重金属离子对流-弥散-吸附参数对于评价防污屏障的服役性能十分重要,目前还缺乏高效且可靠的方法系统地测试这些参数。为了能在较短试验时间内采用较少试验数量获得重金属离子对流-弥散-吸附参数,以Pb2+作为代表性重金属离子,开展了Pb2+在土-膨润土中的土柱试验。结果表明:模型渗流流速从0增大到1.59×10-7 m/s时, Pb2+的阻滞因子Rd从13减小为11,符合流速越大阻滞因子越小的规律;该土柱试验方法得到的Pb2+对流-弥散-吸附参数与文献报道的参数典型取值高度一致,证明了该方法的有效性;该方法减少了试验数量,提高了参数获取效率,且以单参数解耦方式拟合试验结果,拟合结果更可靠。研究结果为防污屏障材料的服役性能评价提供新的途径。
Abstract
The advection-dispersion-adsorption parameters of heavy metals are crucial for evaluating the service performance of barrier systems. Efficient and reliable method to test these parameters systematically is still in lack at present. In order to obtain the advection-dispersion-adsorption parameters of heavy metal ions with less experimental quantities in a shorter test time, the soil column test using Pb2+ as a representative heavy metal ion was carried out in soil-bentonite. Results showed that the retardation factor of Pb2+ decreased from 13 to 11 when the flow rate increased from 0 m/s to 1.59×10-7 m/s, which was consistent with the law that the larger the flow rate, the smaller the retardation factor. The advection-dispersion-adsorption parameters of Pb2+ obtained by this method were in good agreement with the typical values reported in previous literature, which proved the validity of this method. This method reduced the number of tests, improved the efficiency of parameter acquisition by which the test results were also more reliable by means of single parameter decoupling.
关键词
重金属 /
对流-弥散-吸附参数 /
土柱试验 /
土-膨润土 /
防污屏障 /
单参数解耦拟合
Key words
heavy metal /
advection-dispersion-adsorption parameters /
soil column test /
soil-bentonite /
barrier systems /
single parameter
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1]KJELDSEN P, BARLAZ M A, ROOKER A P, et al. Present and Long-term Composition of MSW Landfill Leachate: A Review[J]. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 2002, 32(4): 297-336.
[2] 朱 伟, 舒 实, 王升位,等. 垃圾填埋场渗沥液击穿防渗系统的指示污染物研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2016, 38(4):619-626.
[3] 刘松玉, 詹良通, 胡黎明,等. 环境岩土工程研究进展[J].土工工程学报,2016,49(3):6-30.
[4] 陈云敏. 环境土工基本理论及工程应用[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2014, 36(1): 1－46.
[5] 谢海建,詹良通,陈云敏,等.我国四类衬垫系统防污性能的比较分析[J].土木工程学报,2011(7):133-141.
[6] DU Y J, SHEN S L, LIU S Y, et al. Contaminant Mitigating Performance of Chinese Standard Municipal Solid Waste Landfill Liner Systems[J]. Geotextiles & Geomembranes, 2009, 27(3): 232-239.
[7] 曾 兴. 黏土屏障重金属迁移离心模拟相似性及击穿时间评估方法[D].杭州: 浙江大学, 2015.
[8] 钟孝乐. 重金属在高岭土中对流-弥散参数的测试研究[D]. 杭州:浙江大学, 2013.
[9] SHACKELFORD C D, MEIER A, SAMPLE-LORD K. Limiting Membrane and Diffusion Behavior of a Geosynthetic Clay Liner[J]. Geotextiles & Geomembranes, 2016, 44(5): 707-718.
[10]YEO S S, SHACKELFORD C D, EVANS J C. Consolidation and Hydraulic Conductivity of Nine Model Soil-Bentonite Backfills[J]. Journal of Geotechnical & Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2005, 131(10): 1189-1198.
[11]张文杰, 顾 晨, 楼晓红. 低固结压力下土-膨润土防渗墙填料渗透和弥散系数测试[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2017, 39(10):1915-1921.
[12]杨玉玲, 杜延军, 范日东,等. 膨润土系隔离墙材料渗透特性研究综述[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2015, 37(增刊2):210-216.
[13]曾 兴, 詹良通, 陈云敏. 低渗透性土柱对流-弥散迁移试验解析模拟边界适用性研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2017, 39(4):636-644.
[14]SAMPLE-LORD K M,SHACKELFORD C D.Solute Diffusion in Bentonite Pastes[J].Journal of Geotechnical & Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2016,142(8):04016033.
[15]张文杰, 楼晓红, 高佳雯. 高塌落度防渗墙填料扩散系数快速测定的透析试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2018,39(2):523-528.
[16]李 涛, 张志红, 唐保荣. 太湖疏浚底泥堆场黏土防渗层阻隔污染物的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2012, 33(4): 993-998.
[17]刘兆鹏, 杜延军, 蒋宁俊,等. 基于半动态淋滤试验的水泥固化铅污染黏土溶出特性研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2013, 35(12):2212-2218.
[18]伍浩良, 刘兆鹏, 杜延军,等. 酸雨作用下含磷固化剂处理铅锌镉复合污染土的半动态浸出试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2017, 39(6):1058-1064.
[19]ROWE R K, BADV K. Chloride Migration through Clayey Silt Underlain by Fine Sand or Silt[J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1996, 122(1): 60-68.
[20]DU Y J, HAYASHI S, LIU S Y. Experimental Study of Migration of Potassium Ion through a Two-layer Soil System[J]. Environmental Geology, 2005, 48(8): 1096-1106.
[21]李振泽, 陈云敏, 唐晓武,等. 污染物在黏土中的非线性弥散特性[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2010, 44(12):2337-2341.
[22]XI Y H, REN J, HU Z X. Laboratory Determination of Diffusion and Distribution Coefficients of Contaminants in Clay Soil[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2006, 28(3): 397-402.
[23]KIM J Y, EDIL T B, PARK J K. Effective Porosity and Seepage Velocity in Column Tests on Compacted Clay[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 1997, 123(12): 1135-1142.
[24]王誉泽. 防污屏障土质材料改性及服役寿命分析[D]. 杭州:浙江大学, 2014.
[25]龚 标. 利用短土柱测定黏性土等温吸附曲线的方法及应用[D].杭州:浙江大学, 2015.
[26]潘 倩. 土-膨润土竖向隔离墙力学行为及其对防污性能影响[D]. 杭州:浙江大学, 2016.
[27]DU Y J, HAYASHI S. A Study on Sorption Properties of Cd2+, on Ariake Clay for Evaluating Its Potential Use as a Landfill Barrier Material[J]. Applied Clay Science, 2006, 32(1):14-24.
[28]STUERMER M M, BOSCOV M E G, OLIVEIRA E, et al. Metal Retention Capacity of a Saprolitic Silty Soil Derived from Gneiss[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2008)134:4(509).
[29]CHALERMYANONT T, ARRYKUL S, CHAROENTHAISONG N. Potential Use of Lateritic and Marine Clay Soils as Landfill Liners to Retain Heavy Metals[J]. Waste Management, 2009, 29(1): 117-127.
[30]INTERNÒ G, LENTI V, FIDELIBUS C. Laboratory Experiments on Diffusion and Sorption of Heavy Metals in a Marine Clay[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2014, 73(8):1-7.
[31]ROEHL K E, CZURDAK. Diffusion and Solid Speciation of Cd and Pb in Clay Liners[J]. Applied Clay Science, 1998, 12(5): 387-402.
[32]楼紫阳,赵由才,张 全.渗滤液处理处置技术及工程实例[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2007.
[33]王宝贞,王 琳.城市固体废物渗滤液处理与处理[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2005.
[34]谢海建. 成层介质污染物的运移机理及衬垫系统防污性能研究[D]. 杭州:浙江大学, 2008.
基金
国家重点研发计划项目(2018YFC1802300)
PDF(5143 KB)
