为研究我国北方沿海不同贝壳垃圾透水混凝土的抗冻性能,选取秦皇岛海域生长的贝壳,对其制备的透水植生混凝土进行了研究。采用慢冻法,以质量损失率、强度等评价指标,结合扫描电镜(SEM)、背散射电子成像(BSE)等微观试验,分别研究了厨余牡蛎垃圾、工厂牡蛎垃圾、厨余扇贝垃圾、工厂扇贝垃圾所制备透水混凝土的冻融耐久性。结果表明:工厂垃圾相对厨余垃圾具有更好的抗冻融性能和强度;掺入硅灰可降低碱度,显著提高抗压强度,但对抗冻融性能的提高有限,经微观分析与多因素比对,确定硅灰掺量为5%;扇贝垃圾制备的透水混凝土,其抗冻融耐久性优于牡蛎垃圾透水混凝土,扇贝壳微观致密的表层结构为其抗冻性能提供了积极作用。
Abstract
The aim of this study is to investigate the frost resistance of pervious concrete added with different seashell wastes in northern coastal areas of China. The seashells from Qinhuangdao were selected to prepare pervious vegetation-growing concrete. The freeze-thaw durability of pervious concretes made from kitchen oyster waste, factory oyster waste, kitchen scallop waste and factory scallop waste were examined by slow freezing method with mass loss rate and strength as evaluation indexes in association with Scanning Electron Microscoke(SEM), Backscattered Electron Imaging(BSE) and other microscopic tests. Results revealed that (1)factory shell waste is of better freeze-thaw resistance and strength than kitchen shell waste. The incorporation of silica fume reduced the salinity while improving the compressive strength of shell pervious concrete, and enhancing the freeze-thaw resistance to a limited extent. Through microscopic analysis and multi-factor comparison, the content of silica fume is determined at 5% as the optimal. (2)Pervious concrete containing scallop waste boasts higher freeze-thaw durability than that containing oyster waste owning to its dense microscopic surface structure.
关键词
透水混凝土 /
贝壳垃圾 /
冻融循环 /
质量损失率 /
硅灰掺量
Key words
shell waste /
pervious concrete /
freeze-thaw cycle /
mass loss rate /
silica fume
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] MO K H, ALENGARAM U J, JUMAAT M Z, et al. Recycling of Seashell Waste in Concrete: A Review[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2018, 162: 751-764.
[2] TAYEH B A,HASANIYAH M W,ZEYAD A M,et al. Properties of Concrete Containing Recycled Seashells as Cement Partial Replacement: A Review[J].Journal of Cleaner Production,doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117723.
[3] EZIEFULA U G, EZEH J C, EZIEFULA B I. Properties of Seashell Aggregate Concrete: A Review[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2018, 192: 287-300.
[4] NGUYEN D H, BOUTOUIL M, SEBAIBI N, et al. Valorization of Seashell By-products in Pervious Concrete Pavers[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2013, 49: 151-160.
[5] 程 娟,郭向阳.搅拌方式及成型工艺对透水砼性能的影响[J].raybet体育在线
院报,2009,26(9):91-94.
[6] WU F,LIU C,ZHANG L,et al. Comparative Study of Carbonized Peach Shell and Carbonized Apricot Shell to Improve the Performance of Lightweight Concrete[J]. Construction and Building Materials,2018,188:758-771.
[7] 陈守开,张政男,郑永杰, 等. 再生骨料透水混凝土耐撞磨性试验研究[J].raybet体育在线
院报,2020,37(7):153-159.
[8] NGUYEN D H,BOUTOUIL M,SEBAIBI N,et al. Durability of Pervious Concrete Using Crushed Seashells[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2017,135: 137-150.
[9] 冯文东,郭喜良,杨卫兵, 等. 地质处置用低碱度水泥配方开发[J].辐射防护通讯,2016,36(1):14-17.
[10]郭晓芳.混凝土快冻与慢冻试验方法浅析[J].四川水泥,2016(12):336-337.
[11]GB/T 50082—2009,普通混凝土长期性能和耐久性能试验方法标准[S]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2009.
[12]赵庆新,康佩佩.力学损伤对混凝土抗冻性的影响[J].建筑材料学报,2013,16(2):326-329,334.
[13]姜平伟,方江华,庞建勇, 等. 植物纤维喷射混凝土力学及微观性能分析[J].raybet体育在线
院报,2020,37(8):137-141,149.
[14]楼俊杰.不同掺和料影响下透水混凝土性能及冻融循环劣化研究[D].济南:山东大学,2016.
[15]王 俊,高 静,谢 军,等.栉孔扇贝几丁质酶基因的克隆及功能鉴定[J].水产学报,2017,41(2):189-197.
基金
国家自然科学基金项目(51578477);秦皇岛市科学技术研究与发展计划项目(201801B040);河北省重点研发计划项目(19211505D);黑龙江省省属本科高校基本科研基金项目(2019YDQ-02,2020YDQ-08)
PDF(3863 KB)
