上拔荷载对斜桩水平承载性状影响的试验研究

曹卫平, 赵呈, 李元, 张伟伟

raybet体育在线 院报 ›› 2020, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (8) : 82-88.

PDF(4618 KB)
PDF(4618 KB)
raybet体育在线 院报 ›› 2020, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (8) : 82-88. DOI: 10.11988/ckyyb.20190515
岩土工程

上拔荷载对斜桩水平承载性状影响的试验研究

  • 曹卫平1,2, 赵呈1, 李元3, 张伟伟1
作者信息 +

Experimental Study on Influence of Uplift Load onHorizontal Bearing Behavior of Batter Piles

  • CAO Wei-ping1,2, ZHAO Cheng1, LI Yuan3, ZHANG Wei-wei1
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

斜桩在承受水平荷载的同时,往往会受到上拔荷载的作用。为研究上拔荷载对斜桩水平承载性状的影响,开展了10根直、斜桩的室内模型试验,研究上拔荷载对斜桩桩顶水平位移和水平承载力的影响,对比了直桩与斜桩桩身弯矩和剪力的差异,并分析了上拔荷载对正、负斜桩桩身内力及桩侧摩阻力的影响规律。模型试验结果表明:上拔荷载从直桩水平极限承载力的12.5%增大到75%时,正斜桩水平承载力比增大21%,负斜桩水平承载力比减小25%。上拔荷载的存在会使正、负斜桩桩身轴力均增大,且上拔荷载越大,桩身轴力越大。上拔荷载能减小正斜桩桩身弯矩和剪力,使其抵抗弯矩和剪力的能力得到提高,而增大负斜桩桩身弯矩和剪力,使其抵抗弯矩和剪力的能力被削弱;不论正斜桩还是负斜桩,其上部区段桩身侧表面均出现了方向向上的摩阻力,而下部区段桩身侧表面均为方向向下的摩阻力,随着上拔荷载的增大,斜桩桩身侧摩阻力逐渐增大。

Abstract

Batter piles are subjected to horizontal loads and meanwhile uplift loads. To investigate the influence of uplift load on the horizontal bearing behavior of batter piles, we conducted indoor model tests on two groups of batter piles subjected to different uplift loads and vertical pile subjected only to horizontal load as control group. According to test result we examined the effects of uplift load on horizontal displacement and horizontal bearing capacity of the top of batter pile, compared the bending moment and shearing force between vertical pile and batter pile, and also analyzed the effects of uplift load on the internal force and frictional resistance of positive and negative batter piles. When uplift load increased from 12.5% to 75% of the horizontal ultimate bearing capacity of vertical piles, the horizontal bearing capacity ratio of positive batter piles increased by 21% while that of negative batter piles decreased by 25%. Uplift load augmented the axial force of both positive and negative batter piles. The larger the uplift load, the greater the axial force of pile. Uplift load also reduced the bending moment and shear force of positive batter piles, hence improving their ability to resisting moment and shear force, while weakened the ability of negative batter piles to resisting bending moment and shear force by increasing the bending moment and shear force. Both positive batter piles and negative batter piles witnessed an upward frictional resistance on the lateral surface of the pile body in the upper section, and downward frictional resistance in the lower section. With the increasing of uplift load, such side frictional resistance increased gradually.

关键词

斜桩 / 模型试验 / 上拔荷载 / 水平承载性状 / 桩身轴力 / 摩阻力

Key words

batter piles / model test / uplift load / horizontal bearing behavior / axial force of piles / frictional resistance

引用本文

导出引用
曹卫平, 赵呈, 李元, 张伟伟. 上拔荷载对斜桩水平承载性状影响的试验研究[J]. raybet体育在线 院报. 2020, 37(8): 82-88 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20190515
CAO Wei-ping, ZHAO Cheng, LI Yuan, ZHANG Wei-wei. Experimental Study on Influence of Uplift Load onHorizontal Bearing Behavior of Batter Piles[J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute. 2020, 37(8): 82-88 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20190515
中图分类号: TU473.1   

参考文献

[1] SEED R B, DICKENSEN S E, IDRISS I M. Principal Geotechnical Aspects of the Loma Prieta Earthquake[J]. Soils and Foundations, 1991, 31(1): 1-27.
[2] COOPER S E. Ductile Frames are Tough for Earthquakes[J]. Civil Engineering, 1991, 61(8): 61-63.
[3] BENSLIMANE A, JURAN I, HANNA S, et al. Seismic Behavior of Micropile Systems[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers Ground Improvement, 1998(8): 109-120.
[4] 朱 斌, 朱瑞燕, 罗 军, 等. 海洋高桩基础水平大变位性状模型试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2010, 32(4): 521- 530.
[5] 樊文甫,曹卫平.带承台倾斜单桩水平承载变形性状数值分析[J].raybet体育在线 院报,2016,33(10):121-125.
[6] 横山幸满. 桩结构物的计算方法和计算实例[M]. 唐业清,吴庆荪, 合译. 北京:中国铁道出版社, 1984.
[7] 袁廉华, 陈仁朋, 孔令刚, 等. 轴向荷载对斜桩水平承载特性影响试验及理论研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2013, 34(7): 1958 -1964.
[8] KUBO K. Experimental Study of the Behavior of Laterally Loaded Piles[C]∥Proceeding of the 6th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Montreal, Quebec. September 8-15,1965:275-279.
[9] DAS B M, SEELEY G R, RAGHU D. Uplift Capacity of Model Piles under Oblique Loads[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 1976, 102(9):1009-1013.
[10]REDDY K M, AYOTHIRAMAN R. Experimental Studies on Behavior of Single Pile under Combined Uplift and Lateral Loading[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2015, 141(7):1-10.
[11]ZHANG L M, MCVAYM C, LAI P W. Centrifuge Modeling of Laterally Loaded Single Batter Piles in Sands[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1999, 36(6):1074-1084.
[12]曹卫平,樊文甫. 水平荷载作用下斜桩承载变形性状数值分析[J]. 中国公路学报, 2017, 30(9): 34-43.
[13]ACHMUS M, THIEKEN K. On the Behavior of Piles in Non-cohesive Soil under Combined Horizontal and Vertical Loading[J]. Acta Geotechnica, 2010, 5(3):199-210.
[14]KARTHIGEYAN S, RAMAKRISHNA V V G S T, RAJAGOPAL K. Influence of Vertical Load on the Lateral Response of Piles in Sand[J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2006, 33(2): 121-131.
[15]AL-BAGHDADI T,BROWN M J,KNAPPETT J,et al. Effects of Vertical Loading on Lateral Screw Pile Performance[J]. Geotechnical Engineering,2017,170(3):1-14.
[16]凌道盛, 任 涛, 王云岗. 砂土地基斜桩水平承载特性p-y曲线法[J]. 岩土力学, 2013, 34(1): 155-162.
[17]ROLLINS K M, OLSEN R J, EGBERT J J, et al. Pile Spacing Effects on Lateral Pile Group Behavior: Load Tests[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2006, 132(10):1262-1271.
[18]LOW B K, TANG S K, CHO A V. Arching in Piled Embankments[J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1994, 120(11): 1917-1938.
[19]JGJ 106—2014, 建筑基桩检测技术规范[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2014.

基金

陕西省自然科学基础研究计划一般项目(2019JM-006)

PDF(4618 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/

Baidu
map