为揭示长江洪水研究的现状与发展趋势,运用文献计量学等方法,基于SCIE与CSCD文献数据库对长江洪水研究的发文年代、国际合作、研究机构、核心作者、期刊分布、热点关键词等方面进行了系统性的分析。结果表明:①SCIE与CSCD发文量在1998年后迅速增长,尤其是SCIE文献增长显著,中国与美国、德国等发达国家合作发文较多;②中国科学院的英文和中文文献数量均居于领先水平,约占SCIE与CSCD总文献的31%和23%,中、外文核心作者分别约占作者总数的21%和27%, SCIE文献发表在《Journal of Hydrology》期刊最多,各约占总文献的4%,CSCD文献发表在《长江流域资源与环境》和《raybet体育在线
院报》的最多,各占全部文献的7.28%;③长江洪水研究热点关键词频次＞20的主要是三峡、降水、气候变化、沉积、洪涝灾害等,这些热点关键词反映了长江洪水发生机制及灾害缓解研究的发展态势。研究成果可以为未来长江洪水相关研究提供参考。
Abstract
Bibliometric approach was employed in this paper to reveal the status and development trends of research on Changjiang (Yangtze) River flood based on SCIE and CSCD. The publication age, cooperative nations, core authors, author’s affiliations, and hot keywords were analyzed in detail. Results unveiled that: (1) the number of papers, in particular, SCIE papers, has surged after 1998, and the United States and Germany are top two countries which cooperate with China the most in the research. (2) The Chinese Academy of Sciences has been taking a leading role in contributing papers in English and Chinese languages, accounting for 31% and 23% of the total number of papers in SCIE and CSCD, respectively. Core authors of SCIE and the CSCD take up 27% and 21% of the total number of authors respectively. In SCIE, Journal of Hydrology was the top journal publishing research papers on Changjiang River flood, covering a proportion of 4%; in CSCD, Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin and Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute are top two periodicals publishing research papers on Changjiang River flood, each occupying a proportion of 7.28%. (3) Key words with a frequency over 20% included Three Gorges Reservoir, precipitation, climate change, sediment, and flood disaster. These key words had reflected the development of flood research in mechanism of disaster occurrence and disaster mitigation. Bibliometric information could provide reference for future flood related research in the Yangtze River Basin.
关键词
长江 /
洪水研究 /
SCIE /
CSCD /
文献计量 /
定量分析 /
研究态势
Key words
Changjiang (Yangtze) River /
flood research /
SCIE /
CSCD /
bibliometric /
quantitative analysis /
research trends
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] 杨桂山,翁立达,李利锋.长江保护与发展报告[M].武汉:长江出版社,2007.
[2] 胡四一,施 勇,王银堂,等.长江中下游河湖洪水演进的数值模拟[J].水科学进展,2002,13(3):278-286.
[3] 张小玲,陶诗言,卫 捷.20世纪长江流域3次全流域灾害性洪水事件的气象成因分析[J].气候与环境研究,2006,11(6):669-682.
[4] 汤洪波,段 磊,王 峰.长江流域洪水相关因素及对策[J].raybet体育在线
院报,2012,29(3):18-23.
[5] 陈 璇,张萍萍,田 刚,等.长江上游流域大洪水天气分型特征分析[J].长江流域资源与环境,2015,24(12):2142-2152.
[6] 王 冬,方娟娟,李义天,等.三峡水库调度方式对洞庭湖入流的影响研究[J].raybet体育在线
院报,2016,33(12):10-16.
[7] 邱均平,王月芬.文献计量内容分析法[M].北京:北京图书馆出版社,2008:25.
[8] 田亚平,常 昊.中国生态脆弱性研究进展的文献计量分析[J].地理学报,2012,67(11):1515-1525.
[9] 陈 晶,朱元贵,雍 武,等.中国神经科学领域发展态势:基于WOS数据库10年文献计量分析[J].科学通报,2014,59(23):2310-2319.
[10]吴 昊.基于文献计量的国际河流栖息地研究动态[J].水资源与水工程学报,2017,28(4):162-177.
[11]NEDERHOF A J. Bibliometric Monitoring of Research Performance in the Social Sciences and the Humanities: A Review[J]. Scientometrics, 2006, 66(1):81-100.
[12]ARCHAMBAULT E, CAMPBELL D, GINGRAS Y, et al. Comparing Bibliometric Statistics Obtained from the Web of Science and Scopus[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2009, 60(7):1320-1326.
[13]FU Hui-zhen, WANG Ming-huang, HO Yuh-shan. Mapping of Drinking Water Research: A Bibliometric Analysis of Research Output During 1992-2011[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2013, 443:757-765.
[14]程海云,葛守西,闵要武.人类活动对长江洪水影响初析[J].人民长江,1999,30(2):39-41.
[15]施雅风,姜 彤,苏布达,等.1840年以来长江大洪水演变与气候变化关系初探[J].湖泊科学,2004(4):289-297.
[16]李文龙,李鸿雁.长江流域连续大洪水年机理分析及预报[J].水利水电技术,2018,49(5):1-8.
[17]GAO Zhen,LONG Di, TANG Guo-qiang, et al. Assessing the Potential of Satellite-based Precipitation Estimates for Flood Frequency Analysis in Ungauged or Poorly Gauged Tributaries of China’s Yangtze River Basin[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2017, 550: 478-496.
[18]FANG Jian, KONG Feng, FANG Jia-yi, et al. Observed Changes in Hydrological Extremes and Flood Disaster in Yangtze River Basin: Spatial-temporal Variability and Climate Change Impacts[J]. Natural Hazards, 2018, 93(1): 89-107.
[19]韩其为.江湖关系变化的内在机理[J].raybet体育在线
院报,2014,31(6):104-112.
[20]卢金友,姚仕明.关于长江中下游江湖治理的思考[J].中国水利,2010(16):30-32,45.
[21]郭小虎,渠 庚,朱勇辉.三峡工程蓄水运用以来荆江水位流量关系变化分析[J].raybet体育在线
院报,2011,28(7):82-86.
[22]李义天,李 荣,邓金运.长江中游泥沙输移规律及对防洪影响研究[J].泥沙研究,2000(3):12-20.
[23]寇嘉玮,董增川,罗 赟,等.基于WebGIS的洪泽湖地区动态洪涝管理信息系统[J].raybet体育在线
院报,2019,36(1):145-150.
PDF(1459 KB)
