长江中下游地处冲积平原,洪水灾害较为频繁,沿江堤防是生命财产和生产设施的第一道屏障。其中荆江河段洪水峰高量大,且两岸支流众多、江湖关系复杂,防洪形势尤为严峻。以上荆江松滋江堤防洪保护区为研究对象,分析了可能产生的堤防溃口;在对复杂的荆江-洞庭湖水系进行概化的基础上,建立一二维耦合数学模型,研究了1 000 a一遇洪水条件下松滋江堤发生溃决后长江干流及防洪保护区内的洪水演进过程,并以最大淹没水深、淹没时间、最大流速、受影响人口及洪水损失为风险要素,分析了保护区内的洪水风险分布情况。文章共分为2篇,此为第二篇,旨在阐述保护区内洪水演进过程及风险分布特征。结果表明,涴市横堤发生溃决后造成的洪水损失最为严重,在实际防汛工作中需要重点关注。
Abstract
Located in alluvial plain, the middle and lower Changjiang River suffers from frequent flood disasters. Embankment is the first barrier to protect life and property along the river. The Jingjiang River reach in the middle Changjiang River is exposed to a more serious flood control situation because of large amount of high flood peak and complex river-lake relation. In this research, the flood risk in the flood protection region enclosed by Songzi Levee of upper Jingjiang River reach is assessed. The flood routing process in mainstream Changjiang River and the studied flood protection region in the presence of levee break during a 1 000-year event flood is simulated using a 1-D and 2-D coupled mathematical model with generalized river network of Jingjiang River and Dongting Lake water system. Maximum flood depth, inundation duration, maximum flow velocity,affected population, and flood losses are selected as risk elements to analyze the distribution of flood risk. The article is divided into two parts. Present here is the second part to expound the flood routing process and risk distribution characteristics in the protected zone. In practical flood control, attention should be paid to the Yuanshi levee which would give rise to the most severe loss once breach occurs.
关键词
洪水风险 /
防洪保护区 /
洪水演进过程 /
荆江河段 /
松滋江堤
Key words
flood risk /
flood protection region /
flood propagation /
Jingjiang River reach /
Songzi levee
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] 张闻胜,董秀颖,刘金清.国内外洪水风险分析概述[J].北京水利,2000(6):12-15.
[2] 向 飞.洪水风险综合防范研究[D].武汉:武汉大学,2010.
[3] 李 琼.洪水灾害风险分析与评价方法的研究及改进[D].武汉:华中科技大学,2012.
[4] 卢悉早.城市洪涝灾害风险研究[D].武汉:武汉理工大学,2005.
[5] 张志彤.论面向二十一世纪的防洪减灾对策[J].中国水利,1997(12):14-15.
[6] ARONICA G T,CANDELA A,FABIL P,et al. Estimation of Flood Inundation Probabilities Using Global Hazard Indexes Based on Hydrodynamic Variables[J]. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C,2012,42:119-129.
[7] RODDA H J E. The Development and Application of a Flood Risk Model for the Czech Republic[J]. Natural Hazards, 2003, 36(1): 207-220.
[8] 赵思健,张 峭.东北三省农作物洪涝时空风险评估[J].灾害学,2013,28(3):54-60.
[9] 毛熙彦,蒙吉军,康玉芳.信息扩散模型在自然灾害综合风险评估中的应用与扩展[J]. 北京大学学报(自然科学版),2012,48(3):513-518.
[10]程先富,匡 毅,赵 阳.基于BP神经网络的洪涝灾害风险评价:以杭埠河流域为例[J].皖西学院学报,2015,31(2):1-4.
[11]SANYAL J, LU X. GIS-based Flood Hazard Mapping at Different Administrative Scales: A Case Study in Gangetic West Bengal, India[J]. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, 2006, 27(2): 207-220.
[12]王亚梅.基于GIS的洞庭湖区洪水灾害风险评价[D].长沙:湖南大学,2009.
[13]果 鹏,夏军强,陈 倩,等.基于力学过程的蓄滞洪区洪水风险评估模型及应用[J].水科学进展,2017,28(6):858-867.
[14]卢程伟,周建中,江焱生,等.基于MIKE FLOOD的荆江分洪区洪水演进数值模拟[J].应用基础与工程科学学报,2017,25(5):905-916.
[15]陈 浩,仇劲卫,王艳艳,等.北江大堤保护范围洪水风险图的制作与应用[J].水利水电技术,2000(7):38-43.
[16]毛德华,谢 石,刘晓群,等.洪灾风险分析的国内外研究现状及展望(Ⅲ):研究展望[J].自然灾害学报,2012,21(5):8-15.
[17]张红萍.山区小流域洪水风险评估与预警技术研究[D].北京:中国水利水电科学研究院,2013.
[18]刘 亚,姚仕明,朱勇辉,等.松滋江堤防洪保护区洪水风险研究(Ⅰ):模型的建立与验证[J].raybet体育在线
院报,2019,36(3):40-45.
基金
中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费项目(CKSF2019525/HL,CKSF2017042/HL)
PDF(1508 KB)
