基于改进集对分析的混凝土再生粗骨料质量评价方法

柴乃杰, 陶李培, 李翔

raybet体育在线 院报 ›› 2020, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (10) : 149-155.

PDF(4252 KB)
PDF(4252 KB)
raybet体育在线 院报 ›› 2020, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (10) : 149-155. DOI: 10.11988/ckyyb.2018070155
水工结构与材料

基于改进集对分析的混凝土再生粗骨料质量评价方法

  • 柴乃杰1,2, 陶李培2, 李翔1
作者信息 +

A Method of Assessing Recycled Coarse Aggregate for Concrete Based on Improved Set Pair Analysis

  • CHAI Nai-jie1,2, TAO Li-pei2, LI Xiang1
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

为科学合理地评价再生混凝土粗骨料整体质量等级,提出了基于改进集对分析的再生粗骨料质量等级评价模型。首先参考《混凝土可再生粗骨料标准》(GB/T 25177—2010),选取表观密度等7项因子建立再生粗骨料质量分级的评价指标体系,并确定指标分级标准。然后利用原创联系度可展性对传统集对分析同异反联系度进行修正,构建基于改进集对分析的数学模型,计算单指标优劣等级的同异反联系度的优化值;再结合模糊综合评价理论,以及由熵权法与超标倍数法所确定的指标综合权重,实现对再生粗骨料整体质量的优劣趋同程度进行评价。最后,以某文献中5批再生粗骨料样本为例,运用改进集对分析法进行综合评价。结果表明改进集对分析方法不仅能在初步界定各再生粗骨料样本隶属于2个等级区间范围的基础上,进一步地反映出更偏向某一侧,而且不同等级间的联系度差异效果明显。

Abstract

A model of assessing the quality grade of recycled coarse aggregate based on improved set pair analysis was proposed. Firstly, the assessment index system composing seven factors inclusive of apparent density was established by referring to the Standard for Renewable Coarse Aggregate of Concrete (GB/T25177-2010) and the criteria for the rating of indexes were determined. Meanwhile, the connection degree identical discrepancy contrary in traditional set pair analysis was modified using developability of connection degree. The mathematical model based on the improved set pair analysis was constructed to calculate the optimal value of identical discrepancy contrary of single index. Moreover, the index weights were determined by using the entropy weight method and the multiple super-scale weighting method; on such basis, the degree of quality convergence of recycled coarse aggregate was assessed based on the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation theory. The proposed method was applied to comprehensively assess the quality grades of five groups of recycled coarse aggregate samples. Results revealed that the proposed modified set pair analysis method could preliminarily define the range of intervals of each grade, and further reflected the inclination towards which grade. Difference in the degree of connection between different grades was also obvious.

关键词

再生粗骨料 / 质量等级 / 改进集对分析 / 熵权法 / 超标倍数法

Key words

recycled coarse aggregate / quality rating / improved set pair analysis / entropy weight method / exceeding multiplier method

引用本文

导出引用
柴乃杰, 陶李培, 李翔. 基于改进集对分析的混凝土再生粗骨料质量评价方法[J]. raybet体育在线 院报. 2020, 37(10): 149-155 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.2018070155
CHAI Nai-jie, TAO Li-pei, LI Xiang. A Method of Assessing Recycled Coarse Aggregate for Concrete Based on Improved Set Pair Analysis[J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute. 2020, 37(10): 149-155 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.2018070155
中图分类号: TU448.43   

参考文献

[1] 李 爽. 再生水泥混凝土粗骨料性能及其分级方法的研究[D]. 北京:北京工业大学,2009.
[2] LEE H,KWON J H,KIM K H,et al. Application of DEM Model to Breakage and Liberation Behaviour of Recycled Aggregates from Impact-breakage of Concrete Waste[J]. Minerals Engineering,2008,21(11):761-765.
[3] VYNCKE J, ROUSSEAU E. Recycling of Construction and Demolition Waste in Belgium: Actual Situation and Future Evolution[C]//Proceedings of the Third International RILEM Symposium on Demolition and Reuse of Concrete and Masonry. Denmark: E & FN Spon. October 24-27, 1993: 57-69.
[4] DIN:4226-100, German Committee for Reinforced Concrete (DAFSTB)-Code: Concrete with Recycled Aggregates [S]. Berlin: German Committee for Reinforced Concrete, 2002.
[5] KAWANO H. The State of Using By-product in Concrete in Japan and Outline of JIS/TR. Recycled Concrete Using Recycled Aggregate[M]. Osaka, Japan: Japan Research Institute, 2002.
[6] BS 882-1992, Specification for Aggregates from Natural Sources for Concrete[S]. London, UK: British Standards Institution, 1992.
[7] ASTM-D2940-2003, Standard Specification for Graded Aggregate Material for Bases or Subbases for Highways or Airports[S]. West Conshohocken, PA: American Society for Testing and Materials, 2003.
[8] 柴乃杰,鲍学英,张天奇,等. TOPSIS-熵权决策法在绿色施工节水措施综合效益评价中的应用[J]. 水资源与水工程学报,2017,28(5):156-161.
[9] 高明美,孙 涛,张 坤,等.基于超标倍数赋权法的
济南市大气质量模糊动态评[J]. 干旱区资源与环境,2014,28(9):150-154.
[10]栗 然,李永彬,翟晨曦,等. 基于集对分析和风险理论的变电站主接线综合评价[J]. 电力系统保护与控制,2017,45 (11): 81-88.
[11]钟登华,杨士瑞,张琴娅,等.基于改进集对分析方法的高心墙堆石坝填筑工期仿真及风险评价[J].水力发电学报,2015,34(3):137-144.
[12]李秋义,全洪珠,秦 原.混凝土再生骨料[M]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2011.
[13]周宇哲,高茂庭.水质评价中模糊-集对分析法的改进[J].环境工程学报,2015,9(2):749-755.
[14]邹仁华,王毅超,邓元婧,等.基于变权综合理论和模糊综合评价的多结果输出输电线路运行状态评价方法[J].高电压技术,2017,43(4):1289-1295.
[15]张明媛,高 颖,袁永博,等. 基于集对势的供水系统级联失效下节点重要度分析[J].自然灾害学报,2017,43(4):1289-1295.

基金

国家自然科学基金项目(U1934216);广西中青年教师科研基础能力提升项目(2020KY18024)

PDF(4252 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/

Baidu
map