[8] TANG X Q, LI Q Y, WU M, et al. Review of Remediation Practices Regarding Cadmium-enriched Farmland Soil with Particular Reference to China[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2016, 181: 646-662.
[9] YEUNG A T.Contaminant Extractability by Electrokinetics[J]. Environmental Engineering Science, 2006, 23(1): 202-224.
[10]YEUNG A T. Remediation Technologies for Contaminated Sites[M]//CHEN Y, TANG X, ZHAN L. Advances in Environmental Geotechnics. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University Press, 2009: 328-369.
[11]陈春乐,田 甜,王 果.淋洗对农田土壤镉铅锌的去除、移动性和有效性的影响[J].安全与环境学报,2019,19(2):674-682.
[12]李玉姣. 有机酸和无机盐复合淋洗修复Cd、Pb污染农田土壤的研究[D].南京:南京农业大学,2015.
[13]罗 希, 林 莉,李青云,等.镉污染稻田土壤土柱淋洗修复研究[J].raybet体育在线 院报,2017,34(6):24-28,34.
[14]OH S,BADE R,LEE H,et al. Risk Assessment of Metal (Loid)-contaminated Soils before and after Soil Washing[J].Environmental Earth Science,2015,74(1):703-713.
[15]刘培亚. Cd、Pb重度污染农田土壤化学淋洗及淋洗污水处理的研究[D].南京:南京农业大学,2015.
[16]UDOVIC M, LESTAN D. Pb, Zn and Cd Mobility, Availability and Fractionation in Aged Soil Remediated by EDTA Leaching[J]. Chemosphere, 2009, 74(10): 1367-1373.
[17]陈 楠. 土壤pH对镉在土壤-水稻系统中的迁移、积累与分布的影响[D].长沙:湖南农业大学,2018.
[18]张振兴, 纪雄辉, 谢运河, 等. 水稻不同生育期施用生石灰对稻米镉含量的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2016, 35(10):1867-1872.
[19]邓小华,陈 金,李玉辉,等.酸化土壤修复中石灰施用量的确定方法:中国,CN108664755A[P].2018-10-16.
[20]何电源. 稻田土壤合理施用石灰的研究[J]. 华中农业大学学报, 1989(增刊1):19-24.
[21]王 洪. 氯化钙及黄腐酸盐对镉污染水稻田土壤的淋洗修复[D].武汉:华中科技大学,2017.
[22]柏宏成. 低分子有机酸、腐殖酸对土壤镉污染淋洗修复研究[D].成都:四川农业大学,2015.
[23]胡艳平,王振华,汤显强, 等.基于EKG电动脱水去除稻田土壤重金属Cd的试验研究[J].raybet体育在线 院报,2019,36(5):23-27.
[24]盖荣银, 孙友宝, 马晓玲, 等. 二乙烯三胺五乙酸提取结合火焰原子吸收光谱法测定土壤中的有效态元素[J]. 环境化学, 2016(5):1096-1097.
[25]廉梅花. 根际土壤中重金属的活化因素及作用机理研究[D].沈阳:东北大学,2016.
[26]李 颖. 水体中重金属、腐殖酸和粘土颗粒物之间的相互作用研究[D]. 济南:山东大学, 2010.
[27]胡 园, 林 莉, 胡艳平, 等. 农田土壤重金属Cd的环保淋洗剂筛选研究[J]. raybet体育在线 院报, 2019, 36(9):23-28.
[28]冯 源. 城市污水污泥电动脱水机理试验研究及多场耦合作用理论分析[D].杭州:浙江大学,2012.
[29]CHAVEZ E, HE Z L, STOFFELLA P J, et al. Chemical Speciation of Cadmium: An Approach to Evaluate Plant-available Cadmium in Ecuadorian Soils under Cacao Production[J]. Chemosphere, 2016, 150: 57-62.
[30]RAURET G. Extraction Procedures for the Determination of Heavy Metals in Contaminated Soil and Sediment[J]. Talanta, 1998, 46(3): 449-455.
[31]GÜNGÖR E B Ö, BEKBÖLET M. Zinc Release by Humic and Fulvic Acid as Influenced by pH, Complexation and DOC Sorption[J]. Geoderma, 2010, 159(1):131-138.
[32]沈 欣, 朱奇宏, 朱捍华,等. 农艺调控措施对水稻镉积累的影响及其机理研究[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2015, 34(8):1449-1454.
[33]万玉山,沈 梦,陈艳秋,等.Cd污染土壤的电动修复及其强化[J].环境工程学报,2018,12(7):2075-2083.

基金

水利部公益性行业科研专项(201501019);湖北省技术创新专项重大项目(2017ABA073)

PDF(4259 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/

Baidu
map