粗粒料的力学特性不仅取决于有效围压,还与密实程度密切相关。通过4组不同初始干密度粗粒料的大型三轴固结排水剪切试验,研究了围压和密度对粗粒料临界状态力学特性的影响。试验结果表明:软化型应力应变曲线破坏状态偏应力大于相变状态偏应力,而相变状态偏应力与临界状态偏应力较为接近;不同围压、不同密度的试验,随着剪切的进行,偏应力与平均正应力的应力比逐渐趋向于临界应力比,软化型试验应力比曲线呈单驼峰型形态,硬化型试验应力比曲线呈爬升型形态;临界孔隙比随临界平均正应力的增大而减小,随初始孔隙比的增大基本呈线性增大。研究成果可为特征状态参数研究和临界状态本构模型的建立提供依据。
Abstract
The mechanical properties of coarse granular material are not only depending on effective confining pressure, but also closely related to compaction degree. The effects of confining pressure and density on mechanical properties of coarse granular material under critical state were investigated using large-scale triaxial consolidation and drainage shear tests on specimens with four different initial dry densities. The deviatoric stress at failure state for softening stress-strain curve is larger than that at phase transformation state which is closer to the deviatoric stress at critical state. The stress ratio of deviatoric stress to mean normal stress gradually approaches the stress ratio at critical state. The curve of stress ratio for softening stress-strain test displays a single hump shape, while the curve of stress ratio for hardening stress-strain test shows a climbing shape. The critical void ratio decreases with the increase of mean normal stress under critical state, and basically increases linearly with the increase of initial void ratio.
关键词
粗粒料 /
临界状态 /
力学特性 /
相变状态 /
密度 /
围压
Key words
coarse granular material /
critical state /
mechanical properties /
phase transformation state /
density /
confining pressure
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] 蔡正银,李相菘.砂土的剪胀理论及其本构模型的发展[J].岩土工程学报,2007,29(8):1122-1128.
[2] ROSCOE K H,SCHOFIELD A N,WROTH C P. On the Yielding of Soils[J].Geotechnique,1958,8(1):22-53.
[3] LI X S, WANG Y.Linear Representation of Steady-state Line for Sand[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 1998, 124(12): 1215-1217.
[4] VERDUGO R, ISHIHARA K. TheSteady State of Sandy Soils[J]. Soils and Foundations, 1996, 36(2): 81-91.
[5] 张卫华,赵成刚,傅 方.基于相变状态的砂土本构模型的研究[J].工程地质学报,2013,21(3):337-334.
[6] 胡庆龙.饱和砂土相变状态试验研究[D].北京:北京交通大学, 2016.
[7] CHU J.An Experimental Examination of the Critical State and Other Similar Concepts for Granular Soils[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1995, 32(6): 1065-1075.
[8] LI X S.A Sand Model with State-Dependent Dilatancy[J]. Geotechnique, 2002, 52(3): 173-186.
[9] 黄茂松,李学丰,贾苍琴.基于材料状态相关临界状态理论的砂土双屈服面模型[J].岩土工程学报,2010,32(11): 1764-1771.
[10] 蔡正银,侯贺营,张晋勋,等.考虑颗粒破碎影响的珊瑚砂临界状态与本构模型研究[J].岩土工程学报, 2019,41(6):989-995.
[11] 刘斯宏,沈超敏,毛航宇,等.堆石料状态相关弹塑性本构模型[J].岩土力学,2019,40(8):2891-2898.
[12] 姜景山,刘汉龙,程展林,等.密度和围压对粗粒土力学性质的影响[J].raybet体育在线
院报,2009,26(8): 46-50.
[13] 丁树云,蔡正银,凌 华.堆石料的强度与变形特性及临界状态研究[J].岩土工程学报,2010,32(2):248-252.
[14] 刘恩龙,陈生水,李国英,等.堆石料的临界状态与考虑颗粒破碎的本构模型[J].岩土力学,2011,32(增刊2):148-154.
[15] 姜景山,左永振,程展林,等.三维应力下密度对粗粒料力学特性的影响[J].raybet体育在线
院报,2021,38(1):89-94.
基金
国家重点研发计划项目(2017YFC0404804);国家自然科学基金-雅砻江联合基金重点项目(U1765203);国家自然科学基金面上项目(51679072, 51778282);raybet体育在线
开放研究基金资助项目(CKWV2017510/KY);南京工程学院校级科研基金项目(CKJB201706)
PDF(5930 KB)
