混凝土坝溃决一般在极短时间内发生,以往研究很少考虑其溃决过程和溃决方式。根据混凝土坝结构特征和受力特点,假定了滑动式、倾倒式、开门式3种可能的溃决方式,通过物理模型试验研究了3种溃决方式的溃口水力学特征,并同经验瞬溃计算结果进行了比较。成果表明:溃口峰值流量试验值一般比计算值要小,3种溃决方式中,滑动式溃口峰值流量最大,危害最大。试验考虑了混凝土的溃决过程和溃决方式对溃口水流特征的作用,可为经验公式修订和溃坝机理研究提供指导。
Abstract
Concrete dam break generally occurs in a very short period of time. Previous studies seldom consider the process and mode of dam break. According to the structural characteristics of concrete dam and the stress characteristic, we assumed three possible dam break modes, namely, sliding, toppling over, and opening. We examined the hydraulic characteristics of breach under such three modes via physical model test, and compared the test results with empirical transient failure calculation results. Comparison revealed that the calculated values of peak flow rate at breach were higher than test values in general. Among the three break modes, sliding failure witnesses the maximum flow rate with the greatest harm.The results provide guidance for revising empirical formula of dam break by taking into consideration the influence of process and mode of dam break on the hydraulic characteristics of breach.
关键词
混凝土坝 /
溃决方式 /
滑动式溃口 /
峰值流量 /
水力学特征
Key words
concrete dam /
dam break modes /
sliding break /
peak flow rate /
hydraulic characteristic
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] 魏文礼,沈永明,孙广才,等.二维溃坝洪水波演进的数值模拟[J].水利学报,2003,34(9):43-47.
[2] 马铁成,何建村,杨新成,等.混凝土面板坝溃决过程分析[J].水力发电,2009,(4):42-43.
[3] 傅忠友,张士辰.基于工程实例的重力坝溃决模式和溃决路径分析[J].水利水电技术,2010,41(9):57-60.
[4] 张成林.大坝瞬时全溃最大流量计算公式对比分析[J].人民黄河, 2012,34(11):29-31.
[5] 刘 磊,张红武,钟德钰,等.尾矿库漫顶溃坝模型研究[J].水利学报,2014,45(6):675-681.
[6] 胡文兵,郭红民,蔡黎明,等;考虑混凝土坝溃决过程的溃口流量过程线分析[J].水电能源科学,2017,(3):57-59.
[7] 李 云,李 君.溃坝模型试验研究综述[J].水科学进展,2009,20(2):304-310.
[8] 詹道江,徐向阳,陈元芳.工程水文学[M].4版.北京:中国水利水电出版社,2010.
[9] 吴持恭,水力学与山区河流开发保护国家重点实验室(四川大学).水力学[M].4版.北京:高等教育出版社,2008.
[10]李 炜.武汉大学水利水电学院水力学流体力学教研室.水力计算手册[M].2版.北京:中国水利水电出版社,2005.
基金
水利部公益性行业科研专项(201401027);中国电建项目(DJ-ZDZX-2016-02)
PDF(1824 KB)
