“一带一路”区域未来RCPs情景降水变化分析

黄晓晖, 乐群, 张敏

raybet体育在线 院报 ›› 2020, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (7) : 53-60.

PDF(7727 KB)
PDF(7727 KB)
raybet体育在线 院报 ›› 2020, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (7) : 53-60. DOI: 10.11988/ckyyb.20190325
水资源与环境

“一带一路”区域未来RCPs情景降水变化分析

  • 黄晓晖1,2,3, 乐群1,2,3, 张敏3
作者信息 +

Future Precipitation Change in the Belt and Road Region under Representative Concentration Pathway Scenarios

  • HUANG Xiao-hui1,2,3, YUE Qun1,2,3, ZHANG Min3
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

以“一带一路”地区作为研究区域,利用分位数映射法的4种传递函数订正全球气候模式(HadGEM2-ES)不同RCPs(Representative Concentration Pathways,温室气体浓度轨迹)情景的月降水量,以获得更具可靠性的未来降水变化的预测结果;在此基础上分析未来各地区不同RCPs情景年降水量变化趋势以及差异情况。利用均方根误差RMSE和降水偏差diff分析比较分位数映射法的订正效果,结果显示线性参数化方案PTFl法建立的传递函数综合订正效果最佳;同时也发现未订正的HadHEM2-ES在东亚和俄罗斯等地区存在明显的降水增加趋势高估。订正后的未来“一带一路”降水变化显示:①东亚、东南亚和俄罗斯地区的降水量在4个情景多为增加趋势,北非、西亚地区在4个情景多为减少趋势。②未来平均年降水量总体呈增加趋势;区域平均值中,EA(东亚)和Rus(俄罗斯)增加趋势明显,WA(西亚)和NAfr(北非)则是减少趋势。各地区降水突变情况存在明显的情景差异,RCP2.6情景突变情况最少,其他3种情景在不同地区都有不同的表现。分析结果为今后的政策制定或工程建设提供有效的参考依据。

Abstract

The future precipitation change in the Belt and Road region in 2020—2099 is estimated under different representative concentration pathway (RCP) scenarios. The monthly precipitation under different RCP scenarios of global climate model (HadGEM2-ES) is first of all corrected using four transfer functions of the quantile mapping method for a more reliable estimation result. On such basis, the change trend and regional differences are examined. The root mean square error (RMSE) and precipitation deviation (diff) are analyzed to compare the correction efficacy of quartile mapping method. Results demonstrate that the correction effect of linear function PTF1 reaches the optimum. The uncorrected HadGEM2-ES model overestimates the trend of precipitation increase in Central Asia in the RCP2.6 scenario; the RCP4.5 scenario overestimates the increase in precipitation in Central Asia, East Asia and Russia; the other two scenarios RCP6.0 and RCP8.0 overestimate the increase in precipitation in East Asia and Russia. In the four scenarios after correction, the precipitation increases in East Asia, Southeast Asia and Russia, while mostly decreases in North Africa and West Asia. In future, the average annual precipitation is generally increasing, with the average value climbing in East Asia and Russia, whereas declining in West Asia and North Africa. The abrupt change in precipitation differs with scenarios: RCP2.6 scenario has the least abrupt change, while the other three scenarios perform diversely in different regions.The analysis results provide an effective reference for future policy formulation or project construction.

关键词

降水变化 / RCP情景 / “一带一路” / HadGEM2-ES模式 / 分位数映射法

Key words

precipitation change / RCP scenario / the Belt and Road / HadGEM2-ES model / quantile mapping

引用本文

导出引用
黄晓晖, 乐群, 张敏. “一带一路”区域未来RCPs情景降水变化分析[J]. raybet体育在线 院报. 2020, 37(7): 53-60 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20190325
HUANG Xiao-hui, YUE Qun, ZHANG Min. Future Precipitation Change in the Belt and Road Region under Representative Concentration Pathway Scenarios[J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute. 2020, 37(7): 53-60 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20190325
中图分类号: P467   

参考文献

[1] 张学珍, 李侠祥, 徐新创,等. 基于模式优选的21世纪中国气候变化情景集合预估[J]. 地理学报, 2017, 72(9):1555-1568.
[2] 王书霞, 张利平, 李 意,等. 气候变化情景下澜沧江流域极端洪水事件研究[J]. 气候变化研究进展, 2019, 15(1):23-32.
[3] 秦大河, THOMAS S. IPCC第五次评估报告第一工作组报告的亮点结论[J]. 气候变化研究进展,2014,10(1):1-6.
[4] BAEK H J, LEE J, LEE H S, et al. Climate Change in the 21st Century Simulated by HadGEM2-AO under Representative Concentration Pathways[J]. Asia-Pacific Journal of Atmospheric Sciences, 2013, 49:603-618.
[5] 张 蓓,戴新刚.2006—2013年CMIP5模式中国降水预估误差分析[J]. 大气科学,2016,40(5):981-994.
[6] 杨红龙,王炳坤,杜尧东,等. RCPs情景下珠江流域气候变化预估分析[J]. 热带气象学报,2014,30(3):503-510.
[7] 黄晓莹,温之平,杜尧东,等. 华南地区未来地面温度和降水变化的情景分析[J]. 热带气象学报,2008,24(3):425-458.
[8] 刘绿柳,姜 彤,徐金阁,等. 21世纪珠江流域水文过程对气候变化的响应[J]. 气候变化研究进展,2012,8(1):28-34.
[9] 胡 芩,姜大膀,范广洲. 青藏高原未来气候变化预估:CMIP5模式结果[J].大气科学,2015,39(2):260-270.
[10]RAJCZAK J, SCHÄR C. Projections of Future Precipitation Extremes over Europe: A Multimodel Assessment of Climate Simulations[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, 2017, 122(20): 773-800.
[11]BARKHORDARIAN A, VON STORCH H, BHEND J. The Expectation of Future Precipitation Change over the Mediterranean Region is Different from What We Observe[J].Climate Dynamics, 2013,40: 225-244.
[12]VYSHKVARKOVA E V, VOSKRESENSKAYA E N . Changes of Extreme Precipitation in Southern Russia[C]∥IOP Conference Series: Earth & Environmental Science. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/107/1/012044.
[13]ONYUTHA C. Trends and Variability in African Long-term Precipitation[J]. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 2018, 32: 2721-2739.
[14]WOO S, SINGH G P, OH J H, et al. Possible Teleconnections Between East and South Asian Summer Monsoon Precipitation in Projected Future Climate Change[J]. Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics, 2018(2):1-13.
[15]姜 彤, 王艳君, 袁佳双,等. “一带一路”沿线国家2020—2060年人口经济发展情景预测[J]. 气候变化研究进展, 2018, 14(2):155-164.
[16]LIU Y, HAO Y. The Dynamic Links Between CO2 Emissions, Energy Consumption and Economic Development in the Countries along “The Belt and Road”[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 645: 674-683.
[17]闻新宇,王邵武,朱锦红,等. 英国CRU高分辨率格点资料揭示的20世纪中国气候变化[J]. 大气科学,2006,30(5):894-904.
[18]BELLOUIN N, RAE J, JONES A, et al. Aerosol Forcing in the Climate Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5) Simulations by HadGEM2-ES and the Role of Ammonium Nitrate[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 2011, 116(D20): 1-25.
[19]VAN VUUREN D P, EDMONDS J A, KAINUMA M, et al. A Special Issue on the RCPs[J]. Climatic Change, 2011, 109: 1-4.
[20]VAN VUUREN D P, STEHFEST E, DEN ELZEN M G J, et al. RCP2.6: Exploring the Possibility to Keep Global Mean Temperature Increase below 2℃[J]. Climatic Change, 2011, 109: 95-116.
[21]THOMSON A M, CALVIN K V, SMITH S J, et al. RCP4.5: A Pathway for Stabilization of Radiative Forcing by 2100 [J]. Climatic Change, 2011, 109: 77-94.
[22]MASUI T, MATSUMOTO K, HIJIOKA Y, et al. An Emission Pathway for Stabilization at 6 Wm-2 Radiative Forcing [J]. Climatic Change, 2011, 109: 59-76.
[23]RIAHI K, RAO S, KREY V, et al. RCP8.5: A Scenario of Comparatively High Greenhouse Gas Emissions[J]. Climatic Change, 2011, 109: 33-57.
[24]童 尧,高学杰,韩 振,等.基于RegCM4模式的中国区域日尺度降水模拟误差订正[J].大气科学,2017,41(6):1156-1166.
[25]从 辉, 周维博, 宋 扬,等. 1970—2013年大西安地区降水时空变化特征分析[J]. raybet体育在线 院报, 2017, 34(8):18-23.

基金

国家重点研发计划重点专项(2018YFC1507702)

PDF(7727 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/

Baidu
map